February 2019 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Last Mile Design
by David Ratkay 15 Feb '19

15 Feb '19

I am not sure if this is a easy question to answer. But I am wondering what ISP's do for their residential and business customers for designing POP's that they usually access to get theur traffic into a given ISP and beyond. Is it usually a L1/L2 connection from the CE to the last mile POP? Or L2 even within the last mile POP. Do you just have POP's delegated to residential users and a separate POP for business users. Or is it done on a geographical basis. So for this region of City-A we manage both residential and business customers at this same POP.

23 77

Whitebox with OSPF optics
by Sami Joseph 15 Feb '19

15 Feb '19

Hey, Have you guys seen any ODM vendor that makes platforms based on Tomahawk 3 or later OSPF optics ? Thank you Sam

2 1

cgnat ams0 vrf-aware flow data export help
by Aaron Gould 14 Feb '19

14 Feb '19

Need assistance with exporting flow data for inside interface of cgnat ams0 aggregated multiservice interface I have MX960 with MS-MPC-128G doing cgnat using AMS0 (aggregated multiservice of underlying mams interfaces) using next-hop-style vrf-aware cgnat. I need the cgnat inside domain interface (ams0.551) to be configured to export flow data (jflow, sflow, ipfix, whichever version i can use) to a flow collector server, this is important so we can have flow data of *pre-nat) private ip traffic. Anyone know how ? -Aaron

1 0

adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor?
by nusenu 14 Feb '19

14 Feb '19

Dear NIST RPKI Monitor Team, thanks for creating and maintaining the RPKI Monitor https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/#rpki_adopters I've seen your graphs in multiple routing security presentations :) What do you think about adding graphs that show the amount of actually unreachable prefixes and IP space? (prefix where no alternative valid/unknown announcement exists) I think such graphs would help us focus on those prefixes that we should have to tackle first. This page contains examples of INVALID prefixes that would still be reachable in a route origin validating environment (see the RPKI validator screenshots): https://medium.com/@nusenu/towards-cleaning-up-rpki-invalids-d69b03ab8a8c kind regards, nusenu -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu

5 8

Fwd: wither cyclops?
by william manning 14 Feb '19

14 Feb '19

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: william manning <chinese.apricot(a)gmail.com> Date: Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 9:34 PM Subject: wither cyclops? To: <nanog(a)nanog.org> Did this tool die on the vine? https://cyclops.cs.ucla.edu/ /Wm

2 1

AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers
by Jay Borkenhagen 14 Feb '19

14 Feb '19

FYI: The AT&T/as7018 network is now dropping all RPKI-invalid route announcements that we receive from our peers. We continue to accept invalid route announcements from our customers, at least for now. We are communicating with our customers whose invalid announcements we are propagating, informing them that these routes will be accepted by fewer and fewer networks over time. Thanks to those of you who are publishing ROAs in the RPKI. We would also like to encourage other networks to join us in taking this step to improve the quality of routing information in the Internet. Thanks! Jay B.

17 24

VPS providers contacts
by Mehmet Akcin 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Hey there I am looking to get in touch with VPS providers (like vultr.com etc.) which has all automated control panel to ask few questions regarding BGP implementation and overall automated control panel related stuff. I have been trying to get a hold of someone from virtkick.com which on paper sounded like exactly what i needed but unfortunately got no response from them. thanks in advance mehmet

6 6

skype attack
by Randy Bush 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

an update to skype will pop up and ask you deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ... randy

5 11

Latency question - Juniper MX960 vs the Tellabs 8860
by Steve Danello 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Looking for two latency profiles, best/worst cast would be great for the Telllabs 8860 and Juniper MX960. Looks like the Juniper may be in the 15us range Both cases would be a 10Gb -1Gb and 1Gb - 10Gb We’d understand the serialization piece; really looking to provide a customer the hardware latency, we don’t have a great means to test them Thanks all! Steve

2 2

Route Filtering Update
by Christopher Morrow 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Howdy! At Nanog74 in Vancouver I mentioned (along with some other folk in the security track) that we are planning on filtering peerings to AS15169 'by chrismas 2018', roughly speaking. A few folk(bcc'd, hi!) noticed that I'm late on that work item... yes I am, sorry. I'm hopeful I'll get the ducks[0[ lined up to get this accomplished this quarter instead. I'll be at the Nanog meeting next week and I'm hoping to get a lightning talk slot to chat about this, progress and next steps. Worse case operations folk interested should feel free to corner me at the venue to chat about this topic directly. other topics are also fine to chat about :) thanks, -chris 0: https://www.digitaltrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/1-duck-sized-horse…

1 0