March 2003 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar
by matthew＠eeph.com 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

Was scruz.net, is now sonic.net, per the DNS. Matthew Kaufman, DSL.net-formerly-Tycho.net-formerly-scruz.net matthew(a)eeph.com (home) mkaufman(a)dsl.net (work) On Mar 14, 0:18, Paul Vixie wrote: } Subject: Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar > > scruz.net > > > X-Original-To: paul(a)vix.com > > From: "Gio Sico" <john(a)giosico.com> > > To: <curtis(a)ans.net>, <oberman(a)nersc.gov>, <bmanning(a)isi.edu>, > > <paul(a)vix.com>, <usdomreg(a)isi.edu>, <nanog(a)merit.edu>, > > <oberman(a)nersc.gov> > > Subject: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar > > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:52:26 +1000 > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 > > > > Sorry to bother you guys but I can not find a place to register a name off > > of SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US . > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated, > > > > > > > > John > > }-- End of excerpt from Paul Vixie

1 0

Re: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar
by Paul Vixie 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

scruz.net > X-Original-To: paul(a)vix.com > From: "Gio Sico" <john(a)giosico.com> > To: <curtis(a)ans.net>, <oberman(a)nersc.gov>, <bmanning(a)isi.edu>, > <paul(a)vix.com>, <usdomreg(a)isi.edu>, <nanog(a)merit.edu>, > <oberman(a)nersc.gov> > Subject: I need help finding SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US Registrar > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:52:26 +1000 > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 > > Sorry to bother you guys but I can not find a place to register a name off > of SAN-FRANCISCO.CA.US . > > Any help would be greatly appreciated, > > > > John >

1 0

RE: 69/8...this sucks
by Frank Scalzo 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

We don't need the adminstrative headache of ICANN/ARIN/RIRs on this. Someone could just do it with a private ASN and advertise the route with an arbitrarily null routed next-hop. That doesn't solve the problem of bad filters on firewalls. The problem is lots of books/webpages/templates/etc. say filter bogons. People not smart enough to understand the responsibilities of doing so implement it and forget it. Instead of trying to beat up on the large numbers of people who lack sufficient clue, why isn't the pressure turned to the authors that are irresponsibly and blindly recommending the wide spread use of these filters? I would think we would have more success targeting the people authoring this stuff. There are at most hundreds of authors. There is at least thousands of twits... Funny the media gets all excited about BGP security and dDos attacks against a root nameserver yet no one ever seems to mention the real scalability issues like that we can't allocate large parts of the net because many network operators aren't bright enough to update filters. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen@delong.com] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:16 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: 69/8...this sucks OK... I'm late to this discussion (been mostly ignoring it due to volume in other places), but, Sean's 911->855 mail makes me wonder... It seems to me that it would be relatively simple to solve this problem by doing the following: 1. ICANN (or an ICANN designee, such as ARIN) shall issue an ASN range of 20 ASNs to be used as BOGON-ORIGINATE. 2. Each RIR should operate one or more routers with an open peering policy which will perform the following functions: A. Advertise all unissued space allocated to the RIR as originating from an ASN allocated to <RIR>-BOGON. B. Peer with the corresponding routers at each of the other RIRs and accept and readvertise their BOGON list through BGP. C. Provide a full BOGON feed to any router that chooses to peer, but not accept any routes or non-BGP traffic from those routers. 3. Any provider which wishes to filter BOGONs could peer with the closest one or two of these and set up route maps that modify the next-hop for all BOGONs to be an address which is statically routed to NULL0 on each of their routers. Apologies if this has been discussed before, but, it seems to me that this is the easiest way to make the data readily available to the community directly from the maintainers of the databases in a fashion which is automatically up to date. Owen

32 59

RE: Open source / GPL Ip address management software.
by Bowers, Brent (CCI-San Diego) 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

http://www.brownkid.net/northstar/ Pretty good package. Builds on top of either MySQL or PostgreSQL. bb -----Original Message----- From: Ejay Hire [mailto:ejay.hire@isdn.net] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:09 AM To: nanog(a)merit.edu; isp-tech(a)isp-tech.com Subject: Open source / GPL Ip address management software. Can anyone reccomend opensource or cheap Ip address management software? I've taken IPplan and FreeIPdb for test drives but I'm still looking for options. -EJay

1 0

Re: Getting a Host Record
by Gregory Hicks 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:01:16 -0800 > From: william(a)hq.dreamhost.com (Will Yardley) > To: Gregory Hicks <ghicks> > Subject: Re: Getting a Host Record > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:31:07PM -0800, Gregory Hicks wrote: > > > whois -h whois.completewhois.com dreamhost.com > > Elan Complete Whois Server, Version 0.83h05, compiled on Jan 27, 2003, > > 18:21 PDT > > The original message was about getting a HOST (i.e., nameserver) record, > not getting the whois record for the domain itself. Sorry! After I sent that off, I re-read your message... (I need to read, re-read, and then again, I think...) I don't recall that I've EVER been able to get info on an individual host as you want. I've been using 'whois' since the early-mid '80s whilst I was running the Info-IBMPC Digest (it is now defunct when I got out of the military...). I used to take a FQDN host name, submit to whois, and if I got a "no such record", I'd back the host name off, then any sub-domains, then ... Until I got a match that looked 'reasonable'. Whois stopped being convenient to use about the time Network Solutions went 'commercial' (about '98 or so?). This is what I did for ns1.dreamhost.com. There used to be fully maintained 'hinfo' records in DNS, but not, I believe, in the whois database... I think the best you can do now is to get SOA for an individual host... Oh well. I'll read better next time. regards, Gregory Hicks --------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer Cadence Design Systems | Direct: 408.576.3609 555 River Oaks Pkwy M/S 6B1 | Fax: 408.894.3479 San Jose, CA 95134 | Internet: ghicks(a)cadence.com Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity. Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton Just because "We've always done it that way" is not necessarily a good reason to continue to do so... Grace Hopper, Rear Admiral, United States Navy

1 0

Open source / GPL Ip address management software.
by Ejay Hire 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

Can anyone reccomend opensource or cheap Ip address management software? I've taken IPplan and FreeIPdb for test drives but I'm still looking for options. -EJay

1 0

RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this [degenerate linguistic usage elided)
by Dr. Jeffrey Race 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:58:50 -0500, Vivien M. wrote: >I wonder if perhaps a solution would be doing something I saw a gentleman >from China, IIRC, do on this list quite a while ago. He had added (Mr.) to >his .sig to make it easy for people to figure out his gender. Perhaps this >would be an easyish way to somewhat-subtly warn people of the correct >gender? Female personal-status-specific honorifics (Miss, Mrs.) used to be essential elements of any signature block, at least for written correspondence, in the days when persons honored one another. Lack of such an honorific implied not female. Now it's just 'Hi $first_name'. I'm glad I'm on the way out. Jeffrey Race

3 2

RE: Gender and other protocol issues
by Michael.Dillon＠radianz.com 13 Mar '03

13 Mar '03

>Speaking of Gender and Protocol, I think this whole gender bias thing >can be solved by implementing an LDAP server.... Sorry - wrong >thread... Do a Google search on these three words LDAP schema gender and you will see that LDAP can indeed be part of the solution to gender misidentification. ;-) --Michael Dillon

1 0

att.net domain expired
by Ejay Hire 13 Mar '03

13 Mar '03

Hello all. Expect some calls from people who can't reach *.att.net. The att.net domain has expired and is in Verisign's new "not working and not for sale" hold queue. -Ejay Registrant: AT&T Corp. (ATT2-DOM) 55 Corporate Drive null US Domain Name: ATT.NET Administrative Contact, Technical Contact: GNMC (VXGTRUVDOO) rm-hostmaster(a)ems.att.com <mailto:rm-hostmaster@ems.att.com> GNMC 3324 Hollenberg Bridgeton, MO 63044 US 314-264-9672 fax: 281-664-9975 >>>>>>> Record expires on 14-Dec-2003. Record created on 13-Dec-1993. Database last updated on 13-Mar-2003 03:25:00 EST. Domain servers in listed order: ORCU.OR.BR.NP.ELS-GMS.ATT.NET 199.191.129.139 WYCU.WY.BR.NP.ELS-GMS.ATT.NET 199.191.128.43 OHCU.OH.MT.NP.ELS-GMS.ATT.NET 199.191.144.75 MACU.MA.MT.NP.ELS-GMS.ATT.NET 199.191.145.136

5 4

Ability of Genuity to rate limit on a /24 boundary
by Josh Brooks 13 Mar '03

13 Mar '03

Hello, I currently have a connection to Genuity. I have two /24s routed such that their preferred inbound route is through genuity. In the past, I have told Genuity

1 0