- Test - lists.nanog.org

Boot from 2nd partition on a cisco 4700?
by Dan Caldwell 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

Hello, Could someone please explain how to boot from the 2nd partition in flash on a cisco 4700? Is it even possible? Do I need to specify something in rommon, in the config, or both? I was only able to get the router to boot (from the first partition) by typing "boot flash: 2". Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Here is what is in flash- un-named#sh flash System flash directory, partition 1: File Length Name/status 1 2362132 c4500-p-mz_111-11.bin [2362196 bytes used, 1832108 available, 4194304 total] 4096K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) System flash directory, partition 2: File Length Name/status 1 2375940 c4500-p-mz_111-18.bin [2376004 bytes used, 1818300 available, 4194304 total] 4096K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) This is how the config reads- boot system flash c4500-p-mz_111-18.bin boot system flash c4500-p-mz_111-11.bin Thank you, -Dan Dan Caldwell Network Support Engineer dan(a)agis.net Apex Global Internet Services (AGIS) Network Operations Center - (313)730-5151 Business Office/Sales (313)730-1130 sales(a)agis.net URL: http://www.agis.net/ If you follow the present day world, you will turn your back on the Way; if you would not turn your back on the Way, do not follow the world. -Takuan Soho.

1 0

Genuity response
by Richard Irving 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

Genuity responded FAST! (And BBN, GTE, and just some nice people) Thank you, everyone! ;)

1 0

Re: Rootshell pages hacked
by Alex P. Rudnev 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

Btw, it's of great interest for me too. On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, dhiraj murthy wrote: > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 11:49:19 -0500 (EST) > From: dhiraj murthy <soa(a)funkytekno.exodus.net> > To: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex(a)Relcom.EU.net> > Cc: Michael Freeman <mikef(a)boris.talentsoft.com>, > "Adam D. McKenna" <adam(a)flounder.net>, Joe Shaw <jshaw(a)insync.net>, > JR Mayberry <rick(a)magpage.com>, neil <neil(a)junior.uwc.ac.za>, > Russ Haynal <russ(a)navigators.com>, nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: Rootshell pages hacked > > I am trying to get ssh working with skey. anyone know where to get patches > to force 1.2.6 to do this? > > thanks, > > -dhiraj > > On Mon, 2 Nov 1998, Alex P. Rudnev wrote: > > > SSh withouth S/KEy or some kind of one time password is useless in case > > of any compromyse passwords (except the case when you'd like to restrict > > acxcess to the trusted set of hosts). SSH itself do not believe to be a > > problem, UNIX one-time passwords are real problem. Another bad problem is > > _the same UNIX password for all purposes_ - I can sniff your FTP password > > and use it for SSH access (for example). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 31 Oct 1998, Michael Freeman wrote: > > > > > Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 14:45:51 +0000 (Local time zone must be set--see zic manual page) > > > From: Michael Freeman <mikef(a)boris.talentsoft.com> > > > To: "Adam D. McKenna" <adam(a)flounder.net> > > > Cc: Joe Shaw <jshaw(a)insync.net>, JR Mayberry <rick(a)magpage.com>, > > > neil <neil(a)junior.uwc.ac.za>, Russ Haynal <russ(a)navigators.com>, > > > nanog(a)merit.edu > > > Subject: Re: Rootshell pages hacked > > > > > > It is not a fucking problem in SSH! Jesus christ, people do not listen. > > > If it had anything to do with ssh, heres what happened. (speculation) A > > > trusted host was compromised that Kit Knox or another rootshell staff > > > member used, ssh was trojaned and passwords were snagged, and the intruder > > > simply walked right in through the front door. Nothing sophisticated, > > > nothing fancy, no ssh remote exploits. > > > > > > On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Adam D. McKenna wrote: > > > > > > > They claim they were running only qmail, apache and ssh, but who knows if > > > > that's true. > > > > > > > > I have heard rumours about an ssh exploit but nothing concrete. > > > > > > > > --Adam > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Joe Shaw <jshaw(a)insync.net> > > > > To: JR Mayberry <rick(a)magpage.com> > > > > Cc: neil <neil(a)junior.uwc.ac.za>; Russ Haynal <russ(a)navigators.com>; > > > > nanog(a)merit.edu <nanog(a)merit.edu> > > > > Date: Thursday, October 29, 1998 2:36 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Rootshell pages hacked > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought they were runnign qmail? > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, JR Mayberry wrote: > > > > > > > > > Supposedly sendmail 8.9.1 is to blame, not ssh. > > > > > http://www.sendmail.com/sendmail.8.9.1a.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow > > (+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager) > > (+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax) > > > > Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow (+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager) (+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)

4 4

Problems with peering sessions
by Richard Irving 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

Hi.... Genuity (3847) is currently a peer. The routing is *FOUL* however, GTE is doesn't seem to respond... And of course, all Genuity contacts have changed.... *SIGH* Does anyone have a clue before I source 150 meg smurf to attract attention... (Just kidding about the SMURF) Richard

1 0

None
by observer＠freeyellow.com 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

11/05/98 Y2K Solution! 8 Pine Circle Dr., Silicon Valley, Calif. OTC Company "TCFG" 21 st. Century Frontier Group has through several members of their administrative research department leaked vital information about their companies efforts. Everyone was tight lipped and interviews were refused, and through un-named sources we have learned that the technology and software solution are in the process of being patented! In over 1640 trials, using various data systems the use of the new technology and software solved the Y2K problem 100% of the time. This small publicly traded company "TCFG" which is just 3 years old is through various sources now negotiating with the "Big Boys"! "TCFG" the letters to look for........

1 0

Re: This may sound like a stupid question, but.....
by Sean Donelan 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

>Does anyone know if there is a telephony network operators group out there? >And how I could go about joining it? It's not that I don't like the company >of you fine people, but I haven't the FOGGIEST idea of what the *HELL* you >are talking about. And I really would dig being able to trade the sort of >(obviously important, even to a computer network idjit like me!) information >with people that speak MY language. Irregardless of what they say, telephone companies don't seem to cooperate much better than ISPs. ATIS sponsors a number of committees that are often compared to the function of NANOG. The closest used to be the Network Operators Forum, now called Network Interconnection Interoperability Forum. None are really designed for the real-time exchange of information. Of course, any real-time telephony information about outages may be welcome on NANOG. You'll discover that mailing lists tend to be about whatever the participants want to make it. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation

1 0

RE: digex smurf amplifiers
by Diana Welborn 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

Is this NOC as in Computers or NOC as in Telephony? -----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 1998 8:47 AM To: Alan Hannan; Dan Hollis Cc: 'nanog(a)merit.edu' Subject: Re: digex smurf amplifiers Now would be a good time for me to re-plug my NOC list. http://puck.nether.net/netops/nocs.html This has contact information for Various Network Operations Centers. Please let me know if you have any contributions to the list. - jared On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 09:51:53PM -0800, Alan Hannan wrote: > > > Ok who do I talk to at digex to get their smurf amplifiers closed. > > I have a ticket open with them since Oct 21. > > noc(a)digex.net would be a good start. Then > escalate within their company. Same > as any other noc or company with a problem. > > Contrary to popular opinion, nanog is not the > default destination for all queries or > commentary. > > -alan -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared(a)puck.nether.net | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/

2 1

Re: ARIN?
by Brandon Ross 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

On Thu, 5 Nov 1998 bmanning(a)vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > > BTW, their October 13, 1998 press release says they have 210K users. > > Their /8 has 16,777,216 IP addresses give or take a few hundred > > thousand. Not a bad packing ratio... > > Looks alot like /14 & change. That would be 256K plus delegated - 210K users > Hey, your right, not a bad packing ratio. Hows yours? :) How's 2 /16's & change, 128k addresses - 455k users. I think I win. (In an effort to fully disclose, about 20% of those users are on wholesale dialup providers). Brandon Ross Network Engineering 404-815-0770 800-719-4664 Director, Network Engineering, MindSpring Ent., Inc. info(a)mindspring.com ICQ: 2269442 Stop Smurf attacks! Configure your router interfaces to block directed broadcasts. See http://www.quadrunner.com/~chuegen/smurf.cgi for details.

1 0

pc world+mtu+meltdown
by Jared Mauch 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

incase you see more pps stressing your network, or something of the sort, check this out for possible reason why: http://cnn.com/TECH/computing/9809/29/unclog.idg/ please follow reply-to header. -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared(a)puck.nether.net | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/

2 1

RE: time for a new list?
by Chad Skidmore 05 Nov '98

05 Nov '98

The other problem is how to identify what is appropriate and what is not. It does not seem difficult to find folks on the list who do not agree so it could be tough to appoint the NANOG god that strikes people from the list. Oh well, I guess I'll just keep making good use of my mail filters to catch the garbage. :-) --------------------------------------------- Chad Skidmore Director of Network Engineering Northwest Nexus, Inc. http://www.nwnexus.com 1-888-NWNEXUS > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Kozowski [mailto:eric@haydenisland.verio.net] > Sent: Monday, November 02, 1998 7:59 PM > To: Joe Shaw > Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: time for a new list? > > > At 07:01 PM 11/2/98 , Joe Shaw wrote: > > > >I think moderating the group might not be such a bad idea. The only > >problem with this would be getting someone who had enough > time to actually > >moderate the list. I don't know what is going on lately, > but it seems > >egos and animosity are running rampant on both inet-access > and nanog. I > >have been caught up in it myself, and for that I apologize. > > i didn't, and don't, propose a moderated list. i propose a > list with some > sort of subscription requirement, at least for the ability > post, that will > only allow nano's to post. i also propose that the list be > stringently > policed. one warning re: content of your postings, then your > ability to > post is revoked. > > i'd like to see a list that lives up to the intent of the > nanog list, but > w/o all the useless drivel and chatter. if i wanted that, > i'd still be > subscribed to inet-access. > > -- > Eric Kozowski > eric(a)haydenisland.verio.net > Non carborundum illigitimi >

5 4