April 2011 - Test - lists.nanog.org

How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?
by Graham Beneke 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

Only 0.3 of a /8 left[1] before the rationing policy kicks in. I hope everyone is ready :-) [1] http://www.apnic.net/community/ipv4-exhaustion/graphical-information -- Graham Beneke

8 13

Contact for va.gov
by Nathan Eisenberg 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

Yes, two in one day. Wholesalers don't wipe device configs, apparently. Anyways, would a technical contact for va.gov please contact me off-list? Best Regards, Nathan Eisenberg

6 6

Contact for City of Panama City Beach, FL?
by Nathan Eisenberg 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

Could someone from the IT department for the City of Panama City Beach, Florida please contact me off-list? Best Regards, Nathan Eisenberg

4 4

switch networking help
by Deric Kwok 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

Hello I would like to ask general question about switch speed experience. How can I increase speed in switch port? ls it to combine more than one port? Any other solution? In combing ports, what are the advantages and disadvantages? Any info and experience. Thank you for your sharing.

2 1

Looking for Postmaster contact for js.pentagon.mil
by Mark Keymer 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

We have a client that we resent moved to some new address space (We have had the the space for a couple of years now) However it looks like the mail server for js.pentagon.mil are droping all packet to them. :( If anyone had some leads on a way to contact them. Please contact me off-list. We did try the number in the whois for the IP. The phone rang and rang. :( Thank you all. Sincerely, Mark Keymer

1 0

Syngenta space
by Eugen Leitl 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

Hi, sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16 however. Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to iterate through the entire second octet? Thanks! -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

15 17

historical pricing data
by Chris McDonald 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

This may be the wrong place to ask but maybe one of you could point me in a direction. I'm looking for [ideally] historical market pricing for mpls/ipl between as many as possible city pairs [with a focus toward Asia] as well as ip maybe 5 year back. Thanks, Chris

1 0

SDH 1+1 protected circuit and OSPF minimal setup on a single Juniper platform.
by Lorenzo Rossi 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

Hi, I have some doubts about the minimal configuration to handle an SDH 1+1 protected circuit with OSPF on a single Juniper router platform (one interface as the Working Circuit and another interface as the Protect Circuit). Reading the JunOS documentation, for instance the 9.4 JunOS version: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos94/swconfig-network-int… and using the various configuration snippet I tried to link together various pieces of configuration and the result is below: so-0/2/0 { framing { sdh; } sonet-options { aps { working-circuit bayward; authentication-key blarney; } } unit 0 { family inet { address 10.100.100.1/24; } } } so-1/3/0 { framing { sdh; } sonet-options { aps { protect-circuit bayward; authentication-key blarney; } } unit 0 { family inet { address 10.100.200.1/24; } } } lab@r1# show protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 { interface so-0/2/0.0; interface so-1/3/0.0; } } If I'm not wrong the APS/MSP signaling protocol router implementation should set one of the two sonet interfaces as Up and the other as Down, so the OSPF should install in routing table only the IP network related to the Up interface. Am I wrong? Do you think I forgot some configuration pieces? Thanks and regards, Lorenzo

1 0

Level 3 Agrees to Purchase Global Crossing
by William Allen Simpson 12 Apr '11

12 Apr '11

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2011-04-11/level-3-agrees-to-acquire-gl… The deal will combine two unprofitable companies with total revenue of $6.26 billion as of last year, and cut annualized capital spending by about $40 million, according to the statement. It will also help reduce the pressure on prices, which have declined by as much as 30 percent a year in the industry, said Donna Jaegers, an analyst at DA Davidson & Co. “This is what telecom has needed for a long time,” said Denver-based Jaegers, who recommends buying both stocks. “You have way too many players.”

15 16

RE: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative?
by Ray Corbin 12 Apr '11

12 Apr '11

I also use postini and it works really well for my current needs. <rant>I had experience with Barracuda as outbound anti-spam filters for a very large hosting provider and I won't use Barracuda again. Some of their methods for blocking spam are a tad extreme. At one point they decided to block both yahoo.com and google.com in their domain filters because neither company responded timely to their complaint emails and wanted their attention...not to mention their buggy 'spam engine' that died many times causing mail to error with 'failure to connect to 127.0.0.1'... I especially loved their tier 1's response of how the issue is on the recipients end because they couldn't telnet to mail.domain.com from their workstation...I had to first explain how mail.domain.com wasn’t the MX record for domain.com (it ironically was a postini MX record) and that it was obvious when thousands of messages sit in the inbound queue saying 'failure to connect to 127.0.0.1' meant their engine died and their 'watchdog' process failed to restart it. To me their Tier 1 unable to do the basics was pretty unacceptable. </rant> -r -----Original Message----- From: proth(a)cnsny.net [mailto:proth@cnsny.net] Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 11:56 AM To: Andrew Kirch; John Palmer (NANOG Acct); nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative? Andrew, We use and offer Postini - a front end service. Postini is a anti virus and spam filter, and can spool mail if your circuits are down. Postini is a Google company and works like a charm. If you need more information please contact me offline proth(a)cnsny.net Paul Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone ----- Reply message ----- From: "Andrew Kirch" <trelane(a)trelane.net> Date: Sat, Apr 9, 2011 10:39 am Subject: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative? To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <nanog2(a)adns.net>, <nanog(a)nanog.org> John, My suggestion isn't _QUITE_ an appliance, but it works very well and I've been exceptionally happy with it. It's a distribution of linux controlled via a web interface that does far more than just mail filtering (at which it is both flexible and adept). Take a look at http://www.clearfoundation.com/Software/overview.html. The hardware requirements shouldn't be too insane, and the rules updates/subscriptions for the various services are all month to month, and not a bucket of insane. Andrew On 4/8/2011 11:51 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote: > OK, its been a year since my Barracuda subscription expired. The unit > still stops some spam. I figured that I would go and see what they > would do if I tried to renew my subscription EXACTLY one year after it > expired. Would their renewal website say "Oh, you are at your > anniversary date", and renew me for a year? > > No such luck: They want me to PAY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR for which I did > NOT receive service and then for the current (upcoming year). Sorry - > I don't allow myself to be ripped off like that. Sorry Barracuda - you > get no money from me and I'll tell everyone I know about this policy > of yours. > > I posted an article about this unscrupulous practice on my blog last > year at http://www.john-palmer.net/wordpress/?p=46 > > My question is - does anyone have any suggestions for another e-mail > appliance like the Barracuda Spam Firewall that doesn't try to charge > their customers for time not used. I should be able to shut off the > unit for a year or whatever and simply renew from the point that I > re-activate the unit instead of having to pay for back-years that I > didn't use. > > Thanks > > > > >

24 35