- Test - lists.nanog.org

Not much use :-(
by Leigh Porter 24 Apr '98

24 Apr '98

Hello, Further to my last email, it seems that it is not getting any usefull data ;-) Take a look: [root@mekong tmp]# cfdnets 193.164.160.114.netmatrix.cur | head Net Matrix ---------- number of net entries: 436 SRCNET/MASK DSTNET/MASK PKTS BYTES 192.0.0.0/19 0.32.0.0/216 2338702092 2339630048 128.0.0.0/19 0.32.0.0/243 1666817388 1669372960 192.0.0.0/19 0.32.0.0/80 1206167448 1207129420 192.0.0.0/19 0.32.0.128/89 1876078360 1876096604 192.0.0.0/19 0.32.0.128/89 1876090628 1876090628 192.0.0.0/19 0.32.0.0/12 1995179200 1997963672 [root@mekong tmp]# cfdprotos 193.164.160.114.protocol.cur | head Protocol Table -------------- protocol packets bytes 0 2076977636 2077221280 2 247947584 248023436 5 1286321320 1286586400 8 247931232 247966892 10 4201412532 4201768492 13 1333349088 1333353584 14 1581249504 1581374464 [root@mekong tmp]# I am off to the pub, maybe some beer will make it work ;-) -- Leigh

1 0

Re: Traffic Shapping
by Natambu Obleton 24 Apr '98

24 Apr '98

I am looking to do the shaping on Ethernet Interfaces for a large fiber plant. I have been looking the solution by Aponet. Anyone out there used it? I believe it is what above.net uses. -- Natambu Obleton - Network Administrator - Frontier Internet Inc. 970 385 4177 - fax: 970 385 6745 - http://www.frontier.net 777 Main St. - Suite #201 - Durango - Colorado - 81301 - USA -----Original Message----- From: Alex P. Rudnev <alex(a)Relcom.EU.net> To: Natambu Obleton <no(a)frontier.net> Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu <nanog(a)merit.edu> Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Traffic Shapping >Hmm, it depends of what do you mean as _successfully_ -:). > >It works, but creates some bugs under heavy conditions. > > > >On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Natambu Obleton wrote: > >> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:51:16 -0600 >> From: Natambu Obleton <no(a)frontier.net> >> To: nanog(a)merit.edu >> Subject: Traffic Shapping >> >> Has anyone here successfully implement the traffic shaping option on a Cisco >> router? >> -- >> Natambu Obleton - Network Administrator - Frontier Internet Inc. >> 970 385 4177 - fax: 970 385 6745 - http://www.frontier.net >> 777 Main St. - Suite #201 - Durango - Colorado - 81301 - USA >> >> >> > >Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow >(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager) >(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax) >

2 1

Re: Traffic Shapping
by kli＠yurie.com 24 Apr '98

24 Apr '98

I believe that we have been doing traffic shapping for Bay's Centillion over OC3 interface for a while. Our Yurie switch can shape to satisfy all normal public ATM network requirement. The Yurie switch is also used in the Splitrock network and you can get service from them without shapping your output. Their Yurie switch will provide all buffering and necessary shapping. Kwok "Natambu Obleton" <no(a)frontier.net> on 04/24/98 12:52:04 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu cc: (bcc: Kwok Li/HQ/Yurie) Subject: Re: Traffic Shapping > ---------- > From: Natambu Obleton[SMTP:NO@FRONTIER.NET] > Sent: Friday, April 24, 1998 11:52:04 AM > To: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: Traffic Shapping > Auto forwarded by a Rule > I am looking to do the shaping on Ethernet Interfaces for a large fiber plant. I have been looking the solution by Aponet. Anyone out there used it? I believe it is what above.net uses. -- Natambu Obleton - Network Administrator - Frontier Internet Inc. 970 385 4177 - fax: 970 385 6745 - http://www.frontier.net 777 Main St. - Suite #201 - Durango - Colorado - 81301 - USA -----Original Message----- From: Alex P. Rudnev <alex(a)Relcom.EU.net> To: Natambu Obleton <no(a)frontier.net> Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu <nanog(a)merit.edu> Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Traffic Shapping >Hmm, it depends of what do you mean as _successfully_ -:). > >It works, but creates some bugs under heavy conditions. > > > >On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Natambu Obleton wrote: > >> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:51:16 -0600 >> From: Natambu Obleton <no(a)frontier.net> >> To: nanog(a)merit.edu >> Subject: Traffic Shapping >> >> Has anyone here successfully implement the traffic shaping option on a Cisco >> router? >> -- >> Natambu Obleton - Network Administrator - Frontier Internet Inc. >> 970 385 4177 - fax: 970 385 6745 - http://www.frontier.net >> 777 Main St. - Suite #201 - Durango - Colorado - 81301 - USA >> >> >> > >Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow >(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager) >(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax) >

1 0

cflowd - works?
by Leigh Porter 24 Apr '98

24 Apr '98

Hiya, Thanks to the folks who posted the cflowd data, and to the anonymous scripter :) After getting cflowd to compile on a Linux box, it starts fine and two processes appear, bound to UDP port 2055 - seems OK. Some files are created in /var/tmp (I left the default on for now!) and all seems OK. But no data is collected.. I assume all that is required on the router is: ip flow-export 10.45.16.92 2055 An strace ran on the cflowd process shows it just waiting for select calls to timeout on both processes. Looks like the router is not sending anything out, it's running 11.2(9)P on a 7507 with 96Mb memory. Does the Cisco require any special software for this? Regards, -- Leigh Porter

1 0

cflowd utils
by Tim Flavin 24 Apr '98

24 Apr '98

============================================================== Tim Flavin Internet Access for St Louis & Chicago Internet 1st, Inc Toll Free Sales & Support 800-875-3173 http://www.i1.net For more information email info(a)i1.net ============================================================== ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 00:09:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Tim Flavin <tim(a)i1.net> To: cisco-nsp(a)iagnet.net Subject: cflowd utils After searching for utils to use the data from cflowd and coming up empty, anybody have any pointers to where something useful may be? Lots of cflowd mentions in the NANOG archives, but no utils. ============================================================== Tim Flavin Internet Access for St Louis & Chicago Internet 1st, Inc Toll Free Sales & Support 800-875-3173 http://www.i1.net For more information email info(a)i1.net ==============================================================

3 3

Re: AS8584 taking over the internet
by shields＠crosslink.net 24 Apr '98

24 Apr '98

In article <3.0.3.32.19980409083628.03cebbe8(a)mailhost.ip-plus.net>, philip bridge <bridge(a)ip-plus.net> wrote: > That is of course laudible. But the point has to be made that AS8584 is in > Israel. In an environment when a small ISP in a small country can cause a > lot of damage to the global Internet, a way has to be found to efficiently > propogate this knowledge far and wide. I don't understand this point. Would you have been happier if they were a small ISP in the United States? How about India? Finland? Why does it matter that AS8584 is in Israel? -- Shields, CrossLink.

10 11

Re: So, Cisco?
by kbrown＠primelink.com 24 Apr '98

24 Apr '98

Perhaps he was mis-spoken... I got ahold of someone internal to Cisco who faxed me a bit more information (summarized below:) similar to the PA-H supports speeds up to 45Mbps requires IOS 11.3.(3)T or later supported on 3620 and 3640 support for 2600 "not planned" So..either the document I received was in error, or all the "heads" aren't talking. I think perhaps the latter is more correct, as this product isn't listed anywhere on CCO. "Scott A. Keoseyan" <falcon(a)labyrinth.org> on 04/22/98 09:53:22 PM To: Kevin Brown/Huber & Associates cc: Subject: Re: So, Cisco? We had the product manager for the 2600 in our office the other day. He claimed that the 2600 is able to use the NM-1HSSI... I asked him directly... Scott On Wed, 22 Apr 1998 kbrown(a)primelink.com wrote: > According to the limited information I received, the NM-1HSSI is capable of > handling 45Mbps. The information I received did not disclose details of > interoperability with the 2600-series. A full product data sheet should be > available soon. > > > Kevin Brown > Networking Engineer > kbrown(a)primelink.com > > Huber & Associates, Inc. > http://www.primelink.com/haa > > > > > > Al Reuben <alex(a)nac.net> on 04/22/98 03:57:17 PM > > To: nanog(a)merit.edu > cc: (bcc: Kevin Brown/Huber & Associates) > Subject: So, Cisco? > > > > > > > So, I saw in the Cisco price guide, under 3600 Series: > > > NM-1HSSI Single port HSSI network module for 3640 and 3620 $6,000 > > > First, I can't find anything about it on the website. Second, if anyone at > Cisco would care to comment, how fast will this card go before the box > starts to mel? And last, will it now/ever work in a 2600? > > > Thanks! > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- > Atheism is a non-prophet organization. > I route, therefore I am. > Alex Rubenstein, alex(a)nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member > Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer > Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834 > Don't choose a spineless ISP! We have more backbone! http://www.nac.net > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Scott Keoseyan Director of Technology falcon(a)labyrinth.org Powercom -----------------------------------------------------------------------

4 3

Prefix filtering at /24?
by Adrian Chadd 24 Apr '98

24 Apr '98

Hi. Does anyone here on this list filter BGP routes learnt with prefixes longer than /24 ? Thanks, Adrian -- Adrian Chadd | "Once in a lifetime, you find someone, <adrian(a)creative.net.au> | Who touches not only your heart, | But also your soul."

4 6

Oy. Cisco!
by Jason L. Weisberger 23 Apr '98

23 Apr '98

What happened to the access-list blahblah established command in 11.1.15? is it missing? I find some stuff about reflexive lists in 11.3 which would be nice but it disappear from 10.x to 11.1, the machine even claims I should be able to use an established parameter but doesn't offer it to me. sigh. jlw -- Jason Weisberger Chief Technology Officer SoftAware, Inc. - 310/305-0275 "Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees." -Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson

1 0

Re: So, Cisco?
by kbrown＠primelink.com 22 Apr '98

22 Apr '98

According to the limited information I received, the NM-1HSSI is capable of handling 45Mbps. The information I received did not disclose details of interoperability with the 2600-series. A full product data sheet should be available soon. Kevin Brown Networking Engineer kbrown(a)primelink.com Huber & Associates, Inc. http://www.primelink.com/haa Al Reuben <alex(a)nac.net> on 04/22/98 03:57:17 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu cc: (bcc: Kevin Brown/Huber & Associates) Subject: So, Cisco? So, I saw in the Cisco price guide, under 3600 Series: NM-1HSSI Single port HSSI network module for 3640 and 3620 $6,000 First, I can't find anything about it on the website. Second, if anyone at Cisco would care to comment, how fast will this card go before the box starts to mel? And last, will it now/ever work in a 2600? Thanks! -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am. Alex Rubenstein, alex(a)nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834 Don't choose a spineless ISP! We have more backbone! http://www.nac.net -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

1 0