Test
Threads by month
- ----- 2025 -----
- January
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1997 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1996 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1995 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1994 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1993 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1992 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
June 2006
- 203 participants
- 146 discussions
(I'm starting to guess I'd finish sending these out faster if
I stopped falling asleep on my keyboard so often... --Matt)
2006.06.07 Welcome to Wednesday morning
http://www.nanog.org/
click on Evaluation Form
Let us know how the M-W vs S-Tu
format; next time will be S-Tu due to ARIN
joint meeting, but need more feedback!
Bill Woodcock, been on program committee
And lightning talk people need to send their
slides to Steve Feldman!!
Elliot Gilliam,
ISP community, notifications to
Smart Network Data Services
[slides are at
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/pdf/eliot-gillum.pdf
AGENDA
postmaster services
SNDS
problem
goal
today
tomorrow
motivation
feedback/dialog
questions/discussion
Postmaster--starting point for any issues you have
sending mail into Hotmail/MSN Live.
It's like AOL skunkfeed, you can do junk mail
reporting.
Lets you see what bad stuff is coming from your
domain.
SenderID
Site is at:
http://postmaster.msn.com/snds/
Problem:
bad stuff on the internet (spam, phishing, zombies,
ID theft, DDoS)
makes customers unhappy.
Solution #1 -- try to stop it before it hits customers
doesn't really *solve* the problem
Solution #2 -- take what we learn, apply it upstream,
get more bang for buck
#2: #1 is too low
ISP-centric efficiency
solution #1, n ISPs have n-1 problems, total is O(n^2)
n ISPs have 1 problem (themselves), total is O(n)
reduces work of the overall system.
Crux
today people and ISPs are measured by how much BAD stuff
they *receive*
Not judged by what they send out.
similar to healthcare industry
no tight feedback loop to ISP behaviour
nice quotes on slides
http://www.circleid.com/posts/how_to_stop_spam
7 step program (like 12 step, but shorter)
1: recognize the problem: SNDS
2: believe that someone can help you : Me
3: Decide to do something : You
8: Make an inventory of those harmed : SNDS
9: Make amends to them : Tools
10: Continue to inventory : SNDS
12: Tell others about the program : You
What is SNDS
Website that offers free, instant access to MSN
data on activity coming from your IP space
data that correlates with "internet evils"
informs ISP to enable local policy decisions
Automated authorization mechanism
uses WHOIS and rDNS
users are people not companies
A force multiplier attempt.
You can do it on your own, no need to sign up
your company officially as long as you're an
rWHOIS/WHOIS contact.
SNDS goal:
provide info which allows ISPs to detect and fix any
undesired activity.
qualitative and quantitative data
"No ISP left behind"
stop problems upstream of the destination
Bring total cost of remediation to absolute minimum
keep service free
Make internet a better place.
We have data!
Windows Live Mail/MSN Hotmail is a spam and spoofing
target.
4 billion inbound mails/day
90/10 spam/ham by filtering technologies
User reports on spam, fraud, etc.
Inbound mail system slide--ugly to read, too dark.
SNDS website slide shown.
You can see daily aggregated traffic from your network;
activity periods, IPs, commands and messages seen on
port 25, samples of exchanges.
Filter results on your mail
rate at which users press "this is junk" on your mail.
Trap counts for when IPs hit their junk filters.
comments column is catch-all for anything else they
might put in; like open proxies, when tested positive.
"export to CSV" button, so you can feed the data in
to your own systems if you want.
Today's Scenario
Illustrate magnitude and evidence of a problem.
additional resources
monitoring infrastructure
SNDS Stats
2500 users
mostly senders
67 million IPs
10-20% of inbound mail and complaints
Output drops by 57% on /24+ when monitored by SNDS
SNDS tomorrow
Usability
signup by ASN
better support for upstream providers
access transfer
Utility
programmatic access
Data
virus-infected emails
phishing
honeymonkey
sample messages
Expand the the coverage, try to hit more of the problems
on the net.
Provide sample messages, compelling evidence when facing
customers
This hasn't shipped yet, it's what he's hoping to
have in a month or two.
Tomorrow's Scenarios
Lowered
barrier to entry
recurring "cost"
ISP types
end-user
tier 1/2 monitoring, tier 2/3
directly attack more than just spam
virus emails -> infected PCs, outbound virus filters
phishing/malware hosting -> takedowns.
Is asymmetric routing a sign of people trying to
launch hidden abuses of the net?
Looking to hit more issues, like spotting virus-laden
messages; either infected, or an open relay.
Hoping that automation speeds response.
Safety Tools
Stinger: http://vil.nai.com/vil/stinger
Nessus: http://www.nessus.org/
[oy, read the list from his slide, it's long.]
green items on the list are free, others are pay-for
products.
Pay-for isn't necessarily a bad thing if you get
benefit!
Safety tool breakdown from MSN on next slide.
Motivation:
Hypothesis: everyone benefits
Customers:
infected uses get fixed
safer, cheaper, better internet experience
ISPs
solution #1 isn't solving the problem
altruistic is the "new" selfish
Microsoft
only benefits if everyone else does
make business case why they're doing this.
They need to stop paying costs of trying to
deal with spam.
Wants to get benefit of being one of the people
seeing a cleaner internet
ISP Motivation
Customers
they're unhappy, unsafe
they like people who fix that
be the hero
retain customers
win new ones
fixing has more benefits than bandaging
[bandaging is just sticking fingers in the dike, it
doesn't scale, eventually we run out of fingers to
stick in the holes]
cost reductions
bandwidth--slow growth demands
support--fewer complaints to your help desk.
Community
NANOG
Motivation alternatives
Industry scorecard
public recognition
public shame
Logo ISP program--how clean are you?
Business case
Some nice quotes from different people around the
business case needed here.
appeal to cost reduction and revenue generation
this is starting to happen.
let your sales and marketing people know about
this.
Boston university business case, students arriving
with computers presented danger/load to their
help desk.
Qwest provides windows/one software to their
users.
Feedback:
usability--how easily can you work with it?
utility--what can you do?
what's missing
tools to aid customer remediation
need IPv6 support at some point
how do ISPs see cost vs benfits
costs, benefits, NANOG aggregation
how do we get critical mass?
msn-snds(a)microsoft.com
Discussion:
How does SNDS fit into the larger ecosystem
relationship to
senderBase.org
SCOMP/JMRP
REACT
adam, rick at support intelligence
Yahoo is working on a system like this, Irene Lai is
here to work on that, email her if you're interested.
Should/how do other ISPs provide this?
common schema, authorization, authentication
federation, delegation, aggregation
Forum
bof/track?
NANOG/MAAWG?
Mailing list: upstream(a)mipassoc.org
Conclusion:
http://postmaster.msn.com/
http://postmaster.msn.com/snds/
Try it!
tell people about it!
Q: Matt asks whether Microsoft will point their
own systems at it, since Nick Feamster's presentation
showed on slide 12 that Microsoft was #10 on the
list of spam *sources* that his honeypots saw?
A: Yes, he is connecting the systems that track
mail sending from Hotmail to this as well, so that
they can start making sure they're cleaning their
own house as well.
on to next talk.
2
2
(still here, just been really busy at work today; will try to finish sending the
notes out tonight. --Matt)
2006.06.06 MPLS TE tutorial
Pete Templin, Nextlink
[slides are at:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/pdf/pete-templin.pdf
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/pdf/pete-templin-exercise.pdf
He works in a Cisco shop, no JunOs experience
Operator perspective, no logos
Traffic engineering before MPLS
--the "fish" problem.
two parallel paths, one entry router,
one exit router, you end up with all
traffic taking one path, not using the
other path.
IGP metric adjustments
can lead to routing loops
hard to split traffic
No redundancy left over if both paths
filled, but can be good for using 2 out
of 3 paths.
MPLS TE fundamentals
Packets are forwarded based on FIB or LFIB
FIB/LFIBS built based on RIB
TE tunnels;
TE tunnel interface is a unidirectional logical link
from one router to another.
Once the tunnel is configured, a label is assigned for
the tunnel that corresponds to the path through the
MPLS network (LSP)
TE tunnel basics
Once traffic is routed onto the tunnel, the traffic
flows through the tunnel based on the path.
Return traffic could be placed onto
a tunnel going the opposite direction,
or simply routed by IGP
Key terms for TE
Headend
router on which the tunnel is configured
Tail
destination address of tunnel
Midpoint
router(s) along the path along the tunnel LSP
Basic TE config
Global:
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
IGP: must be OSPF or IS-IS
mpls traffic-eng rouer-id Loopback0
mpls traffic-eng <area X | level2>
physical interfaces
mpls ip
mpls traffic-eng tunnels
tells IGP to share TE info with other TE nodes
interface TunnelX
ip unnumbered loopback0
borrow the loopbak's address so we can forward traffic
down the tunnel
tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
tunnel destination <a.b.c.d>
tunnel tail
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 10 dynamic
find a dynamic path through network
best path
with sufficient bandwidth
will discuss path selection in a bit
Where are we at?
Tunnels go from headend to tail end through midpoint
routers over a deterministic path
we know what commands go on a router for the
global
physical interface
tunnel interface commands
TE and bandwidth
Physical interfaces can be told how much bandwidth can
be reserved (used)
ip rsvp bandwidth X X
TE tunenls can be configured with how much bandwidth
they need:
tun mpls traff bandw Y
Tunnels will reserve Y bw on outbound interfaces, and
find a path across the network wth X(unused)>Y BW.
This prevents oversubscription, or at least helps
control it.
You can allow for burst room, but for now we'll stick
with static, non-oversubscribed links.
TE BW
operators can adjust the tunnel bandwidth values over
time to match changes in traffic.
If tunnels are dynamically placed, the tunnels will
dynamically find a path through the network with
sufficient bandwidth, or will go down.
TE auto-bandwidth magic
Tunnels can be configured to watch their actual traffic
as in "shw int <blah>| inc rate" every five minutes,
and update their reservation to match, at periodic
intervals.
Dynamic reservations to match the live network
Bandwidth is 'reserved' using RSVP
but not "saved" for TE
Often buys enough time to identify the surge, see
where the traffic is coming/going.
The number is only a number in control plane; no
actual impact on data plane, no shaping, no control
on real data flows.
tunnel mpls traffic-eng auto-bw frequency Y
each auto-bw tunnel does "sh int" to capture
its rate every 300* seconds
each auto-bw tunnel updates "tunn mpls traff bandwidth X"
every Y seconds
The config actually changes; this will impact your
RANCID tracking.
It uses highest measured rate during the interval Y
May want to tweak your load-interval, since it's a
decaying function over time; 5 minute is a fairly
smooth value.
May need to tweak config check-in system to avoid
getting flooded with bandwidth adjustments.
Covered:
TE tunnel basics
router config basics
general concepts about TE and bandwidth
In this case, the shortest path that has X BW available
for reservation
actually, bw X at or below priority Y, but that's later.
SPF calculations
step 0: create a PATH list and a TENT list
step 1: put "self" on PATH list.
step 2:
step 3: put PATH nodes' neighbors on TENT list
step 4: if TENT list is empty, stop.
step 5:
jump back to step 2:
Example exercise -- calculate router A's best path to
router D using the handout.
CSPF notes
No load sharing is performed within a tunnel; as soon
as a path is found, it wins
CSPF tiebreakers:
lowest IGP cost
largest minimum available bandwidth
lowest hop count
top node on the PATH list
Creating paths -- can be created dynamically,
or statically via static paths.
Dynamic:
tunnel mpls traff path-option X dynamic
Explicit paths
paths can be crated manually by explicitly creating
a path
"ip explicit-path name <name?>"
next-address X
next-address Y
tunnel mpls traff path-option X explicit name blah
Paths can be created manually by explicity configuring
a path that excludes an address;
use any link EXCEPT this one.
for backup links, oob links, etc.
can't combine exclude-address and next-address on the
same explicit path.
Q: if all other paths go away, will an excluded path
still be used?
A: only if you have a fallback option of "dynamic"
can't both include and exclude on same path.
A TE tunnel can have multiple path options.
lowest cost path option is attempted
higher-cost paths attempted sequentially
until a path can successfully established, or failure
Usually best to have a dynamic option as the highest-cost
option, to ensure you don't fall back to IGP (and lose
traffic matrix accounting!)
CSPF checks tunnel path options in sequence for one that
has sufficient information.
OK, we've got tunnels now--how do we share info around
the network?
TE info is shared around using IGP
available bw per interface
eight priority levels
high priority tunnels can push low priority tunnels
out of the way
some dynamics as far as tunnel vs interface sizing
administrative weight (TE specific IGP metric
Affinity (customizable)
You can configure different interfaces with
bits that indicate territorial restrictions,
or high-latency links, etc. Use the interface
affinity bits, and match/exclude tunnel affinity
bits to include or exclude certain links.
This information is distributed
immediately for "significant" changes
periodically for "insignificant" changes
immediately, if a change causes an error
Significant changes occur when available bandwidth
on an interface passes preset thresholds
customizable with 16 thresholds.
(based on percentages)
Key points where information is passed from device
to device.
Insignificant changes flooded every 3 minutes,
significant flooded immediately, by default.
If a new path (dynamic or static)
appears that's better than the current one
re-optimize
periodically, every hour from tunnel bringup by default
manually "mpls traffic-eng reoptimize"
event-driven
when a link comes up
optional: requires "mpls traff reo events link-up"
not so good with flapping links, though.
If you have a flapping link, TE tunnels will stay
off that link for about an hour; you have flap
dampening in your network.
Up next, how to put IP traffic on tunnels
static routes "ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y tuZ"
policy-based routing
route-map PBR permit 20
match ip addr ACL
set ip next-hop tunX
Autoroute
Autoroute
treat this tunnel as though it's a logically directly
connected link to the tunnel tail
updates the local router's RIB/FIB with "tunnelX"
in place of the IGP next-hop; preserves the IGP cost
all the way to the tail.
One line of config per tunnel; it updates the LOCAL
router's RIB/FIB; prior routers not made aware of
this router as a next-hop for the tunnel tail.
This is supported for IS-IS, but can be more
difficult; you increase number of links in your
IGP pretty quickly.
tunn mpls traff autoroute announce
autoroute and load-sharing
parallel tunnels will load-share inversely proportional
to their configured bandwidth
auto-bandwith can really muck with these values!
load-sharing can be tuned separately with
"tunn mpls traff load-share X"
Limited to CEF 16 buckets, depending on when it
measures, can end with values drifting apart.
If you use same "X" on two tunnels, they will load share
equally.
IGPs can load-share over equal-cost paths
BUT TE tunnel cannot load-share over
multiple physical interfaces
TE diagnostics
show ip route X
sh run int tuX
sh ip rsvp reservation
show mpls traff tun suboptimal constr none
shows headend tunnels taking suboptimal paths to the
tunnel tail (eg, different from IGP best path)
show mpls traff tun
detailed info for all tunnel headends
bandwidth info (auto-bw)
MPLS labels, hop by hop path
show mpls traff tun role <head|middle|remote|tail>
remote is non-headend (not originating or ending on
this router)
show ip rsvp interfaces
shows max allocated bw on an interface.
MPLS VPNs
if a tunnel tail is not the egress PE, add
"mpls ip" to the tunnel configuration
PE-P-P-PE-PE
--adds another label onto the stack.
If the last router VPN isn't on penultimate router,
the TE label won't be recognized, it'll be dropped.
This adds the TE label back on, keeps the LDP label
as well as the VPN label still intact
Add "mpls ldp discovery directed-hello accept"
to config
If you have unidirectional tunnels, that way when
you're bringing up tunnels LDP info can be exchanged
as you're going.
Multicast:
RPF calculations are normally based on unicast RIB
Unidirectional TE tunnels cause RPF failures
add "mpls traffic-engineering multicast-intact" to
IGP config
Bases RPF checks on RIB BEFORE TE tunnels are substituted
Questions?
templin at templin.org
Swap to looking at operational network for some
troubleshooting views.
About 150-200Mb traffic aggregate, 4 pops,
DAL and Houston,
four parallel DS3s, 2 between core1's and 2
between core2's
30mbit IP RSVP reservation; TE kicks in, and
moves traffic.
Houston intercore links tends to not have traffic
unless TE has kicked in.
Aggressive 15 minute auto recalculations, since
surprises can kick up fairly quickly.
Room heads for cookies at 1526 hours Pacific Time
1
1
(last notes from NANOG37, yay! I definitely fell further behind
this time around than in Dallas. Unfortunately, I don't think
I'll be allowed to go to St. Louis, so I probably won't be
able to provide notes for NANOG38. --Matt)
2006.06.07 Deploying DNSSEC--bootstrap yourself
Joao Damas, ISC
[notes are at
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/pdf/joao-damas.pdf
DNSSEC status
standard is complete and usable
some minor nits with regards to some privacy issues
2 implementations: NSD, BIND
at least one DNSSEC aware resolver (BIND 9.3.2 and later)
Really, you just need some data.
DNSSEC follows a hierarchical model for signatures.
sign the root zone
get root zone to delegation sign TLDs
get TLDs to delegation-sign SLDs,
etc.
Today, the root zone remains unsigned
likely will be this way for some time
Very few TLDs have signed their zones and offer
delegation signatures
.se, .ru, .org
DNSSEC provides for local trust anchors
you can use trust-anchors clause in BIND
problem: if you have too many, it becomes a nightmare
to maintain, so it doesn't get used.
very manual process
Enter DLV, domain lookaside validation
it's an implementation feature, not a change to the
protocol; matter of local policy
enables access to a remote, signed repository of
trust anchors, via the DNS
implemented in BINDs resolver so far
more to follow?
unfortunately, requires you to trust remote
repository
DLV lookup
a DLV enabled resolver will try to find a secure
entry point using regular DNSSEC; only if it fails
is DLV used, if it is configured.
[picture of DLV lookup chain]
On resolver (BIND)
add to named.conf
in the options section
//DNSSEC conifg
dnnssec-enable yes
dnssec-lookaside . trust-anchor dlv.isc.org.;
get the key from ISC's web: http://www.isc.org/ops/dlv
ISC is operating a DLV registry free of charge for anone
who wants to secure their DNS
Likely some closed orgs will use their own (eg mil)
have a look, start using it!
Any questions?
Q: Mark Kosters, Verisign: Any plans to configure DLV
registries per TLD?
A: BIND code only allows for one right now.
Q: Would be good to allow it to be configured per TLD.
Q: Randy Bush, IIJ: some feeling or understanding how
IANA, root would validate keys/zones it has keys for;
don't understand how ISC proposes to validate keys
it would be storing. He suggests they publish the
security policy.
A: In case of registrars proxying keys; they trust
registrar. Otherwise, it's like PGP; show me your
face, show me your key.
Q: Paul vixie, ISC, following up on Mark Kosters;
you can only have one DLV for any point in the
namespace; you can specify a different one for a
TLD than root; that allows a TLD DLV to be paranoid,
like .mil. who doesn't want to trust anyone else
with key information.
If every TLD wanted to do that, they would find
high levels of cut-and-paste fatigue, so ISC will
operate a root level DLV server as well.
Q: Rick Wesson, runs Alice's Registry, a small registrar.
he's considering doing this, he can help DNS holders
register their keys if people are interested, and
will help get them into the DLV tree.
Q: Sam Wiler?, Sparta: concerns from Randy about how
ISC will authenticate the entries. Registrars should
consider running their own DLV servers, as they have
the relationship with the domain holder.
Code? Apparently you don't need code...
NANOG 37, ending slides.
425 attendees, 118 first timers
lots of countries
most USA, 11 canada, scattered others.
ISP, then NSP, then other categories.
top 3 companies represented: Cisco, Juniper, Equinix
HUGE thanks to Rodney Joffe and Neustar for
puling off a miracle to make this happen at the
last minute!
Thanks to sponsors, bear, gear, other.
Susan R Harris, many thanks to her for all
the work she has put in over the years and
to make this happen!
Also huge thanks to all the other people
at Merit
And we'll see you in St. Luis, Oct 8-10th,
joint meeting with ARIN, things set in stone.
Network will go down in 30 minutes or so--pack
up and go home! :)
I think that was the fastest closing I've seen at
a NANOG yet. ^_^;;
1
0
Break ends at 11:40, PGP signing will take place,
and don't forget to fill out servers.
ANYCAST fun for the final sessions.
Lorenzo Colitti, RIPE NCC
[slides are at:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0606/pdf/lorenzo-colitti.pdf
Agenda:
introduction
latency
client-side
server-side
Benefit of individual nodes
Stability
Routing issues
Why anycast?
root server anycast widely deployed
c, f, i j, k, m at least
reasons for anycasting
provide resiliency: eg contain DOS attacks
spread server and network load
increase performance
but is it effective?
measure latency
ideally for every given client, BGP should chose node
with lowest RTT. does it?
from every client, measure RTTs to
anycast IP address
service interfaces of global nodes (not anycasted)
for every client, compare K RTT to RTT of closest global
node
a = RTTk/min(RTTi)
if 1, BGP is picking right node
if > 1, BGP picks the wrong node
if <1, seeing local node.
Latency with TTM: methodology
DNS queries from ~100 TTM test boxes
dig hostname.bind
see which host answers
extract RTT
take min of 5 queries
check paths to service interfaces;
is it same as prod IP
according to RIS, mostly 'yes'
TTM probe locations, mostly in europe
Latency with TTM: results (5 nodes)
most values are close to one; generally BGP doing pretty
good job.
from 2 nodes to 5 nodes
(2 nodes, April 2005) (5 nodes, April 2006)
mostly same results, clustered around one, whether
2 or 5 nodes.
consistency of 'a' over time
average of that over time.
TT103 is outlier
calculated over time, threw out that one outlier.
results are pretty consistent.
average is little higher than one, mostly consistent
over time
measuring from servers
TTM latency measurements not optimal
locations biased towards europe
limited number of probes (~100)
don't reflect k client distribution
how to fix?
ping clients from servers
much larger dataset
methodology
process packet traces on k global nodes
extract list of client IP addreses
ping all addresses from all global nodes
plot distribution of 'a'
6 hours of data
246,769,005 queries
845,328 unique IP addresses
CDF of 'a' seen from servers
results not as good as seen by TTM
only 50% of clients have a = 1
about 10% are 4x slower/farther.
probably due to TTM clustering in europe
latency conclusions
5 node result vs 2 node, comparable, at least
in TTM
non-TTM results not so rosy.
How many nodes are needed--is 5 enough?
evaluate existing instances
how to measure benefit of an instance?
Assume optimal instance selection
that is, every client sees closest instance
this is upper benefit of benefit
consistent to see if we've reached diminishing returns
for every client, see how much its performance if the
chosen node didn't exist.
B is loss factor, how much a client would suffer if an
instance were knocked out
B = RTTknockout/RTT...
Graph for LINX; 90% of clients wouldn't see an impact
if it went away; 10% would see a worsening.
geographic distribution pretty wide
AMS-IX
about 20% would suffer performance degregation; busiest
two nodes, see a lot of clients, important to k
deployment.
If they plot it for both LINX and AMSIX together,
about 65% wouldn't be affected, most of others would
see 4x, 10% would be 7x worse.
So taken together, the *two* nodes are important.
Tokyo; best node for few clients; but those served,
BADLY served by others;
about 10% who would go more than 7x if it went way,
those clients mostly Asia.
Miami node at NOTA,
moderate benefit for some clients, US and southAm
would be badly served by europe or Tokyo.
Delhi node is mostly ineffective, most would be
served better by other nodes.
Condense the graph into one number to get a
value for effectiveness of each node.
weighted average of B for each client.
if benefit value is 1, node doesn't provide any
benefit at all.
larger numbers show higher benefits.
Europe, when taken together, high benefit, as is
Tokyo; Miami node not so effective, and Delhi is
nearly ineffective.
Does anycast provide any value then?
knock out all except LINX; dark red curve (pre 1997)
10% wouldn't notice, 85% would get worse,
benefit value is 18.8,
so anycast does bring value.
Stability
the more routes competing in BGP with more nodes
doesn't matter for single packet UDP exchanges
does matter for TCP
Look at node switches that occur.
collect packet dumps on each node.
extract all 53/UDP traffic
k nodes only NTP synchronized
if IP shows up on two nodes, log a switch.
5 nodes, april 2006, 0.06% saw switches
2830 switchers out of 845,328, 0.33% switchers
no big issue with instance switchers.
Routing issues
k-root structure
5 global nodes (prepended)
linkx, amsix, tokyo, mia, del
different prepending values
no-export causing reachability
TT103 has value of 200, the graph axis is cut.
tt103 is in Yokohama; Tokyo is 2ms away; but
the query goes to Delhi through Tokyo to LA.
416ms vs 2, so value is 208.
Thanks to Matsuzaki and Randy Bush,
got BGP paths from AS2497
bad interaction of different prepending lengths
need to fix prepending on Tokyo node.
Delhi had shorter prepending.
no-export and leaks
local nodes can be worse than global nodes
tt89, seeing Denic local node, 30ms instead
of going to London. Local node, if no-export
is ignored, announced to customer, they are
more specific, leak to customers.
no-export can lead to loss of reachability
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2005-10/msg01226.html
problematic interaction of no-export with anycast
use no-export to prevent local nodes from leaking
if have an AS
whose providers all peer with a local node
and honor no-export
customer never sees route for k IP address.
solution, send out a less specific, covering
prefix.
Q: Mark Kosters, Verisign--saw much higher switching rates;
can he define switching better?
A: if an IP is seen at one location, then shifts to a
different site, that's one switch; going back to the
first node would be a second switch.
1
0
Would somebody from earthlink.net mail ops please contact me off-list?
thx
-mark
--
Mark Jeftovic <markjr(a)easydns.com>
Founder & President, easyDNS Technologies Inc.
ph. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225
fx. +1-(866) 273-2892
1
0
the web site and whois info are just about as completely anonymous as can be.
4
3
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 10 Jun, 2006
Analysis Summary
----------------
BGP routing table entries examined: 190168
Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 104652
Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 93198
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 22396
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 19479
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 9338
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2917
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 60
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 3.5
Max AS path length visible: 24
Max AS path prepend of ASN (34527) 16
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 7
Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 5
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 9
Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1543668456
Equivalent to 92 /8s, 2 /16s and 130 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced: 41.6
Percentage of allocated address space announced: 60.2
Percentage of available address space allocated: 69.1
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 94114
APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-----------------------------
Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 40710
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 16880
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 38424
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 18579
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2598
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 747
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 398
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 3.5
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 18
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 227781728
Equivalent to 13 /8s, 147 /16s and 172 /24s
Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 71.2
APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911
APNIC Address Blocks 58/7, 60/7, 121/8, 122/7, 124/7, 126/8, 202/7
210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8
ARIN Region Analysis Summary
----------------------------
Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 97710
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 57771
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 71728
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 26653
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 10759
ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 4051
ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 993
Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.3
Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 18
Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 293558272
Equivalent to 17 /8s, 127 /16s and 88 /24s
Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 76.1
ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106
(pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153
3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466
7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407
18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591,
26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791
35840-36863, 39936-40959
ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/5, 72/6, 76/8, 199/8, 204/6,
208/7 and 216/8
RIPE Region Analysis Summary
----------------------------
Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 38053
Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 25405
Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 35075
Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 23703
RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 8129
RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 4266
RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1342
Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.0
Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 20
Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 252474756
Equivalent to 15 /8s, 12 /16s and 117 /24s
Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 79.2
RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614
(pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631
6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383
20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695
30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935
40960-41983
RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 80/5, 88/6, 193/8, 194/7, 212/7
and 217/8
LACNIC Region Analysis Summary
------------------------------
Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 11498
Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 3701
Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 9595
Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 5546
LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 695
LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 229
LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 133
Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.1
Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 24
Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 27317760
Equivalent to 1 /8s, 160 /16s and 214 /24s
Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 40.7
LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, plus ERX transfers
LACNIC Address Blocks 189/8, 190/8, 200/7
AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary
-------------------------------
Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 2190
Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 895
Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 1501
Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 961
AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 155
AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 45
AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 25
Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 3.5
Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 16
Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 4113152
Equivalent to 0 /8s, 62 /16s and 195 /24s
Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 12.3
AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887 & ERX transfers
AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 196/8
APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary
----------------------------------------
ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description
4134 1242 7204 228 CHINANET-BACKBONE
4755 931 259 74 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut
9583 903 109 16 Sify Limited
4766 690 4435 304 Korea Telecom (KIX)
1221 613 1668 471 Telstra Pty Ltd
9498 571 211 67 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD.
7545 544 124 70 TPG Internet Pty Ltd
17488 519 32 10 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne
17676 486 7029 110 Softbank BB Corp.
9443 450 110 81 Primus Telecommunications
18101 414 85 24 Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet
17557 397 31 178 Pakistan Telecom
4802 378 80 167 Wantree Development
17849 359 22 114 Telecommunications Technology
17974 347 129 14 PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA
2907 336 1733 312 SINET Japan
9929 326 222 58 China Netcom Corp.
7474 298 211 228 SingTel Optus Pty Ltd
9800 275 410 67 CHINA UNICOM
4837 266 2994 112 chinanet IDC center beijing n
ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary
---------------------------------------
ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description
7018 1480 6151 945 AT&T WorldNet Services
4323 1310 740 259 Time Warner Telecom
721 1014 21998 313 DLA Systems Automation Center
6197 1005 625 471 BellSouth Network Solutions,
174 969 5787 904 Cogent Communications
19029 945 151 108 New Edge Networks
18566 943 272 8 Covad Communications
701 940 6753 776 UUNET Technologies, Inc.
2386 894 557 687 AT&T Data Communications Serv
1239 846 2789 600 Sprint
20115 713 617 381 Charter Communications
209 707 3687 551 Qwest
19262 667 2103 183 Verizon Global Networks
22773 664 1741 40 Cox Communications, Inc.
7011 638 218 415 Citizens Utilities
11492 622 87 22 Cable One
852 584 1084 382 Telus Advanced Communications
19916 563 49 54 OLM LLC
855 550 244 64 Canadian Research Network
5668 529 147 23 CenturyTel Internet Holdings,
RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary
---------------------------------------
ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description
702 573 1951 451 UUNET - Commercial IP service
3301 305 1327 292 TeliaNet Sweden
3352 305 1644 30 Ibernet, Internet Access Netw
3320 287 3989 240 Deutsche Telekom AG
8220 274 470 262 COLT Telecommunications
680 245 2025 242 DFN-IP service G-WiN
6746 238 90 212 Dynamic Network Technologies,
3246 236 504 226 Song Networks
8708 216 275 201 Romania Data Systems S.A.
24863 214 42 11 LINKdotNET AS number
3269 201 2182 72 TELECOM ITALIA
3215 200 1680 93 France Telecom Transpac
8551 200 198 24 Bezeq International
30890 193 17 71 SC Kappa Invexim SRL
1257 190 740 166 SWIPnet Swedish IP Network
8866 180 37 15 Bulgarian Telecommunication C
6830 172 781 36 UPC Distribution Services
786 171 1778 171 The JANET IP Service
5400 171 348 140 BT Ignite European Backbone
9121 169 931 28 TTnet Autonomous System
LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary
-----------------------------------------
ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description
8151 705 1082 224 UniNet S.A. de C.V.
22047 419 158 11 VTR PUNTO NET S.A.
11172 352 110 84 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V
16814 329 20 8 NSS, S.A.
6147 267 134 22 Telefonica Del Peru
14117 201 12 6 Telefonica del Sur S.A.
10481 181 72 8 Prima S.A.
7303 175 81 25 Telecom Argentina Stet-France
6503 136 151 82 AVANTEL, S.A.
21826 133 17 23 INTERCABLE
11556 132 80 4 Cable-Wireless Panama
19169 126 8 26 Telconet
14259 119 10 15 GTD Internet S.A.
14522 115 18 9 SatNet S.A.
23216 114 21 9 RAMtelecom Telecomunicaciones
19429 110 60 44 E.T.B.
6505 109 88 79 Global One Communicaoes Ltda
7910 105 7 10 ANDINET ON LINE
5639 103 12 9 Telecommunications Services o
18822 98 7 9 TELEFONICA MANQUEHUE
AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary
------------------------------------------
ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description
3741 286 803 234 The Internet Solution
8452 166 60 7 TEDATA
6713 147 135 11 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB
2018 131 314 105 Tertiary Education Network
5536 121 8 18 Internet Egypt Network
24835 116 48 6 RAYA Telecom - Egypt
33783 104 6 2 EEPAD TISP TELECOM & INTERNET
2905 73 155 66 The Internetworking Company o
15475 61 84 4 Nile Online
20928 59 16 2 Noor Advanced Technologies AS
15706 44 8 3 Sudatel Internet Exchange Aut
5713 39 294 35 Telkom SA Ltd
33774 31 7 21 AS Number for Telecom Algeria
12455 26 6 3 Jambonet Autonomous system
23889 26 8 11 MAURITIUS TELECOM
16637 25 18 23 Johnnic e-Ventures
8524 22 1 5 AUCEGYPT Autonomous System
10798 22 1 13 Standard Bank of South Africa
21280 21 4 4 Swift Global Kenya Ltd.Is an
33766 21 2 1 Nyala Communications Pty Ltd
Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary
----------------------------------
ASN No of nets Net Savings Description
4323 1310 1051 Time Warner Telecom
4134 1242 1014 CHINANET-BACKBONE
18566 943 935 Covad Communications
9583 903 887 Sify Limited
4755 931 857 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut
19029 945 837 New Edge Networks
721 1014 701 DLA Systems Automation Center
22773 664 624 Cox Communications, Inc.
11492 622 600 Cable One
6197 1005 534 BellSouth Network Solutions,
19916 563 509 OLM LLC
17488 519 509 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne
5668 529 506 CenturyTel Internet Holdings,
9498 571 504 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD.
855 550 486 Canadian Research Network
19262 667 484 Verizon Global Networks
8151 705 481 UniNet S.A. de C.V.
7545 544 474 TPG Internet Pty Ltd
3602 525 421 Sprint Canada, Inc.
22047 419 408 VTR PUNTO NET S.A.
List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global)
-----------------------------------------
Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description
65128 PRIVATE 193.110.50.0/24 24652 Juniper Networks, Eu
24409 UNALLOCATED 203.119.29.0/24 9808 Guangdong Mobile Com
64515 PRIVATE 203.126.13.0/25 7610 SINGAPORE ADVANCE RE
64515 PRIVATE 203.126.13.128/26 7610 SINGAPORE ADVANCE RE
65280 PRIVATE 203.197.161.0/24 4755 Videsh Sanchar Nigam
65280 PRIVATE 203.200.14.0/24 4755 Videsh Sanchar Nigam
65280 PRIVATE 203.200.21.0/24 4755 Videsh Sanchar Nigam
Advertised Unallocated Addresses
--------------------------------
Network Origin AS Description
132.0.0.0/10 721 DLA Systems Automation Center
137.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center
158.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center
183.206.196.0/24 2188 FR-RENATER-ASTER
192.44.0.0/24 5501 Fraunhofer Gesellschaft
192.44.0.0/19 702 UUNET - Commercial IP service
192.70.164.0/24 25689 National Research Council of
192.84.205.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system
192.172.0.0/19 721 DLA Systems Automation Center
Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global)
-------------------------------------------------------
/1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0
/7:0 /8:18 /9:9 /10:9 /11:28 /12:92
/13:200 /14:360 /15:704 /16:8855 /17:3247 /18:5351
/19:11723 /20:13263 /21:11524 /22:14724 /23:15902 /24:103048
/25:387 /26:314 /27:182 /28:69 /29:67 /30:51
/31:0 /32:41
Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations
-----------------------------------------------------
ASN No of nets Total ann. Description
18566 926 943 Covad Communications
19029 876 945 New Edge Networks
6197 790 1005 BellSouth Network Solutions,
7018 780 1480 AT&T WorldNet Services
9583 733 903 Sify Limited
4323 641 1310 Time Warner Telecom
2386 613 894 AT&T Data Communications Serv
11492 613 622 Cable One
19916 557 563 OLM LLC
7011 547 638 Citizens Utilities
4766 500 690 Korea Telecom (KIX)
855 424 550 Canadian Research Network
5668 412 529 CenturyTel Internet Holdings,
15270 403 434 PaeTec.net -a division of Pae
1239 390 846 Sprint
4755 365 931 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut
6517 364 395 Yipes Communications, Inc.
17849 359 359 Telecommunications Technology
702 356 573 UUNET - Commercial IP service
6198 354 508 BellSouth Network Solutions,
Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global)
----------------------------------------------
4:9 8:42 11:1 12:1618 13:1 15:15
16:3 17:3 18:4 20:41 24:734 25:1
32:57 38:229 40:54 41:3 44:3 47:6
52:4 55:1 56:3 57:25 58:183 59:217
60:182 61:863 62:775 63:1911 64:3173 65:2181
66:3061 67:613 68:663 69:1531 70:376 71:80
72:756 74:40 80:788 81:647 82:594 83:401
84:387 85:543 86:390 87:358 88:96 89:240
124:295 125:494 128:158 129:190 130:78 131:318
132:33 133:8 134:157 135:48 136:178 137:82
138:206 139:62 140:469 141:130 142:379 143:165
144:223 145:40 146:329 147:136 148:318 149:188
150:112 151:94 152:69 153:107 154:5 155:202
156:98 157:146 158:168 159:173 160:89 161:76
162:245 163:150 164:179 165:208 166:168 167:246
168:491 169:128 170:338 171:14 183:1 190:75
192:5744 193:3368 194:2640 195:1909 196:855 198:3910
199:3214 200:4487 201:978 202:6698 203:7034 204:3901
205:2033 206:2421 207:2901 208:2128 209:3776 210:1973
211:683 212:1259 213:1469 214:364 215:40 216:4177
217:1156 218:291 219:232 220:717 221:360 222:158
End of report
1
0
Re: a fun hijack: 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 7/8, 8/8, 12/8 briefly announced by AS 23520 (today)
by Gadi Evron 09 Jun '06
by Gadi Evron 09 Jun '06
09 Jun '06
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Ariel Biener wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 June 2006 21:58, Gadi Evron wrote:
> Gadi,
>
> There's no real need for such drastic measures over this. The Internet is no
> longer a "safe" place, meaning that the sane NSPs/ISPs sanitize their networks
> rather than trust someone else to do it for them, or trust someone else to never
> make mistakes. As such, the diligent network operators and their networks will
> not even be affected by this.
Indeed, the Internet is not a safe place. It always surprises me when
people think otherwise. Regardles, it is a place where someone else's
mistake can cost YOU.
> Also, there is a sentence that I like, I learned it from a proffessor here, but it
> is well known:
>
> "Never attribute to malice something that can be easily explained by sheer stupidity".
One of the most true I ever heard, and indeed, stupidity does hurt
us. Does it matter if it is malicious by /intent/?
>
>
> best,
>
> --Ariel
> --
> Ariel Biener
> e-mail: ariel(a)post.tau.ac.il
> PGP: http://www.tau.ac.il/~ariel/pgp.html
>
2
1
BGP Update Report
Interval: 26-May-06 -to- 08-Jun-06 (14 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS4637
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASN Upds % Upds/Pfx AS-Name
1 - AS9121 27269 2.3% 65.4 -- TTNET TTnet Autonomous System
2 - AS17974 17031 1.4% 49.2 -- TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA
3 - AS10139 16250 1.4% 53.5 -- MERIDIAN-PH-AP Meridian Telekoms
4 - AS13127 16050 1.4% 263.1 -- VERSATEL AS for the Trans-European Versatel IP Transport backbone
5 - AS11492 13075 1.1% 24.1 -- CABLEONE - CABLE ONE
6 - AS6830 11785 1.0% 72.7 -- UPC UPC Broadband
7 - AS17430 11322 1.0% 235.9 -- GWBN-CHENGDU Great Wall Broadband Network Service Co.,Ltd
8 - AS7018 10540 0.9% 24.9 -- ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services
9 - AS20115 9608 0.8% 19.9 -- CHARTER-NET-HKY-NC - Charter Communications
10 - AS24326 9325 0.8% 211.9 -- TTT-AS-AP TT&T Public Company Limited, Service Provider,Bangkok
11 - AS18231 8746 0.7% 69.4 -- EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd.
12 - AS4755 8338 0.7% 10.2 -- VSNL-AS Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Autonomous System
13 - AS3462 7846 0.7% 182.5 -- HINET Data Communication Business Group
14 - AS7011 7094 0.6% 10.8 -- FRONTIER-AND-CITIZENS - Frontier Communications, Inc.
15 - AS5803 7030 0.6% 76.4 -- DDN-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
16 - AS3475 6411 0.5% 278.7 -- LANT-AFLOAT - NCTAMS LANT DET HAMPTON ROADS
17 - AS2386 6400 0.5% 7.1 -- INS-AS - AT&T Data Communications Services
18 - AS23918 6319 0.5% 48.2 -- CBB-BGP-IBARAKI Connexion By Boeing Ibaraki AS
19 - AS17557 6207 0.5% 15.5 -- PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
20 - AS18207 6046 0.5% 31.7 -- BGBB-INDIA-AP Iqara Telecom India Pvt Ltd.
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix)
Rank ASN Upds % Upds/Pfx AS-Name
1 - AS36877 5008 0.4% 2504.0 --
2 - AS19982 5152 0.4% 1288.0 -- TOWERSTREAM-PROV - Towerstream
3 - AS35379 2494 0.2% 1247.0 -- EASYNET EASYNET s.c.
4 - AS21027 1233 0.1% 1233.0 -- ASN-PARADORES PARADORES Autonomous System
5 - AS39863 1011 0.1% 1011.0 -- CROSSNET Crossnet LLC
6 - AS34378 912 0.1% 912.0 -- RUG-AS Razguliay-UKRROS Group
7 - AS4678 3405 0.3% 851.2 -- FINE CANON NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS INC.
8 - AS36565 842 0.1% 842.0 -- COUNTY-OF-MONTGOMERY-PA - County of Montgomery
9 - AS25690 1367 0.1% 683.5 -- MAMSI - Mid Atlantic Medical Services Inc.
10 - AS16705 1340 0.1% 670.0 -- STORAGEAPPS - Storage Apps Inc.
11 - AS7013 1192 0.1% 596.0 -- NETSELECT - Health Sciences Libraries Consortium
12 - AS3944 586 0.1% 586.0 -- PARTAN-LAB - Partan & Partan
13 - AS14548 580 0.1% 580.0 -- LISTEN-SF-1 - Listen.com
14 - AS14410 2879 0.2% 575.8 -- DALTON - MCM, Inc., DBA: Internet@Dalton
15 - AS24775 4483 0.4% 560.4 -- AS24775 QinetiQ Ltd
16 - AS23917 1055 0.1% 527.5 -- BRIBIE-NET-AS-AP Bribie Island Net Multihomed, Brisbane
17 - AS3043 3126 0.3% 521.0 -- AMPHIB-AS - Amphibian Media Corporation
18 - AS12408 496 0.0% 496.0 -- BIKENT-AS Bikent Ltd. Autonomous system
19 - AS24896 460 0.0% 460.0 -- UKRINTELL-AS IntellCOM Provider LIR, Kiev, Ukraine Northern Nowhere
20 - AS21944 1360 0.1% 453.3 -- DTSI-1 - Data Technology Services Inc.
TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
1 - 152.74.0.0/16 3991 0.3% AS11340 -- Red Universitaria Nacional
2 - 81.212.149.0/24 3535 0.3% AS9121 -- TTNET TTnet Autonomous System
3 - 81.212.141.0/24 3503 0.2% AS9121 -- TTNET TTnet Autonomous System
4 - 61.0.0.0/8 3402 0.2% AS4678 -- FINE CANON NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS INC.
5 - 220.114.32.0/21 3158 0.2% AS17430 -- GWBN-CHENGDU Great Wall Broadband Network Service Co.,Ltd
6 - 211.162.88.0/21 3152 0.2% AS17430 -- GWBN-CHENGDU Great Wall Broadband Network Service Co.,Ltd
7 - 209.140.24.0/24 3101 0.2% AS3043 -- AMPHIB-AS - Amphibian Media Corporation
8 - 195.175.82.0/23 2806 0.2% AS9121 -- TTNET TTnet Autonomous System
9 - 196.47.64.0/22 2556 0.2% AS36877 --
10 - 81.212.125.0/24 2495 0.2% AS9121 -- TTNET TTnet Autonomous System
11 - 196.47.68.0/22 2452 0.2% AS36877 --
12 - 81.212.124.0/24 2449 0.2% AS9121 -- TTNET TTnet Autonomous System
13 - 209.160.56.0/22 1975 0.1% AS14361 -- HOPONE-DCA - HopOne Internet Corporation
14 - 206.251.163.0/24 1703 0.1% AS4314 -- I-55-INTERNET-SERVICES-INC - I-55 INTERNET SERVICES
15 - 211.162.82.0/23 1528 0.1% AS17430 -- GWBN-CHENGDU Great Wall Broadband Network Service Co.,Ltd
16 - 211.162.84.0/22 1528 0.1% AS17430 -- GWBN-CHENGDU Great Wall Broadband Network Service Co.,Ltd
17 - 220.114.40.0/22 1528 0.1% AS17430 -- GWBN-CHENGDU Great Wall Broadband Network Service Co.,Ltd
18 - 81.212.197.0/24 1317 0.1% AS9121 -- TTNET TTnet Autonomous System
19 - 194.61.180.0/23 1313 0.1% AS24775 -- AS24775 QinetiQ Ltd
20 - 64.17.224.0/19 1296 0.1% AS19982 -- TOWERSTREAM-PROV - Towerstream
Details at http://bgpupdates.potaroo.net
------------------------------------
Copies of this report are mailed to:
nanog(a)merit.edu
eof-list(a)ripe.net
apops(a)apops.net
routing-wg(a)ripe.net
afnog(a)afnog.org
ausnog(a)ausnog.net
1
0
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 9 21:48:37 2006 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date Prefixes CIDR Agg
02-06-06 185948 122700
03-06-06 186208 122508
04-06-06 186215 122492
05-06-06 186199 122459
06-06-06 186279 122916
07-06-06 186581 122644
08-06-06 186580 122654
09-06-06 186532 122618
AS Summary
22301 Number of ASes in routing system
9342 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
1467 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS7018 : ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services
91563008 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS721 : DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').
--- 09Jun06 ---
ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
Table 186522 122961 63561 34.1% All ASes
AS4323 1305 266 1039 79.6% TWTC - Time Warner Telecom,
Inc.
AS4134 1229 291 938 76.3% CHINANET-BACKBONE
No.31,Jin-rong Street
AS18566 943 187 756 80.2% COVAD - Covad Communications
Co.
AS721 1014 317 697 68.7% DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network
Information Center
AS22773 661 47 614 92.9% CCINET-2 - Cox Communications
Inc.
AS6197 1009 479 530 52.5% BATI-ATL - BellSouth Network
Solutions, Inc
AS7018 1467 944 523 35.7% ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet
Services
AS19916 563 65 498 88.5% ASTRUM-0001 - OLM LLC
AS855 550 64 486 88.4% CANET-ASN-4 - Aliant Telecom
AS17488 514 42 472 91.8% HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over
Cable Internet
AS9498 572 149 423 74.0% BBIL-AP BHARTI BT INTERNET
LTD.
AS3602 524 104 420 80.2% AS3602-RTI - Rogers Telecom
Inc.
AS18101 414 28 386 93.2% RIL-IDC Reliance Infocom Ltd
Internet Data Centre,
AS15270 429 50 379 88.3% AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec.net -a
division of
PaeTecCommunications, Inc.
AS17676 486 110 376 77.4% JPNIC-JP-ASN-BLOCK Japan
Network Information Center
AS4755 872 515 357 40.9% VSNL-AS Videsh Sanchar Nigam
Ltd. Autonomous System
AS11492 622 268 354 56.9% CABLEONE - CABLE ONE
AS4766 657 307 350 53.3% KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS22047 419 78 341 81.4% VTR BANDA ANCHA S.A.
AS812 370 30 340 91.9% ROGERS-CABLE - Rogers Cable
Inc.
AS6467 382 52 330 86.4% ESPIRECOMM - Xspedius
Communications Co.
AS16852 355 50 305 85.9% FOCAL-CHICAGO - Focal Data
Communications of Illinois
AS8151 705 404 301 42.7% Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS19262 664 370 294 44.3% VZGNI-TRANSIT - Verizon
Internet Services Inc.
AS14654 292 15 277 94.9% WAYPORT - Wayport
AS16814 329 52 277 84.2% NSS S.A.
AS3352 305 30 275 90.2% TELEFONICA-DATA-ESPANA
Internet Access Network of
TDE
AS5668 528 253 275 52.1% AS-5668 - CenturyTel Internet
Holdings, Inc.
AS6198 509 241 268 52.7% BATI-MIA - BellSouth Network
Solutions, Inc
AS19115 348 86 262 75.3% CHARTER-LEBANON - Charter
Communications
Total 19037 5894 13143 69.0% Top 30 total
Possible Bogus Routes
24.246.0.0/17 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services
24.246.128.0/18 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services
61.4.64.0/20 AS9929 CNCNET-CN China Netcom Corp.
64.17.32.0/24 AS13488 CBWU-13488 - Continental Broadband Florida, Inc DBA WebUnited
64.17.33.0/24 AS13488 CBWU-13488 - Continental Broadband Florida, Inc DBA WebUnited
64.17.37.0/24 AS13488 CBWU-13488 - Continental Broadband Florida, Inc DBA WebUnited
66.11.32.0/20 AS6261 VISINET - Visionary Systems, Inc.
66.37.96.0/20 AS3764 IA-HOU-AS - Internet America, Inc.
66.51.134.0/24 AS29876 LNTC - Latency LLC
66.96.0.0/20 AS3770 WORLDPATH-AS - WorldPath Internet Services
66.117.8.0/24 AS174 COGENT Cogent/PSI
66.163.96.0/20 AS25767 WAVEFORM - Waveform Technology, LLC
66.187.96.0/24 AS10026 ANC Asia Netcom Corporation
66.187.108.0/24 AS10026 ANC Asia Netcom Corporation
66.187.109.0/24 AS10026 ANC Asia Netcom Corporation
66.235.158.0/23 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services
69.31.151.0/24 AS26627 AS-PILOSOFT - Pilosoft, Inc.
69.39.193.0/24 AS25973 MZIMA - Mzima Networks, Inc.
69.39.195.0/24 AS25973 MZIMA - Mzima Networks, Inc.
69.39.196.0/24 AS25973 MZIMA - Mzima Networks, Inc.
91.192.0.0/16 AS12654 RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project.
91.255.248.0/21 AS12654 RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project.
125.213.0.0/16 AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street
131.64.0.0/12 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
132.0.0.0/10 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
137.0.0.0/13 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
138.136.0.0/13 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
151.135.0.0/16 AS4763 TELSTRANZ-AS TelstraClear Ltd
158.0.0.0/13 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
163.142.0.0/16 AS2500 JPNIC-ASBLOCK-AP JPNIC
183.206.196.0/24 AS2188 FR-RENATER-ASTER Reseau Regional ASTER
192.30.93.0/24 AS17757 HPAUS-AP HP Australia
192.30.94.0/24 AS17757 HPAUS-AP HP Australia
192.40.105.0/24 AS12582 TSF-DATANET-NGD-AS TSF MPLS VPN Services
192.69.107.0/24 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System
192.69.108.0/24 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System
192.69.177.0/24 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System
192.70.164.0/24 AS25689 NRCNET-AS - National Research Council of Canada
192.81.183.0/24 AS719 ELISA-AS Elisa Oyj
192.81.184.0/24 AS719 ELISA-AS Elisa Oyj
192.88.99.0/24 AS16150 PORT80-GLOBALTRANSIT Port80 AB, Sweden
192.96.36.0/24 AS5713 AFRINIC African Network Information Center
192.96.37.0/24 AS10474 AFRINIC African Network Information Center
192.96.135.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
192.96.136.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
192.96.140.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
192.96.143.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
192.96.145.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
192.96.177.0/24 AS6083 POSIX-AFRICA Posix Systems
192.96.250.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
192.107.104.0/24 AS6458 GUATEL
192.122.212.0/24 AS209 ASN-QWEST - Qwest
192.124.252.0/22 AS680 DFN-IP service G-WiN
192.133.6.0/24 AS10282 EQUANT-CEEUR EQUANT AS for Central and Eastern Europe region
192.153.144.0/21 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
192.168.255.255/32 AS4637 REACH Reach Network Border AS
192.172.0.0/19 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
192.188.208.0/20 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
193.36.1.0/24 AS8220 COLT COLT Telecommunications
193.37.69.0/24 AS2856 BT-UK-AS BTnet UK Regional network
193.110.77.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications
193.110.78.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications
193.110.79.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications
194.31.227.0/24 AS21461 TRANSFAIRNET Transfair-net GmbH Krefeld
194.59.176.0/20 AS1273 CW Cable & Wireless
194.153.156.0/24 AS24865 KMITCHELL-AS Keith Mitchell's Network
194.156.206.0/24 AS4589 EASYNET Easynet Group Plc
194.246.72.0/23 AS8893 ARTFILES-AS Artfiles New Media GmbH
195.189.254.0/23 AS31283 FASTHOST-AS FastHost AS - Norwegian based ISP
195.246.216.0/22 AS15622 MEOCOM old meocom Autonomous System
196.3.162.0/24 AS6083 POSIX-AFRICA Posix Systems
196.6.108.0/24 AS5713 AFRINIC African Network Information Center
196.6.175.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.176.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.183.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.196.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.199.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.208.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.211.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.212.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.212.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.222.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.6.237.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.10.119.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.10.122.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.10.136.0/22 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.10.140.0/22 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.10.231.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.10.251.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.10.252.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.10.254.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.11.0.0/20 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.11.40.0/21 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.11.135.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.11.188.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.11.190.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.11.251.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.13.101.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.102.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.104.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.108.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.13.116.0/22 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.121.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.125.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.126.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.127.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.13.128.0/22 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution
196.13.144.0/22 AS2905 VZBSA Verizon South Africa
196.13.152.0/21 AS2905 VZBSA Verizon South Africa
196.13.160.0/24 AS2905 VZBSA Verizon South Africa
196.13.169.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.174.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.176.0/21 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.188.0/22 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.192.0/22 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.196.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
196.13.252.0/22 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
198.23.26.0/24 AS4390 BELLATLANTIC-COM - Bell Atlantic, Inc.
198.54.82.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
198.54.92.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
198.54.222.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
198.54.249.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
198.54.250.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
198.54.251.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project
198.97.72.0/21 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
198.97.80.0/20 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
198.97.96.0/19 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
198.97.240.0/20 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
198.101.4.0/22 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
198.136.32.0/20 AS19329 MCNET - Martin County Board of County Commissioners
198.161.87.0/24 AS6539 GT-BELL - Bell Canada
198.163.155.0/24 AS684 MTSAL-ASN - MTS Allstream Inc.
198.167.0.0/16 AS7456 INTERHOP - Interhop Network SERVICES Inc.
198.168.0.0/16 AS701 ALTERNET-AS - UUNET Technologies, Inc.
198.169.0.0/16 AS803 SASKTEL - SaskTel
198.199.198.0/24 AS13671 VRIS-AS-BLOCK-13661-13675 - Verizon Internet Services Inc.
198.232.133.0/24 AS23075 SKOTOS-AS - Skotos Tech, Inc
199.9.128.0/17 AS668 ASN-ASNET-NET-AS - Defense Research and Engineering Network
199.10.0.0/16 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.60.0.0/20 AS271 BCNET-AS - University of British Columbia
199.114.0.0/21 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.128.0/18 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.130.0/24 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.132.0/24 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.134.0/24 AS3541 ITSDN-U4 - DISA/UNRRA
199.114.136.0/24 AS27044 DDN-ASNBLK1 - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.138.0/24 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.140.0/24 AS3544 ITSDN-U7 - DISA/UNRRA
199.114.142.0/24 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.144.0/24 AS27064 DDN-ASNBLK1 - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.148.0/24 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.150.0/24 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.152.0/24 AS27033 DDN-ASNBLK1 - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.153.0/24 AS27034 DDN-ASNBLK1 - DoD Network Information Center
199.114.154.0/24 AS3542 ITSDN-U5 - DISA/UNRRA
199.114.160.0/24 AS1733 CENTAF-SWA - AF DDN PMO
199.121.0.0/16 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.123.0.0/18 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.123.16.0/20 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.123.80.0/21 AS721 DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center
199.189.32.0/19 AS7332 IQUEST-AS - IQuest Internet
199.202.0.0/16 AS701 ALTERNET-AS - UUNET Technologies, Inc.
199.246.116.0/24 AS813 UUNET-AS1 - UUNET Technologies, Inc.
202.9.64.0/19 AS9290 TPN-AS-AP Smart Global Network (M) Sdn Bhd
202.45.159.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.58.113.0/24 AS19161 INNOCOM-TELECOM - INNOCOM TELECOM
202.86.252.0/22 AS9304 HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison Global Communications
202.86.253.0/24 AS9304 HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison Global Communications
202.86.254.0/24 AS9304 HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison Global Communications
202.86.255.0/24 AS9304 HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison Global Communications
202.90.33.0/24 AS9830 SWIFTONLINE-AS-AP SWIFT ONLINE BORDER AS
202.90.40.0/24 AS9830 SWIFTONLINE-AS-AP SWIFT ONLINE BORDER AS
202.90.41.0/24 AS9830 SWIFTONLINE-AS-AP SWIFT ONLINE BORDER AS
202.90.42.0/24 AS9830 SWIFTONLINE-AS-AP SWIFT ONLINE BORDER AS
202.90.43.0/24 AS9830 SWIFTONLINE-AS-AP SWIFT ONLINE BORDER AS
202.90.44.0/24 AS9830 SWIFTONLINE-AS-AP SWIFT ONLINE BORDER AS
202.93.0.0/20 AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street
202.124.192.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.124.193.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.124.194.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.124.195.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.124.196.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.124.197.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.124.198.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.124.199.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.124.200.0/22 AS15412 FLAG-AS Flag Telecom Global Internet AS
202.124.204.0/24 AS15412 FLAG-AS Flag Telecom Global Internet AS
202.124.205.0/24 AS15412 FLAG-AS Flag Telecom Global Internet AS
202.124.206.0/24 AS15412 FLAG-AS Flag Telecom Global Internet AS
202.124.207.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
202.131.64.0/19 AS9381 NEWTT-IP-AP Wharf T&T Ltd.
202.148.32.0/20 AS17495 GATEWAY-AP BROADBAND WIRELESSS INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER
202.160.128.0/23 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.128.0/24 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.131.0/24 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.132.0/22 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.136.0/22 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.142.0/24 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.144.0/24 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.145.0/24 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.146.0/24 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.147.0/24 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.152.0/22 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.156.0/23 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.157.0/24 AS10113 DATAFAST-AP DATAFAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD
202.160.158.0/23 AS9837 POWERTEL-AP Powertel Ltd
202.164.100.0/24 AS18101 RIL-IDC Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet Data Centre,
203.13.171.0/24 AS1221 ASN-TELSTRA Telstra Pty Ltd
203.62.0.0/17 AS7575 AARNET-AS-AP Australian Academic and Reasearch Network (AARNet)
203.78.48.0/20 AS9299 IPG-AS-AP Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company
203.89.134.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.139.0/24 AS17911 BRAINPK-AS-AP Brain Telecommunication Ltd.
203.89.143.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.144.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.147.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.148.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.149.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.150.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.151.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.153.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.158.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.89.159.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
203.99.142.0/24 AS9826 ILINK-HK-AP iLink.net Ltd
203.111.192.0/20 AS7473 SINGTEL-AS-AP Singapore Telecom
204.29.185.0/24 AS7268 ATHENET - Athenet Internet Services
204.48.118.0/23 AS29912 CITIZENS-PROPERTY-INSURANCE-CORPORATION - Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
204.48.119.0/24 AS29912 CITIZENS-PROPERTY-INSURANCE-CORPORATION - Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
204.153.104.0/24 AS10913 INTERNAP-BLK - Internap Network Services
204.153.106.0/24 AS10913 INTERNAP-BLK - Internap Network Services
204.153.107.0/24 AS10913 INTERNAP-BLK - Internap Network Services
204.154.125.0/24 AS3952 TELLABS-ASN - TELLABS Operations, Inc.
204.154.126.0/24 AS3952 TELLABS-ASN - TELLABS Operations, Inc.
204.154.127.0/24 AS3952 TELLABS-ASN - TELLABS Operations, Inc.
205.150.0.0/15 AS701 ALTERNET-AS - UUNET Technologies, Inc.
206.128.104.0/21 AS11709 VIC - VIRTUAL INTERACTIVE CENTER
206.167.57.0/24 AS376 RISQ-AS - Reseau Interordinateurs Scientique Quebecois (RISQ)
206.191.64.0/18 AS15290 ALLST-15290 - Allstream Corp. Corporation Allstream
206.191.96.0/19 AS15290 ALLST-15290 - Allstream Corp. Corporation Allstream
207.231.96.0/19 AS11194 NUNETPA - NuNet Inc
209.40.192.0/21 AS6487 CyberNet de Guatemala S.A.
209.40.200.0/21 AS6487 CyberNet de Guatemala S.A.
209.40.208.0/21 AS6487 CyberNet de Guatemala S.A.
209.40.216.0/21 AS6487 CyberNet de Guatemala S.A.
209.205.70.0/24 AS21578 Universidad autonoma de Bucaramanga
209.205.81.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A.
209.205.82.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A.
209.205.84.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A.
209.234.0.0/18 AS3845 STATE-NET - CS&W, Inc.
209.250.224.0/20 AS19318 NJIIX-AS-1 - NEW JERSEY INTERNATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE LLC
216.37.110.0/23 AS4264 CERNET-ASN-BLOCK - California Education and Research Federation Network
216.71.224.0/20 AS23527 COTELLIGENCE - Cotelligence, Inc.
216.201.72.0/24 AS14709 Telefonica Moviles Panama S.A.
216.201.73.0/24 AS14709 Telefonica Moviles Panama S.A.
216.201.74.0/24 AS14709 Telefonica Moviles Panama S.A.
216.201.75.0/24 AS14709 Telefonica Moviles Panama S.A.
216.201.76.0/24 AS14709 Telefonica Moviles Panama S.A.
216.201.77.0/24 AS14709 Telefonica Moviles Panama S.A.
216.201.78.0/24 AS14709 Telefonica Moviles Panama S.A.
216.201.79.0/24 AS14709 Telefonica Moviles Panama S.A.
216.228.64.0/21 AS6295 WHIDBEY1 - Whidbey Internet Services
216.228.224.0/20 AS13674 VRIS-AS-BLOCK-13661-13675 - Verizon Internet Services Inc.
216.240.240.0/20 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services
216.240.242.0/24 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services
Please see http://www.cidr-report.org for the full report
------------------------------------
Copies of this report are mailed to:
nanog(a)merit.edu
eof-list(a)ripe.net
apops(a)apops.net
routing-wg(a)ripe.net
afnog(a)afnog.org
ausnog(a)ausnog.net
1
0