November 2005 - Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: Level3 Question
by Susan Hares 12 Nov '05

12 Nov '05

Per: I had hands experience from EGP, BGP-2, BGP-3, BGP-4, and MP-BGP. Cost/Money/Operational Pain drive transitions. In EGP/BGP-2 it was 12-15 routers. In BGP-3/BGP thousands. Now? I'll let you estimate for Internet routers in the planet. Of course, I like you would like things to be orderly. Sue Hares -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Per Gregers Bilse Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 4:42 PM To: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: Level3 Question On Nov 11, 1:14pm tony.li(a)tony.li wrote: > The only way to get 32-bit AS number support deployed is to run out > of AS numbers in > the 16 bit space. Exactly. - When will the Internet deploy X? - Just before it's too late. How many people on this list remember the transition from BGP3 to BGP4 and CIDR? This was, uhh, about 12 years ago. Before that there was an EGP to BGP transition, but that was less of an issue. But history will repeat itself. Not that I see any great evil in that -- people are always busy, have always been. It's a case of which priorities are most pressing, so, indeed, yes, the only way is to run out of the existing resource. Likewise for whatever will provide more address space.-) -- Per

1 0

reminiscing (was re: level 3)
by brett watson 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

On Nov 11, 2005, at 2:50 PM, bmanning(a)vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > we clustered the engineers into the IETF terminal > room > since we're reminiscing, we did this at dallas ietf in 1995, i think it was (yes, http://merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2000-11/ msg00222.html). we had hit a timer bug in is-is that was causing routers to lose adjacencies. ravi sat down at a terminal, found the bug in the code, compiled a new image, and we loaded and "rebooted the network" that evening. nasty, but fun. we don't seem to have fun like this anymore. (maybe it wasn't as simple as ravi "finding the bug", but i do seem to remember he fixed this in short order) -b

1 0

[Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill]
by charles cala 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

--- Blaine Christian <blaine(a)blaines.net> wrote: <snip> > I suspect the section regarding nondiscriminatory access could have > been worded better. Half the text is repeated. Are they paid by > the word you think? > I believe this part is how utilities (ele, gas, tel(traditional), sewage, etc) who doesn't do tcp/ip must give access to a tcp/ip provider at normal rates� to their trench�.( pole, duct, conduit, or right-of-way). > (a) NONDISCRIMINATORY ACCESS.A utility shall > provide a BITS provider, BIT provider, or broadband > video service provider with rates, terms, and conditions for > access to any pole, duct, conduit, or right-of-way owned > or controlled by such utility that are nondiscriminatory as > compared to the rates, terms, and conditions for such ac- > cess provided to any telecommunications carrier, cable op- > erator, or other BITS provider, BIT provider, or > broadband video service provider. I believe this part is for the tcp/ip speakers , they also have to share the trench. (pole, duct, conduit, or right-of-way). > A BITS provider, BIT > provider, or broadband video service provider shall provide > a cable television system, a telecommunications carrier, or > any other BITS provider, BIT provider, or broadband > video service provider with rates, terms, and conditions for > access to any pole, duct, conduit, or right-of-way owned > or controlled by that provider that are nondiscriminatory > as compared to the rates, terms, and conditions for such > access provided to any telecommunications carrier, cable > operator, or other BITS provider, BIT provider, or > broadband video service provider. > The question that comes up in my mind is... If the city is putting a new water main in a road that connects 2 of my data centers, does this act force them to let me toss in a big bundle of fiber before they cover the pipe up? Is the defense listed on page 64 of http://energycommerce.house.gov/108/news/11032005_Broadband.pdf [(b) CAPACITY EXCEPTION. Notwithstanding para- graph (1), a utility providing electric service may deny a BITS provider or BIT provider access to its poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way, on a nondiscriminatory basis where there is insufficient capacity and for reasons of safety, reliability, and generally applicable engineering purposes.] going to prevent such action? ( Utility per 1934 act = a local exchange carrier, or a electric, gas, water, steam or other public utility and who owns or controls, poles, ducts, conduits, or rights-of-way used, in whole or in part, for any wire communications (the rights-of-way). Incumbent local exchange carriers are considered utilities. ) I can see this allowing a bunch of short dark fiber runs to be installed in highly dense places (times-sq.ny.ny.us) as well as through rural zones. I've set reply-to = me because of perceived drift, feel free to override.

1 0

Re: the iab simplifies internet architecture!
by Sam Crooks 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 20:37 -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > btw, for another great giggle (many thanks to brian candler > for reporting it) > > From the documentation for Cisco's VPN client software for > Linux: > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/products_user_guide_c… > > "User profiles [which contain all your IPSEC parameters: > pre-shared key, username and password] reside in the > /etc/CiscoSystemsVPNClient/Profiles/ directory. Leave the > permissions for the Profiles folder set at drwxrwxrwx. > Each profile in the Profiles folder should have the > follwoing permissions: -rw-rw-rw-." The password string is encrypted in the Profile, however, when you save it... CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, and any attachments, are intended only for the lawful and specified use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are STRICTLY PROHIBITED from disclosing, printing, storing, disseminating, distributing or copying this communication, or admitting to take any action relying thereon, and doing so may be unlawful. It should be noted that any use of this communication outside of the intended and specified use as designated by the sender, may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail, fax and/or telephone, and destroy this original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.

4 4

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Table Analysis 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 12 Nov, 2005 Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 174875 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 98803 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 84517 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 20867 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18147 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 8595 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2720 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 76 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.5 Max AS path length visible: 21 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 3 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 12 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1458454176 Equivalent to 86 /8s, 238 /16s and 62 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 39.3 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 59.2 Percentage of available address space allocated: 66.4 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 84066 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 36485 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 15862 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 34252 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 16829 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2396 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 695 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 367 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.5 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 17 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 205774784 Equivalent to 12 /8s, 67 /16s and 223 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 76.4 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911 APNIC Address Blocks 58/7, 60/7, 124/7, 126/8, 202/7, 210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8 ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 92805 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 55833 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 72359 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 27342 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 10325 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3832 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 966 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 4.3 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 17 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 274748928 Equivalent to 16 /8s, 96 /16s and 86 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 68.2 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863 ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/6, 68/7, 70/6, 74/7, 76/8, 198/7, 204/6, 208/7 and 216/8 RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 33948 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 22968 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 30960 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 20751 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 7279 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3814 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1206 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 5.1 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 20 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 222772736 Equivalent to 13 /8s, 71 /16s and 62 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 66.4 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 80/5, 88/6, 188/8, 193/8, 194/7, 212/7 and 217/8 LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 9821 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 3298 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 8117 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 4738 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 650 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 210 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 122 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 5.2 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 21 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 22713600 Equivalent to 1 /8s, 90 /16s and 149 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 33.8 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, plus ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 189/8, 190/8, 200/7 AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 1808 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 842 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 1134 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 832 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 142 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 44 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 20 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.5 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 12 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 2864640 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 43 /16s and 182 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 8.5 AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 196/8 APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4134 1003 6327 214 CHINANET-BACKBONE 9583 823 77 12 Sify Limited 4755 744 259 65 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 1221 741 1342 515 Telstra Pty Ltd 4766 625 3927 285 Korea Telecom (KIX) 7545 515 108 71 TPG Internet Pty Ltd 17676 470 6819 100 Softbank BB Corp. 9498 396 216 64 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 9443 392 87 78 Primus Telecommunications 17488 366 22 10 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 2907 340 1764 317 SINET Japan 4802 335 73 153 Wantree Development 17557 333 25 163 Pakistan Telecom 7474 332 258 228 SingTel Optus Pty Ltd 9929 326 216 46 China Netcom Corp. 18302 305 141 171 SK Global co., Ltd 9837 274 79 175 Powertel Ltd 17974 272 65 16 PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA 18101 269 68 19 Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet 9800 255 396 67 CHINA UNICOM ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 7018 1476 6324 970 AT&T WorldNet Services 4323 1194 706 233 Time Warner Telecom 721 1062 21936 301 DLA Systems Automation Center 174 1052 5848 984 Cogent Communications 701 1008 8152 847 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 6197 959 407 496 BellSouth Network Solutions, 2386 931 546 696 AT&T Data Communications Serv 18566 875 240 7 Covad Communications 1239 846 2801 596 Sprint 209 659 3621 523 Qwest 20115 644 522 339 Charter Communications 11492 595 81 10 Cable One 852 574 1093 381 Telus Advanced Communications 3602 565 129 107 Sprint Canada, Inc. 19916 563 49 54 OLM LLC 855 555 247 65 Canadian Research Network 22773 555 1472 28 Cox Communications, Inc. 19262 538 1556 134 Verizon Global Networks 3356 521 10634 401 Level 3 Communications, LLC 6478 492 1300 275 AT&T Worldnet Services RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 702 609 1959 478 UUNET - Commercial IP service 3301 305 1085 291 TeliaNet Sweden 3320 285 3230 240 Deutsche Telekom AG 8220 270 475 265 COLT Telecommunications 680 244 2040 239 DFN-IP service G-WiN 8708 234 274 220 Romania Data Systems S.A. 3246 228 475 221 Song Networks 6746 201 51 172 Dynamic Network Technologies, 1257 191 712 169 SWIPnet Swedish IP Network 5515 182 840 128 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 3269 180 1765 68 TELECOM ITALIA 786 174 1795 174 The JANET IP Service 5400 161 316 134 BT Ignite European Backbone 6830 161 669 33 UPC Distribution Services 8866 159 37 9 Bulgarian Telecommunication C 3300 157 170 91 AUCS Communications Services 12479 150 322 5 Uni2 Autonomous System 24863 148 37 6 LINKdotNET AS number 25186 148 211 104 France Telecom Transpac's Tra 3215 144 1237 78 France Telecom Transpac LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8151 387 690 165 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 16814 296 18 7 NSS, S.A. 11172 283 88 68 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V 11664 204 22 28 Keytech SA 19632 196 14 5 Metropolis Intercom S.A. 14117 184 11 6 Telefonica del Sur S.A. 22047 171 128 7 VTR PUNTO NET S.A. 6147 160 116 23 Telefonica Del Peru 7303 145 69 19 Telecom Argentina Stet-France 11556 130 64 3 Cable-Wireless Panama 13999 128 52 9 Mega Cable S.A. de C.V. 19169 125 8 26 Telconet 6505 121 89 85 Global One Communicaoes Ltda 10481 121 48 8 Prima S.A. 18822 112 7 13 TELEFONICA MANQUEHUE 5639 111 12 9 Telecommunications Services o 21826 111 14 19 INTERCABLE 6503 109 148 76 AVANTEL, S.A. 14522 101 12 8 SatNet S.A. 11311 98 8 15 Sinectis S.A. AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 3741 269 708 228 The Internet Solution 8452 139 44 7 TEDATA 5536 123 8 12 Internet Egypt Network 2018 116 298 103 Tertiary Education Network 15475 82 84 4 Nile Online 2905 78 211 71 The Internetworking Company o 6713 70 71 10 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB 20928 60 16 2 Noor Advanced Technologies AS 24835 57 34 6 RAYA Telecom - Egypt 5713 38 151 34 Telkom SA Ltd 12455 33 6 3 Jambonet Autonomous system 15706 31 8 3 Sudatel Internet Exchange Aut 33774 31 3 22 AS Number for Telecom Algeria 8524 24 1 4 AUCEGYPT Autonomous System 16637 24 10 21 Johnnic e-Ventures 10798 22 1 13 Standard Bank of South Africa 21280 21 4 4 Swift Global Kenya Ltd.Is an 23889 21 5 9 MAURITIUS TELECOM 12258 17 3 11 Vodacom Internet Company 15808 17 2 2 Communication Solutions Ltd i Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 4323 1194 961 Time Warner Telecom 18566 875 868 Covad Communications 9583 823 811 Sify Limited 4134 1003 789 CHINANET-BACKBONE 721 1062 761 DLA Systems Automation Center 4755 744 679 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 11492 595 585 Cable One 22773 555 527 Cox Communications, Inc. 19916 563 509 OLM LLC 855 555 490 Canadian Research Network 6197 959 463 BellSouth Network Solutions, 3602 565 458 Sprint Canada, Inc. 5668 471 445 CenturyTel Internet Holdings, 7545 515 444 TPG Internet Pty Ltd 19262 538 404 Verizon Global Networks 17676 470 370 Softbank BB Corp. 17488 366 356 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 6467 398 351 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 812 368 343 Rogers WAVE 4766 625 340 Korea Telecom (KIX) List of Unregistered ASNs (Global) ---------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 65003 PRIVATE 57.250.244.0/24 13879 SITA-EQUANT 65108 PRIVATE 193.202.224.0/20 4589 Easynet Group 24413 UNALLOCATED 202.46.32.0/19 17623 China Netcom Corp. Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 132.0.0.0/10 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 137.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 158.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.43.230.0/24 7575 Australian Academic and Rease 192.44.0.0/24 5501 Fraunhofer Gesellschaft 192.44.0.0/19 702 UUNET - Commercial IP service 192.70.164.0/24 25689 National Research Council of 192.72.0.0/18 4780 Digital United Inc. 192.72.0.0/16 4780 Digital United Inc. 192.84.205.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.119.135.0/24 270 NASA 192.172.0.0/19 721 DLA Systems Automation Center Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:18 /9:5 /10:8 /11:17 /12:80 /13:186 /14:340 /15:663 /16:8592 /17:2869 /18:4838 /19:10998 /20:12096 /21:10140 /22:13429 /23:14626 /24:95043 /25:333 /26:288 /27:192 /28:33 /29:12 /30:37 /31:3 /32:29 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 18566 859 875 Covad Communications 6197 781 959 BellSouth Network Solutions, 7018 725 1476 AT&T WorldNet Services 9583 645 823 Sify Limited 2386 644 931 AT&T Data Communications Serv 11492 587 595 Cable One 4323 571 1194 Time Warner Telecom 19916 557 563 OLM LLC 4766 431 625 Korea Telecom (KIX) 855 427 555 Canadian Research Network 7011 397 459 Citizens Utilities 702 390 609 UUNET - Commercial IP service 5668 373 471 CenturyTel Internet Holdings, 1239 364 846 Sprint 6198 353 483 BellSouth Network Solutions, 6517 324 350 Yipes Communications, Inc. 15270 315 342 PaeTec.net -a division of Pae 13609 297 339 Choice One Communications Inc 18302 289 305 SK Global co., Ltd 701 283 1008 UUNET Technologies, Inc. Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 4:3 8:32 12:1616 13:1 15:11 16:3 17:3 18:3 20:41 24:703 30:2 32:64 38:178 40:54 44:3 47:3 52:4 55:1 56:3 57:35 58:101 59:91 60:147 61:788 62:809 63:1893 64:2967 65:2135 66:2916 67:694 68:661 69:1325 70:223 71:40 72:439 80:651 81:592 82:491 83:314 84:301 85:365 86:183 87:88 125:40 128:153 129:169 130:95 131:308 132:35 133:1 134:148 135:42 136:161 137:70 138:173 139:71 140:437 141:142 142:399 143:141 144:220 145:34 146:299 147:131 148:267 149:194 150:108 151:70 152:111 153:94 154:5 155:144 156:82 157:117 158:147 159:178 160:87 161:77 162:235 163:148 164:190 165:185 166:146 167:248 168:454 169:144 170:312 171:12 190:1 192:5735 193:3349 194:2445 195:1615 196:698 198:3909 199:3230 200:4253 201:429 202:6231 203:6574 204:3815 205:2060 206:2446 207:2899 208:2018 209:3488 210:1760 211:844 212:1208 213:1363 214:314 215:40 216:3864 217:1150 218:214 219:129 220:526 221:308 222:127 End of report

1 0

Fwd: [Arch-econ] Vint an interview you did with me in 1997 is being quoted on Nanog as reason to support the current so callednet neutrality bill
by Gordon Cook 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

thank you Vint. folks please note Vint's remarks on common carriage. This stuff gets very complicate very fast and i do not have it all at the tip of my tongue by any means. Vint did engage with Fred Goldstein, Andrew Odlyzko, David Isenberg and others in a discussion of this about 3 weeks ago. Please note also Vint's remark: > If ISPs were to inspect packets and interfere with those of > competing application providers (voice, video), I would consider > that a violation of the principle of network neutrality. I have NOT been reading this bill carefully myself dangerous i know. BUT if i understand it correctly this is precisely what this bill would allow and this is NOT I think what any of us want. For whatever my opinion is worth I hope you all will oppose this loud and clear. ============================================================= The COOK Report on Internet Protocol, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA 609 882-2572 (PSTN) 415 651-4147 (Lingo) cook(a)cookreport.com Subscription info: http://cookreport.com/subscriptions.shtml IMS and an Internet Economic & Business Model at: http://cookreport.com/14.09.shtml ============================================================= Begin forwarded message: > From: "Vint Cerf" <vint(a)google.com> > Date: November 11, 2005 10:10:40 AM EST > To: "'economics of ip networks'" > Subject: Re:Vint an interview you did with me in 1997 is > beingquoted on Nanog as reason to support the current so callednet > neutrality bill > Reply-To: economics of ip networks > > > Gordon, > > today, you are typically charged based on the maximum capacity of > the access circuit you "purchase" - that's flat rate. At the time > (8 years ago) people wanted to have the burst rate but didn't want > to pay for the unused capacity so we instituted a tiered pricing > system that allowed them, e.g., to burst at 45 Mb/s but only pay > for the effectively used capacity. As I recall, we used something > like the 95th percentile as a measurement of capacity used - in > other words, you paid for that capacity below which 95% of all > sampled rates fell. I don't recall all the details but there may > have been a fixed/variable structure. A fixed amount for having > access to burst capacity of a certain size and a variable amount > depending on average rate. the implication is that if you purchased > a burst T1 and used half on the average you might pay less than if > you purchased burst T3 and used only a half T1's worth. The > somewhat higher charge would be a consequence of having access to a > higher absolute rate/capacity. This idea may still have legs today > although as speeds increase, and prices fall, it may not be nearly > the same issue as it was eight years ago. You might ask MCI and > other ISPs what their pricing structures are today for some > perspective. > > I do not see that tiered pricing is a neutrality threat. Neutrality > has to do with differentiation with regard to the actual content > carried (or service provided). If ISPs were to inspect packets and > interfere with those of competing application providers (voice, > video), I would consider that a violation of the principle of > network neutrality. One might think of the notion of neutrality as > the 21st C version of common carriage although I hesitate to draw > the comparison if only because of the complex way in which "common > carriage" concept and rules have evolved. > > vint > > > Vinton G Cerf > Chief Internet Evangelist > Google/Regus > Herndon, VA 20171 > > > > vint(a)google.com > www.google.com > > > > From: On Behalf Of Gordon Cook > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 9:40 AM > To: economics of ip networks > Subject: Vint an interview you did with me in 1997 is beingquoted > on Nanog as reason to support the current so callednet neutrality bill > > Any comments? > > Any comments from anyone? > > From: sean(a)donelan.com > Subject: Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] > Date: November 11, 2005 12:58:40 AM EST > To: christopher.morrow(a)mci.com > Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu > > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > >> oops ;) my point wasn't that bandwidth wasn't necessary over X >> speed, it >> was that the main motivator for consumer purchase was no long >> bandwidth >> but price alone. >> > > In 1997, Vint Cerf was advocating the necessity of usage based pricing > when he was still with MCI. > > http://www.cookreport.com/05.10.shtml > Although MCI has not yet made a formal announcement via a press > release, > Cerf explained that "we are plainly discussing this with you, Gordon, > and your readers." The MCI move is the outcome of what Cerf describes > as a crunch between the Internet's flat rate pricing model and usage > patterns where both the amount of use and disparity between use by > applications has increased dramatically. > > Will consumers prefer to pay higher flat rate charges for > everything, or > prefer different pricing models when they access applications which > require dramatically different service levels to include the cost as > part of an application specific fee? > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Gordon Cook <cook(a)cookreport.com> >> Date: November 11, 2005 9:11:17 AM EST >> To: Owen DeLong <owen(a)delong.com> >> Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu >> Subject: Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] >> >> >> >> Be careful Owen - i think you may be falling into a libertarian >> trap - worrisome because I respect highly things i have seen you >> write in past. >> >> Think about what you are saying: " Something to consider about >> this proposed "regulation"... It is actually >> >>> in many ways proposed "deregulation" >>> >> >> >> Yes it is indeed. It frees the duopoly to do whatever it wants. >> And Whittacre has said what he wants and what he will do quite >> plainly -- has he not? He will charge google and yahoo and skype >> for using his networks. >> >> Here is how this legislation is being read in London at a public >> telco blog recently launched by DRKW the large investment bank: >> http://telcotech.drkw.com/blog/archives/2005/11/will_evil_preva.html >> >> "For all of our sakes lets hope that the telcos are not successful >> in their lobbying effort in the US. If they are successful, you >> can bet that your investment in the fixed telecoms utilities is >> safer but innovation on the internet is in jeopardy - which do you >> think creates more incremental future value in the world ultimately?" >> >> Vint Cerf is on my economics of IP networks private mail list. The >> DRKW blog post partially cited above came in part from a public >> item comment of Vint's that i posted day before yesterday to my >> private list. It is fascinating that Sean Donelan whom I have >> known and respected since 1991 dug that 1997 item quote from Vint >> from my archives. Donelan: "In 1997, Vint Cerf was advocating the >> necessity of usage based pricing when he was still with MCI. >> >> http://www.cookreport.com/05.10.shtml >> >> COOK Report: Recall the date. This is PRE stupid network and again >> VINT is taking the pre-internet pre stupid network telco point of >> view. I'll post this to my list and see if Vint has anything that >> he wants to say about this 8 year old opinion. >> >> Owen, do you want some legislation that gives the CEO of ATT/SBC >> the world largest dinosaur a blank check to do as he wishes with >> *HIS* network. This bills language is HIGHLY deceptive. I too >> despise government incompetence but giving Whittacre a blank check >> is IMHO much worse. But don't take my word for it - check out >> DRKW's analyst's opinion. Fred Goldstein also has a pretty good >> analysis. I probably will not further respond to this thread >> discussion. Please forgive me but I am swamped with many things >> that demand attention. >> >> ============================================================= >> The COOK Report on Internet Protocol, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ >> 08618 USA >> 609 882-2572 (PSTN) 415 651-4147 (Lingo) cook(a)cookreport.com >> Subscription >> info: http://cookreport.com/subscriptions.shtml IMS and an Internet >> Economic & Business Model at: http://cookreport.com/14.09.shtml >> ============================================================= >> >> >> >> >> On Nov 11, 2005, at 1:38 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> >>> Something to consider about this proposed "regulation"... It is >>> actually >>> in many ways proposed "deregulation". This bill removes more >>> authority >>> from the FCC and state and local governments than it grants. It >>> provides >>> a very minimal framework of regulation, then, except for taxation >>> and >>> a couple of other minor consumer protections, says "The >>> government shall >>> butt the hell out." >>> >>> That's why I like it. >>> >> >> But Owen - what if getting evil gov't out gives Whittacre a blank >> check? >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Owen >>> >>> >> >> > >

3 3

RE: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill]
by Schliesser, Benson 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

Thinking of "services" in terms of /etc/services will get you nowhere with this. It's like using the term "best effort" to a lawyer. It's all about context. -Benson -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Michael.Dillon(a)btradianz.com Sent: Friday, 11 November, 2005 01:44 To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: [Latest draft of Internet regulation bill] > Since port 80 and port 25 are lawful services everyone offering > broadband will have to drop filters and provide full routing! Can > you hear me now? Why yes, port 80 and port 25 are open, of course I > can hear you. Have you sent a letter to your congressional representative saying this? Of course an explanation of the technical terms "80" and "25" would be in order as well. Complaints on the NANOG list carry no weight in the Congress. --Michael Dillon

1 0

Peering VLANs and MAC addresses
by Simon Brilus 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

Hi , We are unable to resolve a problem with our peering exchange connection and would like any assistance. Our peering setup is a follows: - Our peering exchange connection goes into switch A - Switch A has a dark fibre connection to switch B, which is in a different PoP - Our peering router is connected to switch B We use spanning tree across our network to allow the VLANs connectivity across our network. The peering exchange has an MoU that only 1 MAC address should be visible on their switch. However they see 2 MAC addresses on our port. - MAC address of Peering router - MAC address of the port they are connected to on switch A Is there any way to prevent switch A from presenting the interface MAC address? Or is this a symptom of spanning tree that cannot be stopped? Your input will be most welcome. The config on switch A is as follows: interface GigabitEthernet0/5 description Peering Link switchport access vlan 148 switchport mode access speed nonegotiate storm-control broadcast level 5.00 no cdp enable spanning-tree portfast spanning-tree bpdufilter enable spanning-tree guard root Regards Simon Brilus

17 25

Re: Networking Pearl Harbor in the Making
by Robert Bonomi 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:21:20 -0500 > From: Eric Gauthier <eric(a)roxanne.org> > Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu > > I'm not exactly "in the know" on this one, but the heap-overflow advisory > that we've seen indicates that the IOS updates Cisco put out are not patches > for this problem: > > "Cisco has devised counter-measures by implementing extra checks to > enforce the proper integrity of system timers. This extra validation > should reduce the possibility of heap-based overflow attack vectors > achieving remote code execution." > from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20051102-timers.shtml > > We've asked Cisco for a better explanation - namely, are their recommended > updates "patches" to the problem (i.e. repairs) or simply mitigating > updates that make is harder to exploit. The wording of their advisory seems > to indicate the latter. This latter case is what worries me since it implies > that there is a fundamental problem in IOS, the problem still exists even after > patching, and that Cisco can't readily repair it. Unfortunately, so far we've > gotten the run-around and haven't been able to get a better answer, again > leading me to believe the worst. Most exploits (be it IOS or some other target) require multiple things to occur before the "desired effect" is achieved. "buffer overflow" exploits. in general. involve a minimum of two things: 1) "smashing" memory outside of the area you 'should' have been limited to. 2) having 'some other code' accept/use that 'improperly modified' memory believing it to be 'valid' content. Causing =any= step of the exploit process to fail means that the attempt _does_not_succeed_. Re-coding to eliminate all 'possible' buffer overflow situations is a *big* job. The required field-length checking for every multi-byte copy/move operation does have a significant negative impact on performance, as well. Merely _identifying_ the 'tainted' (by being in contact -- directly or in- directly -- with 'user-supplied' data) data-structures is a task measured in man-years. As is isolating _all_ the points where such tainting occurs. Then, and only then, can you begin to -plan- how to remove the taint, whether by sanity-based bounds-checking, 'clipping' to known limits, explicit length checks, or whatever else is appropriate. *AFTER* all that, you can =start= implementing the code that removes taint. It _can_ be much quicker (in terms of "time to delivery to the field") to go after one of the 'other things' that has to happen for an exploit to "work".

3 2

The Cidr Report
by cidr-report＠potaroo.net 11 Nov '05

11 Nov '05

This report has been generated at Fri Nov 11 21:45:55 2005 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date Prefixes CIDR Agg 04-11-05 171530 114553 05-11-05 171757 114595 06-11-05 171908 114540 07-11-05 171870 114573 08-11-05 171933 114742 09-11-05 172117 114860 10-11-05 172173 116237 11-11-05 175515 114835 AS Summary 20782 Number of ASes in routing system 8613 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix 1462 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS AS7018 : ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services 91321344 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s) AS721 : DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center Aggregation Summary The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes'). --- 11Nov05 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description Table 172200 114802 57398 33.3% All ASes AS4323 1188 236 952 80.1% TWTC - Time Warner Telecom AS18566 875 10 865 98.9% COVAD - Covad Communications AS721 1076 315 761 70.7% DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center AS4134 1000 255 745 74.5% CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street AS22773 555 30 525 94.6% CCINET-2 - Cox Communications Inc. AS19916 563 65 498 88.5% ASTRUM-0001 - OLM LLC AS7018 1462 965 497 34.0% ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services AS855 555 65 490 88.3% CANET-ASN-4 - Canadian Research Network AS3602 565 108 457 80.9% SPRINT-CA-AS - Sprint Canada Inc. AS6197 957 560 397 41.5% BATI-ATL - BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS17676 470 101 369 78.5% JPNIC-JP-ASN-BLOCK Japan Network Information Center AS11492 595 244 351 59.0% CABLEONE - CABLE ONE AS812 368 25 343 93.2% ROGERS-CABLE - Rogers Cable Inc. AS6467 400 57 343 85.8% ESPIRECOMM - e.spire Communications, Inc. AS4766 605 289 316 52.2% KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom AS15270 337 25 312 92.6% AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec.net -a division of PaeTecCommunications, Inc. AS9583 821 516 305 37.1% SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited AS14654 292 6 286 97.9% WAYPORT - Wayport AS17488 366 85 281 76.8% HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over Cable Internet AS9498 394 115 279 70.8% BBIL-AP BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. AS6167 328 63 265 80.8% CELLCO-PART - Cellco Partnership AS5668 472 209 263 55.7% AS-5668 - CenturyTel Internet Holdings, Inc. AS9929 315 53 262 83.2% CNCNET-CN China Netcom Corp. AS1239 841 596 245 29.1% SPRINTLINK - Sprint AS6140 420 175 245 58.3% IMPSAT-USA - ImpSat AS18101 268 23 245 91.4% RIL-IDC Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet Data Centre, AS2386 930 697 233 25.1% INS-AS - AT&T Data Communications Services AS19115 258 27 231 89.5% CHARTER-LEBANON - Charter Communications AS6198 482 253 229 47.5% BATI-MIA - BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS16814 296 68 228 77.0% NSS S.A. Total 18054 6236 11818 65.5% Top 30 total Possible Bogus Routes 24.246.0.0/17 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services 24.246.78.0/24 AS25994 NPG-001 - NPG Cable, INC 24.246.128.0/18 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services 64.17.32.0/24 AS13488 CBWU-13488 - Continental Broadband Florida, Inc DBA WebUnited 64.17.33.0/24 AS13488 CBWU-13488 - Continental Broadband Florida, Inc DBA WebUnited 64.17.37.0/24 AS13488 CBWU-13488 - Continental Broadband Florida, Inc DBA WebUnited 64.38.96.0/19 AS19654 HOSTING-NETWORK - HOSTING-NETWORK, INC. 64.66.32.0/20 AS18864 STARTEC - Startec Global Communications 64.66.32.0/22 AS18864 STARTEC - Startec Global Communications 64.66.34.0/23 AS18864 STARTEC - Startec Global Communications 64.127.128.0/17 AS19654 HOSTING-NETWORK - HOSTING-NETWORK, INC. 66.11.32.0/20 AS6261 VISINET - Visionary Systems, Inc. 66.11.224.0/20 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 66.37.96.0/20 AS3764 IA-HOU-AS - Internet America, Inc. 66.51.134.0/24 AS29876 LNTC - Latency LLC 66.96.0.0/20 AS3770 WORLDPATH-AS - WorldPath Internet Services 66.117.0.0/19 AS30033 NHI-NETWORKS - NHI Networks 66.117.0.0/21 AS30033 NHI-NETWORKS - NHI Networks 66.117.8.0/24 AS174 COGENT Cogent/PSI 66.117.23.0/24 AS31972 EMGINECONCEPT-01 - Emagine Concept, Inc. 66.117.25.0/24 AS31972 EMGINECONCEPT-01 - Emagine Concept, Inc. 66.117.26.0/24 AS31972 EMGINECONCEPT-01 - Emagine Concept, Inc. 66.117.27.0/24 AS31972 EMGINECONCEPT-01 - Emagine Concept, Inc. 66.119.128.0/20 AS19754 NETPOINT-COM - Net Point LLC 66.186.192.0/19 AS19654 HOSTING-NETWORK - HOSTING-NETWORK, INC. 66.187.96.0/24 AS10026 ANC Asia Netcom Corporation 66.187.108.0/24 AS10026 ANC Asia Netcom Corporation 66.187.109.0/24 AS10026 ANC Asia Netcom Corporation 66.216.0.0/18 AS19654 HOSTING-NETWORK - HOSTING-NETWORK, INC. 66.235.158.0/23 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services 85.129.3.0/24 AS14585 CIFNET - CIFNet, Inc. 85.129.4.0/24 AS14585 CIFNET - CIFNet, Inc. 90.192.0.0/16 AS12654 RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project. 90.255.248.0/21 AS12654 RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project. 91.192.0.0/16 AS12654 RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project. 91.255.248.0/21 AS12654 RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project. 125.213.0.0/16 AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street 131.64.0.0/12 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 131.68.128.0/19 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 131.68.160.0/19 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 131.68.192.0/19 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 132.0.0.0/10 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 137.0.0.0/13 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 138.136.0.0/13 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 151.135.0.0/16 AS4763 TELSTRANZ-AS TelstraClear Ltd 158.0.0.0/13 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 163.142.0.0/16 AS2500 JPNIC-ASBLOCK-AP JPNIC 190.192.193.0/24 AS3301 TELIANET-SWEDEN TeliaNet Sweden 192.30.93.0/24 AS17757 HPAUS-AP HP Australia 192.30.94.0/24 AS17757 HPAUS-AP HP Australia 192.40.105.0/24 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System 192.43.230.0/24 AS7575 AARNET-AS-AP Australian Academic and Reasearch Network (AARNet) 192.44.0.0/19 AS702 AS702 MCI EMEA - Commercial IP service provider in Europe 192.44.0.0/24 AS5501 FRAUNHOFER-CLUSTER-BW Fraunhofer Gesellschaft 192.70.164.0/24 AS25689 NRCNET-AS - National Research Council of Canada 192.72.0.0/16 AS4780 SEEDNET Digital United Inc. 192.72.0.0/18 AS4780 SEEDNET Digital United Inc. 192.72.192.0/18 AS4780 SEEDNET Digital United Inc. 192.81.182.0/24 AS719 ELISA-AS Elisa Oyj 192.81.183.0/24 AS719 ELISA-AS Elisa Oyj 192.81.184.0/24 AS719 ELISA-AS Elisa Oyj 192.88.99.0/24 AS559 SWITCH SWITCH, Swiss Education and Research Network 192.96.36.0/24 AS5713 AFRINIC African Network Information Center 192.96.37.0/24 AS10474 AFRINIC African Network Information Center 192.96.135.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 192.96.136.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 192.96.140.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 192.96.143.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 192.96.145.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 192.96.177.0/24 AS6083 AFRINIC African Network Information Center 192.96.250.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 192.107.104.0/24 AS6458 GUATEL 192.119.135.0/24 AS270 PSCNI-AS - National Aeronautics and Space Administration 192.124.252.0/22 AS680 DFN-IP service G-WiN 192.133.6.0/24 AS10282 EQUANT-CEEUR EQUANT AS for Central and Eastern Europe region 192.136.53.0/24 AS8346 SONATEL-AS Autonomous System 192.153.144.0/21 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 192.172.0.0/19 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 192.188.208.0/20 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 193.32.19.0/24 AS702 AS702 MCI EMEA - Commercial IP service provider in Europe 193.32.20.0/23 AS702 AS702 MCI EMEA - Commercial IP service provider in Europe 193.36.1.0/24 AS8220 COLT COLT Telecommunications 193.37.69.0/24 AS2856 BT-UK-AS BTnet UK Regional network 193.37.236.0/24 AS702 AS702 MCI EMEA - Commercial IP service provider in Europe 193.110.77.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 193.110.78.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 193.110.79.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 193.110.97.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 193.201.48.0/22 AS34968 IUNXI iunxi BV 194.31.227.0/24 AS21461 TRANSFAIRNET Transfair-net GmbH Krefeld 194.32.174.0/23 AS8426 CLARANET-AS ClaraNET 194.59.176.0/20 AS1273 CW Cable & Wireless 194.59.178.0/24 AS8481 TRANSNET transnet INTERNET Services 194.153.156.0/24 AS24865 KMITCHELL-AS Keith Mitchell's Network 194.246.72.0/23 AS8893 ARTFILES-AS Artfiles New Media GmbH 195.144.6.0/24 AS34052 LOGIKA-AS OOO NPP LOGIKA 195.144.8.0/24 AS8426 CLARANET-AS ClaraNET 195.144.10.0/24 AS15703 TRUESERVER-AS TrueServer BV AS number 196.3.162.0/24 AS6083 AFRINIC African Network Information Center 196.6.108.0/24 AS5713 AFRINIC African Network Information Center 196.6.133.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.147.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.149.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.150.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.151.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.153.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.175.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.176.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.183.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.196.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.199.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.208.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.211.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.212.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.212.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.222.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.6.237.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.10.119.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.10.122.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.10.136.0/22 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.10.140.0/22 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.10.231.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.10.251.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.10.252.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.10.254.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.11.0.0/20 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.11.40.0/21 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.11.62.0/23 AS2905 UUNET-ZA uunet south africa 196.11.135.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.11.188.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.11.190.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.11.251.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.13.101.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.102.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.104.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.108.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.13.116.0/22 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.121.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.125.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.126.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.127.0/24 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.13.128.0/22 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.13.144.0/22 AS2905 UUNET-ZA uunet south africa 196.13.152.0/21 AS2905 UUNET-ZA uunet south africa 196.13.160.0/24 AS2905 UUNET-ZA uunet south africa 196.13.169.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.174.0/23 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.176.0/21 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.188.0/22 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.192.0/22 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.196.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 196.13.214.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.13.216.0/23 AS3741 IS - The Internet Solution 196.13.252.0/22 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 198.23.26.0/24 AS4390 BELLATLANTIC-COM - Bell Atlantic, Inc. 198.54.82.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 198.54.92.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 198.54.222.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 198.54.249.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 198.54.250.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 198.54.251.0/24 AS2018 TENET - 1 - The Uninet Project 198.97.72.0/21 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 198.97.80.0/20 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 198.97.96.0/19 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 198.97.240.0/20 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 198.97.247.0/24 AS3475 LANT-AFLOAT - Department of the Navy 198.101.4.0/22 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 198.136.32.0/20 AS19329 MCNET - Martin County Board of County Commissioners 198.160.171.0/24 AS7046 UUNET-CUSTOMER - UUNET Technologies, Inc. 198.161.87.0/24 AS6539 GROUPTLCOM - GT Group Telecom Services Corp. 198.163.155.0/24 AS684 MTSAL-ASN - MTS Allstream Inc. 198.167.0.0/16 AS7456 INTERHOP - Interhop Network SERVICES Inc. 198.167.163.0/24 AS15290 ALLST-15290 - Allstream Corp. Corporation Allstream 198.168.0.0/16 AS701 ALTERNET-AS - UUNET Technologies, Inc. 198.169.0.0/16 AS803 SASKTEL - SaskTel 198.232.133.0/24 AS23075 SKOTOS-AS - Skotos Tech, Inc 199.9.128.0/17 AS668 ASN-ASNET-NET-AS - Defense Research and Engineering Network 199.10.0.0/16 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.60.0.0/20 AS271 BCNET-AS - University of British Columbia 199.114.0.0/21 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.128.0/18 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.130.0/24 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.131.0/24 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.132.0/24 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.134.0/24 AS3541 ITSDN-U4 - DISA/UNRRA 199.114.136.0/24 AS27044 DDN-ASNBLK1 - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.138.0/24 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.140.0/24 AS3544 ITSDN-U7 - DISA/UNRRA 199.114.142.0/24 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.148.0/24 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.150.0/24 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.153.0/24 AS27034 DDN-ASNBLK1 - DoD Network Information Center 199.114.154.0/24 AS1733 CENTAF-SWA - AF DDN PMO 199.114.160.0/24 AS1733 CENTAF-SWA - AF DDN PMO 199.120.32.0/19 AS16582 NEXTLEVELINTERNET - NEXTLEVEL INTERNET, INC. 199.121.0.0/16 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.123.0.0/18 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.123.16.0/20 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.123.80.0/21 AS721 DLA-ASNBLOCK-AS - DoD Network Information Center 199.189.32.0/19 AS7332 IQUEST-AS - IQuest Internet 199.202.0.0/16 AS701 ALTERNET-AS - UUNET Technologies, Inc. 199.246.116.0/24 AS813 UUNET-AS1 - UUNET Technologies, Inc. 200.49.8.0/21 AS6140 IMPSAT-USA - ImpSat 202.58.113.0/24 AS19161 INNOCOM-TELECOM - INNOCOM TELECOM 202.86.252.0/22 AS9304 HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison Global Communications 202.86.253.0/24 AS9304 HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison Global Communications 202.86.254.0/24 AS9304 HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison Global Communications 202.86.255.0/24 AS9304 HUTCHISON-AS-AP Hutchison Global Communications 202.90.32.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.33.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.34.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.35.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.36.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.39.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.40.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.41.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.42.0/24 AS18231 EXATT-AS-AP Exatt Technologies Private Ltd. 202.90.43.0/24 AS9830 SWIFTONLINE-AS-AP SWIFT ONLINE BORDER AS 202.90.44.0/24 AS9830 SWIFTONLINE-AS-AP SWIFT ONLINE BORDER AS 202.90.46.0/23 AS17747 ZIML-AP ZEE INTERACTIVE MUTIMEDIA LTD., BANGALORE 202.93.0.0/20 AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street 202.131.64.0/19 AS9381 NEWTT-IP-AP Wharf T&T Ltd. 203.13.171.0/24 AS1221 ASN-TELSTRA Telstra Pty Ltd 203.62.0.0/17 AS7575 AARNET-AS-AP Australian Academic and Reasearch Network (AARNet) 203.78.48.0/20 AS9299 IPG-AS-AP Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company 203.89.133.0/24 AS15412 FLAG-AS Flag Telecom Global Internet AS 203.89.134.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.138.0/24 AS9237 HUTCHCA-AS Corporate Access (HK) Ltd. 203.89.139.0/24 AS17911 BRAINPK-AS-AP Brain Telecommunication Ltd. 203.89.143.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.144.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.145.0/24 AS4637 REACH Reach Network Border AS 203.89.146.0/24 AS4637 REACH Reach Network Border AS 203.89.147.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.148.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.149.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.150.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.151.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.153.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.154.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.158.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.89.159.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 203.99.0.0/19 AS17746 ORCONINTERNET-NZ-AP Orcon Internet 203.99.142.0/24 AS9826 ILINK-HK-AP iLink.net Ltd 203.111.192.0/20 AS7473 SINGTEL-AS-AP Singapore Telecom 203.210.69.0/24 AS17536 PRODIGY-AS-AP Prodidgy Telecommunications 204.48.118.0/23 AS29912 CITIZENS-PROPERTY-INSURANCE-CORPORATION - Citizens Property Insurance Corporation 204.48.119.0/24 AS29912 CITIZENS-PROPERTY-INSURANCE-CORPORATION - Citizens Property Insurance Corporation 204.154.125.0/24 AS3952 TELLABS-ASN - TELLABS Operations, Inc. 204.154.126.0/24 AS3952 TELLABS-ASN - TELLABS Operations, Inc. 204.154.127.0/24 AS3952 TELLABS-ASN - TELLABS Operations, Inc. 205.150.0.0/15 AS701 ALTERNET-AS - UUNET Technologies, Inc. 206.108.96.0/19 AS577 BACOM - Bell Advanced Communications Inc. 206.128.104.0/21 AS11709 VIC - VIRTUAL INTERACTIVE CENTER 206.167.57.0/24 AS376 RISQ-AS - Reseau Interordinateurs Scientique Quebecois (RISQ) 206.191.64.0/18 AS15290 ALLST-15290 - Allstream Corp. Corporation Allstream 206.191.96.0/19 AS15290 ALLST-15290 - Allstream Corp. Corporation Allstream 207.231.96.0/19 AS11194 NUNETPA - NuNet Inc 208.138.48.0/20 AS6971 ESCH - Eschelon Telecommunications, Inc. 209.40.192.0/21 AS6487 CyberNet de Guatemala S.A. 209.40.200.0/21 AS6487 CyberNet de Guatemala S.A. 209.40.208.0/21 AS6487 CyberNet de Guatemala S.A. 209.40.216.0/21 AS6487 CyberNet de Guatemala S.A. 209.97.64.0/19 AS6132 INGRESSNET - Ingress Enterprises, Inc w/ Ingress Communications, Inc. 209.112.224.0/20 AS19817 DSLEXTREME - DSL Extreme 209.205.69.0/24 AS21578 Universidad autonoma de Bucaramanga 209.205.70.0/24 AS21578 Universidad autonoma de Bucaramanga 209.205.81.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A. 209.205.82.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A. 209.205.84.0/24 AS15066 SkyNet de Colombia S.A. 209.234.0.0/18 AS3845 STATE-NET - CS&W, Inc. 209.251.0.0/19 AS11036 SISCOM - SISCOM, Inc 216.37.110.0/23 AS4264 CERNET-ASN-BLOCK - California Education and Research Federation Network 216.82.160.0/20 AS20481 CALYX-NL Calyx Internet B.V. Netherlands 216.96.128.0/18 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services 216.178.37.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.178.39.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.178.42.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.178.43.0/24 AS3356 LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications 216.228.64.0/21 AS6295 WHIDBEY1 - Whidbey Internet Services 216.228.224.0/20 AS13674 VRIS-AS-BLOCK-13661-13675 - Verizon Internet Services 216.240.240.0/20 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services 216.240.242.0/24 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet Services Please see http://www.cidr-report.org for the full report ------------------------------------ Copies of this report are mailed to: nanog(a)merit.edu eof-list(a)ripe.net apops(a)apops.net routing-wg(a)ripe.net afnog(a)afnog.org

1 0