- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: trouble with Paradyne Bitstorm 2600 DSLAM
by A.T. 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Thanks. I have already tried interrupting boot process. Booting up with parameter 0x00020 (disable login security) don't seem affect outcome, both serial and management ethernet still asks login. On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 09:09 -0500, Chris Boyd wrote: > Try pressing enter several times after powering the system up. > > --Chris > > On Apr 17, 2012, at 8:19 AM, A.T. wrote: > > > Hello, all! > > > > > > I have Paradyne Bitstorm 2600 DSLAM, but no password. Is it possible to > > reset this device to factory configuration? Manuals don't say much, only > > specified way to restore factory settings assume logged in > > administrator. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > !DSPAM:1001,4f8d6e61937107248971901! >

1 0

trouble with Paradyne Bitstorm 2600 DSLAM
by A.T. 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hello, all! I have Paradyne Bitstorm 2600 DSLAM, but no password. Is it possible to reset this device to factory configuration? Manuals don't say much, only specified way to restore factory settings assume logged in administrator. Thanks!

1 0

Network Storage
by Maverick 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hello Everyone, Can you please comment on what is best solution for storing network traffic. We have been graciously granted access by our network administrator to capture traffic but the one Tera byte disk space is no match with the data that we are seeing, so it fills up quickly. We can't get additional space on the server itself so I am looking for some external solutions. Can you please suggest something that would be best for Gbps speeds . Best, Ali

18 20

Communal Dining
by Ronald Bonica 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Folks, You are all invited to an extremely informal dinner at our house at 6PM on Saturday, April 21. Spouses and children are all invited. I will bake bread and put on a huge pot of soup. If your kids are picky eaters, feel free to bring whatever they will eat. Our house is located at: 241 West Meadowland Lane Sterling, Virgina 20164 703 430 8379 -------------------------- Ron and Nancy Bonica vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf

3 2

FW: Communal Dining
by Ronald Bonica 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Folks, Sorry, you are not all invited to dinner. I apologize for the spam. MS mail address completion helped me a little more than I wanted. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronald Bonica > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:05 AM > To: 'FRBILLS(a)aol.com'; 'Nicholas Hinko'; 'Susan Hinko'; jay cuasay; > 'William Richey'; Will Ress; 'maria torres'; 'landreyko(a)gmail.com'; > nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: Communal Dining > > Folks, > > You are all invited to an extremely informal dinner at our house at 6PM > on Saturday, April 21. Spouses and children are all invited. I will > bake bread and put on a huge pot of soup. If your kids are picky > eaters, feel free to bring whatever they will eat. > > Our house is located at: > > 241 West Meadowland Lane > Sterling, Virgina 20164 > 703 430 8379 > > -------------------------- > Ron and Nancy Bonica > vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf >

2 1

facebook ipv6 is down?
by Ido Szargel 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, It seems that on the last 3 hours facebook isn't available via ipv6, when tracing from HE I don't even get to FB network, only as far as Ashburn on their network, When tracing from nl-ix I get to facebook network but the trace stops traceroute6 -I www.v6.facebook.com traceroute to www.v6.facebook.com (2620:0:1cfe:face:b00c:0:3:0), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 2a01:1b0:705::f (2a01:1b0:705::f) 3.858 ms 3.744 ms 3.504 ms 2 bit.telecity2.nlsix.net (2001:7f8:13::a501:2859:2) 2.133 ms 2.061 ms 1.923 ms 3 br01.ams1.tfbnw.net (2001:7f8:1::a503:2934:1) 3.276 ms 3.159 ms 3.000 ms 4 ae28.bb02.iad1.tfbnw.net (2620:0:1cff:dead:beef::485) 90.835 ms 91.009 ms 90.953 ms 5 ae12.bb02.sjc1.tfbnw.net (2620:0:1cff:dead:beef::85) 160.883 ms 160.820 ms 160.897 ms 6 ae2.pr01.sjc1.tfbnw.net (2620:0:1cff:dead:beef::10) 152.688 ms 152.638 ms 152.890 ms 7 * * * 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * Is anyone else having the same issue? Thanks, Ido

8 9

Re: Most energy efficient (home) setup
by Mike 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

I think the simple test for this problem is to take a non-ECC machine, boot from a CD/USB Key/etc with memtest or memtest86+ on it, and see if you get errors over the course of a few days. Getting errors will certainly prove that this problem exists (or that you have bad ram).

2 1

SORBS?!
by Chris Conn 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello, Is anyone from SORBS still listening? We have a few IP addresses here and there that are listed, one in particular that has been for a spam incident from over a year ago. The "last spam" date is 03/05/2011 according to their lookup tools. We don't have access to their Net Manager even if our ARIN POC corresponds to the account on their system we opened a while ago. We use their ISP feedback form and never get any responses back. Is SORBS still relevant and functional? Sincerely, Chris Conn B2B2C.ca

39 65

IPv6 Launch day preparation
by Pierre-Yves Maunier 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello all, we've had an interesting day today in Paris discussing about how to prepare the IPv6 implementation in various networks. With a couple of vendors and software companies (Juniper, Cisco, A10 Networks, Fortinet, BreakingPoint, StoneSoft, Infoblox, PaloAlto) we decided to make a very technical day about IPv6 transition techniques and various ways to implement it in different type of networks. We've had the morning for some mechanisms presentations and all the afternoon with a lab interconnecting all the vendors and having various scenarios to test all the mechanisms we discussed in the morning. The lab description can be found here : http://g6.asso.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ipv6-launch-lab.pdf (it's in "frenglish" but really understable for english speaking only people, personnaly I'm dual stack french/english :-) ) Actually we had : - a Juniper MX480 with a service card to act as a eyeball network providing IPv6 only connectivity to their customers and a NAT64 (Juniper) + DNS64 (Infoblox) to allow them to reach IPv4 only contents - Stonesoft running a dual stack entreprise network (FW+IPS) that can reach all IPv4/IPv6 contents - A10 networks configured as a IPv4 load balancer and IPv6 NAT64 gateway for contents servers using private IPv4 only address space : The IPv4 only servers were reachable from IPv6 only machines - PaloAlto and Fortinet as IPv4/IPv6 Firewalls - an IPv4 only web server (to be accessible from the IPv6 only eyeball network thanks to the NAT64+DNS64 setup) - an IPv6 only web server And in order to stress all the vendors hardware/software, we had breaking point which was able to generate IPv4/IPv6 applicative traffic from several kpps/mbps to loads of Mpps/Gbps It was very interesting to have this setup on which anybody in the audience was able to ask for specific test/configuration to understand all the mechanisms. Unfortunately we did not have a link to the DFZ to run more interesting tests but we will probably have another Lab day with a better setup for this (and having all the people in the audience using their laptops to simulate eyeball customers). Our goal was mainly to make people aware about what can be done to move forward with IPv6 and I think we achieved this goal. If you have any comments, feel free to reply here. -- Pierre-Yves Maunier

2 1

altdb?
by Justin Zipkin 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Anybody know what the scoop is with ALTDB? It's been down since yesterday.

2 1