September 2003 - Test - lists.nanog.org

FW: e-bay
by Mike Tomasura 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

> I guess e-bay had some problems? A few users got this message from them. > > Dear eBay user! > > At 09.24.2003 our company has lost a number > of accounts in the system during the database > maintenance. If you have an active account, please > click on the link below to update your credit card > information. If you have problems with your account, please let us know > at email support(a)ebay.com <mailto:support@ebay.com> > > https://cgi.ebay.com/saw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?UpdateInformation > <https://e%31bay.com/saw-cgi/?UpdateInformation> > > > >

4 3

Re: FW: e-bay
by Gregory Hicks 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

> From: Mike Tomasura <MTomasura(a)BradleyCaldwell.com> > To: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: FW: e-bay > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:25:52 -0400 > > > > > I guess e-bay had some problems? A few users got this message from them. > > > > Dear eBay user! > > > > At 09.24.2003 our company has lost a number > > of accounts in the system during the database > > maintenance. If you have an active account, please > > click on the link below to update your credit card > > information. If you have problems with your account, please let us know > > at email support(a)ebay.com <mailto:support@ebay.com> Nope! It is a 'credit card harvesting scam'... (Or whatever the term dujour is today...) Good for identity theft purposes and for stealing credit card numbers to run up someone else's bill... I mean... Look at it: Poor grammar, poor punctuation, ... > > > > https://cgi.ebay.com/saw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?UpdateInformation > > <https://e%31bay.com/saw-cgi/?UpdateInformation> Also, if this is for real, it looks like eBay has bigger problems: Connection refused to both of these URLs. Regards, Gregory Hicks ------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer Cadence Design Systems | Direct: 408.576.3609 555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 6B1 | Fax: 408.894.3400 San Jose, CA 95134 | "The trouble with doing anything right the first time is that nobody appreciates how difficult it was." When a team of dedicated individuals makes a commitment to act as one... the sky's the limit. Just because "We've always done it that way" is not necessarily a good reason to continue to do so... Grace Hopper, Rear Admiral, United States Navy

1 0

Detecting a non-existent domain
by Kee Hinckley 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

Getting practical for a minute. What is the optimal way now to see if a given host truly exists? Assume that I can't control the DNS server--I need to have this code run in any (*ix) environment. Assume also that I don't want to run around specialcasing specific IP addresses or TLDs--this needs to work reliably no matter what the domain. User gives me a string, and I need to see if the given host is a real machine. An answer from Verisign would be most appropriate here, since they have done "extensive research" on the impact of their new service, so presumably they figured out the answer to this problem and have code samples available for distribution. However I get the feeling from their press releases that they've forgotten there is more to the internet than just the web. -- Kee Hinckley http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.

7 12

Proposed changes to the AUP.
by Leo Bicknell 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

Two recent e-mails made me take a new look at the Nanog AUP, and I'd like to propose several changes to help clarify the policy. Several recent discussions have descended into the weeds. I'll take my share of the blame for my participation. That said, one on-list event, and several off list events have raised some lingering questions about the Nanog AUP and how it is enforced. I believe that there are a couple of changes to the AUP that would help prevent these threads from happening, and those are the issues I want to raise. If you're not familiar, the AUP is at http://www.nanog.org/aup.thml. I suspect many of you have no idea how the Nanog AUP is enforced, so I will go into that first. Moments ago we saw a glimpse on the list. The first attachment to my message (it's not in the archive yet to give you a URL) entitled "srh-jrace" is a copy of an e-mail I believe Susan accidently copied to nanog(a)merit.edu. If you look at the CC list you'll see the intended target was nanog-support(a)merit.edu. To help show that assumption is probably correct, I attach three more messages, first, second, and third. These are three cases, in chronological order, where I have been given similar warnings for AUP violations. For full context, these three messages were part of the following threads: first - http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/0109/threads.html#01538 second - http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/0110/threads.html#00577 (Note, there are at least three other thread roots right under it as some follow ups didn't get attributed correctly.) third - http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/threads.html#14454 To be clear, I'm not trying to "appeal my conviction" on any of these, the first thread clearly drifted way off topic, the second I clearly mention the law and politics. The third gives me a bit more trouble, as the reason I posted was to see if anyone could operationally use this new (admittedly legal) tool, but heck, it was about law so I'm ok with being wrong on that one. I show you these as I am unhappy about the method by which these were handled. So, what are my proposals? Simple: 1) Change item 6 on http://www.nanog.org/aup.html to read "prohibited" rather than "discouraged". Discouraged suggests to me general discussion about those topics is bad, but if it has operational significance or general interest on the list it may still be appropriate. However, it appears that there is no clear way to define what would or would not be appropriate, and that the enforcement is more in line with prohibited. Changing that one word should make it much more clear, and remove all doubt. Most likely item #3 should also be prohibited and not discouraged as well. 2) The current AUP states: ] Individuals who violate these guidelines will be contacted personally ] and asked to adhere to the guidelines. If an individual persists ] in violating the guidelines, the convener of NANOG, Merit Network, ] Inc., will take action to filter the offender's messages to the ] list. I have several problems with this: * There is no way for the nanog membership to review that the policy is being applied evenly and fairly. * Where there are ambiguities in the appropriateness of a topic there is no way to know that the moderators are using the same criteria the general membership would use. * It does nothing to educate other mailing list participants as to what is or is not appropriate. This method provides a gentle and constant reminder of the AUP that always provides new and relevant examples. * It does nothing to stop the thread. Several people have received these after others for the same thread -- I think we all have an implicit assumption that if it's allowed to continue by the moderators it must be ok to reply. To that end, I propose the following new method of handling things, which I believe is more in-line with what other mailing lists do: When inappropriate messages are sent to the list the convener will reply both to the list and to the poster pointing out that the topic is in violation of the AUP and should cease. Chronic offenders will be notified personally that their messages may be filtered or that they may be removed from the list as deemed appropriate by the conveners. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell(a)ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request(a)tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org

5 6

RE: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server
by Stephen Gill 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

Hi Pekka, Yep, we'd like to. Stay tuned! Cheers, Steve, for Team Cymru -- Stephen Gill -----Original Message----- From: Pekka Savola [mailto:pekkas@netcore.fi] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 3:30 AM To: Stephen Gill Cc: 'NANOG' Subject: Re: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Stephen Gill wrote: > $ whois -h whois.cymru.com 4.2.2.1 > ASN | IP | Name > 3356 | 4.2.2.1 | LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications Do you plan to support IPv6 -> ASN mappings as well, at some point? Another interesting feature related to that would be supporting special resolution of 6to4 addresses (RFC3056); looking up 2002:0102:0304:: would give you also the info on IP 1.2.3.4. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

1 0

The Cidr Report
by cidr-report＠potaroo.net 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

This report has been generated at Fri Sep 26 21:48:00 2003 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date Prefixes CIDR Agg 19-09-03 124625 88453 20-09-03 124231 88712 21-09-03 124485 88757 22-09-03 124825 88767 23-09-03 124583 88869 24-09-03 124650 88899 25-09-03 124729 88878 26-09-03 124718 88911 AS Summary 15808 Number of ASes in routing system 6252 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix 1441 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS AS701 : ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. 73355264 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s) AS568 : SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA Aggregation Summary The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes'). --- 26Sep03 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description Table 125286 88917 36369 29.0% All ASes AS6197 964 284 680 70.5% BATI-ATL BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS4323 668 195 473 70.8% TW-COMM Time Warner Communications, Inc. AS701 1441 1007 434 30.1% ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS7018 1403 986 417 29.7% ATT-INTERNET4 AT&T WorldNet Services AS7843 529 137 392 74.1% ADELPHIA-AS Adelphia Corp. AS3908 906 535 371 40.9% SUPERNETASBLK SuperNet, Inc. AS6198 497 208 289 58.1% BATI-MIA BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS4355 393 107 286 72.8% ERMS-EARTHLNK EARTHLINK, INC AS1221 983 698 285 29.0% ASN-TELSTRA Telstra Pty Ltd AS6347 354 87 267 75.4% DIAMOND SAVVIS Communications Corporation AS4134 374 118 256 68.4% CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street AS1239 909 656 253 27.8% SPRINTLINK Sprint AS22773 286 37 249 87.1% CCINET-2 Cox Communications Inc. Atlanta AS27364 314 70 244 77.7% ACS-INTERNET Armstrong Cable Services AS17676 263 30 233 88.6% GIGAINFRA Softbank BB Corp. AS25844 242 15 227 93.8% SKADDEN1 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP AS209 501 291 210 41.9% ASN-QWEST Qwest AS6140 340 135 205 60.3% IMPSAT-USA ImpSat AS11305 230 38 192 83.5% INTERLAND-NET1 Interland Incorporated AS4519 178 4 174 97.8% MAAS Maas Communications AS6327 201 27 174 86.6% SHAW Shaw Communications Inc. AS22909 297 123 174 58.6% DNEO-OSP1 Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. AS2386 374 202 172 46.0% INS-AS AT&T Data Communications Services AS2048 256 87 169 66.0% LANET-1 State of Louisiana AS14654 171 2 169 98.8% WAYPORT Wayport AS9498 183 20 163 89.1% BBIL-AP BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. AS705 408 249 159 39.0% ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS5786 163 5 158 96.9% UPRENET University of Puerto Rico AS9583 261 108 153 58.6% SATYAMNET-AS Satyam Infoway Ltd., AS9800 203 52 151 74.4% UNICOM CHINA UNICOM Total 14292 6513 7779 54.4% Top 30 total Possible Bogus Routes 24.119.0.0/16 AS11492 CABLEONE CABLE ONE 61.12.32.0/24 AS7545 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Internet Pty Ltd 61.12.34.0/24 AS7545 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Internet Pty Ltd 64.30.64.0/19 AS14900 USLEC-CORP-1 USLEC Corp. 66.41.192.0/18 AS13367 ATT-BBND-B AT&T Broadband 132.0.0.0/10 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 137.0.0.0/13 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 138.136.0.0/13 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 140.143.2.0/24 AS1221 ASN-TELSTRA Telstra Pty Ltd 140.240.0.0/13 AS1 GNTY-1 Genuity 158.0.0.0/13 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 165.212.0.0/16 AS7424 USANET USA.Net 166.16.0.0/16 AS7132 SBIS-AS SBC Internet Services - Southwest 192.43.230.0/24 AS4738 SAARDNET-AS South Australian Academic Research and Development Network 192.44.0.0/19 AS702 ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. 192.83.16.0/20 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System 192.83.32.0/19 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System 192.83.64.0/19 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System 192.83.96.0/22 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System 192.83.100.0/24 AS5515 SONERA-GLOBAL-IP Sonera Solution Autonomous System 192.88.99.0/24 AS3246 SONGNETWORKS Song Networks 192.119.135.0/24 AS270 PSCNI-AS National Aeronautics and Space Administration 192.124.252.0/22 AS680 AS680 DFN-IP service G-WiN 192.135.50.0/24 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 AT&T WorldNet Services 192.136.71.0/24 AS719 AS719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.136.79.0/24 AS719 AS719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.153.136.0/21 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 192.153.144.0/21 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 192.172.0.0/19 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 192.188.208.0/20 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 192.243.32.0/23 AS2044 PALIN-AS Palin Aquisitions Inc. 198.23.26.0/24 AS4390 BELLATLANTIC-COM Bell Atlantic, Inc. 198.97.72.0/21 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 198.97.80.0/20 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 198.97.88.0/24 AS89 NUSC-CSTLNET-AS Naval Underwater Systems Center 198.97.192.0/20 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 198.97.240.0/20 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 198.98.8.0/21 AS3701 NERONET Oregon Joint Graduate Schools of Engineering 198.101.4.0/22 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 198.136.32.0/20 AS19329 MCNET Martin County Board of County Commissioners 198.144.32.0/19 AS3998 CITY-NET CityNet, Inc. 198.161.87.0/24 AS6539 GROUPTLCOM GT Group Telecom Services Corp. 198.161.165.0/24 AS852 ASN852 Telus Advanced Communications 198.163.155.0/24 AS684 MBNET-AS Manitoba Regional Network 198.167.0.0/16 AS7456 INTERHOP Interhop Network SERVICES Inc. 198.167.163.0/24 AS15290 ATTCA-15290 AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company 198.168.0.0/16 AS701 ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. 198.169.0.0/16 AS803 SASKTEL SaskTel 198.232.133.0/24 AS23075 SKOTOS-AS Skotos Tech, Inc 199.10.0.0/16 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 199.60.0.0/20 AS271 BCNET-AS University of British Columbia 199.79.32.0/20 AS3701 NERONET Oregon Joint Graduate Schools of Engineering 199.84.0.0/16 AS701 ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. 199.114.0.0/18 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 199.114.0.0/21 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 199.114.128.0/18 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 199.114.140.0/24 AS3544 ITSDN-U7 DISA/UNRRA 199.114.152.0/24 AS1913 DLA4 Defense Logistics Agency 199.120.32.0/19 AS16582 NEXTLEVELINTERNET NEXTLEVEL INTERNET, INC. 199.121.0.0/16 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 199.123.16.0/20 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 199.123.80.0/21 AS568 SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA 199.166.18.0/24 AS701 ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. 199.189.32.0/19 AS7332 IQUEST-AS IQuest Internet 199.202.0.0/16 AS701 ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. 202.0.180.0/24 AS4058 APNIC-4058 Asia Pacific Network Information Centre 202.3.158.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 202.3.159.0/24 AS17557 PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom 202.4.252.0/22 AS4808 CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP network¡ªChina169 Beijing Province Network 202.4.255.0/24 AS4799 UNSPECIFIED Ji Tong Communications Co., Ltd. 202.6.96.0/24 AS4761 INDOSAT1-AP INDOSATNET-ASN 202.6.97.0/24 AS4761 INDOSAT1-AP INDOSATNET-ASN 202.44.112.0/20 AS17458 CWNETDG-IO-AP Cable and Wireless 202.74.32.0/19 AS9315 CWN-AS-AP Chomanan WorldNet Co., Ltd. 202.93.0.0/20 AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street 202.93.64.0/19 AS9425 I-NEXT-AS-AP Inter.net Philippines border AS 202.122.76.0/24 AS17553 TIMELESS-AP System Integration provider 202.136.254.0/23 AS4808 CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP network¡ªChina169 Beijing Province Network 202.136.254.0/24 AS4808 CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP network¡ªChina169 Beijing Province Network 202.142.130.0/23 AS17820 DIL-AP DIRECT INTERNET LTD. 202.142.132.0/22 AS17820 DIL-AP DIRECT INTERNET LTD. 202.143.48.0/21 AS4795 INDOSAT2-ID-AP INDOSATNET-ASN 202.143.56.0/21 AS4795 INDOSAT2-ID-AP INDOSATNET-ASN 202.164.192.0/19 AS7599 IPXC-AS-AP IP Exchange 202.165.0.0/19 AS9443 INTERNETPRIMUS-AS-AP Primus Telecommunications 202.179.64.0/24 AS7633 SOFTNET-AS-AP Software Technology Parks of India 202.179.65.0/24 AS7633 SOFTNET-AS-AP Software Technology Parks of India 202.179.66.0/24 AS7633 SOFTNET-AS-AP Software Technology Parks of India 202.179.67.0/24 AS7633 SOFTNET-AS-AP Software Technology Parks of India 202.179.68.0/24 AS7633 SOFTNET-AS-AP Software Technology Parks of India 202.189.234.0/23 AS9658 ETPI-IDS-AS-AP Eastern Telecoms Phils., Inc. 203.10.17.0/24 AS9266 VIPER-AU-AP Vipernet 203.10.18.0/24 AS9266 VIPER-AU-AP Vipernet 203.10.19.0/24 AS9266 VIPER-AU-AP Vipernet 203.10.21.0/24 AS9266 VIPER-AU-AP Vipernet 203.10.22.0/24 AS9266 VIPER-AU-AP Vipernet 203.10.23.0/24 AS9266 VIPER-AU-AP Vipernet 203.32.4.0/23 AS7617 APNIC-AS-2-BLOCK Asia Pacific Network Information Centre 203.62.0.0/17 AS7572 AARNET-ACT-RNO Australian Academic and Reasearch Network (AARNet) 203.76.128.0/24 AS9729 IS-AP iAdvantage Limited 203.76.224.0/24 AS9549 COMDEK-ISP-AS-AP Comdek ISP 203.86.2.0/23 AS4058 APNIC-4058 Asia Pacific Network Information Centre 203.90.192.0/20 AS9658 ETPI-IDS-AS-AP Eastern Telecoms Phils., Inc. 203.129.126.0/24 AS7473 SINGTEL-AS-AP Singapore Telecom 203.129.127.0/24 AS7473 SINGTEL-AS-AP Singapore Telecom 203.132.95.0/24 AS9787 CONCEPT-AU-AP Concept Networks 203.132.97.0/24 AS7652 VIANET-AS-AP Vianet Communications Pty Ltd 203.132.99.0/24 AS7657 TIG-US-PAS-AP The Internet Group Limited 203.132.102.0/24 AS9398 ARACHNET-AS-AP Arachnet 203.132.103.0/24 AS9398 ARACHNET-AS-AP Arachnet 203.132.104.0/24 AS9398 ARACHNET-AS-AP Arachnet 203.132.105.0/24 AS9398 ARACHNET-AS-AP Arachnet 203.132.106.0/24 AS9398 ARACHNET-AS-AP Arachnet 203.132.107.0/24 AS10236 FOXGOLD-NET-AU-AP FOXGOLD COMMUNICATIONS 203.132.108.0/24 AS10236 FOXGOLD-NET-AU-AP FOXGOLD COMMUNICATIONS 203.132.109.0/24 AS10141 CALOUNDRA-AS-AP Caloundra.net 203.132.110.0/24 AS7598 ALPHALINK-AS-AP Alphalink Pty Limited - Melbourne, Australia 203.132.111.0/24 AS10236 FOXGOLD-NET-AU-AP FOXGOLD COMMUNICATIONS 203.132.112.0/24 AS10236 FOXGOLD-NET-AU-AP FOXGOLD COMMUNICATIONS 203.132.118.0/24 AS18065 CENTRALDATA-WA Central Data Pty Ltd. 203.132.122.0/24 AS4802 WANTREE-AS-AP Wantree Development 203.132.123.0/24 AS18065 CENTRALDATA-WA Central Data Pty Ltd. 203.132.124.0/24 AS18065 CENTRALDATA-WA Central Data Pty Ltd. 203.132.125.0/24 AS4817 TECHEX1-AS-AP Techex Primary Netblock 203.135.99.0/24 AS2687 IBM-MMD-AS IBM 203.135.224.0/19 AS4058 APNIC-4058 Asia Pacific Network Information Centre 203.161.39.0/24 AS4768 CLIX-NZ CLEAR Internet Exchange 204.19.224.0/19 AS816 UUNET-AS4 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 204.29.189.0/24 AS3956 TX-METRO Texas Metronet 204.52.232.0/24 AS7177 DFWNET DFW Internet Services, Inc. 204.89.225.0/24 AS2495 KANREN Kansas Research and Education Network 204.194.110.0/23 AS10588 ICSNET Intelligent Computer Solutions, Inc 205.150.0.0/15 AS701 ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. 206.41.32.0/19 AS14824 NEWSOUTH NewSouth Communications Corp. 206.81.187.0/24 AS19194 JOVITA Sentris Network LLC 206.82.64.0/18 AS7029 ALLTELNET Alltel Information Services, Inc. 206.108.34.0/24 AS852 ASN852 Telus Advanced Communications 206.108.35.0/24 AS852 ASN852 Telus Advanced Communications 206.167.57.0/24 AS376 RISQ-AS Reseau Interordinateurs Scientique Quebecois (RISQ) 206.191.64.0/18 AS15290 ATTCA-15290 AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company 206.251.69.0/24 AS27429 TIL Telesat International Ltd. 207.47.39.0/24 AS816 UUNET-AS4 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 207.162.192.0/19 AS4589 EASYNET Easynet Group Plc 207.231.96.0/19 AS11194 NUNETPA NuNet Inc 208.65.232.0/23 AS701 ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. 208.81.187.0/24 AS19194 JOVITA Sentris Network LLC 208.104.103.0/24 AS1239 SPRINTLINK Sprint 209.151.128.0/19 AS816 UUNET-AS4 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 209.169.219.0/24 AS189 GENUITY-AS189 Genuity 209.169.223.0/24 AS189 GENUITY-AS189 Genuity 209.172.0.0/18 AS7770 TRITON Triton Technologies, Inc. 209.213.32.0/19 AS10629 INTERPAC Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.213.50.0/24 AS10629 INTERPAC Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.213.51.0/24 AS10629 INTERPAC Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.213.55.0/24 AS10629 INTERPAC Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.213.56.0/24 AS10629 INTERPAC Inter-Pacific Network Services 209.213.160.0/19 AS4355 ERMS-EARTHLNK EARTHLINK, INC 209.222.137.0/24 AS27429 TIL Telesat International Ltd. 209.240.96.0/19 AS10815 KCNET KCnet, Inc. 209.251.0.0/19 AS11036 SISCOM SISCOM, Inc 209.251.64.0/19 AS10266 NETWAY-AS MDC, Inc. 210.213.0.0/19 AS6453 TELEGLOBE-AS Teleglobe Inc 211.27.156.0/24 AS9768 PUBNET1-AS KT 216.18.224.0/21 AS11458 IMBRIS IMBRIS, INC. 216.18.224.0/22 AS11458 IMBRIS IMBRIS, INC. 216.18.228.0/22 AS11458 IMBRIS IMBRIS, INC. 216.47.32.0/19 AS11304 SPLUS Solutions Plus Inc. 216.96.128.0/18 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 AT&T WorldNet Services 216.226.108.0/22 AS3602 SPRINT-CA-AS Sprint Canada Inc. Please see http://www.cidr-report.org for the full report ------------------------------------ Copies of this report are mailed to: nanog(a)merit.edu eof-list(a)ripe.net apops(a)apops.net routing-wg(a)ripe.net afnog(a)afnog.org

2 1

Re: AOL Proxy Servers not connecting via https - resolved
by mike harrison 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

A Clue Bat was gently swung by a friendly and clueful (semi-anonymous) AOL NetOps guys who contacted me from my post on Nanog. Thanks Nanog, and this sounds strange from me, but Thank's AOL. :) And yes, it should have been obvious on my part.. a router was configured with a 172.0.0.0/8 netmask. > ......there is what we call an RFC1918 issue. AOL was given > some IPs in the 172.16.x.x range by ARIN. These are valid routable IPs, > and we use them as IPs for the AOL user's machines (kinda like DHCP). The > problem is that some people block all of 172.x.x.x thinking it's only for > non-routable IPs when it's only half that range that is non-routable. > (172.16.0.0/20 is the routable part). That appears to be the case with > this one. We've asked ARIN for a different range, and they told us to go > away, so we are stuck with this issue. If you can ask someone who does > firewall and/or router ACLs in front of that website, they should be able > to fix the issue.

5 5

Any way to P-T-P Distribute the RBL lists?
by Drew Weaver 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

I know you all have probably already thought of this, but can anyone think of a feasible way to run a RBL list that does not have a single point of failure? Or any attackable entry? Disregard this if im totally out of line, but it would seem to me that this would be possible. Thanks, -Drew

13 15

Re: New Team Cymru IP2ASN whois server
by Pekka Savola 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Stephen Gill wrote: > $ whois -h whois.cymru.com 4.2.2.1 > ASN | IP | Name > 3356 | 4.2.2.1 | LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications Do you plan to support IPv6 -> ASN mappings as well, at some point? Another interesting feature related to that would be supporting special resolution of 6to4 addresses (RFC3056); looking up 2002:0102:0304:: would give you also the info on IP 1.2.3.4. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

2 1

College increases fine for virus computers to $100
by Sean Donelan 26 Sep '03

26 Sep '03

Rollins College in Florida has increased its fine for students with infected computers to $100. Despite repeated warnings, nearly 1/3 of the 1,100 students ignored instructions to install the patch and anti-virus software. The College sent teams door-to-door on campus looking for infected computers to fix them. Even after that, 35 students still didn't fix their computers, and the college turned off their network access. http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/education/orl-locvirus26092603sep26,0,4… In Anchorage, the cable modem provider has started cutting off 500 infected customers. When the customer calls in, GCI won't let them re-connect to the network until they fix their computers. Which can be a difficult process for some customers since the only way Microsoft distributes the patches is on-line. http://www.adn.com/business/story/4002138p-4023398c.html How many other ISPs are turning off customers due to worms isn't known.

1 0