- Test - lists.nanog.org

DS3/OC3 to FE bridge?
by matthew zeier 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

I'm looking for something that can take a DS3 or OC3 and "turn" it into FE. Basically similiar to what http://www.ds3switch.com/ does.

3 2

RE: DS3/OC3 to FE bridge?
by Joiner, Joshua 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

Overture Networks makes a similar product that may work better for you: http://www.overturenetworks.com Josh -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of William Yardley Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 8:10 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: DS3/OC3 to FE bridge? On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:47:32PM -0800, matthew zeier wrote: > I'm looking for something that can take a DS3 or OC3 and "turn" it > into FE. Basically similiar to what http://www.ds3switch.com/ does. Anda makes some boxes that do this. http://www.andanetworks.com/products/ I've had experiences with these (as a user, not an operator), and they seem to work fine. /w

1 0

AT&T transit - thoughts?
by matthew zeier 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

Anyone using AT&T for transit with any useful comments?

2 1

May-June meeting?
by Howard C. Berkowitz 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

I've just gotten with a new firm that should let me play at NANOG again. While I probably can't meet the March proposal deadline, will there be lightning presentations again? Two areas of interest for lightning or BOF: Operational aspects of PBX hosting and general movement of ISPs into telephony More on emergency communications, especially software that complements the 911 operations system, where there are little-known North American standard software packages (DM-Services)

1 0

Wiltel has gone pink.
by Jo Rhett 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

This morning we have started receive an abundance of spam from Wiltel customers, pointing boldly back to websites hosted in Wiltel space. OrgAbuseHandle: WAC18-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Wiltel Abuse Contact OrgAbusePhone: +1-918-547-2000 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse(a)wiltel.com Messages to abuse(a)wiltel.com are being rejected. This phone number goes to their "conferencing group", which doesn't know what 'abuse' is, or even what an IP network is. I went through 4 levels of management, and was informed that they no longer had an abuse team -- that this was disbanded in a recent reorganization. In short, it would appear that Wiltel is now selling pink contracts. -- Jo Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation

11 14

RE: AT&T transit - thoughts?
by Chris Ranch 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

Umm, which backbone, AT&T (legacy), SBCIS or PBNI? I'm so confused. Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On > Behalf Of matthew zeier > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:13 PM > To: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: AT&T transit - thoughts? > > > > Anyone using AT&T for transit with any useful comments? >

1 0

DNS TTL adherence
by Thurman, Steven 15 Mar '06

15 Mar '06

Does anyone know if there is a research paper or statistics related to what percentage of DNS servers do not adhere to advertised TTL's? I am looking for some verifiable research on this topic if it is available. Thanks, Steve

7 7

Load sharing traffic over 3 circuits - 1 eBGP session
by Jeff Neuffer Jr 14 Mar '06

14 Mar '06

Hello, I need clarification; appreciate any comments on list or off list. Here is the backdrop, * Our router is a Juniper and our IP transit provider's router is a Cisco. * 1 ebgp session between us. * Between us we have the following circuits, 2 DS3's 1 OC3 (burstable) * Static routing is used with loopback addresses I've setup and used bgp multi-hop for load sharing traffic across multiple links before and I am quite comfortable with it. Here is what I'm being told and what I'm seeking clarification on. I'm told that my router can divert/stop sending traffic over the two slower links when they become saturated (reach capacity), and the remaining circuit (higher bandwidth) can continue to pass existing traffic flows and take on additional traffic flows. Can someone clarify if that is possible? Thanks, Jeff

1 0

dnsstealer.com
by Randy Bush 14 Mar '06

14 Mar '06

i think someone needs to nuke this domain randy From: "Shopping" <Shopping(a)dnsstealer.com> To: randy(a)rg.net Subject: Confirmation: JC Penney Card Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:23:05 -0600 Dear randy(a)rg.net, We are attempting to contact you about the $250 JCPenney(R) Card and request you to complete your email address below: http://pny.dnsstealer.com/clk/53708886.15.251.101 Thank you for taking your time and on this offer. My best, List Manager If you no longer wish to receive Exclusive Gift Cards emails, visit the Exclusive Gift Cards site or visit the url: http://pny.dnsstealer.com/clk/53708886.15.251.102 Or, print a copy of this email and send it along with your request to: Exclusive Gift Cards, 13900 Jog Road, Suite 203-251, Delray Beach, FL 33446. http://pny.dnsstealer.com/uns/53708886.15.251 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #1688 Las Vegas, NV 89107 -1020468834

7 9

RE: Security problem in PPPoE connection
by James R. Cutler 13 Mar '06

13 Mar '06

At 3/13/2006 11:16 AM -0800, Bora Akyol wrote: "Any info on percentages of users that use routers vs Windows boxes? " Almost 100% of Careful Windows Users use routers. Almost 100% of Potential Victims connect directly. Now, you really meant to ask, what is the ratio of Victims to Careful. Too big, whatever it is. - James R. Cutler james.cutler(a)consultant.com

3 2