August 2013 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
by Tomas Podermanski 06 Jan '16

06 Jan '16

Hi, It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first time when native IPv6 on google statistics (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-) T.

87 261

How are you doing DHCPv6 ?
by Randy Carpenter 02 Apr '15

02 Apr '15

I am wondering how people out there are using DHCPv6 to handle assigning prefixes to end users. We have a requirement for it to be a redundant server that is centrally located. DHCPv6 will be relayed from each customer access segment. We have been looking at using ISC dhcpd, as that is what we use for v4. However, it currently does not support any redundancy. It also does not do very much useful logging for DHCPv6 requests. Certainly not enough to keep track of users and devices. So, my questions are: How are you doing DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation? What software are you using? When DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation seems to be about the only way to deploy IPv6 to end users in a generic device-agnostic fashion, I am wondering why it is so difficult to find a working solution. thanks, -Randy -- | Randy Carpenter | Vice President - IT Services | Red Hat Certified Engineer | First Network Group, Inc. | (800)578-6381, Opt. 1 ----

13 37

Generating IPv6 list with filtergen.level3.net
by Smith, Courtney 28 Mar '15

28 Mar '15

Anyone out there know how to generate a IPv6 list Level3's filtergen? I tried Google but didn't find anything. () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments

4 4

ddos attacks
by sgraun＠airstreamcomm.net 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

I’m curious to know what other service providers are doing to alleviate/prevent ddos attacks from happening in your network. Are you completely reactive and block as many addresses as possible or null0 traffic to the effected host until it stops or do you block certain ports to prevent them. What’s the best way people are dealing with them? Scott

22 32

Blocking private AS
by Thomas Magill 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

I am thinking about implementing a filter to block all traffic with private AS numbers in the path. I see quite a few in my table though so I am concerned I might block some legitimate traffic. In some cases, these are just prefixes with the private appended to the end but a few have the private as a transit. Is this a good idea or would I likely be blocking too much legitimate traffic? The filter I am using currently shows the following: BGP table version is 5462394, local router ID is 209.112.253.4 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i58.68.109.0/24 x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 9498 10201 65534 i *> y.y.y.y 0 6130 9498 10201 65534 i * i68.115.224.0/24 x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 19151 20115 65011 i *> y.y.y.y 0 6130 19151 20115 65011 i * 85.112.22.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 6939 23148 64532 64532 64532 64532 64532 64532 64532 64532 64532 i *> 93.189.194.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 3549 39386 39386 39386 25233 65000 47146 i * i x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 3549 39386 39386 39386 25233 65000 47146 i *> 96.60.243.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 4181 65528 i * i x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 4181 65528 i * i96.61.232.0/24 x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 4181 65527 i *> y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 4181 65527 i * i96.61.233.0/24 x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 4181 65527 i *> y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 4181 65527 i * i96.61.234.0/24 x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 4181 65527 i *> y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 4181 65527 i *> 148.207.2.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 3257 16531 13579 65090 i * i x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 3257 16531 13579 65090 i *> 148.207.40.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 3257 16531 13579 65090 i * i x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 3257 16531 13579 65090 i *> 148.207.97.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 3257 16531 13579 65090 i * i x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 3257 16531 13579 65090 i * 170.34.100.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 19151 20115 65011 ? * 170.34.104.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 19151 20115 65011 ? * 170.34.113.0/24 y.y.y.y 0 6130 19151 20115 65011 ? * i174.35.1.0/24 x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 16467 64565 i * i174.47.199.0/24 x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 4323 15065 65123 i *> y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 4323 15065 65123 i * i192.109.61.0 x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 19151 20115 65011 i *> y.y.y.y 0 6130 19151 20115 65011 i *> 196.216.249.0 y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 3257 8513 8513 8513 36881 65000 36896 37062 i * i x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 3257 8513 8513 8513 36881 65000 36896 37062 i Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 209.172.69.128/30 y.y.y.y 0 6130 16467 64565 i * i x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 16467 64565 i *> 213.146.161.0 y.y.y.y 0 6130 2828 174 64679 48493 i * i x.x.x.x 0 100 0 6130 2828 174 64679 48493 i Thomas Magill Network Engineer Office: (858) 909-3777 Cell: (858) 869-9685 mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com <mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com> provide-commerce 4840 Eastgate Mall San Diego, CA 92121 ProFlowers <http://www.proflowers.com/> | redENVELOPE <http://www.redenvelope.com/> | Cherry Moon Farms <http://www.cherrymoonfarms.com/> | Shari's Berries <http://www.berries.com/>

3 2

Network topology
by Colin Alston 15 Nov '13

15 Nov '13

Hi all I'm considering trying to come up with some means to automatically detect a networks topology and draw pretty pictures. This is somewhat boring though if a network isn't well arranged with VLANs and q-tag trunk routers and so on (It will just look like a big cloud of junk connected off an assumed switch). Is there any kind of cunning trick to detect standard layer2 switches along a path without stuff like STP?

9 12

NFSen plugin - ddd
by Andrew Jones 29 Oct '13

29 Oct '13

Hi All, Does anyone have a copy of the DDoS detection plugin for NFSen called ddd that they could send to me? According to a blog article [1] I read, it used to be available at [2]. It's not there, and I haven't had any luck trying to track it down the usual ways. If anyone is able to provide a copy, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Jonesy [1] http://www.ccieflyer.com/2010-01-JasonRowley.php [2] http://www.synacknetworks.com/ddd/ddd.zip

3 3

IP Fragmentation - Not reliable over the Internet?
by Christopher Palmer 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

I am trolling for information/community wisdom. What is the probability that a random path between two Internet hosts will traverse a middlebox that drops or otherwise barfs on fragmented IPv4 packets? If anyone has any data or anecdotes, please feel free to send an off-list email or whatever. Thanks! ----------------------------------------------------------- Christopher.Palmer(a)microsoft.com Program Manager Windows Networking Core - Client Technologies

18 33

OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table
by Glen Kent 11 Sep '13

11 Sep '13

Hi, Does anybody have details on what this vulnerability is? https://www.blackhat.com/us-13/briefings.html#Nakibly Glen

9 12

Is the FBI's DNSSEC broken?
by John Levine 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

I don't claim to be a big DNSSEC expert, but this looks just plain wrong to me, and unbound agrees, turning it into a SERVFAIL. Here's a lookup that succeeds, an A record for mail.ic.fbi.gov: $ dig @ns1.fbi.gov mail.ic.fbi.gov a +dnssec ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 7222 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 7, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 65235 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;mail.ic.fbi.gov. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: mail.ic.fbi.gov. 600 IN A 153.31.119.142 mail.ic.fbi.gov. 600 IN RRSIG A 7 4 600 20131124123847 20130826123847 32497 fbi.gov. dYs+1bPdO+8y3T5ij8qSn0BvTDv7X51wi++HV681rKzlK5SLKrZiGryV ow67iO30CWwztI3d5oCF7/6bEn3NetWq9IajeM19aorIdJMA6tAp1BQI EZMTcCsnInSIn2IRb3V2MXXOBx6r6wMt7ptNfp/Tro89h2K7q+Pgp0O2 WdU= ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: fbi.gov. 600 IN NS ns3.fbi.gov. fbi.gov. 600 IN NS ns5.fbi.gov. fbi.gov. 600 IN NS ns4.fbi.gov. fbi.gov. 600 IN NS ns2.fbi.gov. fbi.gov. 600 IN NS ns1.fbi.gov. fbi.gov. 600 IN NS ns6.fbi.gov. fbi.gov. 600 IN RRSIG NS 7 2 600 20131124123847 20130826123847 32497 fbi.gov. l/AcT+Pmr/5yosWyvP3zbFIJE7f07F+AA8eh1X3qv8ulw9FbC0DhZfSo 1f5ctD6DIb613ButzKG01PdMzIknMroraOyGyRcAq27qYXzKRE0cTqhv UWz15jLa7N7YKYccR8Hmt6GY1DJitY41EwQP7Z2Fpac9yPTRnybc4mTS 4eY= Here's a query for the same name, but for AAAA which it doesn't have: $ dig @ns1.fbi.gov mail.ic.fbi.gov aaaa +dnssec ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P4 <<>> @ns1.fbi.gov mail.ic.fbi.gov aaaa +dnssec ; (2 servers found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41056 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 65235 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;mail.ic.fbi.gov. IN AAAA ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: fbi.gov. 600 IN SOA ns1.fbi.gov. dns-admin.fbi.gov. 2013082601 7200 3600 2592000 43200 95RIPFTKTJC9I7J8HDAIA7CM6L279FSR.fbi.gov. 43200 IN NSEC3 1 0 10 BBAB 97S2G907NEFOJ79P721E4FEQ9LR3IT1S A RRSIG fbi.gov. 600 IN RRSIG SOA 7 2 600 20131124123847 20130826123847 32497 fbi.gov. QgsdhUT7AHic8tJv39br+994eoyJ4c8/SuQr35dRudceE/bYyZV26IPI 4qnR8Cy35WoepW12bhhhY0Ug26Qy81KWcWHYPw0Wa7g5Ig8Pw27l8gCV J7NDY6O5jTb4MMc9THTPKEvXjeX/YE4060HrbJXo1U93qhdILkGTvno7 3hA= Shouldn't there be some more stuff there in the authority section, like an NSEC3 and RRSIG for mail.ic.fbi.gov? Am I missing something, or is it broken? The server says it's from Ultradns. R's, John

4 7