- Test - lists.nanog.org

NSI Bought Out
by Henry R. Linneweh 08 Mar '00

08 Mar '00

Network Solutions: It will be part of one-stop shop after purchase by VeriSign. http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/news/indepth/docs/veri030800.htm -- Thank you; |--------------------------------------------| | Thinking is a learned process so is UNIX | |--------------------------------------------| Henry R. Linneweh

1 0

DS3 multiplexors
by Simon Lockhart 08 Mar '00

08 Mar '00

Can anyone recommend a product which can multiplex onto a DS3 or E3 the following services: - Fractional DS3/E3 (G.703 and/or HSSI) - T1/E1 (G.703 and/or X.21) - E2 (G.703) (Optional) - 64k channels (X.21) (Optional) At the moment we're using Digital Link DL3100's, but are hitting problems with having just 3 HSSI ports. Thanks, Simon -- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1737 839676 Internet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516 BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart(a)bbc.co.uk Kingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk/

1 0

Re: AGIS Bites the dust
by Sean Donelan 07 Mar '00

07 Mar '00

>On Mon, 06 March 2000, "Henry R. Linneweh" wrote: >> AFTER ROUGH VOYAGE AGIS HITS THE ROCKS >> http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2455629,00.html >From the article: >Founded in June 1994 by Philip Lawlor, AGIS is one of the six original >backbones tapped by the National Science Foundation to carry commercial >Internet traffic. To be pedantic, AGIS was never selected or tapped by the National Science Foundation to carry commercial Internet traffic. No provider was. Any and all providers who connected to the three primary NAPs (new york, chicago, and san francisco) were considered NSPs. Even the term "original" isn't true since there were other commercial networks who never met the definition of NSP, such as BBN, CERFNET and UUNET. Heck I think even Net99 was bigger than AGIS, before it self-destructed and Phil bought them.

2 1

Napster and others...
by Jeff Kell 07 Mar '00

07 Mar '00

Is there an updated list of ports used by Napster and various games (Doom, Unreal, etc)? At this point we're just collecting data points and not actively filtering anything, but of course the IANA port number list is sadly out of date with regard to these tools. Thanks in advance, Jeff Kell <jeff-kell(a)utc.edu> Systems/Network Administrator University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

10 13

Napster and others...
by Scott McGrath 07 Mar '00

07 Mar '00

1 0

AGIS Bites the dust
by Henry R. Linneweh 07 Mar '00

07 Mar '00

AFTER ROUGH VOYAGE AGIS HITS THE ROCKS http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2455629,00.html -- Thank you; |--------------------------------------------| | Thinking is a learned process so is UNIX | |--------------------------------------------| Henry R. Linneweh

4 3

Re: Napster and others...
by smd＠clock.org 07 Mar '00

07 Mar '00

| When you have limited bandwidth you need to ensure that it is used for | what it is purchased for (email access to network based resources etc) Napster traffic is principally bulk TCP transfers. Bulk TCP transfers are good for your network -- much better than lots of short TCP transfers (web "mice") because they are highly sensitive to network congestion. Moreover, where chronic congestion is a problem (i.e., your access line is full and dropping packets for long periods of time), bulk transfers back off much more quickly with a very gentle RED control law than do web mice or short SMTP sessions etc. So, having one's supplier apply RED on your access line, and you applying RED towards the supplier, is a cheap, simple, and bandwidth-effective way of making sure that Napster traffic can consume the entire line, but not in any way worsen the performance of short TCP sessions and the like, which are not as congestion-sensitive. I deliberately do not address intellectual property issues, nor issues of "I don't want my access line to be 100% used, even if the napster traffic behaves in a UNIX nice +20 fashion, because I pay for number of bytes moved per month". Sean.

1 0

Re: D0S resources
by Marc Bejarano 06 Mar '00

06 Mar '00

At 09:59 AM 3/6/2000, deeann mikula wrote: >someone posted an awesome summary of resources for dealing with a DOS >attack, and now i need them. http://www.denialinfo.com marc

1 0

D0S resources
by deeann mikula 06 Mar '00

06 Mar '00

hi folks, i hate to ask for a repost, but i simply cannot find previously posted information in my nanog folder or via the archive search (yes, im impatient, im sure its in there!) someone posted an awesome summary of resources for dealing with a DOS attack, and now i need them. ill leave it up to The Officials to determine whether what we experienced was "technically" a DOS, since we recovered w/o much loss of service. but i need to know who to contact. thanks! deeann m.m. mikula network administrator telerama internet abuse@telerama.com/spam@telerama.com

1 0

Re: WC OC48s cut in PA?
by deeann mikula 06 Mar '00

06 Mar '00

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Shawn Morris wrote: > > Has any one heard anything about WorldCom having multiple OC48's cut > somewhere in PA? this is all we got. does anyone else have any good gorey details about backhoes or anything? i didnt see anything on UUnets network status page either, other than just about the same text as below. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 09:10:53 -0500 (EST) From: UUNET Customer Notification <customer-notify(a)UU.NET> Dear UUNET Customer, Currently your internet connection may be down due to a UUNET outage. We will contact you again once the situation is remedied. In the meantime, if you want further updates, please call us at one of the phone numbers listed below. Please do not respond to this message. Thank you for your patience. UUNET, an MCI WorldCom Company --------------------------------------- deeann m.m. mikula network administrator telerama internet abuse@telerama.com/spam@telerama.com

1 0