- Test - lists.nanog.org

UK gov get onboard the security notification train
by Colin Johnston 24 Feb '05

24 Feb '05

See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4291005.stm Now maybe if we can persude UK Gov to configure mailing lists correctly to not send virus content before it is scanned then maybe we can all sleep safe at night :) Colin Johnston

4 3

Re: Iraqi TLD
by Fergie (Paul Ferguson) 23 Feb '05

23 Feb '05

-- Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner(a)nic-naa.net> wrote: > Oblig operational item -- does anyone know of a comperable > situation? An LEO deciding to seize all XYZ Corp properties > in SomeState(s), including all RIR allocations made to XYZ > Corp, whether for its internal use or for resale, and > locking up everyone down to the first-tier line manager > level? > > Eric No -- these are indeed interesting times that we live in. - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net

1 0

Re: Iraqi TLD
by John Neiberger 23 Feb '05

23 Feb '05

>>> Jeroen Massar <jeroen(a)unfix.org> 2/23/05 10:49:47 AM >>> >On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 17:42 +0000, Ken Gilmour wrote: >>Does anyone know if the .iq tld has been reinstated yet? I believe it >>was disabled a couple of years ago. > >It is now in the hands of some US company: Isn't that pretty much true for the entire country of Iraq? :) John --

3 3

Iraqi TLD
by Ken Gilmour 23 Feb '05

23 Feb '05

Does anyone know if the .iq tld has been reinstated yet? I believe it was disabled a couple of years ago. Thanks and Regards, Ken Gilmour Network Shaman Irish Operations

2 1

Mailing List Update
by Hannigan, Martin 23 Feb '05

23 Feb '05

Hello Folks; Following Steve Feldmans lead, we'd like to offer an update as well. List Admin bios are here: http://www.nanog.org/listadmins.html A few changes have been made that you should know about. First, all previously restricted posters are unrestricted. There are currently no restricted posters and nothing related on the table. Second, we've agreed that nobody will be removed from the list unless a majority of us agree to do so. The exception to this would be for spam and technical problems such as mail loops, etc. The List Administrators can be reached at nanog-admin(a)nanog.org for problems or feedback. Thanks, -M< -- Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663 VeriSign, Inc. (w) 703-948-7018 Network Engineer IV Operations & Infrastructure hannigan(a)verisign.com

1 0

Microsoft WAN Engineer Please contact me off list
by Erik Sundberg 23 Feb '05

23 Feb '05

I am have a routing issues with microsoft could a WAN person from microsoft please contact me off list thanks. Thanks Erik =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Erik Sundberg sunder(a)appscorp.net Network Engineer Apps Communications 10470 West 164th Place Orland Park, IL 60467 http://www.appscorp.net Phone: 708.403.9200 x228 Cell: 708.710.7419 Fax: 708.873.1310 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Appsmail.com]

3 2

Fwd: Call for Nominations to the Public Interest
by Fergie (Paul Ferguson) 23 Feb '05

23 Feb '05

I usually try not to cross-post, but only do so here because I thought this would be of interest to the NANOG community at-large. FYI, - ferg ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- February 21, 2005: Call for Nominations to the Public Interest Registry .ORG Advisory Council The .ORG Advisory Council has been a valuable global resource for the Public Interest Registry ('PIR') management in the areas of policy, outreach, new services and support. The Council continues to provide PIR with beneficial recommendations to improve registry operations and support the non-commercial .ORG community. Eight of the twenty one Advisory Council seats are open to be filled on April 15th. Seven of the seats are for three year terms; one seat is for a two year term. We would like your help in soliciting the best possible nominees for the open seats. We are seeking individuals with significant Internet leadership experience within the Non-profit, NGO, Civil Society and Domain Name arenas who represent the broad and geographically diverse spectrum of the global noncommercial community. Interested individuals are encouraged to submit nominations, including self-nominations. A nomination statement of approximately 400 words should include details of the nominees experience within the Internet, commitment to promoting the noncommercial use of the Internet, understanding of the technical or policy issues facing the .ORG registry and perspectives regarding the needs of the .ORG community. A current biography and digital photograph are also requested. The Council consists of twenty-one members selected by the PIR Board of Directors in accordance with the Charter of the Council, <http://www.pir.org/about_pir/a_c/pir_ac_charter.pdf>. New Council members will be announced on April 15, 2005. Nominations must be submitted by Wednesday, March 23, 2005. Please submit nominations to nominations(a)pir.org. For complete information on the PIR .ORG Advisory Council, go to <www.pir.org/about_pir/a_c/>. Warmest Regards, Edward G. Viltz President & CEO Public Interest Registry "Serving the Public Interest" _______________________________________________ ISOC-members-announce mailing list ISOC-members-announce(a)mailman.isoc.org http://mailman.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/isoc-members-announce To unsubscribe, send a blank message to: isoc-members-announce-leave(a)isoc.org Please note that by leaving this membership list you will also be resigning ISOC membership. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net

1 0

Program commitee update
by Steve Feldman 22 Feb '05

22 Feb '05

This is a status update on the NANOG program committee. First, I'd like to thank my fellow PC members for selecting me as the interim chair. Our primary task and focus for the next few months will be to ensure the quality of the agenda for the Seattle meeting, while the broader discussions on NANOG governance continue. As always, information on the program committee is available at http://www.nanog.org/pc.html. We have setup an alias, naogpc(a)nanog.org, which will reach the entire program committee. We're happy to receive comments and answer any questions sent to us, as a group or individually. Here are a few things you can expect from us over the next couple of weeks: - A survey on meeting content Many interesting ideas for improving the content and format of NANOG meetings were brought up during the community meeting in Las Vegas. This survey is to gauge opinion on some of those ideas from the broad community, including those of you who don't regularly attend the meetings. - The Call for Presentations for the May meeting Although the structure of the meeting won't be set until we've had a chance to review the survey results and other input, we encourage everyone with something to contribute to prepare a submission. Feel free to contact me or any of the other PC members directly if you'd like informal advice or opinions on potential topics. Finally, on behalf of the entire program committee I would like to express our appreciation to Susan Harris for the hard work she has put into keeping NANOG running for the last seven years. Most of you have seen only the public-facing aspects of that role, some of which have now passed to me. But there is also a lot that happens behind the scenes to keep NANOG functioning, and Susan drives most of that. Steve

1 1

Re: UN Panel Aims to End Internet Tug of War by July
by Brandon Butterworth 22 Feb '05

22 Feb '05

> What if the UN says ITU should run the TLDs, ICANN says yes, and, a > significant portion of the operational internet says no? Nothing happened beyond a bit of noise on mailing lists when ICANN did their coup, why should anything happen now? Now ICANN are ramping up their domain tax to fund the increasing overhead they are imposing, who will tax less ICANN or ITU? brandon

2 1

Re: UN Panel Aims to End Internet Tug of War by July
by Ross 22 Feb '05

22 Feb '05

No government will ever have the internet's best intrest in mind when they talk about controlling it. Luckily government control has been kept some what to a minimum so far but it's growing rapidly and this is another attempt for a government body to "control" the internet. I wonder what new rules will be put in place if the ITU gets control? I also wonder if the ITU can really take control. What if the U.N. says the ITU should run the TLD's and ICANN says no? On Mon Feb 21 18:15:00 PST 2005, Joel Jaeggli <joelja @darkwing.uoregon.edu=""> wrote:</joelja> > When I hear Robert Mugabe talk about internet governance I don't really > get the impression that he has the interests of the people of Zimbabwe at > heart. > > joelja > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Dave Crocker wrote: > >> >> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:45:12 -0500, Scott W Brim wrote: >>> > I'm intrigued at the failure to distinguish between the web and >>> > >>> > email, given that spam is a messaging phenomenon, not a publishing >>> > phenomenon. >>> > >>> It's actually a failure to distinguish the web from the Internet >> >> i was probably too cryptic. yes, they are using the term 'web' to mean 'the internet'. >> >> the problem is that professional writing needs to be careful, and a failure at such a basic level as using web to apply to email does not bode well for the utility of the article... >> >> >> d/ >> -- >> Dave Crocker >> Brandenburg InternetWorking >> +1.408.246.8253 >> dcrocker a t ... >> WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net >> > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja(a)darkwing.uoregon.edu > GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2 >

3 2