- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: piracy on parade
by Michael Shields 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

In article <NCBBIKACLKNMKDHKKKNFAEKNEMAA.dima(a)krioukov.net>, "Dmitri Krioukov" <dima(a)krioukov.net> wrote: > wouldn't it to be a right time > to get list moderated? How is the present time different from 1999, 1997, and the other times this has been proposed? You may find it enlightening to search the archives. Another interesting experience would be to start a moderated list for North American network operators, and see how much effort is involved in moderating it, and what level of interest and utility it attracts. The tools are in your hands. -- Shields.

1 0

RE: piracy on parade
by Abrams, Chris 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

Agreed. -----Original Message----- From: Dmitri Krioukov [mailto:dima@krioukov.net] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 1:25 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: RE: piracy on parade wouldn't it to be a right time to get list moderated? thanks, -- dima.

1 0

RE: piracy on parade
by Abrams, Chris 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

Agreed -----Original Message----- From: Dmitri Krioukov [mailto:dima@krioukov.net] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 1:25 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: RE: piracy on parade wouldn't it to be a right time to get list moderated? thanks, -- dima.

1 0

need some digex hosting assistance
by Derrick 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

Can someone from digex hosting familiar with their internal switching and routing environment please contact me off-list. I need some information confirmed to help save my sanity regarding ftp issues. Derrick

1 0

Re: RFC 1918
by Shawn McMahon 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

Folks, I didn't expect to have to have 15 private conversations in which I'd have to send the same thing over and over to 15 different people. If you want to reply to me about my "RFC 1918" post, feel free; but if you do it off-list, I'm gonna read it and then delete it unanswered, with specific exceptions chosen completely arbitrarily and without any attempt at fairness. :-) Thanks, Shawn

1 0

RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst
by Eyers, Jerry 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

Unless you have a monopoly (hence the previous poster's comment). I personally have seen the "we are a monopoly, you get the bandwidth we dictate to you, not what you paid for" mentality in operation in my local area DSL provider, after they changed bandwidth on my service three times (always down, go figure). Jerry -----Original Message----- From: Bob Biver [mailto:bbiver@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 10:49 AM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst Addendum-- To to overwhelming responce: I was simply trying to get a perspective on shaping PPPoE traffic. I would *NEVER* misinform or otherwise attempt to defraud anyone. The account would simply be cheaper than one that was advertised as full bandwidth. This account would be put out there so that *everyone* would know what they were buying 320K down with a 16K CIR up but burstable to 128. Sorry for the confusion- Bob- PS Why does everyone think poeple are trying to 'rip" off customers? you will not stay in business or in your job long if you do that. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

1 0

Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work?
by Richard A. Steenbergen 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Jason Legate wrote: > http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/000712/n12107355.html > > Would all the customers be moved to exds? Wouldn't that be like shooting > one's self in the foot (on gc's part)? > > Anyone have any ideas on how they would do this? I think you believe what you read a little too much. Even if they wanted to, I don't believe Exodus has anywhere near the backbone capacity to support those datacenters, so unless they're getting some dark fiber as part of the deal... -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras(a)e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)

9 9

Bridged 1483
by Morris, Dennis 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

Is anyone running an operational net using bridged RFC 1483 or 2684, or has had other experiences in a lab or test net environment. Any references or pointers would be greatly appreciated. Dennis Morris morrisd(a)ncr.disa.mil

2 1

GC/Exds deal -- How would it work?
by Jason Legate 14 Jul '00

14 Jul '00

http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/000712/n12107355.html Would all the customers be moved to exds? Wouldn't that be like shooting one's self in the foot (on gc's part)? Anyone have any ideas on how they would do this? -j

1 0

RE: MAE West down?
by John Fraizer 13 Jul '00

13 Jul '00

http://www.rsng.net/rs-views/mae-west/index.html Peer | Routes Exported | Peers Exported To | Routes Imported | Peers Imported From --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AS 2548 (Digex) 2431 2 0 2 AS 6259 (FibreNet) 0 18 2273 18 Looks kinda dismal, huh? There's BIG trouble when DIGEX has a grand total of 2 peers at the exchange and they're not importing ANY routes. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.3a mQCNAzlo9RIAAAEEAK03prYoSsHIpASXliiU7HMshrsyT9KrigEKgy/ADVB6noQS Yp5nIlCt4BIV/8oYFloZcNxoo8LDchkDM+0arJcJ9236W+r7nf+UUu8e4hJz0y73 Jq6DEkGY64qbsgF/NBy5xQGnNFyY98KcIbp62m+C5UlTa3NNjIbMmesdFkq5AAUR tClKb2huIEZyYWl6ZXIgPEpvaG4uRnJhaXplckBFbnRlclpvbmUuTmV0PokAlQMF EDlo9RKGzJnrHRZKuQEBa/oEAKiYVn+zfRSeGxA5fdK9be1DpN0ygV0UX0ghIUsg LLAb4bhhGqwXz/my1w5oLIwa4YSOvHzkPzbC0jvEEfbQXlE/bGOqpK8VlznudGy4 DV4p0eu4Ij5gWAdkWmjyI4DfjJL8nVsat9HgE0/IsYi7xwujdvwz6TQWuxmNkQyx D3aS =WdqV -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Dave Cahill wrote: > John, > > The Mae-west looking glass is still functioning and providing BGP routing > information? > > http://nitrous.digex.net/mae/maew-lg.html

2 1