- Test - lists.nanog.org

Interpersonal skills needed for Network Engineers
by Kim Onnel 18 Feb '08

18 Feb '08

Hello Everyone, I am looking for defining what are skills needed in people that will work in an ISP's operational/NOC environment as Network Engineers. In my humble experience, i have came across people that i just feel they are not right for such technical jobs, people would act and take their golden fingers to the devices without logic and others who has more of a structured approach to solving problems and thinking, some that will crank under pressure and just loose it and others who will act rationally. Please correct me if i am wrong and if you believe such skills could be gained by time/training? Maybe the above doesnt really need to be there for others in the development/engineering departments where more of studying and analysis skills are required, please correct me if i am wrong. Private msg me if needed. Thanks, Kim

7 9

2008.02.17 NANOG Community Meeting Notes
by Matthew Petach 18 Feb '08

18 Feb '08

For those unable to attend the meeting today, I took some notes during the open NANOG Community meeting this evening. Slides went past very quickly, so apologies for the gaps in some of the slide contents, or for typos that crept in due to the speed with which things progressed. Now off to the evening reception. :) Matt 2008.02.17 NANOG 42 Community meeting notes Room gets fairly packed fairly quickly. Call to order is made at 1738 hours Pacific Time Philip Smith is steering committee chair, and have been since end of October to October of this year. Agenda Steering comittee report philip programme committee report todd mail list comittee report alex merit report Jason (for alex rosens...() who is sick) open discussion There are open microphones, so if you have questions, feel free to use them for questions; state your name, as the session is being recorded, and speak into the mike so we don't have to repeat questions. Steering comittee Betty Burke (for merit) Randy Bush Steve Feldman (elected in oct) Jared Mauch (elected in oct) Chris Morrow ( Alex Pilosov Joe Provo Philip Smith Todd Underwood (ex-officio, PC) Farewell and thank you to Bill Norton and Joe Abley All recognizable via blue badges, hopefully, for the steering comittee (well, except ex-officios) Highlights since NANOG41 Charter ammendments approved and implemented nanog.org/charter.html 2007-01: addition of MLC chair as ex-officio member of the steering committee 2007-02: editorial consistency in MLC nomenclature 2007-03: removal of text specifying various internal processes to be followed within the PC, in the interests of avoiding micromanagement Now MLC really is MLC, a comittee, not just a manager. Selection of PC members Chris Morrow serves as ex-officio on PC MLC brought up to 6 members MLC Chair now serves as ex-officio on SC NANOG infrastructure migration all but main list and website to do dedicated server for NANOG, futures mailing list is on new system already; main list ready for migration now. Preparations for NANOG42 Preparations for future NANOGs 18 month planning horizon is a goal SC holds fortnightly telephone conference calls Minutes published: http://www.nanog.org/sc.minutes07.html http://www.nanog.org/sc.minutes08.html There's not much feedback, so please read and feedback. mailing lists: nanog(a)nanog.org engineering/ops discussions nanog-futures(a)nanog.org discussion about NANOG list itself steering(a)nanog.org how to contact the steering committee nanogpc(a)nanogpc.org contact the PC committe nanog-admin(a)nanog.org contact the mailing list admins Wow. That's pretty confusing. 268 on the nanog-futures list, vs several thousand on the main list. >From Philip over to Todd now. No slides from here. Best attended NANOG since the bust, 558 attendees so far. Will try to figure out why people are showing up again. The PC members are under general info/program committee on the website, bios are up there if you want to know more; includes academics, small companies, big companies, we try to get a cross section of the community. how does it work? People submit talks, but not early enoug, they talk about them, they put minutes up for review, they talk more about the talks, and they reject those they don't have time for or are blatant sales talks. The submissions are getting better again. Would LOVE to see more talks from actual operators about actual incidents, migrations, attacks, etc. that will really help the other operators. It doesn't matter if they're not as polished; even if you're not sure if it'll be a great talk, come talk to the PC members (yellow badges), they'll help mentor you through the process. Talk submissions closed, and as soon as they closed, 8 or 10 really good talks came in--you REALLY need to start submitting them as soon as the previous NANOG closes! Joel Jaegli from program comittee comments that even if you just have an idea for a talk, even if you don't think you can do it, it can be used as a straw man for development. If you think you're lazy and irresponsible, you can work with the PC to get the talk developed. Ted notes that if you have a good idea for the PC, submit your idea, don't wait. He really wants to see people submit sooner rather than later. The volume of garbage is amazing. He would prefer to rate good stuff rather than garbage. Thank you, for corollary B from Ted Seely; if you don't submit crap for review, don't complain about the shit you have to sit through. :) Todd notes you can bounce ideas off the PC members today, and can help couple people up to do joint talks. They are publishing minutes of the meetings, but there's little evidence people actually read them. OK, some people do read them. So they'll continue to put them up. Lightening talks are open; you just need an abstract and a few points for getting a slot. Submit them and for PC members, vote on the current submissions! V6 only hour, you saw publicity, etc; you won't have normal v4 connectivity; either get your v6 working, or listen to the talk. Questions about process, talks, etc? Blue is steering, yellow is program, Mailing List Committee report MLC: David Barak, Martin Hannigan, Tim Yocum, Sue Joiner, Alex Pilosov, Brett Watson MLC History and People Historical overview susan Harris until 05 currently committe 4+ members appointed by SC plus 1 appointed by Merit Currently: david Barak, Tim Yocum, Brett wAtson, Sue Joiner (merit), Alex Pilosov (chair) Authority: NANOG charter 7.1.2 What does MLC do MLC purpose AUP enforcement cannot change AUP make the ML more useful: The list should reflect the activities of the conference. If you can't point to the list as a justification to attend the conference, we're losing. Goal is to make list operationally useful, and as a reason for people to attend the conference. Not a list police--we expect posters to self moderate. Goal is for people to be adult about what they post. NANOG-L statistics number of subscribers vs 6 months ago nanog-list 8568 vs 8284 nanog-diest 1381 vs 1386 nanog-announce 745 vs 708 nanog-futures 289 vs 268 Current AUP One addition about autoresponders being prohibited. No longer requirement for posting under your real name, no way to verify that. You can read the text online. AUP statistic Between nanog41 and now warnings 6 bans 0 persons with 2 cumulative warnings: 2 one more warning, may be kicked. AUP enforcement policy /nanog-archive/nanog-futures/msg02297.html summary: warning: Any mlc member can warn, MLC votes on appeals from warnings bans: MLC vots to after 3+ warnings. SC hear appeals from both MLC future--AUP signal-to-noise ratio low--what can we do to improve? guiding the conversation without stifling the conversation AUP enforcement tools (warning/ban) not effective in increasing SNR Being clueless is not currently against AUP Hopefully if enough people on the list tell you to shut up, you're an idiot, you'll get the clue, but some people don't seem to be getting it. MLC future -- new initiatives Thread summaries -- time intensive thread statistics poster statistics hoping to get idiots to maybe post *less* web gateway (blog) for threads that do not belong on-list (push vs pull) People should be subscribed to futures so you can be aware of what's going on. List migrations Moving from majordomo to mailman all lists migrated except main list mostly user-invisible web subscribe/unsubscribe digest as option changed mail headers (if procmailing) when? soon! There will be a way to handle unsubscribes via email as well, but not sure how that will be handled yet. MLC is you! This is your mailing list This is your community MLC is NOT the list police--we really do expect the community to self-moderate. Alex does NOT really want to be the Putin of NANOG. MLC transparency (TBD) Automated filters will be posted clearly and accurately on the website Automated monthly statistics will be posted on website Public minutes of monthly meetings posted in a timely fashion on website SOON! (pending migration to mailman) Questions? Peter Harrison, shopping.com, many features could be addressed via forum software; could we maybe consider something like that? People are too busy to read a forum. To move off-topic threads to a forum might be more of a possibility. Lucy Lynch, Internet Society List membership vs attendance at conferences she recommends many people join the list, it's a heartbeat, it allows them to keep track of the community even though they never have any intent to attend a meeting. Threads--if a thread goes in a long time, make a request to the list for someone to summarize the thread, and it's likely that will be enough to end the thread. If you're migrating to mailman for the large list, please get someone to rewrite the MonArch backend, its default filters are poorly crafted for active lists; she can help with that work, and she'll work with Sue. Randy Bush, IIJ, list and meetings are/aren't correlated? As soon as people started flying to the conference, the list went dead; the active members on the list are the ones attending the conferences; this is good. Jay Hennigan, impulse internet; for truly operational items, a mailing list is much more immediate for getting updates on operational issues. Steve Feldman, SC--for web forums, there's been a sense that maybe a forum or wiki for common items could be good for some topics; but needs interest, and someone to set it up first. Merit Report Jason Russell for Andy RosenZweig Interim filler-in for...uh. CRG west is sponsor Network contributions GNI provides wireless PtP network Trango Broadband provided internet access gears Kapela and Ass contributed networking support thanks to duane wessels for caching ARIN provided funding to help support broadcasts and archives Internet2 supported webcasts Beer, gear, break sponsors Merit team onsite Carol Wadsworth, Gale Terkeurst, David Gilbertson, Jason Russell, Larry Blunk, Valerie Wittkop, Sue Joiner, and Betty Burke (in our hearts!) Pete Hoffswell Please fill in survey re IPv6 hour. NANOG 41 stats Albuquerque 450 Total 372 Paid too much applause and laughter to take rest of notes NANOG 41 Albuquerque balnace Future sites 43 Telx Booklyn NY 44 LA, Centergate 45 Not determined (Carribean) Other updates WEbsite is being redesigned and moved to new server new archive WEbcast media improvements done Wirecast encoding software more powerful encoder hardware tunnel unicast feed to ann arbor quicktime streaming format media NOT done yet DV camera capture via firewire over fiber Native multicast from event venue merit-managed windows media and quicktime streaming servers free up Internet2 resources Archive stats oct 07 5,085 hits 21916MB nov 07 3,010 hits, wow, that went fast. Questions? Last 5 minutes is open discussion time. Floor is open for any committee, for merit, for anything else, microphones are wide open. Nope, everyone is very happy for how every one of the committees and committee members is performing. Steering is yellow badges program committee is blue badges mailing list committee are the white badges. Thank you all for attending, hopefully you found this useful, if not, let them know what would be useful for future meetings. Philip adjourns the meeting at 1628 hours Pacific Time.

1 0

nanog 42 is begun, video streaming up
by Todd Underwood 18 Feb '08

18 Feb '08

folx, just to remind everyone not at the conference, nanog42 has begun. the agenda is up at: http://nanog.org/mtg-0802/agenda.html information on the free, live video streams (including the community meeting happening right now) at: http://nanog.org/streaming.html t. -- _____________________________________________________________________ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporation general manager babbledog todd(a)renesys.com http://www.renesys.com/blog

1 0

NANOG 42 Lightning Talk submission reminder...
by Joel Jaeggli 17 Feb '08

17 Feb '08

Greetings, Lightning talk submission remains open until Tuesday Feb 19th. Submissions can be made here: http://www.nanogpc.org/lightning/ A lightning talk is a very short presentation or speech by any attendee on any topic relevant to the NANOG audience. These are limited to ten minutes; this will be strictly enforced. If you have a topic that's timely, interesting, or even a crackpot idea you want to share, we encourage you to consider presenting it. The Program Committee will decide which submissions are relevant (using criteria based on the NANOG mailing list AUP) and choose the best ones to be presented. Use of slides is optional. All slides must be in PDF or Powerpoint format, and will be loaded in advance onto the speaker laptop on the podium. Thanks Joel

1 0

Question on the topology of Internet Exchange Points
by Kai Chen 16 Feb '08

16 Feb '08

A typical Internet Exchange Point (IXP) consists of one or more network switches <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_switch>, to which each of the participating ISPs connect. We call it the exchange-based topology. My question is if some current IXPs use directly-connected topology, in which ISPs just connect to each other by direct link, not through a network switch?? If so, what's the percentage of this directly-connected case? Kai

7 7

Re: Looking for Verizon-GNI network engineer
by Henry Linneweh 16 Feb '08

16 Feb '08

It has been my experience that data center engineers doing NOC support at Verizon do speak to paying customers about routing issues for premium data center services. -Henry ----- Original Message ---- From: K. Scott Bethke <scott(a)carpathiahost.com> To: nanog(a)merit.edu Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 6:49:13 PM Subject: Looking for Verizon-GNI network engineer Sorry if this is off-topic frustration has set in. I've got what looks like a routing loop or a wedge in your network and I cant get past tier2 saying it is an "internet problem". I asked to speak with an engineer directly was told Verizon engineers don't talk directly with customers. Issue going on for 4 days. $ traceroute www.tickerforum.org traceroute to www.tickerforum.org (70.169.168.7), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 10.254.123.1 (10.254.123.1) 3.219 ms 1.085 ms 0.915 ms 2 L301.VFTTP-02.CLPPVA.verizon-gni.net (71.171.93.1) 6.329 ms 6.281 ms 5.036 ms 3 P2-3.LCR-02.CLPPVA.verizon-gni.net (130.81.37.194) 4.885 ms 4.091 ms 6.490 ms 4 so-7-0-0-0.PEER-RTR1.ASH.verizon-gni.net (130.81.10.94) 4.731 ms 8.248 ms 5.167 ms 5 130.81.15.238 (130.81.15.238) 5.926 ms 130.81.15.190 (130.81.15.190) 6.586 ms 9.158 ms 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 * $ traceroute www.google.com traceroute: Warning: www.google.com has multiple addresses; using 64.233.169.104 traceroute to www.l.google.com (64.233.169.104), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 10.254.123.1 (10.254.123.1) 1.774 ms 1.117 ms 0.909 ms 2 L301.VFTTP-02.CLPPVA.verizon-gni.net (71.171.93.1) 5.820 ms 4.029 ms 4.861 ms 3 P2-3.LCR-01.CLPPVA.verizon-gni.net (130.81.37.192) 8.036 ms 6.346 ms 7.671 ms 4 so-6-3-1-0.BB-RTR2.RES.verizon-gni.net (130.81.29.82) 6.524 ms 8.161 ms 8.408 ms 5 * * * 6 * * * Ticket # is VAD01QVDW -Scott

1 0

Area Social Activity
by Owen DeLong 16 Feb '08

16 Feb '08

Sorry for the short notice. For anyone coming to NANOG early who is a certified SCUBA DIver, I'll be diving in Monterey (about 1 hour drive from San Jose) Saturday and Sunday. If you're interested in joining me, send an email off-list. Owen DeLong Open Water SCUBA Instructor (PADI)

7 8

Cogent communities still working?
by David Ulevitch 16 Feb '08

16 Feb '08

Has anyone else noticed that Cogent communities appear to no longer be taking effect for BGP speaking customers? Particularly 174:991, 174:3002 and no-export? Prefixes I'm talking about (if you want to see from your routeview) include: 208.67.222.0/24 and 208.67.220.0/24 sourced from 36692. I can't find a public-facing looking glass which makes debugging difficult... -David

1 0

Equinix Sydney smarthands contact number
by Joseph Jackson 15 Feb '08

15 Feb '08

Odd request I know but I only have a contact number for a tech that is currently off today and am wondering if anyone has the NOC number. Thanks! Joseph

1 0

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Analysis Role Account 15 Feb '08

15 Feb '08

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 16 Feb, 2008 Report Website: http://thyme.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 246017 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 125334 Deaggregation factor: 1.96 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 120557 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 27382 Prefixes per ASN: 8.98 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 23879 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 11589 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3503 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 74 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 3.6 Max AS path length visible: 19 Max AS path prepend of ASN (29642) 15 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 41 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 15 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 46 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 9 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 871 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1834332256 Equivalent to 109 /8s, 85 /16s and 176 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 49.5 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 61.5 Percentage of available address space allocated: 80.5 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 70.1 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 116298 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 56489 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 21163 APNIC Deaggregation factor: 2.67 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 53983 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 23916 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3127 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 17.26 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 824 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 479 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 3.6 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 15 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 329581984 Equivalent to 19 /8s, 165 /16s and 5 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 75.6 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079 APNIC Address Blocks 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 115479 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 65634 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.76 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 84224 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 33644 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 12147 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 6.93 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 4689 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1147 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.4 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 15 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 357097600 Equivalent to 21 /8s, 72 /16s and 224 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 78.8 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863, 39936-40959 ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8, 66/8, 67/8, 68/8, 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, 72/8, 73/8, 74/8, 75/8, 76/8, 96/8, 97/8, 98/8, 99/8, 199/8, 204/8, 205/8, 206/8, 207/8, 208/8, 209/8, 216/8, RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 52198 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 32717 RIPE Deaggregation factor: 1.60 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 47338 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 31707 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 10900 RIPE Prefixes per ASN: 4.34 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 5703 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1653 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.0 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 18 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 345822848 Equivalent to 20 /8s, 156 /16s and 214 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 79.3 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 40960-45055 RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 77/8, 78/8, 79/8, 80/8, 81/8, 82/8, 83/8, 84/8, 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8, 89/8, 90/8, 91/8, 92/8, 93/8, 94/8, 95/8, 193/8, 194/8, 195/8, 212/8, 213/8, 217/8, LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 18589 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 4686 LACNIC Deaggregation factor: 3.97 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 16978 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 9322 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 905 LACNIC Prefixes per ASN: 18.76 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 297 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 152 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.0 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 19 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 48126464 Equivalent to 2 /8s, 222 /16s and 90 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 47.8 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, plus ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 186/8, 187/8, 189/8, 190/8, 200/8, 201/8, AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 3220 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 1116 AfriNIC Deaggregation factor: 2.89 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 3659 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 1750 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 228 AfriNIC Prefixes per ASN: 16.05 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 76 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 42 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 3.8 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 15 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 10004480 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 152 /16s and 168 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 29.8 AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 196/8, APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4755 1576 386 78 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 9498 1159 549 60 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 9583 1132 83 443 Sify Limited 17488 983 63 87 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 4134 863 11881 311 CHINANET-BACKBONE 4766 852 5495 344 Korea Telecom (KIX) 23577 819 34 698 Korea Telecom (ATM-MPLS) 18101 713 128 65 Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet 9829 596 449 11 BSNL National Internet Backbo 4812 552 940 84 China Telecom (Shanghai) Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-APNIC ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 7018 1429 6004 990 AT&T WorldNet Services 4323 1388 1012 367 Time Warner Telecom 2386 1363 634 832 AT&T Data Communications Serv 11492 1215 138 15 Cable One 7011 1055 307 608 Citizens Utilities 18566 1042 296 10 Covad Communications 6197 1034 754 511 BellSouth Network Solutions, 174 984 6835 815 Cogent Communications 6478 927 237 112 AT&T Worldnet Services 20115 887 808 484 Charter Communications Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-ARIN RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8452 397 188 7 TEDATA 3292 396 1778 359 TDC Tele Danmark 3301 333 1459 304 TeliaNet Sweden 3320 325 7045 269 Deutsche Telekom AG 8866 288 78 24 Bulgarian Telecommunication C 8551 279 267 42 Bezeq International 680 275 2046 256 DFN-IP service G-WiN 3215 272 2607 94 France Telecom Transpac 8708 271 420 241 Romania Data Systems S.A. 6746 270 128 247 Dynamic Network Technologies, Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-RIPE LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8151 1153 2421 217 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 11830 555 299 9 Instituto Costarricense de El 7303 443 215 59 Telecom Argentina Stet-France 16814 427 27 10 NSS, S.A. 11172 401 115 65 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V 6471 397 85 40 ENTEL CHILE S.A. 10620 375 98 35 TVCABLE BOGOTA 14117 351 23 16 Telefonica del Sur S.A. 22047 323 270 14 VTR PUNTO NET S.A. 10481 301 120 10 Prima S.A. Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-LACNIC AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 24863 406 60 29 LINKdotNET AS number 3741 282 869 224 The Internet Solution 2018 148 276 116 Tertiary Education Network 6713 143 135 11 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB 5536 120 8 16 Internet Egypt Network 33783 115 10 13 EEPAD TISP TELECOM & INTERNET 33776 99 6 7 Starcomms Nigeria Limited 20858 91 34 3 EgyNet 24835 89 48 7 RAYA Telecom - Egypt 29571 80 13 7 Ci Telecom Autonomous system Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-AFRINIC Global Per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4755 1576 386 78 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 7018 1429 6004 990 AT&T WorldNet Services 4323 1388 1012 367 Time Warner Telecom 2386 1363 634 832 AT&T Data Communications Serv 11492 1215 138 15 Cable One 9498 1159 549 60 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 8151 1153 2421 217 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 9583 1132 83 443 Sify Limited 7011 1055 307 608 Citizens Utilities 18566 1042 296 10 Covad Communications Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 11492 1215 1200 Cable One 9498 1159 1099 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 18566 1042 1032 Covad Communications 4323 1388 1021 Time Warner Telecom 8151 1153 936 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 17488 983 896 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 6478 927 815 AT&T Worldnet Services 22773 861 796 Cox Communications, Inc. 19262 879 731 Verizon Global Networks 9583 1132 689 Sify Limited Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-CIDRnet List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global) ----------------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 15190 UNALLOCATED 63.98.176.0/24 701 UUNET Technologies, 18506 UNALLOCATED 63.107.123.0/24 701 UUNET Technologies, 16886 UNALLOCATED 63.109.3.0/24 1239 Sprint 16886 UNALLOCATED 63.167.139.0/24 1239 Sprint 33526 UNALLOCATED 64.128.26.0/24 4323 Time Warner Telecom 21624 UNALLOCATED 65.163.176.0/24 701 UUNET Technologies, 65000 PRIVATE 92.62.240.0/20 24750 Cable Internet Syste 64601 PRIVATE 118.232.77.0/24 9924 Taiwan Fixed Network 64601 PRIVATE 118.232.78.0/24 9924 Taiwan Fixed Network 64601 PRIVATE 118.232.224.0/21 9924 Taiwan Fixed Network Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-badAS Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 24.48.10.0/23 19548 Adelphia Business Solutions 24.48.12.0/22 19548 Adelphia Business Solutions 24.48.80.0/21 19548 Adelphia Business Solutions 24.54.224.0/19 20001 HoldCo LLC - Road Runner 24.142.40.0/21 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 24.142.160.0/19 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 24.246.0.0/17 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 24.246.128.0/18 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 60.253.0.0/18 27572 Connexion by Boeing 60.253.64.0/19 27572 Connexion by Boeing Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-add-IANA Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:19 /9:9 /10:16 /11:39 /12:134 /13:277 /14:495 /15:985 /16:9767 /17:4244 /18:7106 /19:15119 /20:17290 /21:16363 /22:20733 /23:21818 /24:128946 /25:863 /26:1106 /27:562 /28:108 /29:9 /30:1 /31:0 /32:8 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 11492 1203 1215 Cable One 2386 1066 1363 AT&T Data Communications Serv 18566 1023 1042 Covad Communications 9583 977 1132 Sify Limited 7011 938 1055 Citizens Utilities 4755 931 1576 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 6478 926 927 AT&T Worldnet Services 9498 833 1159 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 23577 810 819 Korea Telecom (ATM-MPLS) 17488 798 983 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data/sXXas-nos Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 4:9 8:101 12:1978 13:2 15:21 16:3 17:6 18:13 20:35 22:1 24:1026 25:1 32:61 33:4 38:390 40:65 41:579 44:2 47:8 52:3 55:3 56:3 57:22 58:517 59:425 60:407 61:988 62:1034 63:1958 64:3358 65:2353 66:3656 67:1115 68:633 69:2097 70:474 71:107 72:1488 73:6 74:825 75:169 76:252 77:549 78:491 79:77 80:877 81:824 82:577 83:359 84:463 85:1008 86:392 87:648 88:308 89:1117 90:12 91:981 92:137 93:63 95:1 96:12 97:10 98:54 99:2 114:1 115:1 116:524 117:252 118:78 119:143 121:439 122:691 123:295 124:798 125:1122 128:310 129:198 130:132 131:398 132:69 133:9 134:188 135:37 136:218 137:117 138:156 139:63 140:494 141:106 142:377 143:270 144:327 145:53 146:337 147:132 148:478 149:178 150:124 151:148 152:95 153:131 154:11 155:288 156:199 157:250 158:163 159:214 160:229 161:99 162:202 163:192 164:563 165:423 166:292 167:308 168:576 169:132 170:431 171:28 172:3 189:152 190:1369 192:5768 193:4098 194:3244 195:2337 196:975 198:3783 199:3199 200:5445 201:1273 202:7566 203:7804 204:3971 205:2060 206:2415 207:2719 208:3152 209:3577 210:2524 211:1034 212:1268 213:1576 214:449 215:47 216:4161 217:1179 218:340 219:400 220:1097 221:411 222:301 End of report

1 0