December 2019 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: RIPE our of IPv4
by Valdis Klētnieks 05 Dec '19

05 Dec '19

On Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:04:24 -0800, Fred Baker said: > > I believe that Dmitry's point is that we will still require IPv4 addresses for new > > organizations deploying dual-stack > > I think I understood what you meant, but not what you said. > If someone is dual stack, they are IPv6-capable and IPv4-capable. And they're going to need v4 addresses to be v4-capable, aren't there? A new corporation that's trying to spin up dual-stack is going to need 2 address allocations, a v4 and a v6.

7 11

Gmail email blocking is off the rails (again)
by Matthew Pounsett 05 Dec '19

05 Dec '19

For some reason Gmail has started blocking mailman administrative emails to someone who's an admin on a list I host. Their SMTP 552 error message points to <https://support.google.com/mail/?p=BlockedMessage>, which implies the "problem" is the URLs in the email, but is otherwise completely unhelpful. If anyone here has any pull with Gmail postmasters, could you please suggest to them that they whitelist messages that are as consistent and well-known as mailman's admin and moderator messages?

11 16

RE: AS328501
by David Guo 05 Dec '19

05 Dec '19

Same here, even we are already their customer, but the other salesman send SPAM every month From: Peers <peers-bounces(a)napafrica.net> On Behalf Of Chris Knipe via Peers Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 6:36 PM To: Sadiq, Bilal <bsadiq(a)cogentco.com> Cc: Chris Knipe <chrisk(a)paygate.co.za>; peers(a)napafrica.net; nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: [NAPAfrica Peers] AS328501 Bilal, I don’t take lightly to SPAM, and carriers harvesting WHOIS data to steal information in order to SPAM AS holders... It’s quite ironic, that you send me two IDENTICAL emails too. Rest assured, I will NEVER in my life, touch COGENT after your conduct. All the best in South Africa, I trust the industry at large will view your conduct in the same light as me. All the best, Chris Knipe Network Manager DPO Group - South Africa<http://bit.ly/2LxSCNp> [https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/signatures.dpopaygate.za/SignatureImages…] <https://www.paygate.co.za/> e: chrisk(a)paygate.co.za<mailto:chrisk@paygate.co.za> p: +27 (0)87 820 2020 [http://bit.ly/2oy5jgx]<http://bit.ly/34gkuKs> [twitter icon] <http://bit.ly/2BZvdwE> [youtube icon] <http://bit.ly/2WAYkQA> [linkedin icon] <http://bit.ly/31YtvGp> [linkedin icon] <http://bit.ly/2NumesG> [http://bit.ly/332Gfx9]<http://bit.ly/2LxSCNp> [http://bit.ly/34efkyD]<http://bit.ly/2qSsUJs> [http://bit.ly/31VoQFi]<https://sidpayment.com/> * Our branding has changed. Learn more here<https://www.paygate.co.za/websitechange/>. The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. Interception of this email is prohibited. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please immediately notify only the sender by replying to the address listed in the "From:” field. DPO Group (and its affiliates) shall not be liable if any variation is effected to any document or correspondence emailed unless that variation has been approved in writing. DPO Group is PCI DSS Level 1 and GDPR compliant. To view the DPO GDPR Privacy Notice, Data Protection Policy and Data Subject Consent Withdrawal Form Click Here.<https://www.paygate.co.za/gdpr/>

1 0

Comcast & NTT packet loss today
by Ben Cannon 04 Dec '19

04 Dec '19

We’re trying to figure out wether this is an isolated or wider incident, looking like one of our customer’s flows is fragging between NTT and Comcast. 5 ae-0.a02.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.3) 5.571 ms 13.026 ms 9.514 ms 6 ae-0.comcast.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.66.34) 119.688 ms 117.368 ms 111.902 ms 7 be-12578-cr01.9greatoaks.ca.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.88.17) 118.845 ms 117.035 ms 114.762 ms 8 * be-7922-ar01.hayward.ca.sfba.comcast.net (68.86.94.154) 120.025 ms 114.310 ms 9 * be-397-rar01.fairfield.ca.sfba.comcast.net (96.108.99.10) 119.178 ms * 10 162.151.79.66 (162.151.79.66) 123.215 ms 121.184 ms 124.125 ms If anyone from either entity would like to contact me off list for troubleshooting please feel free. -Ben Cannon CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC ben(a)6by7.net <mailto:ben@6by7.net>

4 5

CBS Geolocation
by Richard Laager 04 Dec '19

04 Dec '19

Does anyone have a contact at CBS, or know which geolocation service they use for cbs.com TV streaming? CBS has recently started mis-geolocating us as being in Canada. -- Richard

3 2

Re: RIPE our of IPv4
by Valdis Klētnieks 04 Dec '19

04 Dec '19

On Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:58:59 -0800, FREDERICK BAKER said: > I think he is saying that companies like Reliance JIO have started with a /22 > of IPv4 and a /32 (or more) of IPv6, As I said - you need IPv4 space to dual-stack. How does Reliance do this without any v4 address space?

2 1

Rural Broadband Article - New Yorker
by Rod Beck 03 Dec '19

03 Dec '19

A great article on how a very poor Appalachian community was able to bring fiber to the premise. Currently one gig and being upgraded to ten gigs. https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/the-one-traffic-light-t… Roderick Beck VP of Business Development United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com> New York City & Budapest rod.beck(a)unitedcablecompany.com 36-70-605-5144 [1467221477350_image005.png]

1 0

Frontier dallas area ESP issues?
by Randy (K6RP) 03 Dec '19

03 Dec '19

Hi all, Anyone from Frontier lurking or Frontier customers with similar issues? We have a mutual customer in the Dallas area who is experiencing severe dropping/limiting of inbound ESP packets, rendering their IPsec tunnels for the most part useless since a few days ago. Outbound packets make it to their destination, the return packets do not. On or off list is OK. -- ~Randy

1 0

Re: RIPE our of IPv4
by Willy Manga 02 Dec '19

02 Dec '19

Hi, On 02/12/2019 16:00, nanog-request(a)nanog.org wrote: > From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka(a)seacom.mu> > [...] > On 1/Dec/19 02:54, Brandon Martin wrote: > >> How slim are your margins to have been around long enough to have a legacy IPv4 block but not be able to afford the ARIN fees to get a comparable/very usable (/48 to /52 for each IPv4) amount of IPv6? And if you don't need a "comparable" amount of IPv6, presumably you aren't using all your legacy IPv4 and can sell off part of its presumably huge allocation to get some funds. > > AFRINIC offered IPv6 /32's for free for every member that paid for their > IPv4. > > Not sure if they still do, but my annual bill does mention that amount > of IPv6 space we have. still accurate. https://afrinic.net/membership/cost#resource , section 3.1-"For existing members". It is said "No additional fees as a result of the issued IPv6 prefix will apply." Section 3.2. new IPv6-only members get discounts over 3 years -- Willy Manga @ongolaboy https://ongola.blogspot.com/

1 0

Any Charter email admins monitoring this list?
by Paul Gover 02 Dec '19

02 Dec '19

I'm in search of someone from Charter who can help get a small ISP's email servers off the blacklist for stny.rr.com. If you could reach out off list, it would be much appreciated. (Email to PriorityEscalationTeam(a)charter.com was rejected as undeliverable.) Kind regards, Paul Gover, Adams Cable Service

2 1