- Test - lists.nanog.org

Bing news feeds stale for 5 days (api.cognitive.microsoft.com)
by John Von Essen 29 Apr '19

29 Apr '19

Any Bing engineers on here? I work with a major search affiliate partner, and starting this morning news feeds from api.cognitive.microsoft.com <http://api.cognitive.microsoft.com/> were coming in stale, nothing new in the past 5 days. However, this was only effecting API calls originating outside the USA. In the US, api.cognitive.microsoft.com <http://api.cognitive.microsoft.com/> returns fresh news, but globally through GeoDNS, that URL resolves to different IPs, those IPs (Europe, Singapore, etc.,.) are returning 5 day old news. Sorry if this is slightly off-topic, but we dont have a good PoC at Bing for this… I figure there is a very good chance someone here could escalate. Thanks John

2 1

Call for Presentations ICANN65 Marrakesh - June 24, 2019
by Jacques Latour 29 Apr '19

29 Apr '19

Hi all! Call for Presentations ICANN65 Marrakesh Call for Presentations 39th TechDay at ICANN 65 in Marrakesh The ICANN Tech Working Group is again planning a technical workshop at the ICANN 65 meeting in Marrakesh on Monday 2019-06-24, Blocks 3-5, starting 13:30. The TechDay workshop has been a part of ICANN meetings since 2006 and has provided a forum for both experienced and new people to meet, present and discuss technical topics related to registry and DNS work and security. We are specially interested in: 1. IDN 2. Disaster Planning and Mitigation 3. Techniques for fighting abuse 4. DNSSEC In particular: Getting Africa signed) 5. RDAP - what is it, implementing, authentication, challenges 6. IDNA2008 - emoji 7. In addition, we welcome suggestions for additional topics. If you are interested in presenting, please email ccNSO-techday(a)icann.org<mailto:ccNSO-techday@icann.org> We hope that you can join us and request that you disseminate this Request to other lists where it might of interest. Greetings, Jacques, on behalf of the TechDay program Committee

1 0

Microsoft have releases a fix for the misbehaviour of their DNS servers.
by Mark Andrews 29 Apr '19

29 Apr '19

If you are using Microsoft for your DNS servers you really should update to a version that includes this fix from March 19, 2019 monthly updates. • Addresses minor issues with unknown options (unknown OPT) in the Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS) for the Windows DNS Server role. https://support.microsoft.com/en-nz/help/4489893/windows-8-1-update-kb44898… Older versions have even more egregious misbehaviour, with really old versions (pre-EDNS support) being flagged as dead by recursive servers as they do not respond consistently to EDNS queries. They respond a single time then do not respond at all for a period of time. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka(a)isc.org

1 0

IEEE CNS (co-located w/ NANOG) and lectures/notes on cyber-sec, routing
by Amir Herzberg 29 Apr '19

29 Apr '19

Hi NANOG, two activities I'm involved in which may be of some interest/use to some of you: 1. IEEE CNS - Wash. DC, June 10-12 (yes, co-located with NANOG'76 - unfortunately, completely uncoordinated, and being TPC co-chair for CNS, this lack of coordination is frustrating and hard to justify). But maybe some of us will find ways to benefit from the co-location anyway (e.g., drop by to some CNS session, e.g., the session on Internet Infrastructure security - June 10 afternoon). Or organize joint dinner of interested people... or something. 2. While already announcing stuff let me mention that I'm working on pretty extensive text and set of lectures on `foundations of cyber-security' with emphasis on the network-security and crypto aspects. Part I is crypto and much of it is already usable, part II is on network security and currently mainly contains questions/exercises (a fair number and quite challenging). But lectures (pptx) are already available on most topics, incl. routing security. Hope some of you may find these of some use; feedback welcome (probably by private mail would be better). Best, Amir -- Amir Herzberg Comcast professor for security innovation Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut Foundations of Cybersecurity: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Lecture-notes-on-Introduction-to-Cyber… Homepage: https://sites.google.com/site/amirherzberg/home

1 0

which would be better multicast solution - BIER Vs Tree-SID
by Robert yin 28 Apr '19

28 Apr '19

1 0

Disney+ CDN
by Aaron Graves 28 Apr '19

28 Apr '19

Anyone know what Disney is planning on doing for streaming content distribution once they leave Netflix? Would be nice if they'd provide an on-prem cache server. AG

14 18

Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
by Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. 28 Apr '19

28 Apr '19

Just ran into packetstream.io: "Sell Your Unused Bandwidth Earn passive income while you sleep PacketStream is the first of its kind peer-to-peer proxy network. Packeters are compensated for sharing bandwidth on the PacketStream network and allowing users all over the world have access to content on the internet through our secure network. Customers can purchase bandwidth and browse the web from residential IPs to protect their browsing privacy. The PacketStream network routes customer traffic through PacketStream users allowing for increased privacy and access to geo-restricted content while browsing the web. Packeters on the PacketStream network share their bandwidth with PacketStream customers. The website/service receiving HTTP requests sees requests coming from real residential IPs and allows access to content that would otherwise be blocked if it had been requested from traditional datacenter VPNs or proxy networks." How can this not be a violation of the ToS of just about every major provider? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Legislative Consultant CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute Legal Counsel: The Earth Law Center California Bar Association Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Colorado Cyber Committee Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose Ret. Chair, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop

18 32

My .sig (Was Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?)
by James R Cutler 27 Apr '19

27 Apr '19

--- amitchell(a)isipp.com <mailto:amitchell@isipp.com> wrote: From: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell(a)isipp.com <mailto:amitchell@isipp.com>> [This .sig space open to suggestions.] Just to continue this clearly trivial discussion: I enjoy your signature. It always leaves no question regarding the posting identity. James R. Cutler James.cutler(a)consultant.com GPG keys: hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net

2 1

Re: My .sig (Was Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?)
by Scott Weeks 26 Apr '19

26 Apr '19

--- amitchell(a)isipp.com wrote: From: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell(a)isipp.com> [This .sig space open to suggestions.] ----------------------------------------------- I don't really care about your .sig, but in general... %s/\[This .sig space open to suggestions.\]//g scott

1 0

Re: SoftLayer NOC contact to get two IP prefixes de-announced
by Katie Holly 26 Apr '19

26 Apr '19

Hi, the prefixes in question (144.48.82.0/24 and 185.121.178.0/24) are no longer announced today after forwarding the original email to NetworkSupportEngineers-SoftLayer-WW(a)wwpdl.vnet.ibm.com and peering(a)softlayer.com Thanks Best regards Katie Holly On 4/26/19 10:57 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > Hi! > > I try to keep track of prefix mis-originations that I see announced publicly. > > For this one, you did not mention the prefixes involved, so I tried to discover the prefixes you might hold, based only on the info gleaned from your message. > > I’ve found a handful of prefixes associated in some way. None of them seem to be originated by AS36351. They are all originated by AS204136. > > Would you be willing to confirm whether any of these are the prefixes in question? > > 185.121.177.0/24 > 185.121.163.0/24 > 5.253.85.0/24 > 103.230.141.0/24 > > 185.140.114.0/24 > 185.140.115.0/24 > 169.239.202.0/24 > > —Sandy Murphy > > (6 of the 7 are protected by an RPKI ROA, which is good.) > > btw. I typed meo.ws into a web browser, expecting only to receive a list web search results, but I found that meo.ws replies - with what looks like a set of info and references you find generally useful. > >> On Apr 26, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Katie Holly <t0pe5p0h(a)meo.ws> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> anyone from SoftLayer (AS36351) around or someone with a contact to their NOC? They have been announcing two /24's from us without permission and we'd like them to remove the announcement immediately. >> >> Emails were sent to ipadmin(a)softlayer.com, abuse(a)ibm.com and ipreg(a)us.ibm.com without success hence I'm reaching out to this list as a last resort. >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Best regards >> >> Katie Holly >

1 0