June 2005 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Needed : AOL Network Contact
by David Brinks 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

I seem to have a couple Class Cs that AOL's portal servers are blocking and I would like to contact someone at AOL to discuss getting the blocks removed. I've tried going through their tech support but after multiple dead-ends and being told "AOL is a content provider and doesn't have Network Support group, nor servers nor any people who take care of servers" multiple times I'm wondering if any one you may have a backside phone number or email I could try. (I've already tried the number listed in their whois information but that only gets met to their Postmaster group and they also tell me they have no group that takes care of routers, IPs or servers.) Thank-you for your time and any help anyone may be able to offer. David Brinks --- Power-Net Internet Services --- Network Manager brinks(a)power-net.net

3 2

RE: Changes to the Nanog Mailing List Administration Team
by Hannigan, Martin 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of > Malayter, Christopher > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:54 PM > To: 'nanog(a)merit.edu' > Subject: Changes to the Nanog Mailing List Administration Team > > > > Good Afternoon, > > It is my pleasure to announce that Robert Seastrom will be > joining the Nanog > Mailing List Administration Team. He joins us as Martin > Hannigan departs > the list team. And a fine replacement RS will make. Thank you Susan Harris, Betty Burke, and Sue Joiner (Merit) for the education about how the list functions and the cooperation in analyzing it and putting changes in place. It couldn't have been done without their help. I'm looking forward to other volunteer stuff. And thanks to Chris and Steve for the same. :-) -M<

1 0

OT: Need a PA-A3-T3 in Oregon
by Hitesh Patel 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Anyone have a Cisco PA-A3-T3 we could borrow/buy in Oregon? Ours just became a paperweight and the spare is nowhere to be found... Please contact by email or cell phone (# is in my sig). Sorry for the OT post. -- +---------------------------------+----------------------------+ | Hitesh Patel | Office: (541) 759-3126 | | Network Engineering Manager | Cell: (541) 404-8873 | | Preferred Connections Inc. | Email: hitesh(a)pcinw.com | +---------------------------------+----------------------------+

1 0

Changes to the Nanog Mailing List Administration Team
by Malayter, Christopher 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Good Afternoon, It is my pleasure to announce that Robert Seastrom will be joining the Nanog Mailing List Administration Team. He joins us as Martin Hannigan departs the list team. A bit about Robert, Robert Seastrom is a freelance consultant specializing in supporting production and testbed IP networks. He was a cofounder and former president of the Cambridge Bandwidth Consortium, a cooperative ISP in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Previously, Robert was the Director of Network Architecture at Inter.Net Global Ltd. Robert has also held positions at Akamai Technologies, AboveNet Communications, and Digex, and built pioneering ISPs in Japan and the Republic of Georgia. With the departure of Martin from the team, the position of chair has been vacated. I have been selected to assume the chair of the list administration team. As always we appreciate feedback to nanog-admin(a)merit.edu Regards, Chris Malayter TDS Telecom - Network Services Data Network Engineering chris.malayter(a)tdstelecom.com Phone: (608) 664-4878 FAX: (608) 664-4644

2 1

SBC (AS 7132) contact?
by David Hubbard 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Seeing some random issues with hosting customers of ours unable to get to their sites. Traces out of 7132 seem to stop in and around some of the following: core2-p10-0.crrvca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.42.5) core1-p1-0.crrvca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.188.45) core2-p3-0.cranca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.243.233) core1-p1-0.cranca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.241.221) core2-p11-0.crscca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.242.81) Support from them to our mutual customers won't go past "try clearing your cache" so I'd like to find someone in net ops that can help. :-) Thanks, David

1 0

RE: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
by Hannigan, Martin 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of > Sean Donelan > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 7:56 AM > To: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment > > > > On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Jay Hennigan wrote: > > If your data center has an adequate DC plant, will the > carriers insist > > on installing their own batteries and rectifiers? And how > many of them > > have redundant supplies to take advantage of an A and B > feed from you? > > If you are willing to sign some liability waivers, and maybe pay some > special construction charges, I've found most ILECs are willing to use > your plant. Not in provider/colo land. The LEC's will and do pay for rack space. Most will gladly use protected power to their rectifiers and not use battery if offerred. > But remember, the ILEC is stuck with servicing > that building > long after you may disappear. Which is a good reason not to allow any dependancies out of their control. This is in the enterprises interest. Co mingling with the enterprise is a very bad idea. -M<

1 0

RE: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
by Olsen, Jason 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

> From: David Lesher > Question: > Have any NANOG'ers [NANOGites? NANOGees?] run into this? Again, this > is LEC owned, LEC maintained, equipment....Do you provide generator > power for such in your space? SBC (Formerly Ameritech, formerly Illinois Bell, soon to be AT&T again, yadda yadda yadda) has always maintained and replaced the batteries for the FLM 150s and 600s that are installed in our data center and metro sites. Usually the Transport group knows something is wrong before the mouth-breathers in our data center do. We provide power via UPS and generator by default as the FLMs are fed off the same grids as the rest of our gear. I personally wouldn't treat those batteries as a UPS if only because I've never seen a load test performed on them that tells me what sort of survivability I can expect out of them. On the residential side it's easy to guess why they are attempting to force the consumer to buy/maintain batteries for the boxes: as always, follow the money... -jfo Jason "Feren" Olsen DeVry, Inc. Senior Network Engineer One Tower Lane Em: jolsen(a)devry.com Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181-4624 Ph: 630.645.1607 Fx: 630.382.2929

1 0

Juniper Routers with X switches
by Todd Reed 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

How many people are using Juniper routers on their networks and what is your experiences with them? Also, what equipment do you use for switching?

4 3

192.169.0.0
by Randy Bush 05 Jun '05

05 Jun '05

route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bg 192.169.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 192.169.0.0/16, version 51241382 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table, not advertised to EBGP peer) Not advertised to any peer 14608 4323 209.161.175.4 from 209.161.175.4 (209.161.175.4) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best Community: no-export 'cept they don't own it

5 11

Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
by Frank Coluccio 05 Jun '05

05 Jun '05

>>wasn't refering to their POPs. I was refering to the customer location. For about a year I've been in discussions with a private cable operator (PCO) who has been knocking himself out trying to optimize an approach that would enable him to provide generator backups in apartment buildings. He wants to match the incumbent's triple play offerings, and in particular, he saw the need to provide uninterrupted voice service during commercial power outages not only as an amenity that was needed to compete with the telco, but in order to qualify for lifeline service status, as well. The net effect of seeing what is happening in the FTTP space has given him license now to begin considering options based on the use of batteries, as well. Lifeline qualification and delivering non-stop service availability are two separate, yet related, areas of consideration from a regulatory persepective. I suppose its left to interpretation, but I'm wondering if the ILECs, by their use of a battery-replacement policy may be breaking the models of both. Frank A. Coluccio DTI Consulting Inc. 212-857-8150 Office 347-526-6788 Mobile On Sat Jun 4 23:56 , Sean Donelan sent: > >On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, W.D.McKinney wrote: >> >If you wanted to pay for it, some of the CLECs would add batteries. But >> >it wasn't part of the base package. >> >> All the AT&T pops usually have nice battery and gen sets. That's what I like. > >I wasn't refering to their POPs. I was refering to the customer location. > >I've been wondering when the building codes will be updated. Currently >the building codes require backup generators for elevators in high-rise >buildings, but not for the telecommunications room in high-rise building >(other than the fire alarm). Instead of pulling individual copper pairs >from a POP to the high-rise building, a CLEC may install a fiber mux in >the basement and break-down individual circuits locally to copper. When >the building looses power, so does the fiber mux. > >Of course, adding batteries to the fiber mux doesn't solve the problem of >PBXs or even modern pay telephones in office buildings not working when >power fails. > >Who replaces the battery in your cell phone when it expires? How about >the battery in your cordless phone? Or the battery in your smoke alarm? > >If you don't want to do it yourself, for a fee you can hire someone else >to do it for you. But then people would complain about the fee, and how >they could do it themselves for less.

1 0