June 2017 - Test - lists.nanog.org

CGNAT
by Ahmed Munaf 07 Feb '19

07 Feb '19

Hi, Any recommendation regarding CGNAT appliance who try it and which brand is the best from his perspective! The throughput which I want to pass through the CGNAT is about 40Gbits and number of subscribers are about 40,000 subscribers. Regards, Ahmed

10 13

IPv6 Residential Deployment Survey
by John Curran 24 Jan '19

24 Jan '19

NANOGers - If you are providing residential Internet service with IPv6 (or are a customer of same), please take a moment to complete Jordi’s survey - this will help provide insight into the actual technical practices being used in residential IPv6 deployment. More details in attached email - Thanks! /John Begin forwarded message: From: John Curran <jcurran(a)arin.net<mailto:jcurran@arin.net>> Subject: [arin-ppml] IPv6 Residential Deployment Survey Date: May 22, 2016 at 6:24:17 AM GMT+2 To: ARIN PPML <ppml(a)arin.net<mailto:ppml@arin.net>> Folks - Jordi Palet Martínez is conducting a brief survey regarding IPv6 deployment in residential Internet service. Having insight into the various practices that are in use may help to inform IPv6 number resource policy development, and thus I ask that you take a moment to complete the survey if you are providing such services (whether production or trial basis.) Jordi notes - "The results will be published and updated every month or so - No personal data will be published. (If you know your network, it takes less than 2 minutes to complete it) The survey can be responded even if is not yet a commercial service, and customers can also respond, not just the ISP. However, to avoid duplicate data, make sure to include the country and ISP name.” The IPv6 Residential Deployment Survey may be found here - <http://survey.consulintel.es/index.php/175122> Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN

9 16

Hulu
by Mike Hammett 25 Oct '18

25 Oct '18

Could someone from Hulu reach out to me? My customers are getting the anonymous proxy page and I'm not sure why. They don't have any contact info in peeringdb and their ARIN whois looks more generic than useful (ipadmin@). ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com

2 2

survey on BGP prefix hijacking
by Alberto Dainotti 02 May '18

02 May '18

Dear NANOG Community, BGP prefix hijacking remains a problem for Internet routing, despite the (partial) use of RPKI or detection services. We would like to hear your opinions on BGP prefix hijacking (concerns, existing defenses, needs, etc.) that would help us research new defense mechanisms both for its detection and mitigation. Please help us by answering this short (< 10min, 21 questions) and anonymous survey. Survey URL: http://tinyurl.com/hijack-survey *** The survey *** This survey is part of a joint research effort by CAIDA (www.caida.org) and the ICS-FORTH (www.ics.forth.gr) research institute, to study (a) operator awareness of BGP prefix hijacking attacks/incidents, (b) presently used defenses against BGP prefix hijacking, (c) the willingness to adopt new defense mechanisms, and (d) reasons that may hinder the deployment of BGP prefix hijacking defenses. We expect the findings of this survey to increase the understanding of existing BGP hijacking defenses and the needs of network operators, as well as help us design and implement new defense mechanisms that we will present to the operator and scientific communities. A summary of the aggregate results will be published as a part of an article/conference paper. Thank you in advance, and we look forward to your responses! Alberto (CAIDA) and Pavlos (ICS-FORTH)

1 1

Quanta LB4M
by Mike Hammett 20 Apr '18

20 Apr '18

Has anyone gotten a "non-factory" firmware to go onto these guys? There are a couple threads on Google that are inconclusive. There are rumors that it's the same as a Dell something or an HP something else, but no one has outright said, "I loaded a Dell XXXX firmware onto it and solved all of the random ass bugs." If I didn't already have a couple of stacked Extreme x400s, I'd consider these at home, but they're somewhat buggy. Quanta told me to contact whomever I bought it from... but I don't think the random guy on eBay is going to have much of anything useful to say. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com

4 7

ticketmaster.com 403 Forbidden
by Manser, Charles J 08 Feb '18

08 Feb '18

List, It seems that browsing to ticketmaster.com or any of the associated IP addresses results in a 403 Forbidden for our customers today. Is anyone else having this issue? If anyone from Ticketmaster could reach out to me off-list, it would be helpful. Charles Manser | Principal Engineer I, Network Security Charles.Manser(a)charter.com E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.

15 18

IPv6 first hop security on a budget?
by Joel Whitehouse 11 Nov '17

11 Nov '17

What's a good budget option for switching a small lab or office ipv6 with RA Guard, DHCP6 snooping, and ICMP6 snooping?

5 4

DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
by Colton Conor 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

We are building a 40G metro ring using 40-Gigabit Ethernet QSFP+ Transceivers. Specifically, we are using Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4. This is a QSFP+ Transceiver with a LC duplex head. We only have one pair of single mode dark fibers around the ring. Our distance between nodes around the ring are all less than 10KM, so we can use standard optics. We go out of one JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4 and into another JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4. There are no passive muxes involved. This is working great for 40G. My understanding is a JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4 is really a transceiver with a CWDM mux built into it. The spec sheet shows it sends 4 10G channels: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topic… Lane wavelength Lane 0–1264.5 nm through 1277.5 nm Lane 1–1284.5 nm through 1297.5 nm Lane 2–1304.5 nm through 1317.5 nm Lane 3–1324.5 nm through 1337.5 nm This setup is working fine, but now we want to do more than 40G around the ring. To my knowledge there are no other 40G QSFP+ transceivers that use four other channel/lanes than the ones already being used, so they only way to go higher than 40G is to stack 10G or 100G channels ontop of the fiber pair using a passive mux. 100G is too expensive for the time being, so we are looking to add 10G channels to a ring that already have one 40G channel using the QSFP+. I was reading this tutorial, and it mentions "there is a 1310 nm port integrated in a 40 channels DWDM Mux/Demux system. The 1310nm added port is a Wide Band Optic port (WBO) added to other specific DWDM wavelengths in a module. When we run out of all channels in a DWDM Mux/Demux system, we can add the extra optics via this 1310nm port." http://www.fs.com/upgrade-to-500g-with-40ch-dwdm-mux-demux-system-aid-493.h… What I can't seem to understand is they are mentioning that this 1310 port can pass QSFP+ signals, so it sounds like its really a 1270nm through 1330nm port? Is this what they mean by Wide Band Optic port (WBO)? We don't need 40 10G channels plus a 40G for a total of 440G. More than likely we are looking at a 8 channel mux/demux, and 1 40G port for a total of 120G. I don't care if we do CWDM vs DWDM, but I assume it will be hard to find a CWDM mux that has one LC dupluex input for 1270nm through 1330nm channels? Maybe I should just ditch the 40G QSFP+ optics and use all 10G optics, but the switches I am using have 48 10G SFP+ ports and 6 QSFP+ ports built in. I know there are 40G breakout cables, but the whole point of 40G is to aggregate VLAN/circuits. Has anyone done this before?

8 27

10G MetroE 1-2U Switch
by Erik Sundberg 13 Jul '17

13 Jul '17

Hey Nanog, Looking for a new metroE Edge switch that has more that 10x 10G ports. I am having a hard time finding anything worthwhile without buying a full blown ASR9K Chassis or another vendor's chassis. Requirements MEF compliant 1-2U small foot print 10G Ports will be used for ENNI's and UNI Ports Prefer MPLS support for L2VPN's (EoMPLS and VPLS) QOS per Sub interface\vlan on a ENNI Cost effect 10G Ports 100G Not required Looking at the ASR920's - Great box for 1G but not enough 10G Ports Only 4 NCS5001/NCS5501 - New\unproven\probably buggy, Lacking some features & QOS issues :/ ASR900 - Looks good, but was hoping for a smaller foot print. If I remember right the 8x10G Cards can't go in every slot. Any other platforms I should be looking at? Ciena, Brocade, Juniper? Thanks in advance! -Erik ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you.

16 28

Call For Presentations - DNS-OARC Workshop 27, San Jose, CA, USA, 29-30 September 2017
by Jacques Latour 05 Jul '17

05 Jul '17

[with apologies to those who see this on multiple lists] Call For Presentations The DNS-OARC 27th Workshop will take place in San Jose, CA, USA on September 29th and 30th 2017, the Friday and Saturday preceding NANOG 71. The Workshop's Program Committee is now requesting proposals for presentations. All DNS-related subjects are welcome. If you are an OARC member, and have a sensitive topic you would like to present for members-only, we can accommodate those talks during the Members Only session on the morning of September 29th. A timeslot will also be available for lightning talks (5-10 minutes) on Saturday September 30th, for which submissions will be accepted during Friday 29th. Workshop Milestones: 26 May 2017, Call for Presentations posted and open for submissions 28 July 2017, Deadline for submission 11 August 2017, Draft Programme published 01 September 2017, Final Program published 15 September 2017, Final deadline for slideset submission Details for presentation submission will be published here: https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/27/call-for-abstracts/ The workshop presentations will be organized by common themes, depending on the topics and the timing of each presentation. There are 30-minute and 15-minute slots, let us know your preference in your submission. To allow the Programme Committee to make objective assessments of submissions, so as to ensure the quality of the workshop, submissions SHOULD include slides. Draft slides are acceptable on submission. If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via <submissions(a)dns-oarc.net> Ray Bellis, for the OARC Programme Committee OARC depends on sponorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact <sponsor(a)dns-oarc.net> if your organization is interested in becoming a sponsor. (Please note that OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and is not in a position to reimburse expenses or time for speakers at its meetings.)

1 1