- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: rack space in NYC?
by Pete Rabbid-Buffalo 24 Mar '00

24 Mar '00

If you can get into 25 Broadway, InterNAP can provide you with the bandwidth that you require. (refer to the private email I just sent you) >From: Jim Dixon <jdd(a)vbc.net> >To: peter <biitti(a)yahoo.se> >CC: nanog(a)merit.edu >Subject: Re: rack space in NYC? >Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:10:38 +0000 (GMT) > > >On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, [iso-8859-1] peter wrote: > > > I am looking for co-lo space/telehousing in NYC for > > an European ISP. With good connectivity to the major > > networks, ISP's and transmission at 45/155M level. > > > > Any suggestions or experiences? > >Telehouse America. www.telehouse.com +1 (718) 355-2500 > >An affiliate of Telehouse Europe which houses most of the LINX in >London. > >They are in Manhattan at 25 Broadway. > >-- >Jim Dixon VBCnet GB Ltd http://www.vbc.net >tel +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015 > > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

1 0

rack space in NYC?
by peter 24 Mar '00

24 Mar '00

I am looking for co-lo space/telehousing in NYC for an European ISP. With good connectivity to the major networks, ISP's and transmission at 45/155M level. Any suggestions or experiences? _____________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Ditt_namn(a)yahoo.se - skaffa en gratis mailadress på http://mail.yahoo.se

3 2

Latest From Network Solutions
by Derek J. Balling 23 Mar '00

23 Mar '00

I needed to make some NIC changes today (updating contact info), and was told that if I wanted it done "soon", I should pay them $30 or some such for their "express service", where they guarantee that someone will handle the request in one business day. Otherwise, it "could take over a week to get done." And they wonder why people don't bother to keep their whois info up to date? :) D

4 4

Re: Latest From Network Solutions
by Derek J. Balling 23 Mar '00

23 Mar '00

It's a little more confusing than normal, that's all. Something the automated systems kick out for manual processing. D At 04:35 PM 3/23/00 -0500, dhudes(a)advsol4.dsl.concentric.net wrote: >Why is a person at NSI even involved?? Its supposed to be handled >automatically via e-mail with proper authentication (e.g. PGP if you >selected that). > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Derek J. Balling wrote: > > > > > I needed to make some NIC changes today (updating contact info), and was > > told that if I wanted it done "soon", I should pay them $30 or some such > > for their "express service", where they guarantee that someone will handle > > the request in one business day. Otherwise, it "could take over a week to > > get done." > > > > And they wonder why people don't bother to keep their whois info up to > date? :) > > > > D > > > > > >

1 0

Re: more-specifics in class B space?
by Sean Donelan 23 Mar '00

23 Mar '00

On Wed, 22 March 2000, Joe Provo - Network Architect wrote: > It also appears that there are parties who received address delegations > within classical B space and are parceling chunks out, without any > delegation or registration. Without that administrativia, and no clear > customer-vendor relationship in an AS path, how does this behavior look > any different to address hijacking? This was the primary reason why I didn't listen to more specifics than normal ARIN CIDR delegations. I was willing to punch a hole for anyone who could come up with a good story, but almost all the announcements were mistakes or hijacks. Someone unknown person would announce a /17 out of a university's address block, and black hole half of the university. This is a severe, but silent, problem in today's Internet. These hijackings have resulted in worse DoS attacks than the Yahoo! floods in February, but because so few NOCs know what to look for, most people just think its the flacky Internet. Yes, I'm aware of AS 702. It still doesn't make it right. My question is why can't you announce an aggregate matching the allocated address block? If you have no common AS path, no common administrative authority, no common provider, why are you using the same network block? In every case I've come across so far, the correct answer is either get seperate blocks or announce an aggregate at your border or your upstream's border. This is the usual answer in the case of a state university with several campuses. They may have more specifics within their network and their upstreams, but the upstream announces a common aggregate for the entire state network. Or if they are truely independent institutions they should get independent address blocks from one of the address registries on an appropriate boundary. This is a different issue than getting the registries to allocate small CIDR blocks.

1 0

Re: Sprint routing issues
by trall＠almaden.ibm.com 23 Mar '00

23 Mar '00

On 03/22/2000 at 23:34:54 EST, jlewis(a)lewis.org wrote: > Is it just me or is Sprint having issues tonight? I noticed some routing > problems getting to C&W hosted sites via Sprint. When I tried to go to > www.sprint.net, I couldn't resolve it. According to F, sprint.net's NS's > are: > > NS1-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.net. 2D IN A 206.228.179.10 > NS2-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.net. 2D IN A 144.228.254.10 > NS3-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.net. 2D IN A 144.228.255.10 > > These are all currently unreachable from our site (directly connected to > Sprint and UUNet) and multiple offsite locations on other backbones. I can ping all of them, but none answer DNS queries. Makes it tough to access their customers. Tony Rall

4 4

IETF-47
by Alexei Roudnev 23 Mar '00

23 Mar '00

May be, someone from here will be in Adelaida at the IETF-47 meeting?

1 0

Sprint routing issues
by jlewis＠lewis.org 23 Mar '00

23 Mar '00

Is it just me or is Sprint having issues tonight? I noticed some routing problems getting to C&W hosted sites via Sprint. When I tried to go to www.sprint.net, I couldn't resolve it. According to F, sprint.net's NS's are: NS1-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.net. 2D IN A 206.228.179.10 NS2-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.net. 2D IN A 144.228.254.10 NS3-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.net. 2D IN A 144.228.255.10 These are all currently unreachable from our site (directly connected to Sprint and UUNet) and multiple offsite locations on other backbones. If I traceroute from atlantic.net (goes out via Sprint) to my own site (www.lewis.org) hosted off a C&W T1, I get 2 hops into C&W, and then nothing. If I trace from www.lewis.org to atlantic.net, I get 2 hops into Sprint, and then nothing. Before anyone asks...yes, I did call Sprint and run this all by them...and they opened a ticket...but the fact that seemed more interested in doing intrusive testing on our T3 than looking at their own network didn't instill much confidence. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis(a)lewis.org*| Spammers will be winnuked or System Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes Atlantic Net | to get the job done. _________http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key__________

2 1

Re: more-specifics in class B space?
by Jim Mercer 23 Mar '00

23 Mar '00

On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 05:13:45PM -0700, Marc Slemko wrote: > Any examples of such providers? So far, shaw.ca is the main one I found. ah, that is exactly the same one i had issues with. they also said something about sprint, but the sprint looking glass was seeing the sub-/16 subnets that were being advertised. one wonders if shaw.ca is the only one adhereing to "ARIN guidelines". if so, i'd like some ammunition to go whack 'em in the forehead with. -- [ Jim Mercer jim(a)reptiles.org +1 416 506-0654 ] [ Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood ] [ Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code. ]

1 0

viz interface to cflowd
by k claffy 22 Mar '00

22 Mar '00

there was mention on this list last week of cflowd http://www.caida.org/Tools/Cflowd/ not having much in way of viz API here's another knight that's done some cool graphics interface to cflowd with tobi's RRDtool fwiw (hey check out the napster binning: http://net.doit.wisc.edu/data/Napster/ ) k ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Dave Plonka (plonka(a)doit.wisc.edu) Date: Tue Mar 21 2000 - 13:59:40 PST To: cflowd(a)caida.org Cc: dwm(a)caida.org, oetiker(a)ee.ethz.ch Subject: Re: FlowScan-1.002 released X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 02:04:21PM -0800, k claffy wrote: I'm pleased to announce the release of FlowScan-1.002. FlowScan is a tool to monitor and graph flow information from Cisco routers in "near" real-time. I've pushed myself to release it now since I've just recently added passive measurement of Napster traffic. A sample of what FlowScan can do is at: http://wwwstats.net.wisc.edu Availability FlowScan is licensed under the GNU General Public License, and is available to you at: http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~plonka/FlowScan/ Mailing Lists There are two mailing lists having to do with FlowScan: * flowscan a general mailing list for FlowScan users. * flowscan-announce a low-volume, restricted post mailing list to keep FlowScan users informed of news regarding FlowScan. Announcements will be "cross-posted" to both lists, so there's no need to join both. These lists are hosted by the Division of Information Technology's Network Engineering Technology group at the University of Wisconsin - Madison. To subscribe to either of them, send email to: majordomo(a)net.doit.wisc.edu containing either: subscribe flowscan *or*: subscribe flowscan-announce You should receive an automatic response that will request that you verify your request to become a member of the list, to which you must reply with the authentication information there-in. Then, in response to your reply, you should receive a welcome message. If you have any questions about the administrative policies of this list's manager, please contact: owner-flowscan(a)net.doit.wisc.edu *or*: owner-flowscan-announce(a)net.doit.wisc.edu Napster If you're interested in Napster specifically, note the graph labeled "Well Known Services Mb/s" here: http://wwwstats.net.wisc.edu or, directly, here: http://wwwstats.net.wisc.edu/CampusIO/services_Mbps.gif I have written a general document about the Napster portion of the measurement at: http://net.doit.wisc.edu/data/Napster/ Thanks FlowScan-1.001, which was essentially the beta version, has been tested quietly by a number of volunteers since September of last year. I'd like to thank the beta testers for their efforts and feedback. Also, thanks to Daniel McRobb, Tobi Oetiker, and CAIDA for providing the main tools upon which FlowScan is built, namely "Cflowd" and "RRDTOOL". -------------------------------------------------------------

1 0