- Test - lists.nanog.org

Even the FCC isn't safe from backhoes
by Sean Donelan 04 Oct '01

04 Oct '01

A backhoe attempted to attack the FCC today. A backhoe digging near the FCC Portals building today, and managed to strike a large water main next to the building. Apparently it was quite a site with a Worldcom people, backhoe operator, and general public watching the river flow past the FCC front door.

2 1

FW: Proposed Legislation Significantly Affecting Computer Profession (46637)
by Gregory Hicks 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

Thought you might be interested in this and might want to express your opinion to your elected representative. Gregory Hicks ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- From: board-enotify(a)usenix.org [mailto:board-enotify@usenix.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:38 PM The USENIX Board of Directors has decided to alert our membership that bills pending before the U.S. Congress or in committee appear to have a detrimental impact on computer professionals. We are most concerned about aspects of two proposed bills, the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and the Security Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA), and how they interact with existing legislation such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The ATA redefines virtually all computer crime as terrorism, enlarges the maximum penalty to life in prison without parole, allows broad pre-conviction seizures, and, furthermore, does this retroactively, removing the existing statute of limitations. The SSSCA essentially mandates copyright protection in all digital consumer devices and makes disabling or avoidance of copyright mechanisms a felony offense. More information about these and related issues can be found at: http://www.usenix.org/whatsnew/legislation.html Similar legislation is being considered in other jurisdictions including Canada and some states. If you believe that provisions of these or similar acts are inappropriate, we strongly encourage you to contact your elected representatives as soon as possible and register your opinions. Sincerely, The USENIX Board of Directors http://www.usenix.org/directory/board.html ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer Cadence Design Systems | Direct: 408.576.3609 555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 6B1 | Fax: 408.894.3479 San Jose, CA 95134 | Internet: ghicks(a)cadence.com "To do great, important tasks, two things are necessary: a plan and not quite enough time." -- Anonymous

1 0

well, another route-views failure
by David Meyer 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

Folks, I tried again to get a zebra bgpd going to replace the current (Cisco) route-views box. What I have to conclude at this point that zebra bgpd really isn't yet up to handling this kind of scale (not only was it incredibly slow in receiving a single rib (> 35 minutes), the vty management thread was too slow to be useful. Add to that that it would crash before it could get all the RIBs, and well....). I'm not sure what I'm going to do now. I wanted to run a zebra bgpd to get the updates and ribs in MRT format (like the RIPE folks are) as well as the 'sh ip bgp' that we're archiving now, but that doesn't look possible with current generation zebra. In any event, I'll leave the Cisco there until I can verify whatever I do next works (if not forever), and continue see if we can't debug the zebra bgpd on a different box (I'll need a few duplicate bgp sessions to do this). Sorry for all of this inconvenience. Dave

1 0

Re: Verio Peering Question
by smd＠clock.org 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

| Multihoming costs a lot of money I have had a couple friends -- gamers, rather than network techs -- ask me how they could take advantage of their various household broadband connections (cable, DSL and ethernet-from-bredbandsbolaget.se) to increase their download speeds, handle upstream outages, and improve RTTs to selected targets. Admittedly their providers are unlikely to offer them "true multihoming" in the BGP + PI prefix sense, however I think it is an indication of demand in need of some supply. The supply is not horrifically expensive for at least one of the broadband providers, and the others could in principle constrain their _local_ costs enough that passing them down to my friends would not result in an unaffordable option. Is this a trend, or do I simply collect friends who are completely unreflective of reality? Is my estimation that for at least some broadband providers, per-household/per-customer BGP is a operational expense rather than one requring the capital purchase of new equipment, completely out-to-lunch (in advance of an interesting new product launch in the next few days)? Sean.

4 4

Re: netsol: not processing requests?
by Tom Glover 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, *Hobbit* wrote: > okay, since you appear to be successful at getting NSI to jump when you say, > how 'bout sending in some more details to nanog about HOW you manage to do > it? Even down to how you format your mail to them, which is apparently > important since their auto-parsers are so broken, and down to what magic > words you say to humans over the phone, and how you escalate out of the > worldwide-scattered call-centers up to someone with an actual CLUE ... > I think if you provided this information, you would do the NANOG community > a great service. Too many of us have wasted too much time dealing with > NSI, and I'm sure that swapping registrars isn't an immediate option for > many of them... > > _H* > I used their Web site to request a list of all zones using my nameservers. I got it within 3 days. I then called them and asked how they wanted me to handle a global change request. At that time they gave me what they call a "Service request number" and told me to send an e-mail using that number. Specifically they told me to send an e-mail to hostmaster(a)networksolutions.com with a subject of "Global Change Request" and quoting the "Service request number" as the first line of the e-mail body. I did this and all zones were changed as requested within a few days. -- Tom Glover

1 0

800 service down?
by alex＠yuriev.com 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

Hello, I have a few reports that 800 service (not 877) provided by WCOM, Broadwing, Verizon and AT&T are down on the East Coast. A few check from the XO, AT&T and Verizon lines in Philadelphia to a few dozen different numbers incluing 800-USA-RAIL seem to confirm this. Anyone has any details? Alex --

3 2

Re: 800 service out?
by E�l 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

Yes I know this break the charter from emailing from a anon account, no I don't really ever post so never bothered me before. This is the word I got on the issue and if anybody wants, I can forward more specific info when my friend finds out more. Peter Thoenen System Administrator UWM - Career Dev Center vox: 4142294486 fax: 4142295347 email: eol1(a)yahoo.com || pthoenen(a)des.uwm.edu Forwarded: --- Access Denied / DFS <adenied(a)dfs.org> wrote: > From: Access Denied / DFS <adenied(a)dfs.org> > To: 2600(a)lists.wi2600.org > Subject: Re: [2600] 800 service out? > Reply-to: 2600(a)lists.wi2600.org > Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:28:32 -0500 (CDT) > > > just as a matter of course, i thought i'd mention > i'm anxiously awaiting > > your update. thanks ad! > > Just heard that it's fixed.. > > Though I have no easy way of verifying that, and it > might take time to > propegate. > > The story is that it was specific to Ameritech and > parts of Verizon. It > was apparently a problem with some of their SCPs and > STPs in their SS7 > networks. I don't know for sure if it was an actual > problem with the > SMS/800 database or not. Hopefully I'll get better > details from AT&T > sooner or later. > > I sort of think it might have been further reaching > within SBC than just > Ameritech because we saw some problems with Pacbell > out here in CA. > > ad > > ** This is a PUBLIC LIST. All posts are archived > and available to the general public for future > reference. ** > _______________________________________________ > 2600 mailing list > 2600(a)lists.wi2600.org > http://wi2600.org > https://lists.wi2600.org/mailman/listinfo/2600 ===== Peace, love, happiness, and all that Neo-Hippy bullshit. Please support Planned Parenthood, the American Civil Liberties Union, and Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. De Oppresso Liber __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com

1 0

route-server.cerf.net
by Brent Van Dussen 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

...Is now configured with a view into the 1740 Core. I'll update the banner to point people to route-server.ip.att.net when the 1740 demise gets closer. -Brent

1 0

RE: 800-number outage?
by Stanley, Jon 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for the somewhat non-operational content, but anyone affected by this can reach us (SAVVIS) at 314-468-7000. (hearing reports of people in Chicago not being able to get through). > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Day [mailto:toasty@temphost.dragondata.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:52 AM > To: rlos(a)EnvestNet.com > Cc: jrl(a)lodden.com; nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: 800-number outage? > > > > > > > According to Ameritech, at 8:15am they had a "server > overload" that knocked > out toll-free service for the 5 state area. They said it came > back up for a > while, but is definately back down now. Oddly enough, 800-244-4444 > (ameritech customer support) works fine for me, but an 800# > we have through > ameritech ourselves doesn't, so it's not a case of internal > v.s. external > working/not working. > > Also, we've got a DS3 down since around 8:45am, and our > carrier doesn't have > a non 800# to open a ticket (that they're aware of). Yet > another reason for > people to test and maintain non-toll free numbers for > critical services... > > -- Kevin > > > > > > > > I just heard off a friend that there is a possible > Ameritech Fiber cut...is > > there any validity to that? There doesn't seem to be the > usual noise around > > fiber cuts, so I'm guessing that's not the case? > > > > Does anyone from the Ameritech side have a defintive answer? > > > > > > > > Ameritech SCP that handles lookups to the national SMS > > database is having software problems, it seems to be > working soft of now. > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know about this outage? > > > Seems like every 800-type number in the country is out right > > now...is > > > it a network problem somewhere? > > > > > > > > -- > Kevin Day > toasty(a)dragondata.com - kevin(a)stileproject.com > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBO7tCdz1RUKGwp4eKEQJupACg7PberNyq+XHKSoJPLwFyspZyz2kAoMhD YLUPq/TQHt94JiDTAX5cBoR2 =STpe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Verio Peering Question
by P R 03 Oct '01

03 Oct '01

I have a quick question about Verio's public peering policy. What is the smallest size prefix that Verio will accept from public peering? The reason why I ask is because my company informed me that Verio will not accept anything from a Class A address with a prefix smaller than a /20 from pubic peering. Is that true? If so, how do small ISP's work around this? Peter Rohrman Network Engineer Un-Named ISP _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

38 69