- Test - lists.nanog.org

Qwest issues in western US
by Janet Sullivan 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

Anyone seeing Qwest issues in the Western US?

2 1

Re: Qwest issues in western US
by John Neiberger 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

>>> Janet Sullivan <ciscogeek(a)bgp4.net> 4/4/06 9:09:24 AM >>> > >Anyone seeing Qwest issues in the Western US? What sort of issues are you seeing? I've got a site in CA that's using Qwest's iQ VPN and it's been intermittently unreachable all morning. During the short periods I can actually access the router, I'm not seeing any errors or layer three problems from the site's perspective (BGP peer isn't flapping, for example.) I'm just about to open a ticket. We'll see what they say. John --

2 1

ATT/Qwest difficulties anyone?
by PC 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

Is anyone having any difficulties with connectivity between ATT ENS and Qwest?

1 0

Netsol, other brokeness?
by Jason Slagle 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

Anyone have any insight? I'm seeing Netsol brokeness, plus apparent issues between At&t and Qwest in at least one point. Surprised the list isn't more active. Jason -- Jason Slagle /"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign . X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . / \ - NO Word docs in e-mail .

1 0

Re: Network Solutions outage?
by Fergie 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

I _did_ happen to notice that sub-delegation WHOIS lookups via completewhois.com and geektools.com both indicate problems at Network Solutuions this morning.... - ferg -- Vinny Abello <vinny(a)tellurian.com> wrote: Did anyone else notice the withdrawal of 205.178.184.0/21? I couldn't reach Network Solutions or any worldnic.com DNS servers for at least 10 minutes from our network or any route server I tried on the Internet. All were on this /21 which was no longer being announced from any perspective I saw. [snip] -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

1 0

Savvis issues in Weehawken?
by Jeff Busch 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the email and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this email or attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any person.

1 0

Re: OT: Xen
by Eric Frazier 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

At 12:01 PM 4/3/2006, Michael.Dillon(a)btradianz.com wrote: > > Xen's bigges strength really is in the colocation business. With >VX-enabled > > machines, it is capable of running instrumented OS's (Linux, >Free/NetBSD) at > > almost native speeds, and non-instrumented OS's (Windows, Solaris) with >a > > couple-% hit. It's that flexibility that leads to colo as the market >where > > Xen shines. > >People seem to be thinking that Xen is only for sharing >a colo machine with somebody else. But it could just as >well be used for one organization to isolate each major >application to a single virtual server, i.e. email server, >general web server, wiki server, hot web app server, >Asterisk server, etc. This way, when one of the applications >justifies its own server, migration is somewhat simpler >because it is not entangled with other applications. Now that is what I have in mind. For me this is esp important where I have something nasty like a guy hosting a bunch of forums that are always not getting updated and getting defaced or worse. Until now I have had a dirty machine for stuff I know could lead to problems like that. But that brings up another question, how far isolated are different instances from each other really? >-- Michael Dillon

7 6

(Corrected) Call for Presentations - NANOG 37 - June 4-7, 2006
by Steve Feldman 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its 37th meeting June 4-7, 2006, in a location TBA. The meeting will be hosted by UltraDNS. NANOG conferences provide a forum for information exchange among network operators, engineers, and researchers. Meetings are held three times each year, and include panels, presentations, tutorial sessions, and BOFs. NANOG solicits presentations highlighting issues relating to technology already deployed or soon to be deployed in the Internet. The NANOG community is invited to attend and participate in this forum, which offers numerous opportunities to share ideas, explore research and development, and interact with leaders in this important field of network operations. Vendors are encouraged to work with operators to present deployment experiences with the vendor's products and interoperability. General Session =============== The community is invited to develop panel sessions or present talks on topics relevant to the NANOG community, including: Network Operations Present-day operational case studies Everyday life in the NOC and tools of interest Exchange point technologies and implementation Peering/colocation coordination issues Content provider issues Security attacks/mitigation, tools, and analysis State of OAM tools for IP and MPLS networks Disaster recovery and planning Deployment Experience Mergers and their impact on interconnected networks Alternative and emerging last-mile technologies (metro/rural, broadband, radio, optical, etc.) VoIP deployment, architecture, peering, and interconnect Anycast IPTV Large-scale wireless Fiber and wavelength use by enterprises Research, Policy, and New Technology Approaches to securing the global routing system (e.g., s*BGP and/or other tools) Routing system scalability Capacity planning standards and tools Inter-provider MPLS/QoS/PCE RIR policy (e.g., implications of HD ratio) Active standards organizations and areas of interest IPv6: economics, deployments, and adoption rates Approaches to IPv6 scalability, e.g., Shim6 Panels ====== Panel selection will be based on the importance, originality, focus and timeliness of the topic; expertise of proposed panelists; as well as the potential for informative and controversial discussion. The panel leader should provide an abstract describing the panel theme, list of panelists, and an outline of how the panel will be organized. After acceptance, the panel leader will be given the option to invite panel authors to submit their presentations to the NANOG Program Committee for review. Until then authors should not submit their individual presentations for the panel. Lightning Talks =============== Topics for short (10-20 minute) lightning talks will be solicited on-site at the meeting. "Technologies to Watch" topics will be appropriate for this session. Lightning talks were a hit in Dallas so collect your thoughts early! Research Forum ============== Researchers are invited to present short (10-minute) summaries of their work for operator feedback. Topics include routing, network performance, statistical measurement and analysis, and protocol development and implementation. Studies presented may be works in progress. Researchers from academia, government, and industry are encouraged to present. Tutorials ========= Proposals are also invited for tutorial sessions from the introductory through advanced level on all related topics, including: Disaster Recovery Planning Troubleshooting BGP Best Practices for Determining Traffic Matrices Options for Blackhole and Discard Routing BGP/MPLS Layer 3 VPNs How to Present ============== Submit an abstract and draft slides for the presentation in email to nanog-support(a)nanog.org. See this web page for submission guidelines. Your submission should include: Author's name(s) Preferred contact email address Submission category (General Session, Panel, Tutorial, Research Forum) Presentation title Abstract Slides (attachment or URL), in PDF (preferred) or Powerpoint format We are also developing an online submission system, and hope to have it available shortly. Check the NANOG main page for updates. The deadline for proposals is April 17, 2006. While the majority of speaking slots will be filled by April 17, a limited number of slots may be available after that date for topics that are exceptionally timely, important, or critical to the operations of the Internet. Submissions will be reviewed by the NANOG Program Committee, and presenters will be notified of acceptance by May 8. Final drafts of presentation slides are due by May 24, and final versions May 31.

1 0

OT: Xen
by David Lesher 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

Panix is offering Xen-based virtual servers. I mention same here only because I've seen almost no discussion of virtualized servers, and hope to learn from the surely-resulting flameware.... http://www.panix.com/corp/virtuals/ -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz(a)nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

10 13

RE: Hi United! -> Chase.US Was:Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00)
by Pawloski, Kevin 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

I'll see to it that this domain is shutdown from our service. Kevin Pawloski | Security Engineer - United Online | kpawloski at corp.untd.com | VoIP - kevin at netzero.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Martin Hannigan Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 1:12 PM To: NANGO Subject: Hi United! -> Chase.US Was:Re: abuse.clue @ Sprint? (phish in barrel, pictures @ 11:00) At 02:17 PM 4/3/2006, neal rauhauser wrote: > Got this forwarded to me by an associate - seems he tried the > usual channels and is having no luck. I suppose there are > professional phishermen out there but it sure would be nice to cut > to the Chase on this one. Heh ... get it ... Chase? > > >--- phish report > > >We got a bunch of e-mails this morning, purporting to be from >Chase.com; when you click the link in the message, though, you go to >the following site; > >hhhttp://cpe-24-221-82-147.mi.sprintbbd.net:81/colappmgr/colportal/pros pect.php?_n >fpb=change_form > Hey United guys: chase.us? The registrar is appears absent again. Maybe you slam dunk it? This Chase phish is really getting out of hand. I'm getting them daily from 2 to 5 times in the last week. They are being very resilient on the page source. They're everywhere. Phish source: http://www.fugawi.net/~hannigan/chasephish.txt Spam: http://www.fugawi.net/~hannigan/chasespam.txt NS: Non-authoritative answer: chase.us nameserver = authns.lax.mysite.com. chase.us nameserver = authns.nyc.mysite.com. chase.us nameserver = authns.iad.mysite.com. Authoritative answers can be found from: authns.iad.mysite.com internet address = 64.136.35.146 authns.lax.mysite.com internet address = 64.136.28.28 authns.nyc.mysite.com internet address = 64.136.20.28 -M< -- Martin Hannigan (c) 617-388-2663 Renesys Corporation (w) 617-395-8574 Member of Technical Staff Network Operations hannigan(a)renesys.com

1 0