- Test - lists.nanog.org

Hetzner using Netdirekt network?
by Vladimir 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

Hello, I've heard a rumour that Hetzner datacenter is leasing Netdirekt's bandwidth, could anyone confirm please? By tracerouting hetzner.de, netdirekt.de, and two servers (one placed in Netdirekt and another in Hetzner) I can't find anything similar (except russian gateways): kai@zuze:~> lft -s 12345 -d 80 netdirekt.de Tracing .........************.........T TTL LFT trace to ad150.unix-server.com (217.20.112.80):80/tcp ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTL 1 2 10.1.141.145 177.1/105.0ms ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTLs 3 through 4 5 yota-msk-gw.gblnet.ru (109.239.134.1) 101.0/59.8ms 6 msk-spb-te-gw4.gblnet.ru (94.124.183.242) 206.1/109.6ms 7 94.124.182.193 228.6/119.8ms 8 ams-sth-te-gw.gblnet.ru (94.124.182.222) 167.6/174.9ms 9 ams-fra-te-gw1.gblnet.ru (94.124.182.198) 180.0/99.8ms 10 decix.edpnet.net (80.81.192.139) 194.8/310.1ms 11 77.109.91.126.static.edpnet.net (77.109.91.126) 173.5/204.8ms ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTL 12 13 [target open] ad150.unix-server.com (217.20.112.80):80 150.3/203.6ms kai@zuze:~> lft -s 12345 -d 80 hetzner.de Tracing ........*.***.********.........T TTL LFT trace to www.hetzner.de (213.133.107.227):80/tcp ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTL 1 2 10.1.141.145 91.7/173.8ms ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTLs 3 through 5 6 yota-msk-gw.gblnet.ru (109.239.134.1) 94.6/125.2ms 7 msk-spb-te-gw4.gblnet.ru (94.124.183.242) 185.8ms 8 94.124.182.193 134.3/164.1ms 9 ams-sth-te-gw.gblnet.ru (94.124.182.222) 164.4/164.8ms 10 ams-fra-te-gw1.gblnet.ru (94.124.182.198) 138.8/169.9ms 11 decix2-gw.hetzner.de (80.81.193.164) 181.1/176.5ms 12 hos-bb1.juniper1.fs.hetzner.de (213.239.240.242) 253.9/168.4ms 13 hos-tr2.ms-ex3k1.rz11.hetzner.de (213.239.236.83) 187.8/179.9ms 14 [target open] www.hetzner.de (213.133.107.227):80 130.7/151.3ms kai@zuze:~> lft -s 12345 -d 80 ns Tracing ......************.....T TTL LFT trace to ns (188.72.255.99):80/tcp ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTL 1 2 10.1.141.145 95.1/76.3ms ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTLs 3 through 4 5 213.33.166.241.sovintel.ru (213.33.166.241) 104.3/181.5ms 6 mx01.Frankfurt.gldn.net (194.186.157.138) 136.3/205.0ms 7 decix.edpnet.net (80.81.192.139) 179.0/180.6ms 8 77.109.91.126.static.edpnet.net (77.109.91.126) 148.0/139.8ms ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTL 9 10 [target open] ns (188.72.255.99):80 144.2ms kai@zuze:~> lft -s 12345 -d 80 rh Tracing ........*.***********.........T TTL LFT trace to rh (178.63.47.150):80/tcp ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTL 1 2 10.1.141.145 74.4/78.6ms ** [neglected] no reply packets received from TTLs 3 through 5 6 yota-msk-gw.gblnet.ru (109.239.134.1) 90.0/92.5ms 7 msk-spb-te-gw5.gblnet.ru (94.124.183.238) 136.7/185.0ms 8 spb-ams-te-gw5.gblnet.ru (94.124.182.209) 184.9/165.0ms 9 ams-fra-te-gw1.gblnet.ru (94.124.182.198) 176.0/185.2ms 10 decix2-gw.hetzner.de (80.81.193.164) 144.4/186.0ms 11 hos-bb1.juniper1.fs.hetzner.de (213.239.240.242) 165.0/174.1ms 12 hos-tr2.ex3k6.rz12.hetzner.de (213.239.228.167) 209.8/174.6ms 13 [target open] rh (178.63.47.150):80 163.4/234.9ms So is it true or just a rumour? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Vladimir

1 0

[BEWARE] David J. Moore
by Leon Kaiser 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

This is the man who poisoned DroneBL. He is a bad man. Keep your children safe. http://raged.tittybang.org/ Leon ======================================================== Leon Kaiser - Head of GNAA Public Relations - literalka(a)gnaa.eu || literalka(a)goatse.fr http://gnaa.eu || http://security.goatse.fr 7BEECD8D FCBED526 F7960173 459111CE F01F9923 "The mask of anonymity is not intensely constructive." -- Andrew "weev" Auernheimer ========================================================

6 6

Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
by TJ 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

6in4 == deprecated automatic tunneling mechanism ... HE is an example of manually configured Protocol41 encaps. And 6to4 doesn't allow IPv6 to talk to IPv4, contrary to what the name seems to imply :). Some poorly chosen names for our tunneling, yes? Thanks, TJ's Droid2 On Mar 3, 2011 6:27 PM, "William Herrin" <bill(a)herrin.us> wrote:

4 4

Ranges announced by Level3 without permitions.
by Alfa Telecom 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

Hello All! Maybe somebody could help me with some issue: Ranges below are announced by Level3 79.110.224.0/20 *[BGP/170] 08:23:34, MED 0, localpref 150, from 213.248.64.245 AS path: 3356 79.110.64.0/20 *[BGP/170] 08:25:07, MED 0, localpref 150, from 213.248.64.245 AS path: 3356 Both ranges are from RIPE region and couldn't be announced from ARIN ASN at all. We're sponsored LIR for both companies, I sent several emails to Level3 noc, made several calls but they still announce these ranges. ------------------ Andrew

7 8

Fasthosts postmaster
by Alexander Harrowell 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

Can someone who's a mail admin at Fasthosts Ltd. in the UK/AS15148 contact this customer off list? Messagelabs is rejecting random e-mail from one of your SMTP boxes (error 553: Spam, exchange-out-45.livemail.co.uk/213.171.216.45). Your phone number goes to people who don't know what a postmaster is, and your whois tech contact goes to the sales desk. Meanwhile, our ticket has been assigned to someone who wants to know "your e-mail address and password". Hint: 1) of those is in the to: field, and 2) is perfectly useless - how exactly do you login to the mail server's admin interface with a user's address and SMTP pwd? Further, not so sure about sending passwords about in cleartext e-mail to some outsourced thing or other. I've verified that neither us, nor that host, is in any of the major *BLs. (PS, if anyone from Messagelabs is around and can fix the problem without going through Fasthosts, that would be optimal:-)) Sorry for the noise, list. This may be e-mail related, but it is operational. -- The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail to lists complaining about them

1 0

Postfix spam
by Peter Rudasingwa 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

Hello, I am being attacked by a lot of spams on my postfix box. What is the best way to block them and fix this for good? It is so bad some of my IPs have been black listed. Thanks for your help. -- Best Regards, Peter R. *** *

5 6

OT: Where are the VoIP clue bats?
by Eric Brunner-Williams 04 Mar '11

04 Mar '11

First, thanks for all the responses to "What vexes VoIP users?" I'm looking for pointers to sites, like Geoff Huston's potaroo.net, that are VoIP clue dense, or mailing lists(*) where the VoIP-full lurk. Thanks in advance, Eric (*) I'm already on the ecrit list, though my real interest in the ongoing IETF "emergency services" meme has been a "I'm alive" app, not circuit and bandwidth capture by government. I was pleased to see a "I'm alive" app fielded by Google last week at Christchurch, NZ.

2 1

AT&T via Tata and Level3
by Morgan Miskell 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

I've noticed that we have thousands of routes for AT&T via Tata that we don't have from AT&T through Level3. I would expect Level3 to have most of the routes for AT&T that Tata does since they are both directly peered with AT&T. This seems to have started around midnight last night. I have a ticket open with Level3 to inquire...anyone else notice this or anything similar around 12-1AM EST this morning? -- Morgan A. Miskell CaroNet Data Centers 704-643-8330 x206 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any unauthorized disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

3 2

Windows Live Mail/Hotmail Postmaster Contact?
by Ryan Gelobter 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

Can anyone provide me with an alternative contact to someone at Hotmail? I've tried their support form over at https://support.msn.com/eform.aspx?productKey=edfsmsbl&ct=eformts&st=1&wfxr… doesn't seem to ever generate even an auto-reply anymore. Feel free to contact me off-list.

1 0

icmp question
by ann kok 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

Hello Have you had any experience about icmp from window and linux? I ping this linux host and they all are same LAN but Linux (ubuntu) is slow than window to this linux host Do you know why? Thank you

2 1