October 2019 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Provider IPv6 Deployment
by Nicholas Warren 16 Oct '19

16 Oct '19

Can anyone share resources on deploying IPv6 in a provider network? Most all documentation I find is from the customer perspective; which is great and all, but what about setting up dhcpv6-pd, what about the relay agent, or what about an equivalent of dhcp option 82? Nich

1 0

Re: IP Geolocation
by Paul Farag 16 Oct '19

16 Oct '19

Is this an indication of a prefix that was highjacked? Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 14, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Ben Cannon <ben(a)6by7.net> wrote: >

4 3

Anyone noticing any odd latency/bandwidth congestion going on in Seattle?
by Brielle 16 Oct '19

16 Oct '19

Hi all, I've suddenly started showing high latency in Seattle off of CenturyLink in Boise going to Comcast in Denver. Boise fiber to Denver... traceroute to 50.239.215.xxx (50.239.215.xxx), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets <trimmed> 4 sea-brdr-02.inet.qwest.net (67.14.41.194) 12.394 ms 12.348 ms 12.369 ms 5 be-203-pe02.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net (96.87.10.117) 109.073 ms 109.530 ms 109.476 ms 6 be-10847-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.86.225) 110.906 ms 111.427 ms 110.642 ms 7 be-10820-cr01.champa.co.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.84.206) 125.245 ms 126.605 ms 126.492 ms 8 68.86.92.130 (68.86.92.130) 124.478 ms 124.533 ms 124.518 ms 9 ae-1-rur02.wheatridge.co.denver.comcast.net (162.151.51.18) 125.846 ms 126.010 ms 126.353 ms 10 ae-11-sur02.wheatridge.co.denver.comcast.net (162.151.51.146) 125.630 ms 125.480 ms 125.397 ms 11 * * * 12 * * * Reverse path from Denver Comcast to Boise CenturyLink... traceroute to xxxxxxxxxxxxx (205.xxx.xx.xx), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets <trimmed> 6 be-12176-pe02.910fifteenth.co.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.83.94) 0.916 ms 0.983 ms 1.021 ms 7 dvr3-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net (72.164.247.149) 0.864 ms 8.534 ms 0.805 ms 8 * * * 9 63-224-242-xx.dia.static.qwest.net (63.224.242.xx) 125.355 ms 125.681 ms 125.404 ms 10 63.147.164.xx (63.147.164.xx) 125.006 ms 125.590 ms 125.817 ms 11 * * * 12 * * * I've got two CL fiber connections here in Boise - one with BGP for my own block, the other with a CL provided IP block. Both showing same results. Also have a CL fiber connection in Cheyenne, and it does not show any issues going to Boise or Denver. Are we still seeing after-effects from the gaming thing last night? -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org

1 0

Video Streaming Wars
by Rod Beck 15 Oct '19

15 Oct '19

https://www.lightreading.com/video/ott/whats-at-stake-as-the-streaming-batt… [https://img.lightreading.com/2019/10/754841/3383.jpg]<https://www.lightreading.com/video/ott/whats-at-stake-as-the-streaming-batt…> What's at Stake as the Streaming Battle Builds | Light Reading<https://www.lightreading.com/video/ott/whats-at-stake-as-the-streaming-batt…> Netflix, Amazon and Hulu have staked out their turf in the subscription VoD market, but will they be able to hold that coveted ground as Disney, Apple, WarnerMedia and NBCU enter the streaming fray? www.lightreading.com Roderick Beck VP of Business Development United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com> New York City & Budapest rod.beck(a)unitedcablecompany.com 36-70-605-5144 [1467221477350_image005.png]

3 2

lots of traffic starting at 3 a.m. central time
by Aaron Gould 15 Oct '19

15 Oct '19

Anyone else see lots of traffic coming down starting at 3 a.m. central time ? all of my internet connections showed strangely larger load for a few early morning hours. I have some info that tells me what it was but wanted to hear it from others too. -Aaron

7 6

Problems sending emails to AT&T
by Grzegorz Janoszka 15 Oct '19

15 Oct '19

Hi, Whenever I try to send something to emails in @att.net I get a reply: host ff-ip4-mx-vip1.prodigy.net[144.160.159.21] said: 553 5.3.0 flph831 DNSBL:RBL 521< MY.IP4.ADD.RES >_is_blocked.For assistance forward this error to abuse_rbl(a)abuse-att.net (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Of course emails to abuse_rbl go unanswered. My IP turns clean on https://www.dnsbl.info/ (all green and one blue timeout). Anyone had such issues? Any working contacts to AT&T email? Any help appreciated. -- Grzegorz Janoszka

1 0

APRICOT 2020 Call for PC Volunteers
by Mark Tinka 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Hi everyone, The APRICOT 2020 Programme Committee is responsible for the solicitation and selection of suitable presentation and tutorial content for the APRICOT 2020 conference (https://2020.apricot.net/) The APRICOT PC Chairs are now seeking nominations from the community to join the APRICOT 2020 PC to assist with the development of the programme for APRICOT 2020. Eligible PC candidates are those who have attended APRICOT conferences in the recent past, have broad technical knowledge of Internet operations, and have reasonable familiarity with the format of APRICOT conferences. Having constructive opinions and ideas about how the programme content might be improved is of high value too. PC members are expected to work actively to solicit content and review submissions for technical merit. The PC meets by conference call, weekly in frequency during the three months prior to APRICOT. If you are interested in joining the PC and meet the above eligibility criteria, please send a brief note to "pc-chairs at apricot.net". The note should include affiliation (if any) and contact details (including e-mail address), and a brief description of why you would make a good addition to the PC. PC members who are active, successfully solicit content, contribute to regular PC meetings and submit reviews receive complimentary registration for APRICOT 2020. The PC Chairs will accept nominations received by 17:00 UTC+8 on Monday 21st October, 2019, and will announce the new PC shortly thereafter. Many thanks! Mark Tinka, Marijana Novakovic & Philip Smith APRICOT 2020 PC Chairs

1 0

.COM Zone DNSSEC Operational Update -- ZSK length change
by Wessels, Duane 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 All, Verisign is in the process of increasing the size and strength of the DNSSEC Zone Signing Keys (ZSKs) for the top-level domains that it operates. As part of this process, the ZSK for the .COM zone will be increased in size from 1024 to 1280 bits. On October 10, 2019 the 1280 bit ZSK was pre-published in the .COM zone. On October 15, we plan to sign the .COM zone with the 1280 bit ZSK. On October 20, we plan to remove the old 1024 bit ZSK from the zone. We do not anticipate any problems from this upgrade. In accordance with our normal operating procedures we have a rollback process should it become necessary to revert to the 1024 bit ZSK. DW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJdpL5zAAoJEGyZpGmowJiNKZsH/3D1uNJ959pOoZjiRWHd/bZ5 V6mNXkKA34jKudC0ugPt1RQGEExspsNHBTjSK//SO+nayKl8GQUdrnL5AINJKQjU C61nhFORQXxhrE7JTbbbLeiVWVMwBhWmefi9zNIi/2MANWhX0UzuKREfsAnUgyVL 9mbfxxFCmAC6HPVkE3wZS5Z8h+3AP4zkctLOWQv/wi0aCd6o6/k9fejpmN2YhFQy 7OrFqKpTq0wa7K1zx8xXyBNPstWlH0709zn3Cm6aYkQ7mLoCNl2H6ODJCmvtTZeo BYVKGojABUWXAurOiPSaljGHRAEC1sN5cV5rkeWmXjoRo+dGPOA60bzbdNsTfss= =J3+s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

New telemetry system ideas
by Chris Misa 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

I am a researcher working on developing a new switch-based on-the-fly telemetry system that takes a flow chart as input to describe a particular detection task (rather than just features or information elements as in IPFIX). For an example of what I mean by "flow chart" see the figure here: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/mediastore_new/IEEE/content/media/8048782/80488…. Might anyone have pointers to a source of more such flow charts? The other issue I'm worried about is that it might take a couple rounds before an event is detected (since the system has to step through the flow chart and possibly look at different traffic features in the process). What is a typical duration of the types of events people might want to catch with a telemetry system like this? Do these kind of events generate the same type of traffic throughout their durations, or do traffic features change as the event progresses? Thanks! Chris

1 0

IP Geolocation
by Travis Garrison 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Anyone else have issues where their IP block gets randomly set to China? We have been trying to track down this issue for months and our customers are starting to get upset. We get a /29 from our upstream provider that we CGNAT (yeah I know, working on implementing IPV6) to all of our customers at 1 particular site. No other sites have any issues. We had our upstream provider allocate us a new IP block from a different subnet which fixed the issue for a while but now it's back. The state and town are correct but the country states China. This is having issues with Speedtests, NetFlix and others. The upstream is claiming that we are purposely using a proxy or VPN to china which causes this. We have checked all our configurations and even replaced all hardware in case something was hacked. Any ideas? Thanks Travis Garrison

4 3