- Test - lists.nanog.org

Listing or google map of peering exchange
by Dennis Burgess 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

Looking for a good listing of US/Canada peering exchange, similar to Torx in Toronto.. Google map listing would be nice J Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition <http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm> " Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 <tel:314-735-0270> Website: http://www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> - Skype: linktechs <skype:linktechs?call> -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com <http://www.towercoverage.com/> - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace

9 12

Re: No topic -- Photo in its context might be interesting...
by Scott Weeks 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

--- wbailey(a)satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: From: Warren Bailey <wbailey(a)satelliteintelligencegroup.com> 3mbps on a ship at 5:1 tdma oversubscribed is about 16k a month on c band ----------------------------------------------------------- There're 43200 minutes in a month. Just to be fast, the article said 1.5Mbps link, so I used 1/2 of your $16K. Divide the $8K by 43200 and I get 18 cents per minute. Also, I completely missed that there was a page 2. It looks like they use Iridium. Here is some pricing. Just the first thing I found: http://www.sattransusa.com/irprpl.html Plan Monthly Amount Monthly Allowance Cost per 1000 Bytes Plan SBD 0 $27.00 0 Bytes $1.15 Plan SBD 12 $35.10 10,000 Bytes $1.05 Plan LBS 8* $28.78 8,000 Bytes $1.78 scott

4 3

Re: No topic -- Photo in its context might be interesting...
by Scott Weeks 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

--- LarrySheldon(a)cox.net wrote: http://media.englishrussia.com/022013/icebcomm/icebreakercommunicationsyste… In an article titled "Do they have Internet on the Icebreaker?" ----------------------------------------------- I get: 403 Forbidden nginx/1.0.15 ------------------------------------------ http://englishrussia.com/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache/3682a941fcfa4ee… ---------------------------------------- not much there. -------------------------------------- http://englishrussia.com/2014/07/07/do-they-have-internet-connection-on-the… -------------------------------------- works These prices are low if it's INMARSAT. We pay ~$7/minute. If they have their own Ku-band (hopefully not as 12-18Ghz has a lot of rain fade) that seems high. C-band (4-8Ghz) on ships is much better. Not a lot of perks for being bored out at sea for long periods of time. scott

3 2

hotmail email issues today?
by Jared Mauch 09 Jul '14

09 Jul '14

Anyone know what happened? I've started to see a large number of bounces from them (this caused a large number of people with their e-mail hosted there to be removed from mailing lists I host). Offlist replies/pointers to what I'm doing wrong are welcome. - Jared

5 6

No topic -- Photo in its context might be interesting...
by Larry Sheldon 09 Jul '14

09 Jul '14

http://media.englishrussia.com/022013/icebcomm/icebreakercommunicationsyste… In an article titled "Do they have Internet on the Icebreaker?" http://englishrussia.com/wp-content/plugins/ttftitles/cache/3682a941fcfa4ee… -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)

2 1

Anyone from AS7160 (Oracle) around ?
by Mike Tancsa 09 Jul '14

09 Jul '14

Hi, I have been trying to get a hold of someone who looks after ASN 7160 since last Thursday both directly (OrgTechEmail), and indirectly via upstreams with no luck. I am trying to resolve or at least understand a routing reachability issue between our two networks. It seems packets from ASN7160 are not able to get back to some of my netblocks in AS 11647. e.g. eg. this is fine % traceroute -q1 -s 98.159.240.105 -Picmp 68.233.77.173 traceroute to 68.233.77.173 (68.233.77.173) from 98.159.240.105, 64 hops max, 72 byte packets 1 cogent-vl38-tor-hespler-v38 (205.211.165.117) 0.091 ms 2 gi1-18.mag02.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (38.104.158.77) 0.701 ms 3 te0-7-0-12.ccr22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.40.165) 0.765 ms 4 be2080.ccr42.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.42.5) 15.871 ms 5 be2003.ccr21.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.22) 17.882 ms 6 38.104.102.102 (38.104.102.102) 17.395 ms 7 border2.te7-1-bbnet1.chg004.pnap.net (64.94.32.19) 16.335 ms 8 oraclebol-7.border2.chg004.pnap.net (74.217.8.106) 16.945 ms 9 VIP-CH-77-173.taleo.net (68.233.77.173) 17.014 ms This is not % traceroute -q1 -s 205.211.165.119 -Picmp 68.233.77.173 traceroute to 68.233.77.173 (68.233.77.173) from 205.211.165.119, 64 hops max, 72 byte packets 1 cogent-vl38-tor-hespler-v38 (205.211.165.117) 0.145 ms 2 gi1-18.mag02.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (38.104.158.77) 7.926 ms 3 te0-7-0-12.ccr22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.40.165) 1.081 ms 4 be2080.ccr42.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.42.5) 15.699 ms 5 be2003.ccr21.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.22) 15.394 ms 6 * 7 * 8 * Same with 64.7.137.0/24 and 64.7.135.0/24 for some reason, but not all subnets within 64.7.128.0/19 are blocked. % traceroute -q1 -s 64.7.135.1 -Picmp 68.233.77.173 traceroute to 68.233.77.173 (68.233.77.173) from 64.7.135.1, 64 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 iolite3 (199.212.135.73) 0.234 ms 2 cogent-vl108 (67.43.129.246) 2.575 ms 3 gi1-18.mag02.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (38.104.158.77) 2.844 ms 4 te0-7-0-12.ccr21.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.40.137) 3.460 ms 5 be2079.ccr41.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.27.181) 17.338 ms 6 be2005.ccr21.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.74) 17.962 ms 7 * vs % traceroute -q1 -s 64.7.138.225 -Picmp 68.233.77.173 traceroute to 68.233.77.173 (68.233.77.173) from 64.7.138.225, 64 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 iolite3 (199.212.135.73) 0.193 ms 2 cogent-vl108 (67.43.129.246) 2.210 ms 3 gi1-18.mag02.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (38.104.158.77) 2.469 ms 4 te0-7-0-12.ccr22.yyz02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.40.165) 3.091 ms 5 be2080.ccr42.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.42.5) 17.566 ms 6 be2003.ccr21.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.22) 18.457 ms 7 38.104.102.102 (38.104.102.102) 17.831 ms 8 border2.te8-1-bbnet2.chg004.pnap.net (64.94.32.83) 22.324 ms 9 oraclebol-7.border2.chg004.pnap.net (74.217.8.106) 19.091 ms 10 VIP-CH-77-173.taleo.net (68.233.77.173) 20.318 ms The issue started around July 3rd some time. I have tried the listed contacts OrgTechHandle: NOC2096-ARIN OrgTechName: Network Operation Center OrgTechPhone: +1-877-524-5665 OrgTechEmail: network-contact_ww(a)oracle.com OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NOC2096-ARIN with no luck since last Thursday. The toll free people were trying their best to understand who within Oracle I was trying to reach, but its not part of their normal decision tree. via TATA and abovenet gives similar results. traceroute -q1 -Picmp -s 205.211.165.121 68.233.77.173 traceroute to 68.233.77.173 (68.233.77.173) from 205.211.165.121, 64 hops max, 72 byte packets 1 ix-11-2-3-0.tcore1.TNK-Toronto.as6453.net (209.58.16.21) 0.170 ms 2 if-5-0-0-5.core4.TNK-Toronto.as6453.net (63.243.172.25) 30.856 ms 3 if-0-3-2-0.tcore1.CT8-Chicago.as6453.net (63.243.172.34) 14.203 ms 4 63.243.129.14 (63.243.129.14) 13.967 ms 5 ae4.cr1.ord2.us.above.net (64.125.28.49) 12.203 ms 6 ae9.mpr1.ord11.us.above.net (64.125.24.106) 13.043 ms 7 ae4.mpr1.ord5.us.above.net (64.125.24.94) 15.027 ms 8 * traceroute -q1 -Picmp -s 67.43.129.244 68.233.77.173 traceroute to 68.233.77.173 (68.233.77.173) from 67.43.129.244, 64 hops max, 72 byte packets 1 ix-11-2-3-0.tcore1.TNK-Toronto.as6453.net (209.58.16.21) 29.514 ms 2 if-11-0-0-4.core4.TNK-Toronto.as6453.net (64.86.33.42) 0.376 ms 3 if-2-3-2-0.tcore1.CT8-Chicago.as6453.net (63.243.172.42) 12.124 ms 4 63.243.129.14 (63.243.129.14) 13.624 ms 5 ae4.cr1.ord2.us.above.net (64.125.28.49) 12.607 ms 6 ae9.mpr1.ord11.us.above.net (64.125.24.106) 14.290 ms 7 ae4.mpr1.ord5.us.above.net (64.125.24.94) 13.500 ms 8 208.185.21.162 (208.185.21.162) 13.476 ms 9 VIP-CH-77-173.taleo.net (68.233.77.173) 13.778 ms ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike(a)sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/

2 3

Colo Internet Carriers in Atlanta Area
by Chris Lowe 08 Jul '14

08 Jul '14

My organization is building a new data center in the Atlanta area. I need to identify a couple of carriers stability is preferred over cost. Please let me know your preferred carriers as well as any carriers that you would stay away from. Thanks!

2 1

new york new york
by Randy Bush 08 Jul '14

08 Jul '14

susan crawford, @scrawford, tweeted this really well done survey of the major internet infrastructure in nyc. http://cromwell-intl.com/travel/usa/new-york-internet/ randy

1 0

Cheap LSN/CGN/NAT444 Solution
by Skeeve Stevens 07 Jul '14

07 Jul '14

Hi all, I am sure this is something that a reasonable number of people would have done on this list. I am after a LSN/CGN/NAT444 solution to put about 1000 Residential profile NBN speeds (fastest 100/40) services behind. I am looking at a Cisco ASR1001/2, pfSense and am willing to consider other options, including open source.... Obviously the cheaper the better. This solution is for v4 only, and needs to consider the profile of the typical residential users. Any pitfalls would be helpful to know - as in what will and and more importantly wont work - or any work-arounds which may work. This solution is not designed to be long lasting (maybe 6-9 months)... it is to get the solution going for up to 1000 users, and once it reaches that point then funds will be freed up to roll out a more robust, carrier-grade and long term solution (which will include v6). So no criticism on not doing v6 straight up please. Happy for feedback off-list of any solutions that people have found work well... Note, I am in Australia so any vendors which aren't easily accessible down here, won't be useful. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd skeeve(a)eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve experts360: https://expert360.com/profile/d54a9 twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering

10 22

Question on Cisco EEM Policies
by Daniel van der Steeg 07 Jul '14

07 Jul '14

Hello all, I have implemented two EEM Policies using TCL on a Cisco Catalyst 6500, both of them running every X seconds. Now I am trying to find a way to monitor the CPU and memory usage of these policies, to determine their footprint. Does anyone have a good idea how I can do this? Thanks, Daniel

2 2