November 2007 - Test - lists.nanog.org

need help with global ipv6 topology measurement
by k claffy 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

if you have ipv6 connectivity and are willing to volunteer some (low bandwidth) v6 traceroute data to a good cause (== a topology map of observed ipv6 connectivity), please help us out for a few ( estimated < 15) min with: http://www.caida.org/data/how-to/scamper/ipv6-collection-2007/ please share w all your ipv6friends, k

1 0

Cisco outage
by J. Oquendo 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

In re: previous post http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9823196-7.html So much for self healing networks eh -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA #579 (FW+VPN v4.1) SGFE #574 (FW+VPN v4.1) echo c2lsQGluZmlsdHJhdGVkLm5ldAo=|\ python -c "import sys; print sys.stdin.read().decode('base64')" http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E

5 4

Re: Creating a crystal clear and pure Internet
by Paul Ferguson 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Sean Donelan <sean(a)donelan.com> wrote: >Some people have compared unwanted Internet traffic to water pollution, and proposed that ISPs should be required to be like water utilities and be responsible for keeping the Internet water crystal clear and pure. > >Several new projects have started around the world to achieve those goals. > > >ITU anti-botnet initiative > >http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/cyb/cybersecurity/projects/botnet.html > >France anti-piracy initiative > >http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/index-olivennes231107.htm > Sean, Are you purposefully trolling the list? ;-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHTD1Zq1pz9mNUZTMRAkhQAKD4Am49VJFPMQVIu3W1NvVbZ3a7fgCffC7d Fl1bTvyHzkiaVPGUAapjYeQ= =/xQQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

1 0

Re: Cisco outage
by J. Oquendo 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

Martin Hannigan wrote: > Can someone please indirectly email Mr. Oquendo and advise him that we > would like to have a word with him? He seems to have blocked Google > and has made us unable to have a chat. Blocked Google? Strange I got this message. But since you wanted to direct this back to the list when I responded to you, let me level the playing ground and post my direct response to you. Since after all I did follow procedures and leave it off the list. // BEGIN > Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:50:24 -0600 > From: "J. Oquendo" <sil(a)infiltrated.net> > To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan(a)gmail.com> > Cc: admins(a)nanog.org > Subject: Re: Cisco outage > Message-ID: <20071126235024.GA39489(a)infiltrated.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Martin Hannigan wrote: >> We don't mind seeing reports on important parts of the overall >> critical infrastructure being impacted, but we could probably do >> without the off-topic remark that seems to be inaccurate as well. This > I've made four posts in about three months... Is this a targeted > "shut up" http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/ >> In the future, please help us to make sure NANOG is operational by >> being on topic -- and accurate -- wherenever posting. > The link was/is relevant, comment is just a comment. Should I in > turn complain about someone's signatures? Take a look at my four > posts. Their comments and their all relevant to someone else's > comment as are everyone's comments and responses. > How many posts have I made? 12 in seven months... > http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/index2.html >> >> http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9823196-7.html >> >> So much for self healing networks eh > Something personal you have to say, say it. But bitching and > whining about me being off topic according to your personal > taste and you'd have a hell of a lot of bitching to do about > a hell of alot of other people. // END > Hopefully, this won't bounce like our private message did. We'll be > forced to throw him off the list, sadly. Now to be on topic, you state I bounced mail from Gmail? Why didn't you include the SMTP error, I'd be curious to see where I blocked it to correct it. sudo grep -i hanni /var/log/maillog Nov 27 00:01:14 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: D5BB73F420: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=2582, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:15 kryptonite postfix/pickup[73054]: 675043F43F: uid=1006 from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com> Nov 27 00:01:15 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: 675043F43F: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=2878, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:15 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: 763723F443: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=3061, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:36 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: CA1DB3F445: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=2544, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:37 kryptonite postfix/pickup[73054]: 2815A3F449: uid=1006 from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com> Nov 27 00:01:37 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: 2815A3F449: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=2840, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:37 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: 470EA3F44B: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=3023, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Funny, I don't see a rejection from me to you. If there were though, how does a private domain come into a NANOG thread. Its not like Infiltrated is an ISP, NSP, NAP or any other peer or provider. So again I ask you to look at my postings for the last 6 or 7 months where my responses are minimal. Operational you state? Was this something akin to me posting about Botnets but operators stating that 10gigs of malware laced traffic is not operational? J. Oquendo SIGNATURE REMOVED TO AVOID BREAKING POLICY http://www.infiltrated.net/nanogpolice.jpg ----- End forwarded message ----- -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA #579 (FW+VPN v4.1) SGFE #574 (FW+VPN v4.1) echo c2lsQGluZmlsdHJhdGVkLm5ldAo=|\ python -c "import sys; print sys.stdin.read().decode('base64')" http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E

2 1

[admin] tmaresources.com request
by Martin Hannigan 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

Could someone from tmaresources.com please contact me directly, off-list? Your mail server or an employee client seems to be misbehaving. Best Regards, Martin Hannigan NANOG MLC Member

1 0

Re: [Outages] FW: Outages in Portland area
by Jeff Shultz 26 Nov '07

26 Nov '07

Dennis Smock wrote: > Has anybody noticed any outages that would effect traffic in the > Portland area? > Which Portland? -- Jeff Shultz

1 0

Cisco Downloads Down?
by Michael K. Smith - Adhost 26 Nov '07

26 Nov '07

Hello All: I hope this is operational for at least some of us. It appears the Cisco website is experiencing technical difficulties. Of particular interest is the fact that the downloads section is also apparently fubar. On a positive note, when the page does partially load, I see lots of pretty new icons! Regards, Mike

1 0

unwise filtering policy from cox.net
by goemon＠anime.net 26 Nov '07

26 Nov '07

if anyone from cox.net is reading... ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <abuse(a)cox.net> (reason: 552 5.2.0 F77u1Y00B2ccxfT0000000 Message Refused. A URL in the content of your message was found on...uribl.com. For resolution do not contact Cox Communications, contact the block list administrators.) This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of cox.net -- their customers can originate scam emails, but cox.net abuse desk apparently does not care to hear about it.

21 27

General question on rfc1918
by Drew Weaver 24 Nov '07

24 Nov '07

Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is found to be on topic. Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit carriers? We have filters in place on our edge (obviously) but should we be seeing traffic from 192.168.0.0 and 10.0.0.0 et cetera hitting our transit interfaces? I guess I'm not sure why large carrier networks wouldn't simply filter this in their core? Thanks, -Drew

10 10

comcast net issues in SFBay area ?
by ' =JeffH ' 24 Nov '07

24 Nov '07

Hi, I believe I'm seeing intermittent issues in comcast's SFBay area network, at or near.. te0-3-0-5-ar01.oakland.ca.sfba.comcast.net (68.87.192.34) te-9-1-ur02.sanmateo.ca.sfba.comcast.net (68.87.192.18) GE-1-3-ur01.sanmateo.ca.sfba.comcast.net (68.86.90.137) ..from two perspective of two different net locations. If you want you can contact me at this address off list. HTH & thanks, =JeffH

1 0