February 2011 - Test - lists.nanog.org

quietly....
by bill manning 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

039/8 APNIC 2011-01 whois.apnic.net ALLOCATED 106/8 APNIC 2011-01 whois.apnic.net ALLOCATED ... whimper ...

87 383

Switch with 10 Gig and GRE support in hardware.
by Matt Newsom 01 Mar '11

01 Mar '11

I am looking for a switch with a minimum of 12 X 10GE ports on it, that can has routing protocol support and can do GRE in hardware. Does anyone have a suggestion that might fit. Keep in mind I am looking for something in the 1-2U range and not a chassis. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at abuse(a)rackspace.com, and delete the original message. Your cooperation is appreciated.

17 21

SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS
by Diogo Montagner 01 Mar '11

01 Mar '11

Hello, I am looking for industry standard parameters to base the SLA of one network regarding to voice, video and data application. Which are the the accepted values for jiiter, delay, latency and packet loss for voice, video and data in a IP/MPLS ? Thanks ./diogo -montagner

5 8

Re: What If....
by Brian E Carpenter 01 Mar '11

01 Mar '11

On 2011-02-26 10:34, bill manning wrote: > The IANA function was split? RFC 2860 already did that. It seems to work well. > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf I'm glad to see they are up to date: "Paper submissions should include a three and one-half inch computer diskette in HTML, ASCII, Word or WordPerfect format (please specify version)." Brian

5 5

Hughesnet outage - where can I ask?
by Greg Ihnen 01 Mar '11

01 Mar '11

I run a small network in the jungle of Venezuela which is fed by a rebranded Hughesnet connection. We just had a four day failure where the only protocol that worked was ICMP and we were completely without communication. Traceroutes all failed in a bizarre way when using UDP, TCP or GRE packets but traceroute with ICMP worked fine. Our provider (Bantel) is blaming Hughesnet but I'm not finding anything to back that up in forums or in searching the web. I don't want to bother this forum's members with my questions regarding what the traceroute results show and what the problem might be. Is there another forum where these questions would be appropriate? Thanks in advance. Greg

2 1

Sunday Funnies: Using a smart phone as a diagnostic tool
by Jay Ashworth 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Do you have a smartphone? Blackberry? iPhone? Android? Do you use it as a technical tool in your work, either for accessing devices or testing connectivity -- or something else? If so, what kind of phone, and what (if you don't mind letting on) are your magic apps for this sort of work? (My motivation? Well, um, Lee, I'm looking at buying an HTC Thunderbolt, if everyone can get their thumbs out, and I want to get a feeling for the lanscape, if you'll pardon the pun. :-) Cheers, -- jra

11 12

Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
by Paul Vixie 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

there are two replies here. --- Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists(a)gmail.com> writes: > ..., what's the harm in dhcpv6? (different strokes and all that) only the egos and reputations of those who said that stateless autoconf was all ipv6 needed. (which is a small price to pay, according to me.) --- "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins(a)arbor.net> writes: > On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote: > >> Also don't forget privacy-enhanced addresses. > > Yes, which have extremely negative opsec connotations in terms of > complicating traceback. /64 csma subnets with low order 64 bits controlled by infectable pc's means we'll be blackholing by /64 when we blackhole in ipv6. it's no big deal. -- Paul Vixie KI6YSY

1 0

Sunday Funnies: Using a smart phone as a diagnostic tool
by Atticus 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

I use Android phones, mostly for remote administration. SSH using ConnectBot. If you want a really durable phone, with the option of a little bit of additional functionality, I would take a Motorola Droid 1, throw CyanogenMod on it with a p3droid kernel. The phone itself can survive 3ft falls @ 30 mph (proven myself on accident), the keyboard is very useable, and overall is an amazing phone. You can also use a fair number of command line tools, and add your own statically compiled tools, or dynamically compiled with a bit more work. On Feb 27, 2011 9:03 PM, "Jay Ashworth" <jra(a)baylink.com> wrote: Do you have a smartphone? Blackberry? iPhone? Android? Do you use it as a technical tool in your work, either for accessing devices or testing connectivity -- or something else? If so, what kind of phone, and what (if you don't mind letting on) are your magic apps for this sort of work? (My motivation? Well, um, Lee, I'm looking at buying an HTC Thunderbolt, if everyone can get their thumbs out, and I want to get a feeling for the lanscape, if you'll pardon the pun. :-) Cheers, -- jra

1 0

DSL/Fiber/MetroE Options for Fort Worth, TX
by Bobby Lacey 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Hi All, Looking for a provider/contact of a dsl circuit, MetroE, or other >8mbps alternative in the Fort Worth, TX area. Specifically this will be used as internet access for a conference at the Fort Worth Convention center at 1201 Houston St Fort Worth, TX. Sorry for the bandwidth, but we are desperately looking for a provider. Please respond offlist. Thank you, Bobby KF4GTA

1 0

World IPv6 Day (was: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6)
by Randy Bush 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Me: >>> NOC: are you running a macintosh? >>> User: yes, how did you guess? >>> NOC: because it is broken. get vista. btw, i run macosx 10.6.6 Some Clueless Mac Fanchild: >> While I'm as big a fan of IPv6 as anybody, I think in a comparison of >> relative brokenness, Mac comes out quite favorably compared to Vista >> in spite of their DHCPv6 deficiencies. Tore: > Absolutely not. Mac OS X does not do proper source address selection > according to RFC 3484. That makes it do things like preferring the use > of link-local IPv6 addresses when connecting to global dual-stacked > destinations, which of course won't work - as a result a 75 second > long timeout is incurred for every single outgoing TCP connection. i have hope for lion, and maybe even a patch for 10.6. this stuff just has to be fixed before world ipv6 day. > My guess is that about 70-80% of the users calling Randy and others to > report problems on «World IPv6 Day» will be running Mac OS X. sad to say, probably not. the biggest problem here in japan is ntt [0]. they provide no global v6 [1], but an ipv6 walled garden against which users will bang heads when they get a quad-a. they own the last km, provide the cpe, and own the government. so we have to use them for transport. our customers will hit their broken implementation and call us. sweet! the isps, in cooperation with ntt, are trying to sort this problem before it occurs. but it is not pretty and there is no good solution. randy --- [0] - not the ntt which provides layers three and above, and even ipv6 in the states and much of asia except japan. this is ntt the telco semi-monopoly local bearer provider in japan and their ngn implementation. [1] - apocrypha of japan being ipv6 rich are utter bs.

1 0