October 2015 - Test - lists.nanog.org

TWC / XO Chicago?
by Mikeal Clark 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

Anyone know what is going on?

3 2

Cisco WiFI expertise in NYC
by Ryan Pugatch 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

Hi, Looking for a company that has lots of experience with Cisco WiFi in NYC. Our office deployment is struggling due to all of the interfering APs, so we're looking for some outside help to assist us in improving our coverage. If you have any recommendations, please contact me off list. Thanks, Ryan

1 0

sfp "computer"?
by Baldur Norddahl 21 Oct '15

21 Oct '15

Hi Does anyone make a SFP with a system on chip "computer" that you can run a small embedded linux on? I am sure it can be done because I have a "GPON stick" which is basically a ONU with a small embedded Linux all on a SFP module. Does get fairly hot however. My application is to run some small things that I feel is missing in my switches/routers. Plug in this imaginary "SFP computer" to enhance the switch with a small Linux. The SFP slot provides both networking and power to the device. Regards, Baldur

13 14

Short (!) survey about internet interconnection
by Uta Meier-Hahn 21 Oct '15

21 Oct '15

Dear networkers in North America, Internet interconnection is largely unregulated. However, in some countries, public regulation has emerged – be it through transparency rules, mandatory peering or licensing terms. Currently, we lack an overview about where regulation exists and we know little about how it affects internet connectivity on a global scale. To start filling this information gap, I have set up a short survey for network engineers, peering coordinators and network-savvy legal staffers. The goal is to crowdsource an initial overview about formal regulation of internet interconnection around the world. Please participate! It takes no more than 10 minutes and will serve the community: http://limesurvey.hiig.de/index.php/675663?lang=en <http://limesurvey.hiig.de/index.php/675663?lang=en> I will publish the results under a Creative Commons license. Also, please consider helping by forwarding the link to fellow interconnection professionals - think of your Facebook or LinkedIn groups, of chat channels and mailing lists. The more regional diversity, the better. Thank you! Kind regards, Uta Meier-Hahn PhD Candidate Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Oberwallstr. 9 | 10117 Berlin meier-hahn(a)hiig.de <mailto:meier-hahn@hiig.de> | T +49 30 200 760-82 | www.hiig.de/en <http://www.hiig.de/en>

2 2

IMIX or similiar near-user-load packet generator
by Stanislaw Datskevich 20 Oct '15

20 Oct '15

Hi all. Is there any opensource packet generator which can simulate a load closest to real users? Usually I use iperf, but it can simply generate huge load.

5 5

ipv6 connectivity bugs
by Mike 20 Oct '15

20 Oct '15

Hello, I have a 7201 and an ASR1000 and they share a link and run ipv4 and bgp over it no problem. I am experimenting and have now added some static ipv6 configuration, and I can't seem to ping across the link. The issue looks like one side us advertising prefixes correctly and the other isn't. Here's my interface configs: ASR1000: interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1/0.110025 encapsulation dot1Q 25 second-dot1q 11 ip address x.x.x.1 255.255.255.248 ipv6 address xxxx:yyyy::1:1/126 end 7201: interface GigabitEthernet0/0.110025 encapsulation dot1Q 25 second-dot1q 11 ip address x.x.x.2 255.255.255.248 ipv6 address xxxx:yyyy::1:2/126 end When I try pinging 7201 from the asr1000, no response. I do see a neighbor entry on the asr1000: sh ipv6 neighbors IPv6 Address Age Link-layer Addr State Interface xxxx:yyyy::1:2 0 xxxx.yyyy.8e1b REACH Te0/1/0.110025 FE80::xxxx:yyyy:FE49:8E1B 0 xxxx.yyyy.8e1b REACH Te0/1/0.110025 On the 7201 however, there seems to only be the link local address neighbor entry for the asr1000: sh ipv6 neighbors IPv6 Address Age Link-layer Addr State Interface FE80::xxxx:yyyy:FE2D:D190 0 xxxx.yyyy.d190 STALE Gi0/0.110025 Can anyone spot what I am doing wrong? Mike-

3 6

Static IPs
by Joel Maslak 20 Oct '15

20 Oct '15

A helpful hint from a local broadband provider (I'm trying to wade through broadband options at home): "If your business is online, then you should have an IP address." I do find that helps. (in fairness, they are talking about static IPs, but it kind of fits with the rest of their marketing which says their highest speed plans include the advantage of "most reliable Wifi" when compared to their lower speed plans)

7 10

Zayo / Sales Rep.
by Faisal Imtiaz 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

Hello, Any Zayo Sales Rep. can you please contact me off list. Thanks. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: Support(a)Snappytelecom.net

1 0

Are there any ATT postmasters in the house?
by Jeremy Parr 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

I have a mail server that is repeatedly getting blacklisted, but is not sending anything spammy or bulk.

1 0

Dial Up Solutions
by Will Duquette 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

Does anyone have any suggestions on equipment for our ISP that is still supporting dial up customers? At the moment we are running 3Com Total Control 1000's but are running out of spare parts as we have failures. Given that this gear is so old trying to source spare parts is proving to be difficult. We do have access to an Cisco AS5200 but are looking for maybe a SIP based solution that could possibly run on our VM farm? Has anyone heard of anything like that or does it even exist? What kind of gear are you running if you still are supporting dial up customers? Thanks in advance -- Will Duquette GWI Network Systems Engineer www.gwi.net

12 13