February 2010 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Google to offer fiber to end users
by Charles N Wyble 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-10/google-plans-to-build-high-spee… http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/think-big-with-gig-our-experimental.… What do folks think? Granted it's very early on, and g00g could decide to never leave the announce phase. - -- Charles N Wyble Linux Systems Engineer (818)280-7059 charles(a)knownelement.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAktzF2sACgkQJmrRtQ6zKE91lwCgjdYmEewZtPb2iFM6VZMW5Xce ydkAoI+ycZQ1JYLoZt7yL04CliGXRLoc =4eps -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

17 22

The Internet Revealed - A film about IXPs v2.0: now available
by Serge Radovcic 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

After releasing the initial version of the the Internet Revealed at RIPE59 in Lisbon last year, we received some valuable feedback from the wider IXP community. We took this feedback to the producers of the film and now have a slightly edited version 2.0 of the film. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5837LcDHfE Enjoy Serge Radovcic Euro-IX

15 21

Re: Linux Router distro's with dual stack capability
by Wade Blackwell 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

Sorry for the top post, BB won't let me punch this at the bottom. I believe 2.0 is in beta and supports ipv6, I don't know if beta is something you want to mess around with. The PF products have been bulletproof for quite a long time. -W ------Original Message------ From: Bryan Irvine To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: Linux Router distro's with dual stack capability Sent: Feb 10, 2010 16:17 would pfsense work for you? On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch(a)cpgreeley.com> wrote: > Anyone have some insight on a good dual stack Linux (or BSD) router distro? Currently using IPCop but it lacks ipv6 support. I've used SmoothWall Express but not in some time and not sure how well it works with IPv6. Not looking for something huge, just something for the equivalent of a small branch office. Site to Site VPN support and NAT translation capability for a few public IP addresses to private addresses are the only requirements. Public or private responses are welcome! > > Thanks! > Blake Pfankuch > Network Engineer > > Wade Blackwell Sent from Mobile 805-457-8825 X998 cupofcompassion.com Coffee that makes a difference

1 0

Re: Google to offer fiber to end users
by Scott Weeks 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

--- aegal(a)cisco.com wrote: From: Abdulkadir Egal <aegal(a)cisco.com> You can now nominate your community http://www.google.com/appserve/fiberrfi/public/options ----------------------------------------------- When you select 'nominate your community' you're taken to a 'create an account' page. I doubt they'd consider Sunset Beach on the North Shore of Oahu Hawaii anyway. That's kinda out there... ;-) scott

2 1

RE: Connectivity problems to google via openDNS
by Mark 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Hello nanog, Just wondering if anyone is experiencing the same problem with google and openDNS on their end or knows what's going on there with openDNS. The problem just occurred about 20 minutes ago. Trace is as follows: http://inetpro.org/pastebin/2418 Kind regards, Mark

4 3

Q9 BGP contact needed, urgently
by James Smith 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Please contact me off list. -- James Smith

1 0

Re: The Internet Revealed - A film about IXPs v2.0: now available
by Larry Sheldon 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

On 2/10/2010 9:28 AM, Jay Ess wrote: > So, for example, if i don't like how a car works i must be able to build > a car to be allowed to voice my opinion? How much did you pay for the video? -- "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml

2 1

black listing of web traffic
by Andrey Gordon 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Hi list I have a problem that I can't seem to find a solution to yet. My student network is being NATted out and anyone who's on that network had troubles accessing random websites. For example, going to www.apple.com or www.facebook.com would work great, but store.apple.com would either not load or take forever to open up. I've had that problem last week and thought I tracked it down to the NAT ip being black listed with one of the span black lists. Even though that IP is not used for mail out, that somehow seemed to affect it. Changing it to a different one seemed to solve the problem and I got that original address of the list in the mean time. Changed it back and everything was well, until today. Same symptoms, but now I don't see us listed anywhere. The best description of the symptoms seems to be that that IP is rate limited or something. Anyone seen that? Are there any blacklists for web access? PS. I checked everything under my control and i don't see a bottle neck anywhere or anything like and IPS working up or something.... ----- Andrey Gordon [andrey.gordon(a)gmail.com]

5 5

ip address management
by Pavel Dimow 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Hello, does anybody knows what happend with ipat? http://nethead.de/index.php/ipat http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Tools_and_Resources Any other suggestion for a good foss ip address management app with ipv6 support?

13 18

about udp 80,8080,0
by 최종훈 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

These days, most of ddos attack use udp port 80.8080.0 in our country and our network. Sometimes the traffic volume is up to 100gbps higher. So, we are considering to rate(bps) control about udp port 8,8080,0 in our ISP network. Although such a ports arp not be used commonly... I'm wondering about whether any of problems happen after do that. Is there anyone who have experiences controlling udp port 8,8080,0 ? rate-limiting or block! What does application use 8.8080,0 port for the proper purpose? [chk_receive.html?msgid=1265716670&uniqid=23455&sender=eversuede%40chol .com]

5 4