August 2016 - Test - lists.nanog.org

[NANOG-announce] 2016 NANOG General Elections and Committee Selection
by Daniel Golding 09 Aug '16

09 Aug '16

NANOG Members and Participants, We are once again approaching the annual NANOG election <http://nanog.org/elections/2016/general> and appointment time. Board candidate nominations open August 15th and the complete Election timeline can be found here <http://nanog.org/elections/2016/general>. We encourage those in the community who are not currently NANOG members to consider becoming members of NANOG and to participate in the election process. Through membership and voting, you will be an active participant in directing all NANOG activities. Only NANOG members are eligible to vote and serve in the NANOG Board of Directors and Committees. Click here <https://www.nanog.org/membership> to become a member today! **If you are not a member and wish to vote in this election, your membership must be received by 12:00 p.m. Central Time on Friday October 14, 2016.** Why? If you care about NANOG and think that you would like to take a turn at volunteering your time to help make it better, please consider joining as a member and taking part in the election and nomination process. If you know someone else that you believe would be interested in serving on the Board of Directors, nominate them by completing the Online Process <https://www.bigpulse.com/127736/register> beginning August 15, 2016. Any questions should be submitted to elections(a)nanog.org. As NANOG continues to evolve, our Board of Directors and Committees will continue to play an increasingly important role in our success. By joining now, you can be an integral part of the process. For more information about the role of a Board of Director or any Committee Member, or to find out more about what's involved in serving, please consult the current NANOG Bylaws <http://nanog.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/NANOG-Bylaws-Octob…> or follow the links to the Board and Committee pages from the General 2016 NANOG Elections Page <https://www.nanog.org/elections/2016/general>. Best regards, Daniel Golding *Chair, NANOG Board of Directors* _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)mailman.nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

calling a routing deep diver in as12369
by Randy Bush 09 Aug '16

09 Aug '16

hi. i would really appreciate a conversation with a routing geek in 12369. research measurements have raised some questions, and we would love an inside clue. thanks. randy

1 1

Google compute engine private ASNs
by Lee Fuller 08 Aug '16

08 Aug '16

Hey, first post so sorry if it's misguided. I'm curious about the BGP implementation in Google compute engine that allows you to define routing policy using private ASN numbers. How similar is it in terms of learning about BGP as a broader concept, or is it all smoke and mirrors? I'm not in a position where iBGP would benefit me in any other context than learning so I'm keen not to bother if it's too abstracted from a real world scenario. Lee Fuller (mobile) PGP Fingerprint: 4ACAEBA4B9EE1B3A075034302D5C3D050E6ED55A

3 3

Advertising rented IPv4 prefix from a different ASN.
by Andrew 05 Aug '16

05 Aug '16

Hello List, I work for a medium sized ISP. We are entering an agreement to rent some IPv4 space from a local higher education institution. Being a multi-homed ISP we would like to advertise the rented prefix from our ASN. The prefix that will be advertised is a smaller subnet from the higher educations block; they will continue to advertise the larger prefix. What is the best way to accomplish this? Is there any way of doing this without having to tunnel the traffic through the origin ASN? I feel if we just adverse the prefix it get put on a bogon list for prefix hijacking. This space is rented long term but they are not interested in reassigning the space to us. They also want to keep advertising their prefix as one contiguous block. I appreciate any insight and information. Thank you for your time, Andrew.

13 14

Host.us DDOS attack
by Robert Webb 04 Aug '16

04 Aug '16

Anyone have any additonal info on a DDOS attack hitting host.us? Woke up to no email this morning and the following from their web site: *Following an extortion attempt, HostUS is currently experiencing sustained large-scale DDOS attacks against a number of locations. The attacks were measured in one location at 300Gbps. In another location the attacks temporarily knocked out the entire metropolitan POP for a Tier-1 provider. Please be patient. We will return soon. Your understanding is appreciated. * >From my monitoring system, looks like my VPS went unavailable around 23:00 EDT last night. Robert

11 23

NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology
by Kasper Adel 04 Aug '16

04 Aug '16

Hi, I am interested in hearing the approach and thought-process that senior people on NANOG are following when presented with an NFV solution. Assuming that the exercise at hand is to consider NFV for future expansions of Firewalls and L3VPNs or stay with the existing model of what is called PNF (physical network function)...i.e : classic routers and FWs. There are a lot of factors to consider and Vendors will typically give their biased opinion, so i'm trying to get my head out of their game, to be able to think agnostically about the whole thing. 1) Product and Service/Support Cost. 2) Operation Complexity/Learning Curve. (open source products included). 3) X Factors (Those that are never listed but do bite in the back) : Quality, Integration with Classic, Migration, Usability...etc The main goal behind us exploring NFV is the promised cost-saving, so a good method to be able to do the math of whether NFV will save opex/capex or NOT is definitely needed here and i'm trying to gather guidelines from the list. I think its easier to keep this post high-level, and later dig deeper. Cheers, K

10 11

Clueful BGP from TW-Telecom/L3
by Scott Morris 03 Aug '16

03 Aug '16

Is there per chance anyone hanging on here who is clueful about BGP working with TW-Telecom and the recent integration with Level3???? I have a client that I consult with whose route is not getting sent from TW to L3 and the techs on the case are convinced we need to put different BGP communities in (both to TW link and other provider link) which of course we are putting in to satisfy them, but magically it is not working. This SHOULD be an easy thing to figure out using the Looking Glass servers within both TW and Level3, but this concept is lost on techs we are dealing with. Anyone internal there who can contact me off-list would be greatly appreciated! Scott swm(a)emanon.com

3 3

Frontier FlashWave Support contact
by Mel Beckman 03 Aug '16

03 Aug '16

Can someone from Frontier provide a CO contact for customer-prem FlashWave units? We have several in alarm, although otherwise functional, but Frontier front line support seems unable to open tickets on this gear, since it's not apparently considered CPE by Frontier. -mel beckman

1 1

Re: Brighthouse Orlando Port blocking ISAKMP
by Mallette, Edwin J 02 Aug '16

02 Aug '16

Hi Erik, We definitely do not filter UDP500 across our network. I¹m going to reach out to you directly to see if I can help figure out what¹s going on. Cheers! Ed On 7/30/16, 11:38 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Eric C. Miller" <nanog-bounces(a)nanog.org on behalf of eric(a)ericheather.com> wrote: >Hello! > >Subject says it all!!! I cannot open any IPSec tunnels, because UDP 500 >is not making it through to my Brighthouse connection. I've tried from >Level3, Cogent, and AT&T. Are there any Brighthouse engineers on that >would help me shed some light on this? > >Thank you, > >Eric

2 1

Verizon Wireless contact
by Matt Larson 02 Aug '16

02 Aug '16

Could someone from Verizon Wireless please contact me off-list? Thanks, Matt -- Matt Larson <matt.larson(a)icann.org> VP of Research Office of the CTO, ICANN +1 240 459-9562 (mobile)

1 0