May 2010 - Test - lists.nanog.org

tagged.com contact
by Okechukwu 27 May '10

27 May '10

Is there anyone from tagged.com (or parent co.) on the list that can contact me off list to help with a blocked IP range issue? Thanks in advance for any help. ./Okech

1 0

wanted: WAN connectivity statistics
by travis+ml-nanog＠subspacefield.org 26 May '10

26 May '10

Hey all, I was wondering if anyone can direct me to information about WAN connectivity statistics. I'd like to get an idea of the typical frequency and length of outages, distribution (is it gaussian?) and any relevant confounding factors (routing stabilization times, network topology issues, etc.). Thanks! Travis -- A Weapon of Mass Construction My emails do not have attachments; it's a digital signature that your mail program doesn't understand. | http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/ If you are a spammer, please email john(a)subspacefield.org to get blacklisted.

1 0

Quick IP6/BGP question
by Thomas Magill 26 May '10

26 May '10

>From the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6 peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to exchange routes or doing IP6 peering? Thomas Magill Network Engineer Office: (858) 909-3777 Cell: (858) 869-9685 mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com <mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com> provide-commerce 4840 Eastgate Mall San Diego, CA 92121 ProFlowers <http://www.proflowers.com/> | redENVELOPE <http://www.redenvelope.com/> | Cherry Moon Farms <http://www.cherrymoonfarms.com/> | Shari's Berries <http://www.berries.com/>

12 13

Latency between GCI Anchorage and VZB in NY
by Brad Beck 26 May '10

26 May '10

All, I've been working diligently to improve performance of interactive applications (Citrix, terminal) that are run by users in our office located in Anchorage, and are served by a managed Internet connection provided by GCI. Our applications reside in the Buffalo, NY area. Via MTR, I've seen no or almost-no lost packets, whereas RTT averages around 124ms and at times is as high as 328ms. I'm looking for feedback from others regarding this RTT, hopefully from customers of GCI. 328ms RTT is high as far as I'm concerned, and it seems like this could be controlled a little better. If this is status quo for GCI->VZB/MCI connections, then I'd be interested in that feedback as well. Thanks in advance Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

4 3

help finding knowledgable BGP person at Cogeco/old Fibrewired in Canada
by Wood, Loralee 26 May '10

26 May '10

Hello- If anyone from Cogeco is monitoring this list, can you please contact me off list. Our BGP advertisement through you is not propagated to any routers that I can see, and test thru looking glass. Now, all our inbound traffic is traversing our least preferred connection. Apologies for the NANOG distribution, but getting thru your new support system always routes me to another company handling end-user connections. Thank you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------This message contains information that may be confidential and proprietary. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message immediately. ==============================================================================

1 0

Cisco ASR
by Thomas Magill 26 May '10

26 May '10

Anyone using ASRs? We are demoing one to possibly upgrade our 7206s. We are seeing what looks like a memory leak on the RP. Cisco is looking at it and says they haven't seen it before. I am wondering if anyone else has run across this. With the default 2G of memory the RP only had about 1% free memory, and the router was rebooting every 5 days or so when the RP ran out. We upgraded and now have about 60% free on the RP, but I still see the used memory incrementing at a pretty steady rate. We are running IOS-XE 12.2(33)XNF. The router is currently not even routing traffic, just acting as a BGP peer so it has one set of full tables. It seems to be a process on the Linux OS side that has the leak as the IOS memory commands show everything staying pretty static. Thomas Magill Network Engineer Office: (858) 909-3777 Cell: (858) 869-9685 mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com <mailto:tmagill@providecommerce.com> provide-commerce 4840 Eastgate Mall San Diego, CA 92121 ProFlowers <http://www.proflowers.com/> | redENVELOPE <http://www.redenvelope.com/> | Cherry Moon Farms <http://www.cherrymoonfarms.com/> | Shari's Berries <http://www.berries.com/>

8 7

Cisco 7606 RSP720 - no SVI bit/packets counters
by Dean Belev 26 May '10

26 May '10

Hi all, Another strange Cisco behavior - or may be unknown one. Creating SVI interface with a lot of traffic passing through - nothing suspicious. Until ... /7606#sh int vlan XXX Vlan537 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is EtherSVI, address is MAC (bia 001c.b0b7.6400) Description: 0449-070C001#NetLan_Int Internet address is IP/30 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 0/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set Keepalive not supported ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:08:18 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue: 0/40 (size/max) *30 second input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 30 second output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec* L2 Switched: ucast: 25025 pkt, 2426613 bytes - mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes L3 in Switched: ucast: 3597038 pkt, 3755053095 bytes - mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes mcast L3 out Switched: ucast: 2000511 pkt, 602156179 bytes mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes 3678505 packets input, 3803335802 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts) 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored 1899084 packets output, 568639522 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 interface resets 0 unknown protocol drops 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out/ #### 7606#sh int vlan XXX summary *: interface is up IHQ: pkts in input hold queue IQD: pkts dropped from input queue OHQ: pkts in output hold queue OQD: pkts dropped from output queue RXBS: rx rate (bits/sec) RXPS: rx rate (pkts/sec) TXBS: tx rate (bits/sec) TXPS: tx rate (pkts/sec) TRTL: throttle count Interface IHQ IQD OHQ OQD RXBS RXPS TXBS TXPS TRTL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *VlanXXX 0 0 0 0 *0 0 0 0 * 0 ####### All counters but RXBS/RXPS/TXBS/TXPS showing there is a traffic (~400 Mbps). Also visible using MIB values. But the SVI bits/packets not showing it. There are 146 SVIs configured there (we have another Cisco 7609 RSP720 with 393 ones and no such a problem present). We deleted around 10 interfaces trying to release any resources - without result, delete/create the interface - the same. Is there any limit I do not know. I tried to read about any limits of the number of SVIs - no result. Are there any assumptions? Thank you in advance! Best~ /Dean Belev Network Management Team Neterra Ltd. Sofia, Bulgaria Phone: +359 2 974 33 11 Fax: +359 2 975 34 36 Mobile: +359 886 663 123 http://www.neterra.net/

2 1

looking glass
by Randy Bush 25 May '10

25 May '10

so i went to get a looking glass going, and went to install lg (http://freshmeat.net/projects/lg/) on freebsd 8. it is perl insanity. among other cpan sikness, it wants to build an entire perl implementation of ssh, with 666 other library modules included when there is a perfectly fine ssh client on the machine. is there a decent looking glass package that does not fill my machine with trash? randy

7 6

ISP Security BOG - Nanog 49 San Francisco
by Scalzo, Frank 25 May '10

25 May '10

Hello All, Nanog 49 is just a couple weeks away, and we're looking for agenda topics for the ISP Security BOF. Currently, on the agenda we have Levi Gundert talking about "Investigating botnets and current attribution feasibility", and Duane Wessels giving a DNSSEC update, and we working on getting someone to speak about the China routing incident. If there are any topics you would like to see, or better yet present (slides welcome but not required), please let either me or Danny McPherson know ASAP. Thanks! Frank

1 0

Mikrotik BGP Question
by Lorell Hathcock 25 May '10

25 May '10

I am inheriting a WISP network with Mikrotik equipment throughout. One of my first duties is to make the network multihomed. We have our first internet connection at one location and our second internet connection will be delivered at a second location in a week or so. I understand all of the steps I need to go through with ARIN in terms of getting an ASN and so forth. My question is about BGP on the Mikrotik platform. The guy who I am supplanting swears that we are supposed to be bringing the second internet link to the same place as the first internet link for BGP to work properly. Obviously that is not true with major brand routers which would do the BGP job just fine. (And he's the same guy that has bridged this whole network, so it is easy to disbelieve his opinion.) But maybe he knows that Mikrotik can't perform BGP in the same way that other routers can. So here's the question. Is there something about running BGP on a Mikrotik platform that precludes having the internet connections come in at different locations? Sincerely, Lorell Hathcock OfficeConnect.net | 832-665-3400 x101 (o) | 832-782-4656 (c) 713-992-2343 (f) | lorell(a)officeconnect.net Texas State Security Contractor License | ONSSI Certified Channel Partner Axis Communications Channel Partner | BICSI Corporate Member Leviton Authorized Installer

13 21