- Test - lists.nanog.org

akamai rate limiting?
by Joseph Gersch 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

Does anyone know if Akamai edgesuite servers rate limits or blacklists caching servers that query it too often? It appears that queries are timing out if we exceed a query load to edgesuite. Does anyone at Akamai know if there are any changes to rate limiting or an abnormally high load? Joseph Gersch Chief Operating Officer Secure64 Software Corporation

3 3

Re: How to begin making my own ISP?
by hasserw＠hushmail.com 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

No one replied with any useful information. I guess no one wants competition on this list? Pretty poor tactic. On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:55:01 -0400 hasserw(a)hushmail.com wrote: >I want to begin making my own ISP, mainly for high speed servers >and such, but also branching out to residential customers. I'm >going to be in Germany for the next school year (probably either >Frankfurt am Main or Berlin); any suggestions on what sort of >classes I can take there that will be in English and will teach me > >all I need to know on how to build and manage my own ISP, AS, etc? > >Thanks.

11 12

Any Verizon routing folks listening?
by Drew Linsalata 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

We're seeing complaints from VZ DSL customers in the NY area that are unable to exchange any IP traffic with mail hosts on multiple netblocks. Port independent. Sounds like auto- blacklisting run amok. Off list contact welcomed and appreciated. -- Sent from my iPhone

1 0

Anyone used Adtran NetVanta 1544?
by Jay Nakamura 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

Has anyone have experience using Adtran NetVanta 1544 as a iSCSI SAN switch? Or any Adtran switch in general? Any problems or unexpected issues? Thanks!

4 3

Fwd: [NANOG-announce] NANOG 53 Update
by Ren Provo 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

Thanks for the reminder Betty! Comcast is hosting a social on Sunday night, October 9th, from 6:30-9:30pm on the 43rd floor at Comcast Center. NANOG and ARIN participants, registered by Wednesday the 5th of October, will be on the guest list with security in the lobby. Late registrants will need to work with security onsite so please register early instead. Photo ID will be required for all participants to proceed from the lobby to the 43rd floor. A pair of trolley cars will make an optional continuous loop between the Loews Hotel and Comcast Center. The stroll is about a half a mile / 15 minutes with Philadelphia City Hall at the mid-spot. https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/ARIN-XXVIII/social.html has details as well. We look forward to a great night in Philly to kick-off the week. Cheers, -ren On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Betty Burke <betty(a)newnog.org> wrote: > Colleagues: > > A short NANOG 53 reminder and update. NANOG 53 will be held in Philadelphia, > PA on* October 9-12, 2011*. NANOG 53 will begin with tutorials starting > early Sunday afternoon, October 9th. The meeting will adjourn approximately > 12 noon on Wednesday, October 12th. > > Thank you to our NANOG 53 Speakers and to the NANOG Program Committee. > Attendees are sure to enjoy another fantastic program. The posted agenda > continues to be updated, however, the NANOG 53 program is expected to remain > as posted! Do not delay, register for NANOG 53 now as the* registration > rate will increase on October 4, 2011.* > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog53/agenda.html > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog53/nanog53_registration.html > > > Please note the Loews Philadelphia *Hotel Group Rate Expires on September > 23, 2011*. Make your reservation as soon as possible. > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog53/hotel.php > > In addition to a wonderful program, attendees will be treated to our famous > "Sponsor Socials". NANOG 53 Attendees will have ample social networking > opportunities during each day and through out the evening. Philadelphia is > a wonderful place to visit and NANOG is grateful to our host, Comcast, for > the opportunity to return to the City of Brotherly Love. Make sure to join > us and be a part of the NANOG experience. > > Should you have any questions or concerns regarding your reservation, the > hotel, or NANOG 53 in general, please be sure to send a note to * > nanog-support(a)nanog.org or phone us at +1 510 492 4030.* > > > Betty > > Betty Burke > NewNOG/NANOG Executive Director > Office (810) 214-1218 > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG-announce mailing list > NANOG-announce(a)nanog.org > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce >

1 0

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 53 Update
by Betty Burke 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

Colleagues: A short NANOG 53 reminder and update. NANOG 53 will be held in Philadelphia, PA on* October 9-12, 2011*. NANOG 53 will begin with tutorials starting early Sunday afternoon, October 9th. The meeting will adjourn approximately 12 noon on Wednesday, October 12th. Thank you to our NANOG 53 Speakers and to the NANOG Program Committee. Attendees are sure to enjoy another fantastic program. The posted agenda continues to be updated, however, the NANOG 53 program is expected to remain as posted! Do not delay, register for NANOG 53 now as the* registration rate will increase on October 4, 2011.* http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog53/agenda.html http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog53/nanog53_registration.html Please note the Loews Philadelphia *Hotel Group Rate Expires on September 23, 2011*. Make your reservation as soon as possible. http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog53/hotel.php In addition to a wonderful program, attendees will be treated to our famous "Sponsor Socials". NANOG 53 Attendees will have ample social networking opportunities during each day and through out the evening. Philadelphia is a wonderful place to visit and NANOG is grateful to our host, Comcast, for the opportunity to return to the City of Brotherly Love. Make sure to join us and be a part of the NANOG experience. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding your reservation, the hotel, or NANOG 53 in general, please be sure to send a note to * nanog-support(a)nanog.org or phone us at +1 510 492 4030.* Betty Betty Burke NewNOG/NANOG Executive Director Office (810) 214-1218 _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

(no subject)
by mjp16＠ieee.uow.edu.au 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

Your message was not delivered due to the following reason: Your message was not delivered because the destination server was unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely there is a network problem that prevented delivery, but it is also possible that the computer is turned off, or does not have a mail system running right now. Your message was not delivered within 5 days: Host 86.112.1.86 is not responding. The following recipients could not receive this message: <nanog(a)nanog.org> Please reply to postmaster(a)ieee.uow.edu.au if you feel this message to be in error.

1 0

insurance
by harbor235 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

Curious if anyone out there is acting as an independent contractor, consultant, or small business, if so do you use professional liability insurance? What should I look out for and is there any good brokers that offer inexpensive yet reliable insurance? thanks as always, Mike

9 10

Re: lots of latency on qwest to google?
by Scott Weeks 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

--- paul4004(a)gmail.com wrote: From: PC <paul4004(a)gmail.com> You can traceroute from all their POPS here if you'd like: https://kai02.centurylink.com/PtapRpts/Public/BackboneReport.aspx --------------------------------------------- Hmmm, it seems to work with only one vendor's browser. Anyone else notice that? scott

2 1

Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a nationwide network
by Dorn Hetzel 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Jon Lewis <jlewis(a)lewis.org> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Dorn Hetzel wrote: > > If what you have is LEC frame relay service over which you have PVCs to >> two >> providers of IP transit service, then, IMO, you are multihomed. Are you >> protected against every single failure mode? No, but then neither are >> many >> folks with more traditional methods of multihoming. You are certainly >> afforded reasonable protection against routing issues on each of your two >> providers. >> > > I'd agree in that case that you do have connectivity to two providers and > are multihomed, though in a very foolish way. > > Past experience has taught me that while Layer 2 LEC frame certainly fails, it may do so quite a bit less often than the rate of routing flaps, peering spats, and everything else that can go wrong at Layers 3..9 ... So while it's not physically diverse, it may still yield a significant reduction in downtime compared to that same T1 direct to a single Layer 3 provider... > > How about a hard T1 to provider A and a GRE tunnel over a 3G router for a >> backup? That's certainly physically diverse... >> > > If I was the ARIN auditor, I'd say that's borderline acceptable as > multihomed. It's not much different from one of your connections being > "wireless", as long as that 3G connection is of sufficient bandwidth to of > meaningful utility if the T1 is down. If your primary connection is > T1/T3/ethernet/etc. and your second is a v.90 modem, then I'd probably call > BS on the claim of being multihomed. > > So now you think ARIN should be judging how much bandwidth is enough, and how much is not? Perhaps I just have a corporate ASN, and my backup connection is the most I can afford to make sure at least email gets through when the primary is down. It's a slippery slope from "v.90 not good enough" to "less than 2xOCn not good enough" where n can be adjusted to suitably limit competition... -dorn

5 6