Comment can be appreciated but please remove the I2 WG address from
responses unless it's something you want to blast to that community, I
don't want them upset at me for filling their inbox with a 40 email
NANOG thread (you know how this list can get).
;-)
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Brent Jones <brent(a)brentrjones.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Ray Soucy <rps(a)maine.edu> wrote:
>>
>> This is great news.
>>
>> I wonder if this is evidence that they plan to continue to develop the
>> Procurve line and eventually abandon the 3Com line. Uncertainty of
>> which line would win out has kept me (and others I'm sure) from
>> wanting to invest in anything HP.
>>
>
>
> Some of us have chosen not to invest in anything HP for a long time
>
>
>
> -Brent Jones
--
Ray Soucy
Epic Communications Specialist
Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526
Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
http://www.networkmaine.net/
This is great news.
I wonder if this is evidence that they plan to continue to develop the
Procurve line and eventually abandon the 3Com line. Uncertainty of
which line would win out has kept me (and others I'm sure) from
wanting to invest in anything HP.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Jason Mueller <jasmuell(a)indiana.edu> wrote:
> All,
>
> I received HP code today that implements RA guard (K.15.07.0002). This is for the 5400, 8200, 3500 series switches. The feature blocks both RAs (ICMP type 134) and IPv6 redirects (ICMP type 137).
>
> Here is the CLI command syntax:
> [no] ipv6 ra-guard ports <port-list> [log]
>
> This should be included in their next general release of K.15 series code.
>
> No word on my request for IPv6 DHCP snooping. I generally get an HP drafted version of special feature requests, when they accept them for development. I don't have any record of that, so I sent a gentle reminder to HP tonight.
>
> -Jason
>
--
Ray Soucy
Epic Communications Specialist
Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526
Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
http://www.networkmaine.net/
I am in great hopes that a Microsoft Postmaster could get in contact
with me. This is dealing with a delisting of a banned IP
"blocked using Blocklist 3, mail from IP banned" My client is e-mailing
a vendor of theirs who's mail goes to "mail.messaging.microsoft.com"
We have submitted a request to delist it but have not heard back from
anyone for about 2 weeks now. Our client is up in arms and all that.
There has been no know reasons for why the ban would have taken place.
It is possible this is an old ban from before we had the IP space which
we got 1-2 years ago. :(
Sincerely,
Mark Keymer
CFO/COO
Vivio Technologies
