July 2011 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
by Aftab Siddiqui 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

Just want to re-confirm. I've got only 4 in my spam. Is it google spam who is not putting it in SPAM folder? Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM, William Pitcock <nenolod(a)systeminplace.net>wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:50:38 +0100 (BST) > Tim Franklin <tim(a)pelican.org> wrote: > > > > Thankfully, the current test has been a success. > > > > Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other > > anti-spam? > > > > I've got a sudden influx this morning of spam addressed to > > nanog(a)nanog.org :( > > > > Ditto. Getting lots of crap here. > > William >

1 0

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
by Joe Greco 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > > > If you have any questions or concerns please let me know. > > The new posts do not have list (un)subscribe information in the headers. I'll offer an evenhanded comment in that it's frustrating that the headers used have changed, since some of us key procmail off of them to split mailing lists into folders, but it *is* nice to see that the current NANOG mailing list team has been supporting List-Id for some time now, and that such was propagated properly between old and new host. Good job. Unfortunately my filter predates NANOG's use of that so now I gotta go fix it here. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.

1 0

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
by Philip Dorr 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Tim Franklin <tim(a)pelican.org> wrote: >> Thankfully, the current test has been a success. > > Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other anti-spam? > > I've got a sudden influx this morning of spam addressed to nanog(a)nanog.org :( > > Regards, > Tim. > Same here. Previously I have maybe received maybe one or two spam messages total via NANOG, but this morning I have received seven.

1 0

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward?
by XPhi 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

Hi Also seeing a gross amount of spam from list and my "digest" setting has been lost apparently. Sigh C

1 0

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
by Mikael Abrahamsson 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > >> If you have any questions or concerns please let me know. > > The new posts do not have list (un)subscribe information in the headers. This took a very long time to get delivered (2h20 minutes). Also, the new mail server doesn't seem to support TLS and during this short time it's been active, we've had multiple SPAM get distributed through the list as well. What was the reason for the change, from what it looks like right now there seems to be quite a few downsides and functionality/performance lost. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike(a)swm.pp.se

1 0

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
by Mattias Ahnberg 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

On 2011-07-12 07:19, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > If you have any questions or concerns please let me know. I miss proper List-Id headers for identifying and filtering the list easily. I might have missed some discussion; but why are we moving away from mailman, and what software is in the new system? -- /ahnberg.

1 0

dammit, please make nanog poster only .. dont let nonmembers post to it
by Suresh Ramasubramanian 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

That's the second spam received on nanog so far. First a chinese voip vendor who probably wont gain any customers, the second a nigerian westernunion scam -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists(a)gmail.com)

1 0

IMPORTANT: NANOG List Cutover Test
by Michael K. Smith - Adhost 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

Hello: I'll be testing the list cutover again at 10:00 PM PDT (GMT -7). Please ignore the subsequent "NANOG TEST" email that comes through to the list. Regards, Mike

1 0

Facebook contact?
by Walter Keen 11 Jul '11

11 Jul '11

If anyone from Facebook is here, Please contact me. Thanks -- Walter Keen Network Engineer Rainier Connect (P) 360-832-4024 (C) 253-302-0194

3 2

Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?)
by Lucy Lynch 11 Jul '11

11 Jul '11

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, William Herrin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja(a)bogus.com> wrote: >> >> On Jul 11, 2011, at 12:18 PM, William Herrin wrote: <snip> > > My focus in this thread is this: how do we help the next teams avoid > the discourtesy and the smackdown that the v6 teams are getting for > not adequately recognizing the ops' issues. These guys should have > been heroes but instead they screwed the pooch and everybody's paying > for it. How do we fix the systemic problems so that next time they are > heroes? get to the party early: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/ and stay late... lots of new work inbound. - Lucy > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > >

2 1