August 2002 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Radware Peer Director
by Roy Hooper 23 Aug '02

23 Aug '02

Does anyone have real world experience with the Radware peer director? Does it really provide any benefit that can't be obtained by tuning BGP periodically? I am not sure I trust an application or hardware product to touch my router configurations for me. My experiences with products that change configuration of other applications or products so far have been negative, as they tend to need to make assumptions. I only became aware of Radware's products today when a sales person with Sprint brought them up. I presume their motive was for money-making, but would be glad to hear that there is some real valid reason to look into such a class of products if they can indeed provide significant benefits. TIA, Roy -- Roy Hooper Sr. System Administrator Cyberus Online Inc.

1 0

Re: wireless access point accounting
by Spencer.Wood＠dot.state.oh.us 23 Aug '02

23 Aug '02

If you have Cisco AP's, there LEAP Process works very well.....It authenticates against a RADIUS Server, and provides good authentication info, and some accounting...... Spencer ************************************************************ Spencer Wood, Network Manager Ohio Department Of Transportation 1320 Arthur E. Adams Drive Columbus, Ohio 43221 E-Mail: Spencer.Wood(a)dot.state.oh.us Phone: 614.644.5422/Fax: 614.887.4021/Pager: 866.591.9954 ************************************************************* Hugh Irvine <hugh(a)open.com.au> Sent by: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu 08/23/2002 10:35 AM To: radiator(a)open.com.au cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: wireless access point accounting Hello Everyone - I have recently been investigating wireless access points for 802.1x. Is anyone out there using radius authentication and accounting with these devices? If so could you please send me copies of the authentication requests and the accounting starts and stops? Any war stories regarding different brands would also be welcome. many thanks Hugh NB: I am travelling this week, so there may be delays in our correspondence. -- Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X. - Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible, flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.

2 1

Summary: what do you use to configure devices?
by Eliot Lear 23 Aug '02

23 Aug '02

I asked: > I'm curious as to how you configure your routers (whatever they may be). > In particular, what tools do you use? Home grown? Rancid? Vendor provided? > > I'll summarize. Here's the summary: by hand/ssh/telnet 10 hand + rancid 5 home grown 2 Vendor provided 1 Will ask again in a few months. Probably more specific. Thanks to all who participated. Eliot

1 0

Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
by Brad Knowles 23 Aug '02

23 Aug '02

At 12:55 PM -0400 2002/08/23, Greg A. Woods wrote: > All correctly implemented SMTP mailers _MUST_ modify the envelope sender > address when forwarding a message to the target address(es) of an alias. That's a new requirement in a new RFC. How many sites are there in the world that run older MTAs that do not necessarily always implement this rule? Indeed, are there any MTAs which exist today that enforce this rule in all cases? Even if you do have an MTA which implements this rule, what if all you have is the alias, and there is no "-owner" or "owner-" address defined? So, you run a big site, with tens of millions of customers. Are you going to tell them all to "piss off" if they're subscribed to a mailing list that is not implemented according to this rule? Riiiiiiiiight. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles(a)skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)

1 0

FW: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?)
by Jerry Eyers 23 Aug '02

23 Aug '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: music-bar-admin(a)ampfea.org [mailto:music-bar-admin@ampfea.org]On > Behalf Of Joost Schuttelaar > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:13 PM > To: music-bar(a)ampfea.org > Subject: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) > > > http://www.informationwave.net/news/20020819riaa.php > > Too bad it's just a small ISP. > > - Joost > > _______________________________________________ > music-bar mailing list > music-bar(a)ampfea.org > http://www.ampfea.org/mailman/listinfo/music-bar >

29 43

RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
by Brad Knowles 23 Aug '02

23 Aug '02

At 7:42 PM -0400 2002/08/21, Robert Blayzor wrote: >> Sorry, guy. Ain't gonna happen. > > Just like the way domain name registration and Internet numbers are > assigned today. You don't register, get unintended results. Go ahead. Set up your own Verisign for the required registration of e-mail servers. I dare you. Let's see just how fast you can put yourself out of business. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles(a)skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)

2 1

Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
by Martin Cooper 23 Aug '02

23 Aug '02

Brad Knowles writes: > At 12:56 AM +0000 2002/08/22, Paul Vixie wrote: > > i won't glock up this already busy list with a full copy of the proposal, > but before y'all go off and invent something, here's some prior art that's > been resoundingly pooh-pooh'd by the smtp community. > > http://www.vix.com/~vixie/mailfrom.txt > > Yeah, the problem is that this breaks mailing lists, just like other > proposals. Otherwise, it would seem to be a nice concept. How does it break mailing-lists? If the list sets the envelope sender to <list-request(a)listserv.domain.com> creating a MAIL-FROM shouldn't be a problem. The only problem I can see is what to do about bounces (i.e. with a null envelope sender) - guess you could use header From instead maybe. Martin

2 1

How does this help?
by blitz 23 Aug '02

23 Aug '02

I read and re-read the decision of the ISP that was going to block RIAA access and setup a honeypot. Wouldn't legitimate users as well find themselves in that honeypot, and thus be blocked, achieving what the RIAA wanted in the first place, to disrupt GNUtella services? Somehow this doesn't make sense to me. Color me dumb. Marc Blitz Macronet.net

3 2

Re: introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?)
by Steven M. Bellovin 22 Aug '02

22 Aug '02

In message <20020822142836.A92148(a)mail.webmonster.de>, "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wr ites: > > > >i am not an expert in this field, but i think that a generic standard >for this kind of trust model is long overdue, the only application >nowadays out there in the wild using it being pgp's model of the web of >trust.=20 > I doubt that it would work well -- one "mole" would suffice for many large penetrations. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me) http://www.wilyhacker.com ("Firewalls" book)

2 1

Major Labels v. Backbones
by John Ferriby 22 Aug '02

22 Aug '02

A number of major music labels have joined forces and are seeking relief from backbone providers, see: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=582&e=2&cid=582&u=/nm/200 20816/wr_nm/media_copyright_dc_4 It sounds like the labels are alleging that the providers are, in some way, contributing infringers. If there are any legal eagles here, can a Common Carrier be a contributing infringer? Could a trucking firm be labeled a contributing infringer if it carries goods that violate patent/copyright law? Would Verizon/SBC/Qwest et al be construed this way if the service delivered copyrighted material over the voice network unencoded? -- John Ferriby - PGP Key: www.ferriby.com/pgpkey

23 28