March 2011 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2
by Adam Armstrong 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Hi All, I'm scouring the Internet for potential devices to use in a FTTB/FTTP scenario. Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and selective QinQ. Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes the cost per port too high. Has anyone come across anything I've not found yet? Thanks, adam.

9 10

Re: What vexes VoIP users?
by Jay Ashworth 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Thomas" <mike(a)mtcc.com> > Yes, really. The only difference was which L2 channels the RTP > packets were flowed onto, which was determined by the MGCP/SIP > signalling and interaction with the telephony gateway. There > is a **very** complicated state machine that deals with this > using some bastardized IETF protocols (COPS IIRC). Ok, see, now I (like, I suspect, Frank Bulk) am confused again: when you say "which L2 channels the RTP packets were flowed onto", that sounds to me a *whole* lot like "which VLAN on the end-user drop carried the RTP packets from the terminal adapter in their cable box to our concentrator"... which is pretty much the point I was originally trying to make, if perhaps in slightly different terms. Am I still misunderstanding you? Cheers, -- jra

3 2

IPv6? Why, you are the first one to ask for it!
by George Bonser 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Fairly major global network provider likes to call themselves a "Tier 1". Asking about native IPv6 in one of their colo facilities in the UK. They say their US facilities won't be v6 capable until Q4 2011. The UK rep acted like it was the first he'd ever heard of it and implied we were the very first to ask for it. Note to providers: That might have worked a couple of years ago but when we hear that today, we know it is false. Please be honest in your responses to that question. If you aren't going to deploy it for another year or two, just say so. The notion that we are the very first ones to ever ask for it from a global provider in a major country is just lame. George

18 20

Issues with 23.1.64.0/20?
by Ernie Rubi 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Anyone else see anything / know of any odd behavior on the prefix yesterday afternoon/today? Here in Miami (NAP) we saw some issues through one of our upstreams and ended up disabling the BGP session, then re-enabling it with a filter to block said prefix. We've since removed the filter and things are stable but would be nice to know what broke 'out there.' Ernesto M. Rubi Sr. Network Engineer AMPATH/CIARA Florida International Univ, Miami Reply-to: ernesto(a)cs.fiu.edu Cell: 786-282-6783

1 0

Video explaining [RPKI] Resource Certification
by Alex Band 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Under the NRO flag, we have just released a short video about Resource Certification, giving a high-level explanation of what it is and why it is important for your organisation: http://youtu.be/rH3CPosGNjY I hope to release another video going into more detail, outlining what it means practically for an operator. To get an idea of the practical side for now, here is a video we released earlier on how to set up and use the hosted Resource Certification service the RIPE NCC provides: http://youtu.be/Q0C0kEYa1d8 Kind regards, Alex Band Product Manager, RIPE NCC

1 0

quietly....
by bill manning 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

039/8 APNIC 2011-01 whois.apnic.net ALLOCATED 106/8 APNIC 2011-01 whois.apnic.net ALLOCATED ... whimper ...

87 383

Request for assistance with BGP feeds
by Geoff Huston 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Hi I am conducting some research relating to BGP behaviour and I need some eBGP multihop feeds - IPv4 and/or IPv6 eBGP, and full eBGP route table feeds please. These are incoming feeds only (I will be announcing _nothing_ back in these sessions - I'll filtering outbound and you should defensively filter inbound of course). I am looking at the real time behaviour of BGP updates in a relatively dense multi-peer environment, which is why I am looking for a number of full route feeds. Please drop me a note if you can assist me with this activity. Thanks in advance, Geoff -- Geoff Huston APNIC

1 1

Coffer MAC Address Vendor Database
by Scott Berkman 01 Mar '11

01 Mar '11

Is anyone on the list that knows about the Coffer MAC address vendor database (http://www.coffer.com/mac_find/)? I have used this resource for years and I am now getting a permission error (403 Forbidden) when I try to go to any page on that site. Otherwise, anyone have recommendations for another resource for this information? Thanks, -Scott

3 3

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 52 Registration is open!
by David Meyer 01 Mar '11

01 Mar '11

Registration for NANOG 52 is open. Something new this time around: There is a $25 discount for NewNOG members. Please register soon and see you in Denver. Dave (for the NANOG PC) _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

Switch with 10 Gig and GRE support in hardware.
by Matt Newsom 01 Mar '11

01 Mar '11

I am looking for a switch with a minimum of 12 X 10GE ports on it, that can has routing protocol support and can do GRE in hardware. Does anyone have a suggestion that might fit. Keep in mind I am looking for something in the 1-2U range and not a chassis. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse(a)rackspace.com, and delete the original message. Your cooperation is appreciated.

17 21