- Test - lists.nanog.org

Network management software with high detailed traffic report
by Sergey Voropaev 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Does any one know the NMS (network management software) which can do the fallowing: 1. Monitor on Cisco Routers/Switches interface utilization every 5-10 seconds and send e-mail alarm when utilization low or high of predefined thresholds. 2. Collect net-flow statistics (at least src/dst) with granularity of 5-10- seconds. The main idea is to have detailed monitoring of the external links and to be able to know why (by what traffic type) and when link was highly utilized. Existing flow-collector can store netflow reports only with 1 minute granularity but we need 5-10 second. As about e-mail alarms - now I do it by embedded event manager on the router. But I think it would be better to use external SNMP software for that. As about detailed to 5-10 second netflow statistics there are 2 ways. 1st - Use port mirror and use some software which can analyze captured traffic and made a good reports. Do you know such software? 2nd - Use SNMP or telnet/ssh for access to the router/switch every 5-10 seconds and catch netflow counters. Do you now such software? thanks in advance for you help.

12 17

Re: U.S. officials deny technical takedown of WikiLeaks
by msokolov＠ivan.Harhan.ORG 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Jorge Amodio <jmamodio(a)gmail.com> wrote: > If you get a court order I guess you have two choices, one is to > comply with it and the other get used to wear a nice pair of matching > bracelets until your attorney shows up. Option 3: unleash your full firepower against the miscreants who have dared to invade your soil despite the sign at the gate which reads in plain English: THIS FACILITY IS EXTRATERRITORIAL AND IS NOT PART OF ANY COUNTRY NO MAKERS OR ENFORCERS OF ANY FORM OF MAN-MADE LAW ARE ALLOWED ON THE PREMISES DEADLY FORCE WILL BE USED AGAINST ANY NATIONAL AUTHORITIES TRESPASSING PAST THIS BOUNDARY! Factoid: we outnumber the pigs by 1000 to 1. Even if only 1% of us were to go out and shoot a pig, we would still outnumber them 10 to 1! We *CAN* win -- wake up, people! American People vs. USA -- let's see who is stronger. MS Hold the Heathen Hammer High! With a battle cry! For the pagan past I live and one day will die. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu2bgwcv43o

7 6

RE: U.S. officials deny technical takedown of WikiLeaks
by msokolov＠ivan.Harhan.ORG 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Nathan Eisenberg <nathan(a)atlasnetworks.us> wrote: > As someone who was personally connected to this (http://www.komonews.com/ne= > ws/local/78088192.html), and this, http://www.komonews.com/news/local/68320= > 537.html I feel pretty justified in telling you to keep this 'shoot a pig' = > crap off the list. To all uniformed dudes reading this: if you don't want the people you serve to feel like shooting you, perhaps you should consider going on strike, immediately stopping enforcing any and all man-made laws that go against the natural law of Universe, against common sense and against basic humanity; immediately stopping following any and all orders telling you to do things that are morally wrong, and finally, switching over to our side, helping defend America and the American People against USA. In the timeless words of The Internationale: No more deluded by reaction, On tyrants only we'll make war; The soldiers too will take strike action, They'll break ranks and fight no more! And if those cannibals keep trying To sacrifice us to their pride, They soon will hear the bullets flying: We'll shoot the generals on our own side! MS Hold the Heathen Hammer High! With a battle cry! For the pagan past I live and one day will die.

2 1

Re: list archive
by Mark Kent 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Randy Bush wrote: > how do i find archives of this list from the '90s and early '00s? > > randy Nicely organized here: http://seclists.org/nanog/ -mark

1 0

U.S. officials deny technical takedown of WikiLeaks
by andrew.wallace 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Washington (CNN) -- U.S. officials at the Pentagon and State Department denied Friday knowing of any efforts to take down the WikiLeaks website or asking companies to do so. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/12/03/wikileaks.takedown/index.html Andrew

14 16

Wikileaks takedown in US
by Lou Katz 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Sadly, no report that I have seen has indicated that any legal process or court order was in action. -- -=[L]=- Reassembled from random thought waves ... the puckish comment of Gertrude Stein: "There ain't no answer. There ain't going to be any answer. There never has been an answer. That's the answer." Stein G. Quoted in: Gertrude Stein: In Words and Pictures. Renate Stendhal, ed. New York, NY: Algonquin Books; 1994: 262.

4 3

Google acquires Netflix, Vudu, and Blockbuster's streaming video DRM provider Widevine
by Paul Ferguson 04 Dec '10

04 Dec '10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Not for nothing, but I figured this has direct relevance to the current dialog regarding Netflix, Comcast, et al. http://www.betanews.com/article/Google-acquires-Netflix-Vudu-and-Blockbuste rs-streaming-video-DRM-provider-Widevine/1291420252 FYI, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFM+eRqq1pz9mNUZTMRAsm7AJ0Ub6UeMyhjmu8iNZUX9shm+s3r0QCg24b7 YCqeHLPeaNIq+h1zrED4cU4= =Wi/L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

2 1

Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks
by Robert Bonomi 04 Dec '10

04 Dec '10

> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:42:10 -0800 > From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell(a)ufp.org> > Subject: Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks > > In a message written on Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 04:57:03PM +0000, Gary Buhrmas= > ter wrote: > > limits so that ones life has increased protection. A protective trip > > is better than > > the alternative. > > Not always. > > I worked in a data center with something I thought was very, very cool. > > http://www.hilkar.com/highresistance.htm > > The concept, at a high level, is rather than tie the (service, not > signal) ground back to grounding rods directly you run it through a > large resistor. Now when a phase is "grounded" it runs through the > resistor, allowing a small but safe current to flow. > > Why is this cool? Well, say you have a power strip running at 10A > with a bunch of servers on it. If you took a paperclip and inserted it > in an empty plug connecting hot to ground with a normal system > (simulating a faulty bit of gear) the breaker would trip, all your > servers would go off. > > If you did this with a high resistance setup the paperclip would conduct > about 0.5A, maybe less. An alarm, dectecting current, at the resistor > would go off to say there was a fault. Your circuit would draw 10.5 > amps and everything would stay up and running. That faulty bit of gear > didn't take down your entire power strip. > > This totally eliminates arc faults, and there isn't enough current to > ground to arc. I think GFCI's are also unnecessary, as the fault can't > conduct enough current to be harmful. All is "well and good", *UNTIL* "something happens" that introduces _another_ path to 'ground' that bypasses the 'high rresistance' links. (Reminiscent of the old "Branch on C.E. grounded" programming joke.)

1 0

Trying to Make Sense of the Comcast/Level 3 Dispute
by Paul Ferguson 04 Dec '10

04 Dec '10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Interesting article: http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/sjs/trying-make-sense-comcast-level-3 - -dispute Considering the fact that I received an e-mail survey request today from Netflix (I am a subscriber) which, among other questions, asked if I ever did streaming of their services on the Internet, Wii, Live TV, etc. (I don't), as well as asked if I am a Comcast subscriber (I am), among other last-mile service provider options -- I just found the timing of all of this very "interesting". FYI, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFM9zEnq1pz9mNUZTMRAkZjAJ9hbP54xMUAuXKBM8XFbPlE1in2+gCgiW5m K5IDw1Qo+Su6L0ySdb+kbLE= =H1rb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

7 8

Earthlink MX from *Earthlink* dynamic IPs blocked?
by Jay Ashworth 04 Dec '10

04 Dec '10

I'm trying to get my sister's MythTV DVR to send her a daily email with its recording schedule. Earthlink is apparently blocking the email because it's coming from a dynamic address -- even though that address *is an Earthlink cablemodem*. Is there anyone from Earthlink email ops around who can confirm that's actually the proper interpretation of your policy? Cheers, -- jra

4 4