- Test - lists.nanog.org

Tom, get closer to the mike !!!!
by Jorge Amodio 15 Jun '09

15 Jun '09

ouch

1 0

Re: for the DNS inclined
by bmanning＠vacation.karoshi.com 15 Jun '09

15 Jun '09

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:39:53PM +0200, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:51:45AM +0000, bmanning(a)vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > > There is a public mailing list: root-scaling(a)icann.org > > I fear from the ICANN Website it's not apparent how to subscribe to this > list, can you give me or nanog/dnsop a hint? > > Stefan > -- > Truman's Law: If you can't convince them, confuse them. i am sorry for the confusion. Threw me for a loop as well... i wrote: There is a public mailing list: root-scaling(a)icann.org and There is a comment site: +http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200907.html#root-scaling which in ICANN parlance is: send mail to <root-scaling(a)icann.org> and your mail shows up on the ICANN website at: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200907.html#root-scal… so its not really a forum or format for discussion, its more of a forum where one can vent. not the cleanest design, but that's ICANN view of gaining public inputs. i suspect if you sent mail to any of the members of the study team, inputs would be considered, but it would not be public. --bill

1 0

RE: [inquiry] Internet/cell in Teheran down?
by bobbyjim＠gmail.com 15 Jun '09

15 Jun '09

So what's the update. Has iran gone back? -----Original Message----- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner(a)nic-naa.net> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 8:28 PM To: Steve Pirk <orion(a)pirk.com> Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: [inquiry] Internet/cell in Teheran down? I exchanged notes with someone in Tehran shortly after 6am EDT this morning. NPR is at least partially incorrect. Steve Pirk wrote: > Npr (All things considered) is reporting that cell phones and Internet > access in at least Teheran if not all of Iran is down. Reporters are > unable to connect out. > > Anyone hear of anything? > -steve > > >

4 3

[inquiry] Internet/cell in Teheran down?
by Steve Pirk 14 Jun '09

14 Jun '09

Npr (All things considered) is reporting that cell phones and Internet access in at least Teheran if not all of Iran is down. Reporters are unable to connect out. Anyone hear of anything? -steve

10 9

RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
by Arno Meulenkamp 14 Jun '09

14 Jun '09

As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, we are proud to announce the second in a series of interviews. Randy Bush (IIJ) discusses IPv6 deployment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU So far, we have interviewed 22 people from the community about their experiences and are very busy editing all the video material. In the coming months, you will be able to enjoy the rest of the interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/RIPENCC These interviews will also be published on our e-learning page and on our IPv6 Act Now website: http://ripe.net/training/e-learning/ http://www.ipv6actnow.org/ Cheers, Arno Meulenkamp RIPE NCC

8 10

Traffic billing - L2 encap to include or not?
by Weber, Markus 13 Jun '09

13 Jun '09

We all have our billing systems for traffic (bought, downloaded or home made, volume based or usage). We all got hit by fancy SNMP bugs of various vendors and we all suffer from the fact, that SNMP counters do not carry a time stamp, when they had been taken from the ASICs, causing a slight derivation. [...] Most systems (not the xflow based ones) do use IF-MIB::InOctets and IF-MIB::OutOctets or their HC counter parts to retrieve the number of transmitted bytes and do their calculation based on these numbers. What would you expect these counters to return, esp. on Ethernet? RFC2683 states ifXxxOctets The definitions of ifInOctets and ifOutOctets (and similarly, ifHCInOctets and ifHCOutOctets) specify that their values include framing characters. The media-specific MIB designer MUST specify any special conditions of the media concerning the inclusion of framing characters, especially with respect to frames with errors. The total number of octets transmitted out of/received on the interface, including framing characters." So, is L2 encapsulation (e.g. Ethernet) considered as framing characters or not? Cisco does count them (looks like they also count the FCS), while Juniper does not (at least not on their routers) with above MIBs. So who's right? Which brings me to the question: How do others handle this? Do your customers have to pay for the L2 encapsulation overhead or not? Does your (special) G T&C address this? Does your system adjust the numbers by adding/subtracting L2 enc overhead * number of transmitted packets? Or do you just live with it as it is (and hope, your provider uses J-counters to do their billing). Oh, it's Friday ... Markus PS1: And what about padding? IP packets could be smaller then the min ethernet frame size ... (think of some kind of DOS attacks) ... PS2: Oh, maybe someone could check on J switches - would be nice to know ... -- [E] Markus Weber <fvd(a)kpn.DE> [IRC] FvD [T] +49 69 96874-298 [F] -289 [KPN Eurorings B.V. Darmstädter Landstraße 184 D-60598 Frankfurt] [HRB56874 Amtsgericht Frankfurt Carolien Nijhuis+Louis Rustenhoven]

2 1

for the DNS inclined
by bmanning＠vacation.karoshi.com 13 Jun '09

13 Jun '09

With resolution 2009-02-03-04, the ICANN Board asked the Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC), the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC), and the ICANN staff to study the potential impact on the root zone stability that might arise when IPv6 address records, IDN top level names, other new TLDs, and new records to support DNS security are added to the root zone. The Board has expressed interest in hearing of the impact of the distinct changes, but also their aggregate effect on root zone operations. The Board also asks that the study address the technical and operational concerns regarding expanding the DNS root zone that have been expressed on this topic. A study team has been assembled and is composed of the following: Jaap Akkerhuis Lyman Chapin - Chair Patrik FC$ltstrC6m Glenn Kowack Lars-Johan Liman Bill Manning The goal of the study is to construct a complete, definitive, and authoritative model of the root server system (including all of its provisioning and query components) that shows how the different parts are related, and how changing the value of a variable in one part would affect each of the other parts. It will be as quantitative a model as possible given the relatively short time frame of the study. The idea is not to try to identify all of the bad things that might happen if (for example) the number of TLDs in the root zone were to increase by several orders of magnitude during the same time period in which new RRs were added for DNSSEC (b^@^\how many entries in the root zone is too many?b^@^]), but to construct a model that demonstrates what the effects would be throughout the system of changing the value of one or more variables either individually or in combination (e.g., the rate at which new TLDs are added to the root, or the frequency of key rollover events in a signed root). This model will provide an unbiased factual and analyticalb^@^Trather than anecdotalb^@^Tbasis for recognizing and evaluating concerns about root server system security and stability as the root grows. As a tool for policy makers, it will show the expected impact on the root server system of policy decisions that would change various root zone parameters. The study team has a couple of methods for collecting inputs and encourages interested parties to provide the study team with their concerns. There is a public mailing list: root-scaling(a)icann.org and There is a comment site: +http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200907.html#root-scaling If there are others whom you think would be interested in this work or have opinions/ideas, please pass along this note. Thanks

1 0

[OT] Micros~1 Sysinternals
by jamie rishaw 13 Jun '09

13 Jun '09

[Off Topic] [Dont annoy the MLC by making this a thread] [MLC: *waves hand, jedi style* This post is okay.] All, I dont know the politics behind it, but whenever things like this come out, it usually means the viability is being questioned. MS has put out a survey w.r.t. Sysinternals, formerly sysinternals.combut now part of the Microsoft collective. If you use, or have used, Sysinternals tools [1] (invaluable to those with clue trying to deal with MS crap), you know its value. As SANS writes, "If you are a Sysinternals user please consider taking five minutes to contribute to their future." It took me about a minute and a half. The link URL is below at #2, or *http://tinyurl.com/mvtd6d* -jamie [1] http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/default.aspx [2] SURVEY LINK : *http://tinyurl.com/mvtd6d* , aka http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/survey-intro.zgi?p=WEB229A879HFVU -- Jamie Rishaw // .com.arpa@j <- reverse it. ish. [Impressive C-level Title Here], arpa / arpa labs

2 1

ICSI Netalyzr launch
by vern＠ee.lbl.gov 12 Jun '09

12 Jun '09

Folks, you might be interested in checking out a network monitoring tool we launched today, Netalyzr. It's a Java applet you can run by surfing to netalyzr.com. It aims to measure a bunch of the properties of and end user's network access, particularly looking for transparent modifications (e.g., hidden proxies), connectivity restrictions, and some security issues (e.g., whether the DNS resolver is vulnerable to the Kaminsky attack). We've had several thousand users run it today so far, so you may be hearing about reports your customers have gotten from it. You can see a sample report at: http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/restore/id=example-session - Vern

8 15

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Analysis Role Account 12 Jun '09

12 Jun '09

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 13 Jun, 2009 Report Website: http://thyme.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 287824 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 137147 Deaggregation factor: 2.10 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 142799 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 31449 Prefixes per ASN: 9.15 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 27360 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 13306 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 4089 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 96 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 3.6 Max AS path length visible: 29 Max AS path prepend of ASN (12026) 22 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 500 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 147 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 181 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 49 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 829 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2050857808 Equivalent to 122 /8s, 61 /16s and 155 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 55.3 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 64.0 Percentage of available address space allocated: 86.4 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 77.4 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 142267 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 68490 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 24490 APNIC Deaggregation factor: 2.80 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 67896 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 30776 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3665 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 18.53 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 997 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 556 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 3.5 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 18 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 453620336 Equivalent to 27 /8s, 9 /16s and 178 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 84.5 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079 APNIC Address Blocks 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 180/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 123257 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 65969 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.87 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 124046 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 51834 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 13033 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 9.52 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 4995 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1276 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.3 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 24 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 1009227328 Equivalent to 60 /8s, 39 /16s and 150 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 194.0 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863, 39936-40959, 46080-47103 53248-55295 ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8, 66/8, 67/8, 68/8, 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, 72/8, 73/8, 74/8, 75/8, 76/8, 96/8, 97/8, 98/8, 99/8, 108/8, 173/8, 174/8, 184/8, 199/8, 204/8, 205/8, 206/8, 207/8, 208/8, 209/8, 216/8, RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 65736 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 38944 RIPE Deaggregation factor: 1.69 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 64869 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 43770 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 13116 RIPE Prefixes per ASN: 4.95 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 6865 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1966 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.0 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 28 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 482559648 Equivalent to 28 /8s, 195 /16s and 70 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 102.7 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 40960-45055, 47104-52223 RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 77/8, 78/8, 79/8, 80/8, 81/8, 82/8, 83/8, 84/8, 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8, 89/8, 90/8, 91/8, 92/8, 93/8, 94/8, 95/8, 109/8, 178/8, 193/8, 194/8, 195/8, 212/8, 213/8, 217/8, LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 23862 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 5946 LACNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.01 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 23726 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 13297 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1119 LACNIC Prefixes per ASN: 21.20 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 361 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 184 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.0 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 29 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 71622272 Equivalent to 4 /8s, 68 /16s and 222 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 71.2 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, 52224-53247 plus ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 186/8, 187/8, 189/8, 190/8, 200/8, 201/8, AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 6035 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 1453 AfriNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.15 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 6445 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 2468 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 296 AfriNIC Prefixes per ASN: 21.77 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 88 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 59 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 3.8 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 15 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 19460608 Equivalent to 1 /8s, 40 /16s and 242 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 58.0 AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 197/8, APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4766 1709 6931 402 Korea Telecom (KIX) 17488 1600 130 101 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 4755 1251 362 128 TATA Communications formerly 9583 1100 87 549 Sify Limited 4134 892 16925 377 CHINANET-BACKBONE 7545 793 198 101 TPG Internet Pty Ltd 23577 780 34 664 Korea Telecom (ATM-MPLS) 18101 751 216 30 Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet 24560 714 230 174 Bharti Airtel Ltd. 9829 683 572 18 BSNL National Internet Backbo Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-APNIC ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 6389 4290 3647 324 bellsouth.net, inc. 4323 1863 1035 376 Time Warner Telecom 1785 1687 717 138 PaeTec Communications, Inc. 20115 1627 1447 733 Charter Communications 7018 1506 5924 1042 AT&T WorldNet Services 6478 1375 305 476 AT&T Worldnet Services 2386 1264 683 918 AT&T Data Communications Serv 3356 1204 10980 452 Level 3 Communications, LLC 11492 1114 208 12 Cable One 18566 1062 296 10 Covad Communications Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-ARIN RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 3292 454 1902 392 TDC Tele Danmark 12479 450 578 6 Uni2 Autonomous System 702 431 1861 347 UUNET - Commercial IP service 30890 413 87 193 Evolva Telecom 35805 358 24 4 United Telecom of Georgia 8866 351 109 21 Bulgarian Telecommunication C 3301 344 1684 307 TeliaNet Sweden 3215 343 3041 108 France Telecom Transpac 3320 338 7066 296 Deutsche Telekom AG 9121 319 1442 25 TTnet Autonomous System Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-RIPE LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8151 1466 2879 233 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 10620 906 206 115 TVCABLE BOGOTA 22047 591 302 14 VTR PUNTO NET S.A. 7303 566 298 85 Telecom Argentina Stet-France 28573 538 563 35 NET Servicos de Comunicao S.A 11830 486 292 54 Instituto Costarricense de El 6471 443 96 32 ENTEL CHILE S.A. 11172 443 102 70 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V 7738 404 794 28 Telecomunicacoes da Bahia S.A 3816 363 188 81 Empresa Nacional de Telecomun Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-LACNIC AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8452 981 188 7 TEDATA 24863 884 82 40 LINKdotNET AS number 20858 324 34 5 EgyNet 3741 277 856 237 The Internet Solution 2018 243 215 143 Tertiary Education Network 6713 160 151 12 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB 33783 152 10 8 EEPAD TISP TELECOM & INTERNET 29571 139 15 8 Ci Telecom Autonomous system 5536 123 8 9 Internet Egypt Network 5713 115 507 66 Telkom SA Ltd Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-AFRINIC Global Per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 6389 4290 3647 324 bellsouth.net, inc. 4323 1863 1035 376 Time Warner Telecom 4766 1709 6931 402 Korea Telecom (KIX) 1785 1687 717 138 PaeTec Communications, Inc. 20115 1627 1447 733 Charter Communications 17488 1600 130 101 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 7018 1506 5924 1042 AT&T WorldNet Services 8151 1466 2879 233 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 6478 1375 305 476 AT&T Worldnet Services 2386 1264 683 918 AT&T Data Communications Serv Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 1785 1687 1549 PaeTec Communications, Inc. 17488 1600 1499 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 4323 1863 1487 Time Warner Telecom 4766 1709 1307 Korea Telecom (KIX) 8151 1466 1233 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 4755 1251 1123 TATA Communications formerly 11492 1114 1102 Cable One 18566 1062 1052 Covad Communications 22773 1062 996 Cox Communications, Inc. 8452 981 974 TEDATA Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-CIDRnet List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global) ----------------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 16927 UNALLOCATED 12.0.252.0/23 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 15132 UNALLOCATED 12.9.150.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 32567 UNALLOCATED 12.14.170.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 13746 UNALLOCATED 12.24.56.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 32567 UNALLOCATED 12.25.107.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 26973 UNALLOCATED 12.39.152.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 26973 UNALLOCATED 12.39.154.0/23 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 26973 UNALLOCATED 12.39.159.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 32326 UNALLOCATED 12.40.49.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic 25639 UNALLOCATED 12.41.169.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-badAS Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 41.223.112.0/22 5713 Telkom SA Ltd 41.223.176.0/22 36981 >>UNKNOWN<< 41.223.188.0/24 22351 Intelsat 41.223.189.0/24 26452 Local Communications Networks 62.61.220.0/24 24974 Tachyon Europe BV - Wireless 62.61.221.0/24 24974 Tachyon Europe BV - Wireless 63.140.213.0/24 22555 Universal Talkware Corporatio 63.143.251.0/24 22555 Universal Talkware Corporatio 64.31.32.0/19 11955 ServiceCo LLC - Road Runner 64.31.59.0/24 7017 ServiceCo LLC - Road Runner Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-add-IANA Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:19 /9:10 /10:20 /11:58 /12:166 /13:348 /14:601 /15:1154 /16:10514 /17:4723 /18:8087 /19:16903 /20:20163 /21:19974 /22:25876 /23:25740 /24:150868 /25:863 /26:1030 /27:538 /28:148 /29:8 /30:5 /31:0 /32:8 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 6389 2796 4290 bellsouth.net, inc. 4766 1402 1709 Korea Telecom (KIX) 17488 1313 1600 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 1785 1163 1687 PaeTec Communications, Inc. 11492 1044 1114 Cable One 18566 1043 1062 Covad Communications 2386 977 1264 AT&T Data Communications Serv 4323 953 1863 Time Warner Telecom 9583 951 1100 Sify Limited 8452 914 981 TEDATA Complete listing at http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-sXXas-nos Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 4:13 8:206 12:2245 13:10 15:19 16:2 17:4 20:36 24:1081 32:52 34:2 38:571 40:97 41:1701 43:1 44:2 47:22 52:4 55:2 56:3 57:24 58:570 59:640 60:459 61:1073 62:1107 63:2013 64:3718 65:2384 66:3622 67:1623 68:824 69:2643 70:557 71:174 72:1676 73:2 74:1572 75:169 76:311 77:849 78:549 79:353 80:971 81:833 82:560 83:434 84:634 85:1030 86:397 87:650 88:354 89:1445 90:57 91:2312 92:344 93:1055 94:1228 95:1031 96:140 97:217 98:245 99:22 109:1 110:143 111:9 112:136 113:125 114:256 115:326 116:1163 117:530 118:288 119:692 120:145 121:754 122:1031 123:694 124:994 125:1336 128:224 129:236 130:127 131:408 132:74 133:9 134:186 135:38 136:224 137:153 138:161 139:78 140:433 141:119 142:385 143:345 144:362 145:48 146:380 147:164 148:519 149:233 150:177 151:190 152:147 153:141 154:2 155:276 156:170 157:302 158:115 159:312 160:284 161:151 162:271 163:169 164:482 165:502 166:275 167:359 168:674 169:164 170:471 171:39 172:10 173:287 174:226 178:1 180:1 183:1 186:22 187:96 188:22 189:432 190:2745 192:5780 193:4256 194:3307 195:2696 196:1101 198:3598 199:3360 200:5086 201:1278 202:7900 203:8170 204:3879 205:2153 206:2441 207:2731 208:3883 209:3400 210:2681 211:1122 212:1604 213:1657 214:80 215:31 216:4534 217:1306 218:387 219:443 220:1223 221:488 222:304 End of report

1 0