- Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: 601 West 26th Street
by Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL) 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

Let me clarify a little more. We are building into that facility for capacity circuits and I was wondering if it was worth placing an IP node there as well. We were planning on going into 111 8th with IP, but are unable to cost effectively get there from 601 W 26th. Shane -----Original Message----- From: Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL) [mailto:sowens@epik.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:23 PM To: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: 601 West 26th Street Does anyone do any IP business out of this address?? Shane Owens Sr. Manager IP Engineering and Operations EPIK Communications 3501 Quadrangle Blvd Ste 225 Orlando FL 32817 Phone:(407)472-8291 Cell:(321)436-3232 fax:(407)472-8216 sowens(a)epik.net

1 0

Re: 601 West 26th Street
by Martin J. Levy 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

Hello Shane, Yes. There are many companies. Here is one that you may know... Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia LLC. 601 West, 26th Street, 9th Floor New York, NY 10001 US http://www.marthastewart.com/ ...I belive she posts her home decorating hints to that web site every day. I can not belive that there is a legitimate reason to talk about Martha Stewart on the NANOG mailing list. Martin ------------------ At 03:23 PM 10/23/2002 -0400, Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL) wrote: >Does anyone do any IP business out of this address?? > >Shane Owens >Sr. Manager IP Engineering and Operations >EPIK Communications >3501 Quadrangle Blvd Ste 225 >Orlando FL 32817 >Phone:(407)472-8291 >Cell:(321)436-3232 >fax:(407)472-8216 >sowens(a)epik.net

1 0

601 West 26th Street
by Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL) 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

Does anyone do any IP business out of this address?? Shane Owens Sr. Manager IP Engineering and Operations EPIK Communications 3501 Quadrangle Blvd Ste 225 Orlando FL 32817 Phone:(407)472-8291 Cell:(321)436-3232 fax:(407)472-8216 sowens(a)epik.net

1 0

WP: Attack On Internet Called Largest Ever
by Sean Donelan 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A828-2002Oct22.html The heart of the Internet sustained its largest and most sophisticated attack ever, starting late Monday, according to officials at key online backbone organizations.

21 24

RADIUS question
by Jonathan Disher 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

I'm trying to implement dialback with RADIUS on an Ascend MAX TNT... I've been looking for examples but can't find any. Anyone made this work and willing to share the necessary voodoo? Offlist replies welcome. Thanks in advance. -j

1 0

Sprint VS. Qwest
by Christopher K. Neitzert 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

List, Neither Sprint nor Qwest are serious about earning my business and are not providing me with their network peering details. I was hoping that the list might have the collective resources to help me determine who has better peering. thanks chirstopher -- Christopher K. Neitzert / 0xC10D222F / chris(a)neitzert.com

13 14

Way off Topic - 'shrooms
by Lucy E. Lynch 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

All - If you're coming to Eugene for the NANOG/ARIN meeting and looking for something Northwest-y to do on Sunday - check out the Mushroom Show at the Mt. Pisgah Arboretum: http://www.efn.org/~mtpisgah/upcoming.htm This is a really nice event, and close enough to town so you can drop in, see the wierd fungi, take a short hike, and still make the tutorials - directions: http://www.efn.org/~mtpisgah/location.htm I now return you to the regularly scheduled content. Lucy E. Lynch Academic User Services Computing Center University of Oregon llynch(a)darkwing.uoregon.edu (541) 346-1774/Cell: 912-7998

1 0

need opinions re: contact methods for a noc@ alias
by fingers 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

Hi there Over the years I've seen a few very odd methods for dealing with a noc@ email address. I've always had the mindset that: 1) individual users are subscribed to a list/alias for noc@ 2) it's _never_ a single/shared "account" 3) it _always_ accepts plaintext email, at the least, for reporting problems. recently I've been seing more of the "single account" that some poor sod on shift uses, and now I've seen it all - an isp who won't accept plaintext email to their noc@ list, but instead want the person sending the report to go to a webform and fill it in. I was wondering what others' thoughts on these and other methods of dealing with noc@ were. Regards --Rob

2 1

RE: AMS-IX problems
by neil＠DOMINO.ORG 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

Iljitcsh, > There seem to be large scale problems at the AMS-IX. BGP sessions with > peers keep oscillating. Since their own addresses keep jumping all > over the place, it is not possible to reach anyone over the AMS-IX > tech list. > > I have disabled all AMS-IX peerings for the networks I manage, and I > suggest everyone who is present there looks in to doing the same. > > Iljitsch van Beijnum > Did you try calling them?! Neil. -- Neil J. McRae - Alive and Kicking neil(a)DOMINO.ORG

2 3

RE: WP: Attack On Internet --more info?
by Brennan_Murphy＠NAI.com 23 Oct '02

23 Oct '02

It's ironic how these events make their way into the media but no one in the media seems inquisitive enough to truly follow up on an event. Was the attack widely distributed or were the streams large enough to traceback with netflow, etc? Was there any success in identifying compromised machines? Any forensic clues found? -----Original Message----- From: dies [mailto:dies@pulltheplug.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:06 AM To: Richard A Steenbergen Cc: Sean Donelan; nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: WP: Attack On Internet Called Largest Ever Agreed...I worked these attacks on UUNET's backbone and quite honestly none of them was over 100mbit worth of traffic. We see this everyday, this was nothing out of the ordinary except the destination... Shrug...fear is an easy weapon to wield, eh? On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:15:21PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: > > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A828-2002Oct22.html > > > > The heart of the Internet sustained its largest and most sophisticated > > attack ever, starting late Monday, according to officials at key online > > backbone organizations. > > Looked like a pretty piddly and unintelligent smurf/ping flood combo to > me. The state of the so-called "experts" saddens me more with each passing > day. > > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <ras(a)e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6) >

1 0