- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: T1 Circuit actual throughput 1290Kbp
by vaananen＠NASBPD01BS.ntc.nokia.com 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

>(!) The cell tax is about 10% -- the SAR expands user data from 48 >bytes to 53 bytes, plus an additional amount of overhead for internal >fragmentation on the final cell (AAL-5), plus overhead for whatever >encapsulation mode is being used. The cell tax is actually about 20%, based on the traces of the backbone IP traffic. Reason for this is the additional overhead imposed of partially filled cells. Fixwest 960926: total packets seen = 15315121, total payload bytes seen = 4276560002 ATM framing bytes = 5155881287 ATM efficiency = 82.95% ATM w/snap framing bytes = 5387212772 ATM w/snap efficiency = 79.38% Funet 970608: total packets seen = 6699991, total payload bytes seen = 2336213700 ATM framing bytes = 2783454053 ATM efficiency = 83.93% ATM w/snap framing bytes = 2919019891 ATM w/snap efficiency = 80.03% Pasi

2 1

Re: network 32.100.0.0
by Sean Butler 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

Not sure what you are asking, but yes, the 32.100.0 /24 is a dial range IBM provides for Brazil... Please take this off-line (off NANOG) and respond to me (or noc(a)ibm.net) directly with any questions you have. Thanks Sean Butler IBM Internet Support >Is that correct ? > DIGEX > MAE-East Looking Glass Results > > >Type escape sequence to abort. >Tracing the route to 32.100.0.116 > > 1 mae-east.ibm.net (192.41.177.110) 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec > 2 198.133.27.10 [AS 2685] 168 msec 252 msec 20 msec > 3 beth29-16-br2.md.us.ibm.net (165.87.29.18) [AS 2685] 0 msec 4 msec 4 >msec > 4 165.87.230.86 [AS 2685] 12 msec 8 msec 8 msec > 5 165.87.44.3 [AS 2685] 280 msec 156 msec 164 msec > 6 slip166-72-39-194.ri.br.ibm.net (166.72.39.194) [AS 2685] 156 msec 156 >msec 196 msec > 7 * > 32.100.0.116 [AS 2686] 1324 msec 444 msec > > >-- >Marcelo Manta >SAGA

2 1

network 32.100.0.0
by Marcelo Manta 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

Is that correct ? DIGEX MAE-East Looking Glass Results ______________________________________________________________________________________ Query: trace Addr: 32.100.0.116 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 32.100.0.116 1 mae-east.ibm.net (192.41.177.110) 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec 2 198.133.27.10 [AS 2685] 168 msec 252 msec 20 msec 3 beth29-16-br2.md.us.ibm.net (165.87.29.18) [AS 2685] 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec 4 165.87.230.86 [AS 2685] 12 msec 8 msec 8 msec 5 165.87.44.3 [AS 2685] 280 msec 156 msec 164 msec 6 slip166-72-39-194.ri.br.ibm.net (166.72.39.194) [AS 2685] 156 msec 156 msec 196 msec 7 * 32.100.0.116 [AS 2686] 1324 msec 444 msec -- Marcelo Manta SAGA PGP fingerprint = E3B8 ACAF 2461 E7E5 B838 01D1 3CF4 325E

2 1

Re: Process management
by Jonathan Clark 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

ihnp4; Indian Point, a Bell System [remember THAT?] plant in Illinois, or was it Indiana... Indian Hill Network Processor #4. At the Bell Labs (now Lucent) facility outside Chicago. Run by Gary Murakami then by Doug Price. decvax, at the Old Mill [DEC Hq] in Medford Run by Armando Stettner. Jonathan

2 1

Re: Process management
by Sean Donelan 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

Perhaps it might be helpful to read how some folks on the outside view the state of the Internet industry. http://www.ncs.gov/n5_hp/Information_Assurance/PSN-A97.htm Just for grins the President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Comittee has established a working group on Internet outages. You all did get your invitiations, didn't you? http://www.ncs.gov/n5_hp/Information_Assurance/IO.htm A person asked my how I define 'tiny tykes.' Let me ask a hypothetical question. Do you think I could get 100 ISPs to sign up for this? Each contribute $25,000/annually to establish a out-of-band communication system between all the participating network operation centers. This may simply be a 'bat' phone with a really obnoxious ringer in the middle of their NOC connected via nationwide system which doesn't rely on IP, ATM, or SS7 to enable the NOCs coordinate/communicate when everything else goes to hell. In a previous life I knew this as a 'squawk box' which traders used worldwide. There have already been cases (plural, more than one) where you could not reach a provider's NOC because they obtained their 1-800 service from the same network provider supplying their network facilities, and the same event took out both. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation

5 5

The Cidr Report
by Tony Bates 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

This is an auto-generated mail on Fri Jul 10 12:00:01 PDT 1998 It is not checked before it leaves my workstation. However, hopefully you will find this report interesting and will take the time to look through this to see if you can improve the amount of aggregation you perform. The report is split into sections: 0) General Status List the route table history for the last week, list any possibly bogus routes seen and give some status on ASes. 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level This lists the "Top 30" players who if they decided to aggregate their announced classful prefixes at the origin AS level could make a significant difference in the reduction of the current size of the Internet routing table. This calculation does not take into account the inclusion of holes when forming an aggregate so it is possible even larger reduction should be possible. 2) Weekly Delta A summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does give some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. Clearly, it is generally a good thing to see a large amont of withdrawls. 3) Interesting aggregates Interesting here means not an aggregate made as a set of classful routes. Thanks to xara.net for giving me access to their routing tables once a day. Please send any comments about this report directly to me. Check http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html for a daily update of this report. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CIDR REPORT for 10Jul98 0) General Status Table History ------------- Date Prefixes 020798 51673 030798 51528 050798 51481 060798 51579 070798 52104 080798 52116 090798 52255 100798 52359 Check http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr.plot.html for a plot of the table history. Possible Bogus Routes --------------------- *** Bogus 213.102.1.0 from AS3259 *** Bogus 214.0.0.0/8 from AS568 *** Bogus 215.0.0.0/9 from AS568 *** Bogus 216.0.0.0/14 from AS2548 *** Bogus 216.13.4.0/23 from AS6401 *** Bogus 216.13.32.0/19 from AS6401 *** Bogus 216.15.0.0/19 from AS10368 *** Bogus 216.15.128.0/19 from AS7393 *** Bogus 216.19.0.0/18 from AS4492 *** Bogus 216.214.0.0/18 from AS7194 AS Summary ---------- Number of ASes in routing system: 3726 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix: 1823 (952 cidr, 871 classful) Largest number of cidr routes: 353 announced by AS3561 Largest number of classful routes: 1139 announced by AS701 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level --- 10Jul98 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS4293 461 253 208 45.1% IMCI AS3602 514 310 204 39.7% Sprint Canada Inc. AS2493 485 281 204 42.1% iSTAR Internet, Inc. AS701 1139 937 202 17.7% Alternet AS271 339 144 195 57.5% BCnet Backbone AS3749 223 66 157 70.4% TECNET AS174 727 587 140 19.3% Performance Systems International AS2685 267 162 105 39.3% IBM Global Network - US AS4755 114 39 75 65.8% Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. India AS3221 112 42 70 62.5% EENet Autonomous System AS5668 120 51 69 57.5% Century Telephone Inc. AS7046 226 161 65 28.8% UUNET-CUSTOMER AS3804 216 153 63 29.2% Bell Solutions AS4740 394 334 60 15.2% ASN-OZEMAIL (Ozemail Pty Ltd) AS10928 102 45 57 55.9% UNKNOWN AS3403 181 127 54 29.8% TIAC AS549 205 152 53 25.9% ONet Backbone AS8517 123 72 51 41.5% ULAKNET-ASN AS6335 69 18 51 73.9% NTRNET AS72 85 37 48 56.5% Schlumberger Information Network AS4539 73 25 48 65.8% NETROPOLIS AS1239 543 496 47 8.7% SprintLink Backbone AS719 449 403 46 10.2% LANLINK autonomous system AS3218 70 24 46 65.7% AS-RSSI AS4200 140 95 45 32.1% AGIS (Apex Global Information Ser AS852 158 117 41 25.9% AGT Advance Communication AS7545 102 61 41 40.2% TPG Internet Pty Ltd AS762 118 80 38 32.2% WELLFLEET-AS AS1785 290 252 38 13.1% NYSERNet Backbone AS6181 65 28 37 56.9% FUSE-NET For the rest of the previous weeks gain information please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html 2) Weekly Delta Please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html for this part of the report 3) Interesting aggregates Please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html for this part of the report

1 0

Co-Lo in 60 Hudson
by Jonathan Arneault 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

Does anyone know if there is available Co-Lo in 60 Hudson, NYC? If so, can you send me a contact name & address? Thanks, Jonathan Arneault Director of Business Development CMA jarneault(a)corp.cma.com jarneault(a)inet-solutions.net 518.783.9003

1 0

Re: Linux Vice ( Was: NAT Box )
by John Fraizer 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

At 12:27 PM 7/10/98 -0600, Stephen Fisher wrote: > >Mmmmm-Bop! > >Ewww.. wait.. anything but HANSON! Only if the modify the lyrics to be: Mmmmmm-Bop! dit dit dit dah dah dah dit dit dit Bop! (With subliminal messages that say "Someone send ammunition quickly! I'v fired all I have into my TV and radio and this stupid frequin' song is still playing!") > >:-) > >On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 10:46:11AM -0600, Charlie Watts wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Alan B. Clegg wrote: >> >> > From: "Alan B. Clegg" <abc(a)cyclue.bsdi.com> >> > > vice a Linux box? >> >> > Yes, I can see a linux box as a vice. 8) >> >> That'd make a cool TV show for geeks, dontcha think? Linux Vice! Anybody >> want to write the theme music? >> >> -- >> Charlie Watts Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. >> cewatts(a)frontier.net (Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.) > >-- > - Steve > - Systems Manager > - Community Internet Access, Inc. > - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico > > ------- John Fraizer (root) | __ _ | The System Administrator | / / (_)__ __ ____ __ | The choice mailto:root@EnterZone.Net | / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / | of a GNU http://www.EnterZone.Net/ | /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | Generation A 486 is a terrible thing to waste...

1 0

NAT Box
by Shaun S. Amini 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

Can anyone recommend a Network Address Translation box, preferably with a 100 MB Ethernet port? Shaun

7 6

Internic Database not Updating.
by chaz＠mill.net 10 Jul '98

10 Jul '98

Any reason why internic hasn't updated their database in over 24 hours??? And is there a web page over at internic that discusses such infomation?? thanks

1 0