August 2013 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: CNN broadcasting online free? Hogging my bandwidth...
by Larry Sheldon 14 Aug '13

14 Aug '13

On 8/14/2013 8:24 PM, Zachary McGibbon wrote: > I noticed my bandwidth graphs were a little out of whack tonight and after > much digging through pcap files I found that my chrome tab with 'cnn.com' > had a live stream of cnn playing on the right side halfway down. > > It seems this started around 8am this morning and it was a macromedia tcp > flash stream on port 1935. > > Did they decide to give free CNN to everyone today? Or is this a goof? > Either way it chewed up a lot of my bandwidth which doesn't come cheap > here in Canada, eh? > > Also, sometimes it says: > > Watch CNN will resume momentarily > > on the feed but it's still pushing traffic. What a pain! > > Turning off the 'free' Piers Morgan feed now... Trying to get their "numbers" up off the floor? -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)

2 1

.gov DNSSEC operational message
by Wessels, Duane 14 Aug '13

14 Aug '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 An algorithm roll for the .gov zone will occur at the end of August, 2013. This notice is provided as a courtesy to the DNSSEC community. No action should be required on your part. The .gov zone is currently signed with algorithm 7 (RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1) and will be changed to use algorithm 8 (RSA/SHA-256), bringing it in line with other top-level domains such as as .com, .net, and the root zone. The zone will be signed with both algorithms for a period of approximately 10 days. Further scheduling details will be provided one week before the algorithm roll begins. Duane W. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR+BwJAAoJEGyZpGmowJiNb1QIAL4VURzp377H7iX8ZaBfljTt pdj6gTyChZe4M4AwTslT3woTBMwJZsOYxMKFnGcPoxFd0ROT1HuFKt1JE5G6ITBN +qHQJFplgU4SBKcknAcIL5/0DXgqeGVR9JYsbkRiytocp89eBWx8lhZuVRqQCRDw u/ZiKluAd32ioSosuzAJJawRp0PZQKJX8/WQ5HnLPeDpH3jHDR21I5RDp35l8X0x GIiD9+UV1yivYr4JhjLfVqTkToND+m3rwG7c6VwUf8PxCv5mEJN3sFpC72HsRvCd uNipDuwaAcYLFCx3mSUsuXjUttUXe9yFE9v3rPZ286eMo5GqVvs+Zy7yjrQuOpU= =p/aG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 1

Re: How big is the Internet?
by Larry Sheldon 14 Aug '13

14 Aug '13

On 8/14/2013 10:31 AM, Anthony Williams wrote: > > > One segment is the number of people on the planet with a mobile device > that can connect to the Internet? Throw in laptops, workstations, > servers, routers, toasters, etc and the number starts to get pretty big. > > The NSA will need some more hard drives. lol > > > ** Of the 6 billion cell phones in use, only around 1.1 billion of them > are mobile-broadband devices. ** > > http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/mobile-phone-world-population-2014 Do "we" (meaning y'all) even know the edges look like? My elderly crackberry does internetish stuff like email and browsing and file transfers when there is no wiffy in sight. So it either speaks TCP/IP with the towers (it might, I have no clue), or there is non-TCP/IP fabric in the skirts. -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)

2 1

Re: How big is the Internet?
by Larry Sheldon 14 Aug '13

14 Aug '13

On 8/14/2013 1:29 PM, Scott Howard wrote: > To paraphrase Douglas Adams... > > "The Internet is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, > hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way > down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space!" It occurred to me that discussing the size of the Internet is a lot like discussing cosmology (for somebody like me that is not well schooled in either art-form). -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)

1 0

Re: How big is the Internet? - about the size of a strawberry
by Jayram Deshpande 14 Aug '13

14 Aug '13

If we try to comprehend the Internet in terms of number of boxes that can reach from their local networks to globally routable destinations, we have to take into account Multi- NATed , multi-tunneled (ipv6 over ipv4 in a VPLS , and other crazy scenarios such v6 over v4 in a VPLS running over VXLANs : is that even realistic ? ) overlay networking environments. So also the overlays formed to talk to sensors who can understand say TM/TC ( Telemetry/Tele-commands). In terms of the Address space , the problem statement shows more convergence. Regards, -Jay Sent from my iPhone On Aug 14, 2013, at 10:06 AM, bmanning(a)vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:32:13AM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: >> >> Researchers have complained for years about the lack of good >> statistics about the internet for a couple fo decades, since the >> end of NSFNET statistics. >> >> What are the current estimates about the size of the Internet, all IP >> networks including managed IP and private IP, and all telecommunications >> including analog voice, video, sensor data, etc? >> >> CAIDA, ITU, Telegeography and some vendors like Cisco have released >> forecasts and estimates. There are occasional pieces of information >> stated by companies in their investor documents (SEC 10-K, etc). > > thats easy... the number of allocated IPv4 /32s and the > number of allocated IPv6 /64s. By definition, private > networks (RFC 1918) space is not part of the Internet. > > Or, is your question actually the absolute number of globally > reachable IP addresses at any given instant? (reachable from where?) > > Or do you mean anything that might have an IP address associated with > it at some time in its existance? > > Clarity would be helpful if you want a repeatable answer. > > /bill > >

1 0

Limelight contact
by Eric Sieg 14 Aug '13

14 Aug '13

Can someone from Limelight contact me offline to assist in isolating some routes leaking into their network?

1 0

route-views3 resource update
by John Kemp 14 Aug '13

14 Aug '13

Subject: route-views3 resource update * route-views3.routeviews.org * route-views3 was, until yesterday, a Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G2) 1GB. route-views3 is now a Redhat 6 box running Quagga 0.99.22.3. This change was made due to memory exhaustion on the older hardware. Quagga provides a similar but less powerful CLI. The new platform has allowed us to resume data collection on route-views3. The data format is the same as most of our other collectors. route-views3 is a multi-hop ebgp collector located at the University of Oregon. The resources available are: CLI -- telnet://route-views3.routeviews.org PEERS -- http://www.routeviews.org/peers/route-views3.routeviews.org.txt DATA -- {http,ftp,rsync}://archive.routeviews.org/route-views3/bgpdata/ ex. rsync --list-only archive.routeviews.org::routeviews ex. rsync -av archive.routeviews.org::routeviews/route-views3/bgpdata . ex. rsync -av archive2.routeviews.org::routeviews/route-views3/bgpdata . Please be aware that the older route-views3 data still resides at the higher level within that data directory. New data is being stored in the bgpdata directory. The older data was captured using the Cisco hardware and expect session scripts. Questions and comments are welcome. We do intend to retain the Cisco CLI on the original route-views router for the forseeable future. --- John Kemp (kemp(a)routeviews.org) RouteViews Network Engineer help(a)routeviews.org

1 0

Re: How big is the Internet? - about the size of a tastey strawberry
by RijilV 14 Aug '13

14 Aug '13

On 14 August 2013 10:06, <bmanning(a)vacation.karoshi.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:32:13AM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: > > > > Researchers have complained for years about the lack of good > > statistics about the internet for a couple fo decades, since the > > end of NSFNET statistics. > > > > What are the current estimates about the size of the Internet, all IP > > networks including managed IP and private IP, and all telecommunications > > including analog voice, video, sensor data, etc? > > > > CAIDA, ITU, Telegeography and some vendors like Cisco have released > > forecasts and estimates. There are occasional pieces of information > > stated by companies in their investor documents (SEC 10-K, etc). > > > > thats easy... the number of allocated IPv4 /32s and the > number of allocated IPv6 /64s. By definition, private > networks (RFC 1918) space is not part of the Internet. > > Or, is your question actually the absolute number of globally > reachable IP addresses at any given instant? (reachable from > where?) > > Or do you mean anything that might have an IP address associated > with > it at some time in its existance? > > Clarity would be helpful if you want a repeatable answer. > > /bill > > > Or is size volume based, ie number of bits, and if so is it provisioned capacity or average usage of that capacity? Or even real devices vs used IPs as there isn't a 1:1 mapping... .r'

1 0

Re: Native VLAN for Huawei MA5616 DSLAM
by Shahab Vahabzadeh 13 Aug '13

13 Aug '13

Dear Tina, Thanks for your reply, I have done the same example you told but there is no native-vlan command inside interface eth 0/0. here my configuration and version of device, maybe firmare does not support it. MA5616#display current-configuration > > [vlan-config] > <vlan-config> > vlan 2 smart > port vlan 2 0/0 0 > MA5616#display board 0 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SlotID BoardName Status SubType0 SubType1 Online/Offline > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 0 H831CCUB Active_normal EP1A ASDA > 1 H835ADLE Auto_find > 2 H835ADLE Auto_find > 3 H835ADLE Auto_find > 4 H835ADLE Auto_find > 5 H831PDIA Normal > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MA5616#display version > > Command: > display version > > VERSION : MA5616V800R308C01 > PATCH : SPC200 SPH508 HP2108 > PRODUCT : MA5616 > > Mainboard Running Area Information: > -------------------------------------------- > Current Program Area : Area A > Current Data Area : Area A > > Program Area A Version : MA5616V800R308C01 > Program Area B Version : MA5616V800R308C01 > > Data Area A Version : MA5616V800R308C01 > Data Area B Version : MA5616V800R308C01 > -------------------------------------------- > MA5616(config)#interface eth 0/0 > > MA5616(config-if-eth-0/0)#? > --------------------------------------------- > Command of eth Mode: > --------------------------------------------- > auto-neg Enable/Disable port negotiation > combo-mode Switch working mode of COMBO port > display Display information > duplex Set duplex > flow-control Support flow control > line Line test > mdi Line-adaptive function > mirror Add mirror > network-role Network role > port Set TX optical power threshold > quit Exit from current mode and enter prior mode > reset Clear port statistics > return Enter the privileged mode > shutdown Deactivate port > speed Rate > switch Switch language mode > traffic-suppress Set port traffic suppression > undo Negate a command or set its defaults > Thanks On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting(a)huawei.com>wrote: > Dear all, > Only for the uplink GE, the native VLAN can be configured, it can not be > configured for NNI EPON/GPON and UNI DSL port. > > //if the uplink port is GE, then configure a new VLAN 2 > huawei(config)#vlan 2 > //add the uplink GE 0/0 0 to VLAN 2 > huawei(config)#port vlan 2 0/0 0 > //change to uplink card interface view > huawei(config)#interface eth 0/0 > //change native vlan of uplink GE to 2 > huawei(config-if-eth-0/0)#native-vlan 0 vlan 2 > > > Thank you, > Tina > > On Aug 11, 2013, at 6:44 AM, "Shahab Vahabzadeh" <sh.vahabzadeh(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Only these interface's are available under: > > > > MA5616(config)# interface ? > >> adsl > >> emu > >> eponnni > >> eth > >> gponnni > >> h248 > >> loopback > >> meth > >> null > >> shl > >> vdsl > >> vlanif > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Shahab Vahabzadeh > > <sh.vahabzadeh(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Dear Georgi, > >> MA5616 does not have any SCU interface... > >> What can we do? > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Georgi Genov <linuxloader(a)gmail.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> It`s configurable under scu/scuh/giu board > >>> > >>> interface scu 0/9 > >>> native-vlan 1 vlan XXXX > >>> native-vlan 2 vlan YYYY > >>> or > >>> interface giu 0/19 > >>> native-vlan 1 vlan XXXX > >>> native-vlan 2 vlan YYYY > >>> > >>> On 11.8.2013 г. 09:33 ч., Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear Friends, > >>>> Anybody have idea about changing native vlan on Huawei MA5616 DSLAM? > >>>> I can not find the correct syntax, there is no option under "interface > >>>> eth > >>>> 0/0" > >>>> Thanks > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator > >> > >> Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 > >> PGP Key Fingerprint = 8E34 B335 D702 0CA7 5A81 C2EE 76A2 46C2 5367 BF90 > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator > > > > Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 > > PGP Key Fingerprint = 8E34 B335 D702 0CA7 5A81 C2EE 76A2 46C2 5367 BF90 > -- Regards, Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 PGP Key Fingerprint = 8E34 B335 D702 0CA7 5A81 C2EE 76A2 46C2 5367 BF90

2 3

COX contact
by Meshier, Brent 12 Aug '13

12 Aug '13

Can someone at COX contact me off-list to troubleshoot packet loss I'm seeing on langbprj02-ae2.rd.la.cox.net I've tried tech support but they only seem to be concerned about signal strength rather than peering issues. --- Please refer to http://www.amherst.com/amherst-email-disclaimer/ for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.

3 2