- Test - lists.nanog.org

FairPoint New England Internet Access issues.
by Davis, Bill (Manchester, NH) 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Oct 2, 2009: Verizon identified it largest CORE Juniper router was creating issues for all of it peering points to New York and Boston having said that all of FairPoint's DIA, DSL, Fast customer had intermittent issues accessing the internet partial service was restored after Verizon reroute part of FairPoint traffic. Verizon was able to replace the Juniper router and restore full service around 1:45 PM EDT October 3rd 2009. Bill Davis William P. Davis - Director IT Network FairPoint Communications | 900 Elm St., Manchester, NH 03101 | bdavis(a)fairpoint.com <mailto:acouture@Fairpoint.com> 620-339-4786 office | 309-696-0299 Cell _______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail message and its attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients. They may contain confidential information, legally privileged information or other information subject to legal restrictions. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this message or its attachments, notify the sender by replying to this message and delete or destroy all copies of this message and attachments in all media.

1 0

operations contact @ facebook?
by Leland Vandervort 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Hi All, Would anyone happen to have an operations contact at Facebook by anychance? Our systems are being overwhelmed by a facebook application that we were neither aware of nor condoned. Thanks in advance. Leland Vandervort Director, Technical Operations Gandi SAS Paris t: +33 1 70 39 37 59 m: +33 6 31 15 15 07

9 12

Verizon Southeast Network Map
by Jason Bertoch 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

We're considering adding a Verizon connection to our network in Florida, so I've been looking unsuccessfully for a map of Verizon's fiber network in the southeast to verify that I'll have diverse paths with my other providers. Does anyone know if such a map exists in a public location?

2 1

Re: Minimum IPv6 size
by Brandon Butterworth 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

> Is there some central repository for information on this? We usually > seem to find out about such changes out of the ARIN region a bit after > the fact. Have we not learnt from v4? If there are to be filters then they should be defined once and never changed as people will fail to update If a different allocation requirement arises then start a new prefix (v6 is big enough to handle this) and define its filter once. Do not allocate it from an existing range and expect people to adjust their filters. brandon

4 4

ICETel Costa Rica BGP Engineers
by Ken Gilmour 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

Hi there, Is there anyone from ICETel in Costa Rica who speaks English on this list? I need to discuss some BGP stuff and my Spanish is not the best. Failing that, anyone from RACSA or other major ISP in CR will do. Thanks! Ken

1 0

OT: iPhone Problems
by Clue Store 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

Mine's rebooted at leat 3 times a day sine the upgrade :( What ever happened to quality control.... http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2152619&tstart=0

2 1

Re: Minimum IPv6 size
by Brandon Butterworth 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

> > If there are to be filters then they should be defined once and never > > changed as people will fail to update > > Yay! We can return to classful routing again. That sure worked out well > for us the first time around. ^_^; We have already, all we're discussing now is if we do a better job of implementing it. Classful suffered from lack of space in each range and too coarse a set of fixed ranges, all fixable in v6 so perhaps it's not so bad? > So, if I need to break up my /32 into 4 /34s to cover different geographical > regions, I should instead renumber into a new range set aside for /34s > and give back the /32? And what if you need a few /48's, then you're open to others advertising some of yours too. With no organised mechanism of communicating acceptable prefix lengths to all routers [1] then we either do nothing and let anarchy rule, do something that overly constrains or do half the job and have both problems. > Perhaps we should give everyone an allocation out of each filter > range, so that they can simply number from the appropriately-classed > range; when you apply for space, you'd get a /32, a /33, a /34, a /35, > a /36, etc. all from the appropriate, statically defined ranges. > > *removes tongue from cheek* What would be most efficient for all? Semi classful or not I don't mind but it does seem pointless to have been going round the same circle for so many years. brandon [1] sbgp would be secure anarchy

1 0

Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients
by deleskie＠gmail.com 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

Sounds great but who cover the costs? ------Original Message------ From: Peter Beckman To: Gadi Evron Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility for bottedclients Sent: Oct 3, 2009 7:18 PM On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Gadi Evron wrote: > The story is covered by PC mag: Thanks for the article Gadi. Honestly, I wish both my personal ISP and one of my business ISPs would do this. Though I have the technical ability to monitor my outgoing connections for such things, it's not a trivial task and requires resources I've decided not to invest in, namely a Linux PC running as my gateway with yet more software (OS, monitoring tools, etc) I need to secure and keep updated. For me to be thrilled about my ISPs monitoring my connection for "bad behavior," the ISP should: * Quickly notify the customer about the problem via email and phone * Offer the ability to view the evidence of the "bad behavior," accessible on the ISP network via the web so it can be viewed whether the connection is active or blocked, to help determine which host(s) is/are responsible * Clearly classify the type of "bad behavior" and offer both free and paid alternatives to potentially rectify the problem for those less technically inclined to self-solve the issue * Provide a short period of time (3 days) after notification and before disconnect to give an opportunity to fix the issue without service interruption * Offer a simple, automated way to get the connection re-tested and unblocked immediately (within 15 minutes) using a web service accessible even if the connection is blocked This would make me happy. What would make me angry is if they: * Simply turn the connection off with little or no notice * Provide no notification of what happened or why * Offer no evidence of why they turned the connection off to help debug * Force the customer to call customer service to ask for a retest or reconnect * Have the reconnect take multiple hours/days once approved If done right, such a treaty here in the US and elsewhere thing would be a major win for the Internet. Beckman --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy beckman(a)angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network

2 1

Request for Contact - Verizon AS19262
by Shawn Marck 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

Can admin from Verizon AS19262 contact me off-list? Changes to our AS are not reaching Verizon AS19262. Thanks, -- Shawn Marck, shawn.marck(a)blacklotus.net

1 0

Request for Contact
by Shawn Somers 03 Oct '09

03 Oct '09

Can an EchoStar admin contact Me off-list? I'm seeing a routing loop at ECHOSTAR.edge1.SaltLakeCity1.Level3.net Shawn Somers (425) 405-0263

1 0