- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: Regarding NDU.EDU
by Fergie 03 Jan '07

03 Jan '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sure. That's what it is: "architectural changes". I heard the Naval War College was doing that, too. :-) http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/12/mystery_hacker_.html - - ferg - -- "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow(a)verizonbusiness.com> wrote: On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > > They took their systems offline a few weeks ago: > > http://www.fcw.com/article97160-12-19-06-Web > Right -- something's definitely going on on that part of the world. > See http://fcw.com/article97178-12-22-06-Web which talks about how DoD > is banning HTML email (what a wonderful thought in any event!) and > Outlook Web Access. Why? The threat level has been raised from > Information Condition 5 to Information Condition 4 -- but they won't > say why.... why terrorists of course... :) in all seriousness, perhaps they are doing some architectural changes to better secure their perimeter in light of (as the hawaii.edu gentleman pointed out) the internet becoming more and more critical to the common person? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.2 (Build 4075) wj8DBQFFmvd8q1pz9mNUZTMRAtmdAJ9Ywah+H+vITdYSI5nMtvia1deOaQCggnxn m7+UFpHQwDFr2a/fa6+iYfU= =i5RY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

1 0

Re: Regarding NDU.EDU
by Fergie 03 Jan '07

03 Jan '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 They took their systems offline a few weeks ago: http://www.fcw.com/article97160-12-19-06-Web Cheers, - - ferg - -- Robert Mathews <mathews(a)hawaii.edu> wrote: Ladies & Gentlemen: I thought to post here - that NDU.EDU' (National Defense University') MX record and A record seems to be missing. This has been going on for nearly TWO weeks (since before Christmas 2006)! One can reach their WEB servers.. but, all mail to NDU is presently bouncing. Technical and Admin Contacts have been unreachable over the same duration of time. Does anyone have any idea (more than just an extemporaneous ref.) as to why this is happening? Appreciate having some insight. If you wish to reply privately, I welcome it. All my best, Robert. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.2 (Build 4075) wj8DBQFFmtMlq1pz9mNUZTMRAnH0AJ9APYWTyOsOzFhpYstkZNuIwFFqVQCg6N78 6t/Zam6sI6Vek38YoM45K4o= =p3D6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

3 2

Re: Regarding NDU.EDU
by Robert Mathews 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote: > REINISHJ(a)jfsc.ndu.edu > > Trying 24.248.20.30... > Connected to ip-24-248-20-30.jfsc.ndu.edu (24.248.20.30). > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 mx1.jfsc.ndu.edu ESMTP (11497e0f29573a89e48fcb5a6c1ccaca) > helo me > 250 mx1.jfsc.ndu.edu > > [ .... ] > > tried that? Dear Chris: It appears that Fergie had the answer... However, I wish to thank you, and the others for the response. I appreciate having it. Yes, it does seem like a PART of NDU, the Joint Forces Staff College is accepting E.mail but, other parts are not. Some of us who have been on travel were NOT advised of the Net Disconnection. Calls to NDU have gone unanswered -- even at levels above Network admins. While I 'have been in touch' with those that I needed to establish contact - via other means, this disconnection has been more than just plain inconvenience to many. Thank you, for all your responses. I appreciate having them. Kind regards, Robert. --

1 0

Regarding NDU.EDU
by Robert Mathews 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

Ladies & Gentlemen: I thought to post here - that NDU.EDU' (National Defense University') MX record and A record seems to be missing. This has been going on for nearly TWO weeks (since before Christmas 2006)! One can reach their WEB servers.. but, all mail to NDU is presently bouncing. Technical and Admin Contacts have been unreachable over the same duration of time. Does anyone have any idea (more than just an extemporaneous ref.) as to why this is happening? Appreciate having some insight. If you wish to reply privately, I welcome it. All my best, Robert. --

2 1

RE: would you run this little script, please
by Randy Bush 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 > I would be glad to run the script but I just want to verify that it was you > who sent it. darned good point, ron. <blush> yes, it was i. randy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iQCVAwUBRZqTePvCP42xMxQ5AQo1fgP9EkgUcKnjNXfpU3hgVAG0oVwVyxZZtmXq xdpUv0oDDeTBeu8QrbgU6UHRY4hWHqHVj30tUq9BQP8+knyYLImPj6ZBoVhtnEta uuTo9wUyfZovhpWJtsTNflMHaE1QlhCyLUESAJVHiEQeT0LeY7urA7N9GVWRsH/f GZii7iIpna0= =0bdG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 4

Re: Security of National Infrastructure
by Scott Weeks 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

--- shadow(a)geek-guy.com wrote: Why is it that every company out there allows connections through their firewalls to their web and mail infrastructure from countries that they don't even do business in. Shouldn't it be our default to only allow US based IP addresses and then allow others as needed? The only case I can think of would be traveling folks that need to VPN or something, which could be permitted in the Firewall, but WHY WIDE OPEN ACCESS? We still seem to be in the wild west, but no-one has the b@lls to be braven and block the unnecessary access. ------------------------------------------------------------- Please don't feed the troll... scott

2 1

Re: DNS - connection limit (without any extra hardware)
by Scott Weeks 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

--- jrhett(a)svcolo.com wrote: On Dec 8, 2006, at 10:36 AM, Scott Weeks wrote: > Lawful in which country? What is this group's name? Oh yeah. So that means you have one of two choices ;-) ---------------------------------------------------- I was speaking about 'the internet' and not just the NA part of it. It's my goal to keep pointing out that 'the internet' isn't only the US and, therefore, a particular government's rules (whatever government that may be) don't apply. Unless, of course, every country gets their own 'Great Firewall of China'. Also, NANOG is the closest thing I can find to a GNOG (Global). scott

2 1

would you run this little script, please
by Randy Bush 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

if you have a bsd, linux , or probably cygwin machine, would you please run the attached script once as a favor to a research project? it simply does a traceroute to a eight targets in four locations around the net to see if they are reachable from your site, and, if not, where the route dies. this is a small part of a larger experiment, so try not to jump to too many conclusions :). if things are as we suspect, we'll try to present the analysis in toronto. thank you! randy

4 4

2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
by Iljitsch van Beijnum 01 Jan '07

01 Jan '07

2006 was another busy year for the five Regional Internet Registries: together, they gave out 161.48 million IPv4 addresses, just shy of the 165.45 million given out in 2005 as measured on january first 2006. The current (jan 1st, 2007) figure for 2005 is 175.52 million addresses. Together with adjustments for earlier years, this brings the total addresses available to almost exactly 1.3 billion, down from 1468.61 million a year ago. This is out of 3706.65 million usable IPv4 addresses, so 2407.11 million addresses are currently given out to either end-users or Internet Service Providers. Breakdown by Regional Internet Registry over the past few years as seen on 2007-01-01: 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 AfriNIC 0.56 0.39 0.26 0.22 0.51 1.03 2.72 APNIC 20.94 28.83 27.03 33.05 42.89 53.86 51.78 ARIN 30.83 28.55 21.08 22.32 34.26 47.57 38.94 LACNIC 0.88 1.61 0.65 2.62 3.77 10.97 11.50 RIPE NCC 24.79 25.36 19.84 29.61 47.49 62.09 56.53 Total 78.00 84.73 68.87 87.82 128.92 175.52 161.48 Compare this to the totals as seen on 2006-01-01: Total 78.35 88.95 68.93 87.77 128.45 165.45 (See last year's report for more details at http://www.bgpexpert.com/ addrspace2005.php ) The main reason for the discrepancy is that the RIRs publish on their respective FTP servers lists of which address block was given out when. When a block of address space is given back by the holder, it's removed from the list. This is the reason why the numbers for earlier years keep going down. The 10 million extra addresses in 2005 and 4 million in 2001 are the responsibility of ARIN, which went from 36.30 million addresses for 2005 in their 2006-01-01 records to 47.56 in their 2007-01-01 records. The reason for the retroactive growth is unknown. AfriNIC gives out address space in Africa, APNIC in the Asia-Pacific region, ARIN in North America, LACNIC in Latin American and the Caribbean and the RIPE NCC in Europe, the former Soviet Union and the Middle East. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA, part of ICANN) keeps an overview of the IPv4 address space at http://www.iana.org/ assignments/ipv4-address-space. The list consists of 256 blocks of 16.78 million addresses. Breakdown: Delegated to Blocks +/- 2006 Addresses (millions) AfriNIC 1 16.78 APNIC 19 +3 318.77 ARIN 27 +4 452.98 LACNIC 4 67.11 RIPE NCC 22 +3 369.10 Various 50 838.86 End-user 43 721.42 Available 55 -10 922.74 Of the 2063.60 million addresses delegated to the five Regional Internet Registries, 1685.69 million have been delegated to end-users or ISPs by the RIRs, and 377.91 million are still available, which is almost identical to last year's 378.09 number. Along with the 922.74 million addresses still available in the IANA global pool this makes the total number of available addresses 1300.65 million, down 167.96 million from a year earlier. The size of address blocks given has been increasing steadily. The table below shows the number of requests for a certain range of block sizes (equal or higher than the first, lower than the second value). (2005 and earlier values from 2006-01-01 data, 2006 values from 2007-01-01 data.) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 < 1000 326 474 547 745 1022 1309 1526 1000 - 8000 652 1176 897 1009 1516 1891 2338 8000 - 64k 1440 868 822 1014 1100 1039 1133 64k - 500k 354 262 163 215 404 309 409 500k - 2M 19 39 29 46 61 60 56 > 2M 3 5 5 6 7 18 13 The number of blocks in the two smallest categories have increased rapidly, but not as fast as the number of blocks in the largest category, in relative numbers at least. However, the increase in large blocks has a very dramatic effect while the small blocks are insignificant, when looking at the millions of addresses involved: 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 < 1000 0.10 0.16 0.18 0.25 0.35 0.44 0.52 1000 - 8000 2.42 4.47 3.23 3.45 4.49 5.07 6.10 8000 - 64k 18.79 12.81 11.35 14.00 15.99 15.46 17.17 64k - 500k 35.98 32.19 20.28 25.51 42.01 34.23 49.64 500k - 2M 12.68 24.64 21.30 31.98 44.63 41.63 46.64 > 2M 8.39 14.68 12.58 12.58 20.97 68.62 41.42 The increase in the 2M+ blocks was solely responsible for the high number of addresses given out in 2005. In 2006, there was growth in all categories except the 2M+ one (even the 500k - 2M category increased in number of addresses if not in number of blocks). When the 2M+ blocks are taken out of the equation, 2005 had a total of 96.83 million addresses (2006-01-01) and 2006 119.06 million given out. Another way to look at the same data: Year Blocks Addresses (M) Average block size 2000 2794 78.35 28043 2001 2824 88.95 31497 2002 2463 68.93 27985 2003 3035 87.77 28921 2004 4110 128.45 31252 2005 4626 165.45 35765 2006 5475 161.48 29494 The 2407.11 million addresses currently in use aren't very evenly distributed over the countries in the world. The current top 15 is: Country Addresses 2007-01-01 Addr 2006-01-01 US 1366.53 M 1324.93 M United States JP 151.27 M 143.00 M Japan EU 115.83 M 113.87 M Multi-country in Europe CN 98.02 M 74.39 M China GB 93.91 M 73.81 M United Kingdom CA 71.32 M 67.43 M Canada DE 61.59 M 51.13 M Germany FR 58.23 M 45.16 M France KR 51.13 M 41.91 M Korea AU 30.64 M 26.87 M Australia BR 19.27 M 17.17 M Brazil IT 19.14 M 18.39 M Italy ES 18.69 M 16.29 M Spain TW 18.16 M 16.28 M Taiwan NL 18.08 M 16.40 M Netherlands The US holds 57% (down from 60% a year ago) of the IPv4 address space in use. The other countries in the list together hold another 34% (up from 32%). The rest of the world has 9% (up from 8%). A copy of this information and a tool to perform queries on up to date data is available at http://www.bgpexpert.com/addrspace2006.php

1 0

bellsouth noc contact
by Zak Thompson 31 Dec '06

31 Dec '06

Hello, can someone from Bellsouths Noc or Abuse contact me off list? Cheers, Zak Thompson

1 0