July 2002 - Test - lists.nanog.org

CA Power
by Richard A Steenbergen 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

Hrm looks like I beat Sean Donelan... http://www.caiso.com/awe/systemstatus.html http://www.caiso.com/outlook.html Is it time for a rolling blackout again? -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras(a)e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)

8 7

Question regarding web hosting ip addressing
by Martin Hannigan 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

Folks, could use some pointers. I seem to remember from experience some years ago that if you were hosting multiple domains for web hosting in a shared environment that they needed to have individual IP numbers assigned specifically to the domain, all sharing the interface, so things like AOL browser, etc. would all work properly. Am I out of date on this, or is it still common practice to assign a single ip number to a single web hosted domain i.e. hme0/1.2.3.1/www.test1.com hme0/1.2.3.2/www.test2.com ...and so on and so forth? Specifics would be helpful i.e. certain browsers, applications, etc. Thanks. Regards, -- Martin Hannigan hannigan(a)fugawi.net

4 3

Sprint multicast route list
by Pete Kruckenberg 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

I'm doing some analysis of who I might be able to reach via multicast through Sprint. Sadly, route-views multicast peering with Sprint is not working at the moment. I'd appreciate if someone could email me the output from "show ip mbgp neighbor <sprint peer> received-routes" or "show ip mbgp" from a Sprint multicast BGP session. Thanks. Pete.

3 4

Windows Media/RealPlayer monitoring?
by cw 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

Hi there folks. Just a quick question that has come up at my workplace. We are running some streaming services and have got a new proper server which is going into the main machine room as opposed to the old one which is sat in our building. One question that has been put forward is how to go about monitoring the streaming services to ensure that they are functional. We have tools available which can make sure that the machine is still up but so far we're only at the ideas stage with regards to monitoring the actual services. My question is simple. Is there anyone out there who is using, or has implemented a successful monitoring system for Windows Media Server and/or Real Server? If so, then how did you go about it? Cheers.

2 1

XO
by Pawlukiewicz Jane 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

Anybody have a noc phone number for these guys? I can't seem to find anything on them publicly, except the usual hype. Thanks for any help. Jane

5 6

ANN: Panoptis DoS detection tool version 0.1.1 is out
by Constantinos A. Kotsokalis 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

Hello, the latest version of Panoptis DoS/DDoS detection tool is out (version 0.1.1). A few fixes should make it more effective and stable. On another note, if you want to run it on FreeBSD all you have to do is compile Panoptis *and* the CommonC++ library with g++ 3.x (tested with 3.0.4). Earlier versions of g++ will break it. The same applies to GNU/Linux and (probably, have not tested it yet) Solaris. You can download it from: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/panoptis/panoptis-0.1.1.tar.gz Get it, test it, feed back :) Costas -- Constantinos A. Kotsokalis || ckotso(a)grnet.gr Greek Research and Technology Network Tel: +30 10 7474243 && Fax: +30 10 7474490

1 0

RE: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6)
by David Sinn 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

Cynical/realist, it's a fine line. While p0rn does drive a lot of the utilization on the net, I doubt that the those content providers are going to be happy with sending their content un-protected across the net for anyone (paying or not) to see. So now you are into a encryption issue where you need to insure the receiving end can securely receive the encryption key and not share it. Not insurmountable, but not (that I'm aware of) possible with today's applications. The upshot is today's client applications need to grow to add these and other discussed features and functions to help the content providers. David -----Original Message----- From: Joe St Sauver [mailto:JOE@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:55 AM To: David Sinn Cc: bicknell(a)ufp.org; nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6) Hi, >There is also a "cart and horse" issue here: Where is the pervasive >content? At the risk of sounding somewhat cynical, I suspect the market driver for IP multicast will be what it often is for these sort of things: pr0n. My prediction? When one of the big adult hosting speciality companies starts IP multicasting free full length "cable cut" R-rated adult films in watchable MPEG1 quality, people will begin lobbying their ISP's for IP multicast support. Evidence supporting this assertion can be found in the popularity of events such as the Victoria Secret webcast, which reportedly drew more than a million viewers worldwide, even when streaming video was being done at postage-stamp-sized resolution. Of course, at the same time the pr0n channels get rolled out, there will also need to be something innocuous, like the "Field Hockey Channel" or the "Brand-New-Bands-Live!-From-Small-Clubs Channel" so that people will be able to use those less-embarassing content choices as their nominal interest when calling to request IP multicast support: "Um, hi, my friends who connect via ISP Foo up the street tell me that if you do something to your network I can get the, uh, Field Hockey channel via IC muteypast. I'm, uh, a real big field hockey fan, and I'd really love to be able to watch, uh, field hockey on my PC." >Most content providers don't want multicast because it breaks their >billing model. They can't tell how many viewers they have at a given >moment, what the average viewing time is, or any of the other things >that unicast allows them to determine and more importantly bill their >advertisers for. That's why they'll go ahead and use it as a tease/for the free publicity they'll get if they're the first ones to do it. People have spent a lot more on publicity stunts that would get a lot less coverage than this sort of thing would. >There is no Nielsen's Ratings for multicast so that advertisers could >get a feel for how many eyeballs they are going to hit. Some IP multicast products *do* offer the ability to track viewership (albeit at the cost of some degradation to IP multicast's otherwise essentially perfect scalability). Cisco's StreamWatch is one example that comes to mind. Regards, Joe

8 8

Re: Readiness for IPV6
by Rizzo Frank 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

"Phil Rosenthal" wrote: > As far as I can tell, neither Foundry Bigiron, nor Cisco 65xx support IPV6 As far as I can tell, despite many feature requests to the contrary, Foundry barely supports IPV4. Your local Foundry sales ofice can offer you a more percise time-line on Foundry's planned support for Internet Protocol versions 4 and 6. Alif The Terrible wrote: > I am on the 6bone using a combination of 2600 and Zebras. Forge any checks to pay for those, Jerry? Frank Rizzo

4 3

RE: HP Openview
by Daniska Tomas 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

the newer openview you have the more alarms it generates... you need to spend a hell lot of time tuning alarm correlation etc. by the way did anyone see a nms that's capable of working in duplicate-ip environments like mpls vpns etc? e.g. one that'd use saa agents on cisco boxes (or vrf-aware remote commands) to poll the network... thanks -- Tomas Daniska systems engineer Tronet Computer Networks Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199 A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by blowing first. > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Duggan [mailto:matt.duggan@world-data-systems.com] > Sent: 10. júla 2002 22:57 > To: John Kinsella; Eric Whitehill > Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: HP Openview > > > > Also take a look at JFFNMS - http://jffnms.sourceforge.net/ > It might be worth letting us know what your management requirements > are before dismissing OpenView ;-) > > ta, > Matt. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Kinsella" <jlk(a)thrashyour.com> > To: "Eric Whitehill" <eric(a)botbay.net> > Cc: <nanog(a)merit.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:40 PM > Subject: Re: HP Openview > > > > > > Might want to take a peek at > OpenNMS...http://www.opennms.org I'm not > > sure it'll be everything you dream of, but hey it's a hell of a lot > > cheaper... > > > > John > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 04:34:26PM -0400, Eric Whitehill wrote: > > > > > > NANOG: > > > > > > I am curious if anyone has been working with HP Openview > as an NMS. > I've > > > been looking at it (Specifically the service call > portion) and so far, > > > have not been impressed - I'm just not seeing the feature > set I would > > > expect. Am I just being stubborn and not seeing the > advantages of this? > > > >From my understanding the full HP Openview is in beta, > but I'm not > sure. > > > > > > I've done some researching on HP's website, and I can't > seem to really > > > find any relevant data. One of the large sticking points > is I am trying > > > to find a *nix based client, specifically one I can get working on > > > Solaris, and so far, I'm having a difficut time tracking one down. > > > > > > Am I wasteing my time with HP Openview? If you are using > it, are you > > > pleased? Should I accept fate and life and eat chicken for supper > > > tonight? > > > > > > Any advise and suggestions are welcomed. > > > > > > -Eric > > > > > > >

1 0

RE: Just an FYI - Apache Worm on the loose
by Robert Boyle 11 Jul '02

11 Jul '02

At 06:42 PM 7/10/2002 -0400, Phil Rosenthal wrote: >If you want to be really proactive... Just filter out port 80, and then >you can't get hacked... That's simply not true! The command below will make your IP based network completely secure from outside attack. You need to issue this command on all IOS based routers. Start at the edges and work your way into the core to which you must be connected via some out of band method preferably a modem connected to the console port. core# conf t core(config)# no ip routing This will secure your network against this Apache worm for sure! Robert Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211 "Good will, like a good name, is got by many actions, and lost by one." - Francis Jeffrey

1 0