- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: T-Mobile ?
by chaim.rieger＠gmail.com 04 Nov '09

04 Nov '09

According to what I got from t-mobile It out and in but only between t-mobile devices, phone, sms, and data. Data to the rest, as well as cell and sms to the rest still work Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

1 0

Small guys with BGP issues
by Steve Bertrand 04 Nov '09

04 Nov '09

Seems to me that some people have issues when a thread is taken over. capiche... However, it also seems to me that there are people here who are intelligent engineers who are afraid to speak, due to the size of the company they work for. On behalf of the 'small guys', it sucks when you big(ger) guys: - don't listen to us - practice good behaviour (bcp38) and don't preach it - speak proudly of decent support, but don't respond to people who aren't staffed by a tier(x) - act as though you know something, but won't get out of the textbook mentality - again, this isn't a test for ccie, just because were working in smaller *sp's doesn't mean that we know less than you - we work hard. We have smaller networks. I bet we defend our border egress to you than you defend toward us - if all small guys like me are the same, then the 'big boys' should be motivated to move forward Lets take it off topic and off-thread... This is a big-boy list. Out of the small guys on this big boy list, lets have a hands-up for who is doing the right thing (v6 & network defence & protecting their connected networks )... Steve

15 23

In Building Dark Fiber inside Infomart Dallas
by Konstantin Bezruchenko 03 Nov '09

03 Nov '09

Hi all, Just wondering if someone here can offer in building dark fiber (cross connects) inside Infomart (1950 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX). We are trying to get from Equinix to Switch and Data. Please reply offlist. Thanks! -Konstantin

4 3

New Class C's just lit on on AT&T, Email Marketing
by Michael Peddemors 03 Nov '09

03 Nov '09

A new block under AT&T, listed as being owned by: The Karcher Group Inc. ATTIS-9951800 (NET-99-51-80-0-1) 99.51.80.0 - 99.51.81.255 Just started an email marketing campaign to addresses stripped from the web.. We wouldn't run out of IP's if this didn't keep happening.. So called CAN-SPAM compliant of course.. Return-Path: <618882010(a)return.signtabulararrayoffice.com> Delivered-To: support(a)linuxmagic.com Received: (qmail 25942 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 05:26:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail23.collegeloanassociates.com) (99.51.80.247) by thundercracker.cityemail.com with SMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:26:41 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=signtabulararrayoffice.com; s=default; c=simple/simple; q=dns/txt; i=(a)signtabulararrayoffice.com; t=1257225979; h=From; bh=dua1L4dgTnW3vCenQjnlynXJ0yk=; b=jxhpH/zBQxVZ5O4+8Yd2Va5Dj3v6Soasndd6moffduE1XIfNz7UzYntYdA6AwGZ1 qLBFmNjyNyTKjdeCc9vDa/ApxFy6LrsPMpsRjbyOjh8Io3951KpzLOPD3BwcYYsf; DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=default; d=signtabulararrayoffice.com; h=Received:Date:From:To:Message-id:Mime-Version:Subject:X-Ver:X- CampaignDetail:X-Edata1:X-Log:Errors-To:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Type; b=PhZXM6t8AayFvb3UDWPYbhL98WpXfcC/g95pqhVM2gNwjRd6hnTO+w1PB2z2Xv8/ 5L7acKRTMWdCNZ8Ql1doxzrZ0QYt5u4bd48rbyQiUmMU69ToMXnvFw5mKxLtX5H+ Received: from 316-99.51.80.247 (316-99.51.80.247-s [192.168.1.75]) by signtabulararrayoffice.com for support(a)linuxmagic.com; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:26:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:26:19 -0500 From: NaughtyDating Alerts <NaughtyDatingAlerts(a)signtabulararrayoffice.com> Return-Path: <618882010(a)return.initiativesnetwork.com> Delivered-To: support(a)linuxmagic.com Received: (qmail 28563 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 05:32:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail16.bankanswer.net) (99.51.80.144) by thundercracker.cityemail.com with SMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:32:47 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=initiativesnetwork.com; s=default; c=simple/simple; q=dns/txt; i=(a)initiativesnetwork.com; t=1257226339; h=From; bh=ZAz5horGN06rHfgsLW4iBy5nKtY=; b=1sfpRla+5g4KyKZbji1fiTueDe9pLJKojoqbjic6icN+CehR20mDLLxhi1m58Jjh 4IO10Esc9T1+nDvh3D68nw0bePfCkBKYO6yOThLpGBb95ewtzZ7oFoq3agpS6tYM; DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=default; d=initiativesnetwork.com; h=Received:Date:From:To:Message-id:Mime-Version:Subject:X-Ver:X- CampaignDetail:X-Edata1:X-Log:Errors-To:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Type; b=VTbPf7DV+qu9jWHRmmpB4U8p9Ug4DMdqkz3c1KcCXPw4uyq23JKkBr/fkWJDnyAz hI+zrGFDem3jt+ReJO7X9IK0nZsB0q7f2gZ2YyZyEP53+LnCScdpcpTWB7CnZXUM Received: from 315-99.51.80.144 (315-99.51.80.144-s [192.168.1.78]) by initiativesnetwork.com for support(a)linuxmagic.com; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:32:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:32:10 -0500 From: CoverQuotes <CoverQuotes(a)initiativesnetwork.com> -- -- "Catch the Magic of Linux..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Peddemors - President/CEO - LinuxMagic Products, Services, Support and Development Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca "LinuxMagic" is a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 604-589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.

6 6

Re: New Class C's just lit on on AT&T, Email Marketing
by Paul Bosworth 03 Nov '09

03 Nov '09

Just filter it and move on- business as usual. If we barked up every tree we'd never get any real work done. On Nov 3, 2009 11:33 AM, "Michael Peddemors" <michael(a)linuxmagic.com> wrote: A new block under AT&T, listed as being owned by: The Karcher Group Inc. ATTIS-9951800 (NET-99-51-80-0-1) 99.51.80.0 - 99.51.81.255 Just started an email marketing campaign to addresses stripped from the web.. We wouldn't run out of IP's if this didn't keep happening.. So called CAN-SPAM compliant of course.. Return-Path: <618882010(a)return.signtabulararrayoffice.com> Delivered-To: support(a)linuxmagic.com Received: (qmail 25942 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 05:26:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail23.collegeloanassociates.com) (99.51.80.247) by thundercracker.cityemail.com with SMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:26:41 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=signtabulararrayoffice.com; s=default; c=simple/simple; q=dns/txt; i=(a)signtabulararrayoffice.com; t=1257225979; h=From; bh=dua1L4dgTnW3vCenQjnlynXJ0yk=; b=jxhpH/zBQxVZ5O4+8Yd2Va5Dj3v6Soasndd6moffduE1XIfNz7UzYntYdA6AwGZ1 qLBFmNjyNyTKjdeCc9vDa/ApxFy6LrsPMpsRjbyOjh8Io3951KpzLOPD3BwcYYsf; DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=default; d=signtabulararrayoffice.com; h=Received:Date:From:To:Message-id:Mime-Version:Subject:X-Ver:X- CampaignDetail:X-Edata1:X-Log:Errors-To:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Type; b=PhZXM6t8AayFvb3UDWPYbhL98WpXfcC/g95pqhVM2gNwjRd6hnTO+w1PB2z2Xv8/ 5L7acKRTMWdCNZ8Ql1doxzrZ0QYt5u4bd48rbyQiUmMU69ToMXnvFw5mKxLtX5H+ Received: from 316-99.51.80.247 (316-99.51.80.247-s [192.168.1.75]) by signtabulararrayoffice.com for support(a)linuxmagic.com; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:26:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:26:19 -0500 From: NaughtyDating Alerts <NaughtyDatingAlerts(a)signtabulararrayoffice.com> Return-Path: <618882010(a)return.initiativesnetwork.com> Delivered-To: support(a)linuxmagic.com Received: (qmail 28563 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 05:32:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail16.bankanswer.net) (99.51.80.144) by thundercracker.cityemail.com with SMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:32:47 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=initiativesnetwork.com; s=default; c=simple/simple; q=dns/txt; i=(a)initiativesnetwork.com; t=1257226339; h=From; bh=ZAz5horGN06rHfgsLW4iBy5nKtY=; b=1sfpRla+5g4KyKZbji1fiTueDe9pLJKojoqbjic6icN+CehR20mDLLxhi1m58Jjh 4IO10Esc9T1+nDvh3D68nw0bePfCkBKYO6yOThLpGBb95ewtzZ7oFoq3agpS6tYM; DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=default; d=initiativesnetwork.com; h=Received:Date:From:To:Message-id:Mime-Version:Subject:X-Ver:X- CampaignDetail:X-Edata1:X-Log:Errors-To:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Type; b=VTbPf7DV+qu9jWHRmmpB4U8p9Ug4DMdqkz3c1KcCXPw4uyq23JKkBr/fkWJDnyAz hI+zrGFDem3jt+ReJO7X9IK0nZsB0q7f2gZ2YyZyEP53+LnCScdpcpTWB7CnZXUM Received: from 315-99.51.80.144 (315-99.51.80.144-s [192.168.1.78]) by initiativesnetwork.com for support(a)linuxmagic.com; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:32:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:32:10 -0500 From: CoverQuotes <CoverQuotes(a)initiativesnetwork.com> -- -- "Catch the Magic of Linux..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Peddemors - President/CEO - LinuxMagic Products, Services, Support and Development Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca "LinuxMagic" is a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 604-589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.

1 0

Re: New Class C's just lit on on AT&T, Email Marketing
by Michael Peddemors 03 Nov '09

03 Nov '09

It was mentioned that this might be offtopic for this list, however I did want to get a feel for the attitudes of network operators, in light of the recent discussions regarding the Russian Operators.. and blocking routing et al.. At what point does it become an issue to the point where operators demand that others are responsible for the activiities coming from their networks? Wanted to start a thread on this issue.. It was mentioned that not routing operators who are puported to be owned/operated/supported by criminal activities, in conjunction with the Russian IP's, and the controversy on the Hurricane Electric actions.. I think this is on topic.. However, if others think it isn't I will not post to this subject here further... I do know that there is a lot of chatter on this list, so I fully understand if it needs to be kept for strictly technical problems, rather than discussions. -- Michael -- On November 3, 2009, you wrote: > Hi, > > This really is not on topic for NANOG at all (unless you want to hear > people whine about calling it a 'class c' instead of the /23 it is, > etc etc) but it probably *is* on topic for the mailop list. I would > suggest setting followups to this message accordingly with nanog not > included. > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Peddemors > > <michael(a)linuxmagic.com> wrote: > > A new block under AT&T, listed as being owned by: > > > > The Karcher Group Inc. ATTIS-9951800 (NET-99-51-80-0-1) 99.51.80.0 - > > 99.51.81.255 > > > > Just started an email marketing campaign to addresses stripped from the > > web.. > > > > We wouldn't run out of IP's if this didn't keep happening.. > > > > So called CAN-SPAM compliant of course.. > > -- -- "Catch the Magic of Linux..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Peddemors - President/CEO - LinuxMagic Products, Services, Support and Development Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca "LinuxMagic" is a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 604-589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.

3 2

Level3 90+% Packet Loss in New York
by Peter Beckman 03 Nov '09

03 Nov '09

Anyone know anything? Has happened twice today, right now, and between 12:22pm and 12:49pm (at least same symptoms as this issue) Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. 208.72.185.177 0.0% 785 0.3 0.3 0.2 20.4 1.1 2. 208.72.184.245 0.0% 785 0.6 0.4 0.2 78.7 2.9 3. ge-6-7.car3.NewYork1.Level3.net 0.0% 785 0.6 11.7 0.4 316.3 37.7 4. vlan69.csw1.NewYork1.Level3.net 96.4% 784 8.2 5.4 0.6 13.5 4.2 5. ae-64-64.ebr4.NewYork1.Level3.net 97.1% 784 3.6 11.1 1.7 25.2 6.4 6. ae-6-6.ebr2.NewYork2.Level3.net 95.5% 784 9.0 5.5 1.0 13.7 4.1 7. ae-2-2.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net 94.9% 784 39.1 31.2 22.0 41.6 6.5 8. ae-1-53.edge3.Chicago3.Level3.net 96.3% 784 33.4 29.9 21.6 83.6 12.8 9. BANDCON.edge3.Chicago3.Level3.net 95.7% 784 26.8 32.4 22.3 150.1 23.2 10. po2.core3.chi01.steadfast.net 96.3% 784 33.0 30.1 22.2 93.0 13.0 11. ip76.216-86-150.static.steadfast.net 96.3% 777 33.5 28.4 22.6 35.4 4.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy beckman(a)angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

some discussion on one vendor's (juniper) silicon...
by Joel Jaeggli 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

The juniper pr event at the nyse actually contained some not unreasonable information on their new silicon. starts about 25 minutes in (silly registration required)... http://www.thenewnetworkishere.com/simulcast.html

1 0

Re: Small guys with BGP issues
by mitigator＠gmail.com 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

Friends don't let friends drink and reply-all. I'm just sayin. -j ------Original Message------ From: Richard A Steenbergen To: Steve Bertrand Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Small guys with BGP issues Sent: Nov 1, 2009 11:07 PM On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:54:07PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: > I'm not a political person. Take it for what it is worth. > > I personally know people who do both: > > - practice but not preach > - preach but don't practice > > ... however you take my point, I don't care. > > I just wanted it to be known that the 'guys' who do practice it should > 'God willing' come out and preach it. > > > And this is not the big boy list. This is for all Operators in North > > America, and many who are not, regardless of size. (Well, I guess we'll > > exclude the guy who buys are cable/DSL link and "provides" to his mother > > & father with a LinkSys.) > > eh, -stevieb has much respect for all those who read this list, and when > he posts, feels that the big guys are looking down upon him... hopefully > with approval. Ok so, without getting into debates over being political, practicing vs preaching, BCP38, or big guys vs little guys, can you please explain in clear english what in the name of holy hell you're talking about? What is the issue here, that your DSL provider won't speak BGP with you no matter how many times you've asked, so you're complaining to NANOG about it because you don't have the ability or authority to change providers? Please correct me if I'm reading this wrong, but the emails so far haven't been very clear and this isn't making a lot of sense. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras(a)e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)

1 0

Re: Upstream BGP community support
by Matthew Petach 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Steve Bertrand <steve(a)ibctech.ca> wrote: ... > I am AS14270. BGP with me... I tried, but I couldn't find you in http://peeringdb.org/ > its been two years... you've got to have an > engineer who can set up a session by now, no? > > Steve You might consider just taking matters into your own hands, and getting a connection to an exchange point, adding an entry into peeringdb, and start doing BGP with other folks; announce your /21 directly to people, and it's likely your upstream will suddenly wake up and smell the coffee when they realize you've actually become truly multihomed in spite of them. Nothing shows clue factor quite as much as, well, practical demonstrations--and turning up sessions with other networks at an exchange point is a really good way to let folks see the level at which you're ready to play. Best of luck! Matt

1 0