- Test - lists.nanog.org

nanog coordination meeting video...
by Joel Jaeggli 07 Feb '05

07 Feb '05

I put up an isma mpeg-4 recording from the NANOG 33 "Coordinating NANOG: Input From the Community" session up to supplement the m3 recording... Both are here: ftp://limestone.uoregon.edu/pub/videolab/video/nanog33/ The video is 547MB, 2 hours 5 minutes... -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja(a)darkwing.uoregon.edu GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2

3 3

Quickie survey [offlist]: DNS geolocation
by Todd Vierling 07 Feb '05

07 Feb '05

I'd like to know of any networks (primarily providers) on here whose customer-facing DNS recursion servers either (1) don't recurse directly to the authoritative roots, instead deferring to the upstream's DNS; or (2) are often not "nearby", geographically, to clients. For (2), transcontinental or intercontinental indirect recursion configurations are of particular interest. I'm trying to gather some information for research regarding today's DNS recursion, and how close (geographically) the last hop of recursion, before the authoritative answer, is to the original requestor. -- -- Todd Vierling <tv(a)duh.org> <tv(a)pobox.com>

1 0

RE: Time to check the rate limits on your mail servers
by Hannigan, Martin 06 Feb '05

06 Feb '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of > J.D. Falk > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:35 PM > To: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: Time to check the rate limits on your mail servers > > > > On 02/03/05, "Miller, Mark" <mark.miller(a)qwest.com> wrote: > > > How come it is always about controlling the symptoms and not the > > illness? The vast majority of these > > "spam drones" are compromised WINDOWS machines. If the > operating system > > and dominant email applications so easily allows the users' > machines to > > be taken over by a third party, then there is something > wrong with the > > operating system and the mail applications. It occurs to > me that the > > solution is not to limit the range of destruction, but to defuse the > > bomb. Perhaps the focus for a solution should move up the model to > > layer 7. > > Upgrading and/or replacing the OS for every Windows user on the > planet is an educational issue. Keeping the network viable > while you figure out how to do that is an operational issue. ..or a cost issue. Most of these users are people who have decided not to spend the $40 to defend their machine at home. -M<

12 27

Time to check the rate limits on your mail servers
by Michael.Dillon＠radianz.com 06 Feb '05

06 Feb '05

CNET reports http://news.com.com/Zombie+trick+expected+to+send+spam+sky-high/2100-7349_3… that botnets are now routing their mail traffic through the local ISP's mail servers rather than trying their own port 25 connections. Do you let your customers send an unlimited number of emails per day? Per hour? Per minute? If so, then why? --Michael Dillon

27 42

[sorta offtopic] Cygwin.com / sources.redhat.com down or sorta unreachable?
by Jeff.Hodges＠KingsMountain.com 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

Is the network situation from May-2004 described here.. http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-May/009459.html ..possibly repeating itself? I can traceroute to sources.redhat.com (aka sourceware.org aka cygwin.com) from VA via alter.net, but not from stanford.edu via ucaid.edu & ncren.net. anyone have any clues as to what's going on? thanks, JeffH stanford.edu[41]> traceroute sources.redhat.com traceroute to sources.redhat.com (12.107.209.250), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 171.64.20.1 (171.64.20.1) 0.955 ms 0.884 ms 0.545 ms 2 bbr2-rtr (171.64.1.161) 0.457 ms 0.466 ms 0.436 ms 3 hpr1-rtr (171.64.1.131) 1.165 ms 1.052 ms 0.979 ms 4 hpr-svl-hpr--stan-ge.cenic.net (137.164.27.161) 1.311 ms 1.373 ms 1.171 ms 5 lax-hpr--svl-hpr-10ge.cenic.net (137.164.25.12) 8.754 ms 8.862 ms 8.817 ms 6 abilene-LA--hpr-lax-gsr1-10ge.cenic.net (137.164.25.3) 9.207 ms 9.069 ms 8.924 ms 7 hstnng-losang.abilene.ucaid.edu (198.32.8.22) 50.405 ms 40.517 ms 40.459 ms 8 atlang-hstnng.abilene.ucaid.edu (198.32.8.34) 60.384 ms 60.848 ms 64.189 ms 9 washng-atlang.abilene.ucaid.edu (198.32.8.66) 76.186 ms 75.836 ms 76.271 ms 10 rlgh1-gw-abilene-oc48.ncren.net (198.86.17.65) 83.146 ms 82.987 ms 83.112 ms 11 rlgh7600-gw-to-rlgh1-gw.ncren.net (128.109.70.38) 83.576 ms 83.658 ms 83.548 ms 12 ncsu7600-gw-to-rlgh7600-gw.ncren.net (128.109.70.26) 83.941 ms 84.702 ms 83.651 ms 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * * [neustar.com internal network hops elided] 5 114 ms 84 ms 106 ms stih7206.va.neustar.com [209.173.53.232] 6 253 ms 180 ms 84 ms 500.Serial4-0-3.GW1.TCO4.ALTER.NET [65.195.225.2 13] 7 161 ms 185 ms 248 ms 0.so-4-0-0.XL2.TCO4.ALTER.NET [152.63.33.242] 8 163 ms 168 ms 119 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XL2.DCA5.ALTER.NET [152.63.38.150] 9 146 ms 94 ms 143 ms 0.so-6-1-0.BR2.DCA5.ALTER.NET [152.63.48.21] 10 208 ms 201 ms 206 ms 204.255.169.2 11 108 ms 126 ms 157 ms tbr2-p011901.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.123.9.118] 12 177 ms 129 ms 115 ms gar1-p370.rlgnc.ip.att.net [12.122.3.61] 13 217 ms 225 ms 188 ms 12.119.93.62 14 208 ms 233 ms 233 ms sourceware.org [12.107.209.250]

2 1

RE: Time to check the rate limits on your mail servers
by Joel Perez 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

I keep reading these articles and reports about this botnet and that botnet problem and how many user's pc's are infected. The only thing I don't see is a way to remove these bots! Not everyone knows how to even look at their machines for signs of these bots. Heck, I know most of my guys here don't even know how these bots work. It would be impossible to educate everybody but it's better to try than sitting around blocking this and that and not really solving the issue at hand. My .02 cents. ------------------------------------------------- Joel Perez | Network Engineer 305.914.3412 | Ntera ------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Michael.Dillon(a)radianz.com Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:47 AM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Time to check the rate limits on your mail servers > > Do you let your customers send an unlimited number of > > emails per day? Per hour? Per minute? If so, then why? > > Doing that - especially now when this article has hit the popular > press and there's going to be lots more people doing the same thing - > is going to be equivalent of hanging out a "block my email" sign. I don't understand your comment. This is an arms race. The spammers and botnet builders are attempting to make their bots use the exact same email transmission channels as your customers' email clients. They are getting better at doing this as time goes on. I think we are at the point where the technical expertise of the botnet builders is greater than the technical expertise of most people working in email operations. We cannot win this battle by continuing to attempt to trump their technical abilities. However, if we shift the battleground to a location where network operators have the upper hand, we can do better. And that's why I suggest that people should start looking at email volume controls. The vast majority of individual users only send a small number of emails over a given time period whether you measure that time period in minutes, hours or days. SPAM is a form of DDoS against the Internet's email architecture. Rate limiting has proven to be an effective way of mitigating DDoS because it strikes at the very core of the DoS methodology. Why not deploy this strategy against email? Please note that I am not suggesting that this is a way to "solve" the SPAM problem. First of all, I do not agree that there is a SPAM problem. The fundamental problem is that the Internet email architecture is flawed. SPAM is merely a symptom of those flaws. If we fix the architecture, then nobody will care about SPAM. As you can see, two separate problems are becoming intertwingled here. In the past we had viruses, DDoS, botnets, SPAM, phishing. But now, all of these things are merging and evolving together. And secondly, I'm only pointing out that there are reasons for people to start thinking about rate limiting email on their networks. I'm suggesting that people should be asking questions. I don't think it is wise to run out and slap rate limits on mail infrastructure without thinking through the implications. --Michael Dillon

8 9

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Table Analysis 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 05 Feb, 2005 Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 155903 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 90519 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 74424 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18921 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 16444 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 7720 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2477 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 81 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.5 Max AS path length visible: 22 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 17 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 21 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1373013836 Equivalent to 81 /8s, 214 /16s and 135 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 37.0 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 58.6 Percentage of available address space allocated: 63.2 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 72958 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 30873 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 14883 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 28938 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 14655 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2195 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 645 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 325 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.4 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 173269632 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 83 /16s and 226 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 64.3 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 23552-24575 APNIC Address Blocks 58/7, 60/7, 124/7, 126/8, 202/7, 210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8 ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 87607 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 52291 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 66880 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 24068 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 9852 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3590 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 960 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 4.3 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 240400640 Equivalent to 14 /8s, 84 /16s and 57 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 71.6 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647,29695-30719, 31744-33791 ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/6, 68/7, 70/7, 72/8, 198/7, 204/6, 208/7 and 216/8 RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 29269 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 20230 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 26227 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 17361 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 6282 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3334 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1061 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 5.1 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 22 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 187324736 Equivalent to 11 /8s, 42 /16s and 89 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 65.7 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-34815 RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 80/5, 88/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/7, 212/7 and 217/8 LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 6813 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 2399 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 6700 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 4041 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 419 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 127 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 83 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 5.0 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 17342464 Equivalent to 1 /8s, 8 /16s and 160 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 51.7 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671 LACNIC Address Blocks 200/7 Emerging AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 1324 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 716 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 886 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 683 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 96 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 24 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 13 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.6 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 12 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 2162688 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 33 /16s and 0 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 12.9 AfriNIC AS Blocks <none> AfriNIC Address Blocks 196/8 APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4134 883 4688 172 Data Communications Bureau 1221 785 1183 560 Telstra Pty Ltd 4766 592 3415 282 Korea Internet Exchange for " 9583 582 48 12 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 4755 456 241 101 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 7545 396 86 69 TPG Internet Pty Ltd 17676 394 5916 62 XTAGE CORPORATION 9443 362 71 77 Primus Telecommunications 9929 351 164 35 China Netcom Corp. 2907 347 1838 322 SINET Japan 17557 324 23 149 Pakistan Telecom 10036 294 27 270 C&M Communication Co. Ltd. 7474 280 297 208 Optus Communications Pty Ltd 2764 271 254 218 connect.com.au pty ltd 703 270 339 211 UUNET 9800 237 383 75 CHINA UNICOM 4808 234 170 128 CHINANET core WAN North 4802 231 28 140 Wantree Development 9498 230 81 53 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 17974 227 63 12 PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 7018 1463 6607 980 AT&T WorldNet Services 721 1125 21787 313 DLA Systems Automation Center 701 1061 8336 906 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 7015 963 212 22 AT&T Broadband 1239 943 2880 621 Sprint 6197 858 378 402 BellSouth Network Solutions, 4323 847 672 219 Time Warner Telecom 2386 819 506 606 AT&T Data Communications Serv 18566 770 208 6 Covad Communications 209 649 3404 499 Qwest 3356 594 10867 443 Level 3 Communications, LLC 3561 584 2370 414 Cable & Wireless USA 20115 573 476 305 Charter Communications 852 525 1126 399 Telus Advanced Communications 6478 502 821 97 AT&T Worldnet Services 3602 491 120 91 Sprint Canada, Inc. 22773 468 1090 24 Cox Communications, Inc. Atla 27364 467 44 18 Armstrong Cable Services 6198 457 499 200 BellSouth Network Solutions, 7132 441 8395 381 SBC Internet Services RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 702 618 2022 510 UUNET - Commercial IP service 3320 291 2992 227 Deutsche Telekom AG 3301 288 1112 276 TeliaNet Sweden 8220 277 466 270 COLT Internet - International 680 253 2041 239 DFN-IP service G-WiN 3246 223 471 218 Song Networks 13083 217 51 8 Mannesmann Datenverarbeitung 8708 213 119 194 Romania Data Systems S.A. 1257 205 708 171 SWIPnet Swedish IP Network 3215 188 1032 78 France Telecom Transpac 5515 187 842 135 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 6746 179 47 144 Dynamic Network Technologies, 786 176 1794 176 The JANET IP Service 8866 166 19 24 Bulgarian Telecommunication C 3300 162 166 82 AUCS Communications Services 3269 161 1392 71 TELECOM ITALIA 719 159 322 105 LANLINK autonomous system 25186 141 138 99 France Telecom Transpac's Tra 5400 140 219 124 BT Ignite European Backbone 9051 127 8 33 INCONET Autonomous System LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 6140 359 140 70 ImpSat 8151 335 489 142 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 16814 234 14 6 NSS, S.A. 11172 217 99 54 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V 6147 189 102 20 Telefonica Del Peru 11664 150 19 24 Keytech SA 7303 149 68 22 Telecom Argentina Stet-France 6505 135 90 92 Global One Communicaoes Ltda 6503 116 147 80 AVANTEL, S.A. 14117 114 7 5 Telefonica del Sur S.A. 11992 107 9 31 Integrated Systems 11556 97 48 3 Cable-Wireless Panama 13999 87 52 9 Mega Cable S.A. de C.V. 14420 87 6 42 ANDINATEL S.A. 11311 86 8 22 Sinectis S.A. 6535 85 7 23 Chilesat Servicios Empresari 10481 83 32 7 Prima S.A. 5639 81 8 8 Telecommunications Services o 4270 79 18 9 Red de Interconexion Universi 15311 78 25 37 Telefonica Empresas AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 3741 268 636 226 The Internet Solution 5536 113 15 17 Internet Egypt Network 2018 102 297 98 Tertiary Education Network 20928 84 16 2 Noor Advanced Technologies AS 2905 76 272 70 The Internetworking Company o 24835 56 34 6 RAYA Telecom - Egypt 8452 38 20 5 TEDATA 6713 35 46 10 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB 9129 33 3 2 UUNET Kenya 12455 28 7 4 Jambonet Autonomous system 5713 27 141 24 Telkom SA Ltd 8524 23 1 4 AUCEGYPT Autonomous System 16637 22 10 19 Johnnic e-Ventures 10798 18 1 12 Standard Bank of South Africa 12258 18 3 12 Vodacom Internet Company 21280 18 2 3 Swift Global Kenya Ltd.Is an 8346 15 11 15 SONATEL-AS Autonomous System 15706 15 4 2 Sudatel Internet Exchange Aut 21491 15 1 3 UTL On-line is RF broadband I 15808 14 1 1 Communication Solutions Ltd i Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 7015 963 941 AT&T Broadband 721 1125 812 DLA Systems Automation Center 18566 770 764 Covad Communications 4134 883 711 Data Communications Bureau 4323 847 628 Time Warner Telecom 9583 582 570 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 6197 858 456 BellSouth Network Solutions, 27364 467 449 Armstrong Cable Services 22773 468 444 Cox Communications, Inc. Atla 5668 433 406 Century Telephone 6478 502 405 AT&T Worldnet Services 3602 491 400 Sprint Canada, Inc. 22909 422 358 Comcast Cable Corporation 4755 456 355 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 17676 394 332 XTAGE CORPORATION 6467 359 328 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 7545 396 327 TPG Internet Pty Ltd 1239 943 322 Sprint 9929 351 316 China Netcom Corp. 4766 592 310 Korea Internet Exchange for " List of Unregistered ASNs (Global) ---------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 64826 PRIVATE 64.200.250.0/23 7911 Williams Communicati 64513 PRIVATE 149.117.96.0/24 577 Bell Advanced Commun 26422 UNALLOCATED 196.46.184.0/22 3741 The Internet Solutio 64512 PRIVATE 199.213.17.0/25 15296 Netera Alliance Inc. 64512 PRIVATE 199.213.17.128/25 15296 Netera Alliance Inc. 64512 PRIVATE 199.216.97.0/28 15296 Netera Alliance Inc. 64512 PRIVATE 199.216.148.0/28 15296 Netera Alliance Inc. 65004 PRIVATE 200.0.113.0/24 28477 * 65004 PRIVATE 200.4.0.0/24 28477 * 65004 PRIVATE 200.4.1.0/24 28477 * 65004 PRIVATE 200.4.2.0/24 28477 * 65004 PRIVATE 200.4.3.0/24 28477 * 65004 PRIVATE 200.4.4.0/24 28477 * 65004 PRIVATE 200.4.5.0/24 28477 * 65004 PRIVATE 200.4.6.0/24 28477 * 65529 PRIVATE 216.21.199.0/24 14697 VDot.Net 65529 PRIVATE 216.152.237.0/24 14697 VDot.Net Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 132.0.0.0/10 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 137.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 158.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 172.212.0.0/16 1668 GNN Hosting Service 172.213.0.0/16 1668 GNN Hosting Service 172.214.0.0/16 1668 GNN Hosting Service 172.215.0.0/16 1668 GNN Hosting Service 172.216.0.0/16 1668 GNN Hosting Service 192.44.0.0/19 702 UUNET - Commercial IP service 192.70.164.0/24 25689 National Research Council of 192.83.16.0/20 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.32.0/19 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.96.0/22 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.100.0/24 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.84.205.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.119.135.0/24 270 NASA 192.135.50.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 192.136.79.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.172.0.0/19 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.172.11.0/24 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.200.100.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:19 /9:3 /10:7 /11:14 /12:62 /13:146 /14:311 /15:564 /16:8292 /17:2392 /18:4078 /19:10055 /20:10655 /21:8486 /22:11845 /23:12989 /24:85128 /25:294 /26:259 /27:115 /28:49 /29:21 /30:80 /31:0 /32:39 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 7015 926 963 AT&T Broadband 18566 755 770 Covad Communications 6197 703 858 BellSouth Network Solutions, 7018 628 1463 AT&T WorldNet Services 2386 592 819 AT&T Data Communications Serv 27364 452 467 Armstrong Cable Services 9583 410 582 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 4766 405 592 Korea Internet Exchange for " 702 377 618 UUNET - Commercial IP service 5668 374 433 Century Telephone 1239 368 943 Sprint 6198 328 457 BellSouth Network Solutions, 10036 294 294 C&M Communication Co. Ltd. 13609 294 336 Choice One Communications Inc 4323 291 847 Time Warner Telecom 6517 282 304 Yipes Communications, Inc. 9929 276 351 China Netcom Corp. 6467 271 359 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 701 268 1061 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 11456 263 310 Carolina Online, Inc. Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 4:4 8:9 12:1483 13:1 15:6 16:2 17:3 18:4 20:4 24:1176 32:68 33:3 38:91 40:55 44:3 47:2 52:3 55:2 56:3 57:21 59:2 60:12 61:683 62:512 63:1869 64:2587 65:2135 66:2599 67:492 68:496 69:911 70:57 71:2 72:52 80:561 81:504 82:353 83:246 84:122 85:93 128:130 129:166 130:91 131:191 132:37 134:142 135:30 136:213 137:68 138:180 139:47 140:195 141:101 142:139 143:121 144:250 145:45 146:282 147:98 148:265 149:160 150:94 151:62 152:111 153:72 154:2 155:136 156:69 157:77 158:149 159:163 160:67 161:59 162:413 163:85 164:214 165:157 166:131 167:226 168:390 169:131 170:314 171:8 192:5683 193:3044 194:2253 195:1566 196:611 198:3852 199:3247 200:3955 201:50 202:5173 203:5971 204:3593 205:2033 206:2315 207:2663 208:2093 209:3075 210:1577 211:780 212:1148 213:1265 214:240 215:31 216:3700 217:1090 218:188 219:117 220:349 221:79 222:75 End of report

1 0

FW: [Apnic-announce] APNIC new IPv4 addresses
by Leslie Nobile 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

-----Original Message----- From: apnic-announce-bounces(a)lists.apnic.net [mailto:apnic-announce-bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of John Tran Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:28 AM To: apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net Cc: apops(a)apops.net Subject: [Apnic-announce] APNIC new IPv4 addresses Dear colleagues APNIC received IPv4 address blocks 124/7 and 126/8 from IANA in January 2005 and will be making allocations from these ranges in the near future. This announcement is being made for the information of the Internet community so that network configurations such as routing filters may be updated as appropriate. For more information on the resources administered by APNIC, see: http://www.apnic.net/db/ranges.html For information on the minimum allocation sizes within address ranges administered by APNIC, see: http://www.apnic.net/db/min-alloc.html Kind regards Son ____________________________________________________________________ Resources Services Manager <Son(a)apnic.net> Asia Pacific Network Information Centre phone: +61 7 3858 3100 http://www.apnic.net fax: +61 7 3858 3199 Helpdesk phone: +61 7 3858 3188 email: helpdesk(a)apnic.net Please send Internet Resource Requests to <hostmaster(a)apnic.net> _____________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Apnic-announce mailing list Apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-announce _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list apnic-talk(a)lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk -- This is the SANOG (http://www.sanog.org/) mailing list. _______________________________________________ Apnic-announce mailing list Apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-announce

1 0

State of multicast traceroute and ping
by Chen, Weijing 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

What is the state of arts about multicast traceroute and ping, especially: 1) The fate of draft-ietf-idmr-traceroute-ipm? Dead or became RFC? 2) Is the mtrace still useful in PIM-SM, PIM-SSM, etc? Does most of router support mtrace? 3) Any multicast ping tool from receiver to source available? Thanks. -- Weijing Chen

1 0

Stats from Las Vegas
by Susan Harris 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

NANOG 33 Jan. 30-Feb. 1, 2005 Las Vegas, Nevada Host: UltraDNS Connectivity: OC3, donated by Sprint ----------------------------------------- Total attendance 400 Women attendees 7% NAPs represented 11 Univ./Colleges repr. 20 Non-US/Canada/Mexico attendees 38 Attendee occupation breakdown: ISPs/NetOps 44% Hardware vendors 20% Software vendors 3% R&E 11% Government 4% Consultant 4% Content provider 3% Other 11% Presentation proposals reviewed by Program Committee: Total submissions: 25 (22 rec'd. before CFP deadline, 3 after) On-time talks accepted: 15 On-time talks rejected: 4 Late submissions: 5 Late submissions accepted: 4 Support: Meeting coordination: Merit Network Squid, DNS, DHCP: Measurement Factory Multicast: University of Oregon IPv6 feed: Merit Sponsors: UltraDNS, Sprint, Force10, Arbor Cariden, Cisco, Cloudshield, Juniper Packet Design, Tellabs Sunday evening community meeting: ~200 attendees, excellent input! Watch email for a Merit/Program Committee announcement of initial proposals for change.

1 0