- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: Cisco, haven't we learned anything? (technician reset)
by Fergie 12 Jan '06

12 Jan '06

Very good points, BTW. And these are certainly factors which, I'm sure, other companies are also susceptible. :-) - ferg -- Hank Nussbacher <hank(a)efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: [re: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a00805e3…] [snip] Cisco acquired Protego in Dec 2004 and thereby acquired MARS: http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/12/20/HNciscoprotego_1.html Cisco didn't put it in there - they bought the bug for $65M. :-) [snip] I think Cisco just doesn't check the product closely enough and trusts the R&D coders and doesn't introduce an external security QA to the product being purchased. -Hank -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

1 0

Sticky Bogons
by Joe Loiacono 12 Jan '06

12 Jan '06

a little help ... ----- Forwarded by Joe Loiacono/CIV/CSC on 01/11/2006 10:51 AM ----- "Dong Yan" <dongyan @cnnic.cn> Sent by: apnic-talk-bounces 01/09/2006 10:17 PM To: <apnic-talk(a)apnic.net>, <apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net> cc: Chen Tao <chentao(a)cnnic.cn>, Xiangjian Li <lixiangjian(a)cnnic.cn> Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] APNIC new IPv4 addresses (121/8and122/7) The same issue from China. One of our member got a block /17 from 125/8, this block caused many web-accessing problems, which annoyed our member very much. This time, when they came back for subsequent IPv4 application, they pointed out clearly they do not want to get any block in 125/8 or even newer /8. Any doable suggestion and action from APNIC and all members in AP region will be helpfull. Dong Yan CNNIC > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Skeeve Stevens" <skeeve(a)skeeve.org> > To: <apnic-talk(a)apnic.net>; <apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net> > Cc: <apops(a)apops.net>; <sanog(a)sanog.org> > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 5:08 PM > Subject: RE: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] APNIC new IPv4 addresses (121/8and122/7) > > > > > > Just an opinion... But as someone who is currently experiencing the pain of > > using a /19 in 125/8 at present and have our customers suffering greatly, I > > think APNIC needs to do something better to be approaching the bogon list > > managers and perhaps giving notice of 6 months or some such that these > > ranges will be used so the pain will be a lot less. > > > > ..Skeeve > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: apnic-talk-bounces(a)lists.apnic.net > > [mailto:apnic-talk-bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of John Tran > > Sent: Monday, 9 January 2006 3:15 PM > > To: apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net > > Cc: apops(a)apops.net; sanog(a)sanog.org > > Subject: [apnic-talk] [Apnic-announce] APNIC new IPv4 addresses (121/8 > > and122/7) > > > > > > Dear colleagues > > > > APNIC received IPv4 address blocks 121/8 and 122/7 from IANA in January > > 2006 and will be making allocations from these ranges in the near future. > > > > This announcement is being made for the information of the Internet > > community so that network configurations such as routing filters may be > > updated as appropriate. > > > > For more information on the resources administered by APNIC, see: > > > > http://www.apnic.net/db/ranges.html > > > > For information on the minimum allocation sizes within address ranges > > administered by APNIC, see: > > > > http://www.apnic.net/db/min-alloc.html > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > Son > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > Resources Services Manager <Son(a)apnic.net> > > Asia Pacific Network Information Centre phone: +61 7 3858 3100 > > http://www.apnic.net fax: +61 7 3858 3199 > > Helpdesk phone: +61 7 3858 3188 > > email: helpdesk(a)apnic.net > > Please send Internet Resource Requests to <hostmaster(a)apnic.net> > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Apnic-announce mailing list > > Apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-announce > > _______________________________________________ > > apnic-talk mailing list > > apnic-talk(a)lists.apnic.net > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk > > > > ======================================================================== > > iBurst Wireless Broadband from $34.95/month www.platformnetworks.net > > Forward undetected SPAM to: spam(a)mailsecurity.net.au > > ======================================================================== > > > > _______________________________________________ > > apnic-talk mailing list > > apnic-talk(a)lists.apnic.net > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list apnic-talk(a)lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk

4 3

Broadwing IRR maintainer contact.
by Stephen Fulton 12 Jan '06

12 Jan '06

If someone from Broadwing reponsible for maintaining routing registry entries, or who could direct me to the correct person, would contact me off-list, I'd appreciate. I need Broadwing to remove stale RR information for our prefixes, and I have not received any responses to queries sent to dnscc(a)broadwing.com. Thanks, -- Stephen.

1 0

workhorse of the future...
by bmanning＠vacation.karoshi.com 12 Jan '06

12 Jan '06

first it was the vitalinks, then the bridge gear, then proteon, then cisco AGS, then 7600VXR, then 7301s.... looking to find the next-gen workhorse ... looking for 4-6yr life expectancy. pointers(private are ok) are appreciated - as well as -why- you think the suggested boxen are likely candidates. --bill

6 6

Re: workhorse of the future...
by Scott Weeks 11 Jan '06

11 Jan '06

Slightly associated with the workhorse of the future thread... Is anyone out there rolling out the triple play thingie using alcatel? In particular the 7750, 7450, 7670 and 7300 products. If so, please let me know what to be afraid of --uh-- I mean look forward to... ;-) Off list is fine if this isn't what others want to hear. Thanks, scott

1 0

SprintPCS Contact
by Dennis Dayman 11 Jan '06

11 Jan '06

Can somesone from SprintPCS contact me offline? -Dennis

1 0

Reporting botnets?
by Konstantin Barinov 11 Jan '06

11 Jan '06

Hello colleagues, Please advise, where to can I report botnet control activities? I'm from overseas and interested if there are some law enforcement organizations in US who may handle these issues? I assume it is illegal business in US, and I have enough evidence how botnet control sites command our trojaned customer PC's to send spam and activate DDoS attacks. Thank you! -- Konstantin Barinov, Senior Network Engineer INFONET AS, http://infonet.ee, sbr(a)infonet.ee

3 2

Virus: Remarks about Virus Volume reduction since mid-decemeber 2006
by Alain Hebert 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

Hi, We had a constant volume of virus trapped by clamav, mcafee, etc. of about 2% of all mail traffics coming from outside our network. Since mid-december the volume is now under 0.2% while the mail traffic stay in line with the tendencies of the previous year. I'm not looking for opertional instructions about clamav, broken config, etc. But if anybody else noticed a volume reduction also? And I'm curious to find out which network finally got fixed... Thanks and have a good year. -- Alain Hebert ahebert(a)pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7 tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net fax 514-990-9443

1 0

routeviews outage
by David Meyer 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

Folks, We've had a UPS failure in the colo space where much of the routeviews gear is housed. We're working on bringing it all back up, but I suspect its going to be a few minutes (like 30-45). Thanks, and sorry for any inconvenience. Dave

1 0

Re: SAVVIS and Global Crossing Loss on West Coast
by Guy Tal 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Flint Barber wrote: > Has anyone seen heard about network loss on the west coast for SAVVIS > and Global Crossing?? > -Flint uhh.. no

1 0