- Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
by Hannigan, Martin 21 Jun '05

21 Jun '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: vijay gill [mailto:vgill@vijaygill.com] > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 9:06 PM > To: Hannigan, Martin > Cc: Daniel Golding; nanog(a)merit.edu; nanog-support(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution > > > Hannigan, Martin wrote: > > > > > It shouldn't be complicated. I think "members" are looking > > for Operator experience. I don't think it's too hard to make that > > easily discernable as long as it's fair. > > Members aren't looking for Operator experience (sic). Members are > looking for talks that do not suck. > (sic) is a matter of interpretation, and, you already said the talks suck. The PC said they don't get enough talks. Some of the talks are going to be filler. -M<

3 2

LACNIC's new allocation from IANA
by Ricardo Patara 20 Jun '05

20 Jun '05

We apologize for duplicates. LACNIC received new IPv4 address blocks from IANA on last June 17th, and will start to make allocation from these new blocks in near future. The IP blocks allocated are the following: 189/8 and 190/8 We recommend the network administrators to revise and to adjust the filters they might have in place. For additional information about Internet Resources under LACNIC administration, please refers to: http://lacnic.net/en/registro Ricardo Patara LACNIC / RS Manager --

1 0

Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]
by Joe St Sauver 20 Jun '05

20 Jun '05

Of course, there's already one application-level messaging protocol that relies extensively on arranged peerings: Usenet. Usenet doesn't rely on a *full* N-way mesh of arranged peerings, it relies instead on a core of fairly well interconnected "backbone" or "core" news sites who've agreed to do feeds with each other, as well as to feed downstream "leaf nodes" (either on a for-fee commercial basis, or gratis as part of a regional consortia or whatever). To receive traffic or originate traffic, a leaf node doesn't need to peer with every other news server, it just needs to do feeds with a couple of upstream core sites to insure that it has reasonable coverage and redundancy. Spam isn't much of a problem on Usenet anymore because peers who tend to have spam issues tend to clean them up or get depeered or shunned... There's no reason why one couldn't build a comparable model for mail, with the SMTP speciality service provider offering "SMTP transit" to a base of trusted customers. This comparatively small number of SMTP speciality provider would then maintain good relations ("peerings") with the comparatively small number of major ISPs. Oh wait -- there are a variety of folks who are already specializing in doing that sort of thing -- it's just that most folks don't need to buy that sort of service (yet). Regards, Joe St Sauver (joe(a)uoregon.edu) University of Oregon Computing Center

4 3

Re: More long AS-sets announced
by Randy Bush 20 Jun '05

20 Jun '05

> June 15th: Lorenzo gives us 24 hours notice that he is going to be using > our (a very general our here, meaning all Internet operators) network for > performing his experiments on. (oh, and points out that hes been doing the > same with IPv6 since last year, just unannounced, but thats okay because > noone noticed) > > June 15th: Those that check their email frequently enough to spot this ask > Lorenzo for at least a week notice before doing this in future. > > June 20th: Lorenzo gives us same day notice that he will be using our > network as his plaything again. Anyone sufficiently behind Lorenzo in the > grand scheme of things (either they have better things to do than read > their email all day, or perhaps they're on the west coast USA) won't even > know about this until it is too late. If something strange happens I'm not > sure everyone will suddenly think better check to see if Lorenzo is > playing again. > > I see the use of the Internet for experiments like this to be somewhat > frivilous, and the notice periods given as warning even more so. I'm sure > Lorenzo would not appreciate if I were to give 20 minutes warning of some > clandestine experiment, such as announcing more specifics of his > institutions prefixes as particularly helpful! he is announcing his own bleedin' prefixes. get a life randy

2 1

Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]
by sthaug＠nethelp.no 20 Jun '05

20 Jun '05

> Here's a simple mechanism which has not yet been tried > seriously. Email server peering. This means that an SMTP > server operator only accepts incoming mail from operators > with whom they have a bilateral email peering agreement. This has been tried in the X.400 world. I wouldn't exactly say it worked well - and I, for one, have no desire to return to X.400 style email peering. > Bilateral agreements have been shown to scale quite well > whether you look at BGP peering or the world of business > contracts. In any case, the fundamental need here is that > for somebody to notify the email administrator that is > sending spam and for that administrator to act immediately > to cut the flow. The number of agreements needed in the email world is significantly higher than what is needed for BGP. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug(a)nethelp.no

19 31

books
by Steven Kalcevich 19 Jun '05

19 Jun '05

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6965449804 Almost all the cisco press books on sale one auction winner reads all. Best deal better then happy hour.

1 0

ARIN's new allocations from IANA
by Leslie Nobile 18 Jun '05

18 Jun '05

Hello- ARIN received the IPv4 address blocks 74.0.0.0 /8 and 75.0.0.0 /8 and 76.0.0.0 /8 from the IANA on June 17, 2005. In the near future, ARIN will begin making allocations from these new blocks. This will include allocations of /20 and shorter prefixes, according to ARIN's minimum allocation policy. You may wish to adjust any filters you have in place accordingly. For informational purposes, a list of ARIN's currently administered IP blocks can be found under "CIDR Blocks" at: http://www.arin.net/statistics/index.html Regards, Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)

1 0

RE: ISP's Contact List
by Daniel Senie 18 Jun '05

18 Jun '05

At 10:18 AM 6/13/2005, Sanfilippo, Ted wrote: >Suresh, > > Sorry I meant GEOBYTES --- http://www.geobytes.com/IpLocator.htm > When I enter my new /16 at this site it translates to Canada and > it shouldn't. ARIN reports the address properly on the ARIN lookup. I > have sent emails to the Geobytes website two weeks ago, they confirmed to > me they have the email, but have done nothing to date to fix the problem. > So my customers are getting a little upset because when they go to a > website they are directed to the .ca portion. Well, I just looked up addresses in a few of my blocks, and geobytes either had wrong info or no info. If you're the ISP, then your answer to your customers is "the web site you are going to is using an unreliable method to attempt to determine locality from IP address." Then point them at the web site's contact form and suggest they complain to the web site owner. As you've already noted, ARIN got the info correct. I suspect there are multiple vendors attempting to provide IP address to GPS address services. I doubt any of them will be 100% reliable, but clearly there is an interest in such services.

4 5

Telephone pedestals
by james edwards 18 Jun '05

18 Jun '05

I am looking for a seller of outdoor Telephone pedestals. I plan to install a DSLAM, post splitters and associated cross connect gear in this enclosure. Can anyone suggest a dealer for this sort of gear ? James H. Edwards Routing and Security Administrator At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa jamesh(a)cybermesa.com noc(a)cybermesa.com http://www.cybermesa.com/ContactCM (505) 795-7101

2 1

the mother of all credit card data thefts
by william(at)elan.net 18 Jun '05

18 Jun '05

Get ready for even more scripkiddies stolen cc signups for ISP and other services.... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:17:27 -0400 From: David Farber <dave(a)farber.net> To: Ip ip <ip(a)v2.listbox.com> Subject: [IP] the mother of all credit card data thefts? Begin forwarded message: From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb(a)cs.columbia.edu> Date: June 17, 2005 6:38:57 PM EDT To: dave(a)farber.net Subject: the mother of all credit card data thefts? MasterCard reported that over 40,000,000 credit card numbers, less than half of which are MasterCards, may have been stolen. CardSystems Solutions, which processes transactions for merchants and banks, was infected with a script that that targeted certain kinds of transactions. That is, this wasn't the usual carelessness, it was a targeted attack by a sophisticated adversary. The MasterCard statement is at http://www.mastercardinternational.com/cgi-bin/newsroom.cgi?id=1038 . --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as william(a)elan.net To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/

1 0