December 2002 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Has anyone out there had problems with Sunrise Leasing?
by Alex Rubenstein 13 Dec '02

13 Dec '02

Let me first start with the comment that I apologize for this off topic post. However that being said, this is very relevant for any ISPs or other companies that do business in the used equipment market. We are gathering information on Sunrise Leasing relating to any alleged problems or possible mistreatment that you may have had. We are interested in any legal, billing, alleged unfair business practices, or other related problems. I am not a lawyer, nor do represent one. I represent Net Access Corporation (aka nac.net) and as a long time participant in the ISP community we are very interested in anything that helps to protect the interests of the independent ISPs. Sunrise Leasing is also known as (all based out of Minnesota): Sunrise International Leasing International Leasing Sunrise Leasing Corporation Cisco Systems Capital Corporation Internet Finance & Equipment (IF&E) Capital Corporation Redirect Tech We are considering a class action lawsuit against Sunrise and any information that is relevant may help. Even if your dealings with them were many years ago or if your company has since gone out of business we are still interested in hearing from you about your interactions with Sunrise Leasing. In addition, if you know of any current or ex employees that have information we would be very happy to speak with them as well. We are interested in both good and bad experiences, we need your help. Please direct all replies to me (off list), as I do not want to clutter the list with extraneous traffic. All replies will be kept confidential. -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex(a)nac.net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --

1 0

The Cidr Report
by cidr-report＠potaroo.net 13 Dec '02

13 Dec '02

This report has been generated at Fri Dec 13 21:45:30 2002 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date Prefixes CIDR Agg 06-12-02 116870 84511 07-12-02 116855 84559 08-12-02 116930 84442 09-12-02 116755 84596 10-12-02 116879 84724 11-12-02 117039 84740 12-12-02 117133 84733 13-12-02 116860 84827 AS Summary 14178 Number of ASes in routing system 5599 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix 1805 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS AS3908 : SUPERNETASBLK SuperNet, Inc. 72982528 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s) AS568 : SUMNET-AS DISO-UNRRA Aggregation Summary The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes'). --- 13Dec02 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description Table 116935 84790 32145 27.5% All ASes AS3908 1805 1063 742 41.1% SUPERNETASBLK SuperNet, Inc. AS701 1676 1219 457 27.3% ALTERNET-AS UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS18566 419 5 414 98.8% COVAD Covad Communications AS7018 1389 1014 375 27.0% ATT-INTERNET4 AT&T WorldNet Services AS4323 524 185 339 64.7% TW-COMM Time Warner Communications, Inc. AS1221 1162 843 319 27.5% ASN-TELSTRA Telstra Pty Ltd AS6197 456 141 315 69.1% BATI-ATL BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS7843 596 295 301 50.5% ADELPHIA-AS Adelphia Corp. AS4355 405 136 269 66.4% ERMS-EARTHLNK EARTHLINK, INC AS6347 352 85 267 75.9% DIAMOND SAVVIS Communications Corporation AS7046 586 319 267 45.6% UUNET-CUSTOMER UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS22927 289 22 267 92.4% AR-TEAR2-LACNIC TELEFONICA DE ARGENTINA AS1239 935 670 265 28.3% SPRINTLINK Sprint AS705 434 195 239 55.1% ASN-ALTERNET UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS4814 249 15 234 94.0% CHINANET-BEIJING-AP China Telecom (Group) AS1 665 440 225 33.8% GNTY-1 Genuity AS6198 420 201 219 52.1% BATI-MIA BellSouth Network Solutions, Inc AS17676 232 28 204 87.9% GIGAINFRA XTAGE CORPORATION AS690 513 319 194 37.8% MERIT-AS-27 Merit Network Inc. AS6140 314 121 193 61.5% IMPSAT-USA ImpSat AS4151 326 135 191 58.6% USDA-1 USDA AS4134 292 108 184 63.0% ERX-CHINALINK Data Communications Bureau AS209 519 339 180 34.7% ASN-QWEST Qwest AS852 625 445 180 28.8% ASN852 Telus Advanced Communications AS2048 260 88 172 66.2% LANET-1 State of Louisiana AS6327 183 34 149 81.4% SHAWFIBER Shaw Fiberlink Limited AS2386 377 232 145 38.5% INS-AS AT&T Data Communications Services AS17557 314 173 141 44.9% PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom AS3215 308 170 138 44.8% AS3215 France Telecom Transpac AS702 807 670 137 17.0% AS702 UUNET - Commercial IP service provider in Europe Total 17432 9710 7722 44.3% Top 30 total Please see http://www.cidr-report.org for the full report ------------------------------------ Copies of this report are mailed to: nanog(a)merit.edu eof-list(a)ripe.net apops(a)lists.apnic.net routing-wg(a)ripe.net afnog(a)afnog.org

1 0

lists of DNS servers by region.
by Tatsuya Kawasaki 13 Dec '02

13 Dec '02

Many web sites which are mulihome/mult co-located seem to act differnetly depend on which DNS severs that we use. Questions: 1. Does anyone have lists of DNS servers by region to may optimize the path?-- of course it may depend on the network topology ...Assume that If ISP is fully messed with others.. ie Teir I provider for exmaple. 2. what is the typical of method they(web hosts) used to decide which one to give? Tatsuya --------------------------------------------------- Tatsuya Kawasaki - Engineer III - CSC tatsuya.kawasaki(a)allegiancetelecom.com - 240-616-2417 800-581-8711 (24 Hour Support) - 240-616-2414 (fax) Allegiance Internet

7 8

Re: Net block blocked
by Michael.Dillon＠radianz.com 12 Dec '02

12 Dec '02

> We are currently working on this issue on a case by case basis, but it is > becoming an overwhelming task to try and track down the appropriate > contact(s) of the larger organizations and military agencies. If anyone has > some advise, suggestions, or assistance that they can offer in regards to > this situation, it would be greatly appreciated. Talk to the trade press, i.e. write emails to editors or columnists at your favorite network or internet publications. That is the only way to reach a significant fraction of the people who have built filtering into firewalls, VPN gateways, system admin software etc. The implication of this is that we have already almost run out of IPv4 address space because the rest of the former Class A space is tainted and unusable on the global Internet. IPv6 anyone? http://www.ipv6forum.org http://hs247.com/ --Michael Dillon

1 0

Re: BGP version 5 announcement
by Paul Ferguson 12 Dec '02

12 Dec '02

I almost thought you were serious when I scanned the subjectline. ;-) - fergie ---------- Michael.Dillon(a)radianz.com writes: > Perhaps e-mails > can be sent to the registered contacts of existing IP space upon initial > allocation, on the first of each month, and then on the last day of the > hold. That's a brilliant idea! We could call this BGP version 5. This is such an amazingly simple idea that I can't understand why anyone would want to run any other data distribution protocol. -- Michael Dillon ;-)

1 0

Guam - Typhoon 180 MPH winds
by Sean Donelan 12 Dec '02

12 Dec '02

Guam was struck by Typhoon Pongona with sustanted winds of 150 mph, and gusts of 184 mph. Electricity is out on the entire island. Most telephone service is down, although some calls have been received. The University of Guam, the the ccTLD manager for .GU, is offline. Backup name service for .GU is being provided by NS.RIPE.NET, although I haven't found working Internet service to the island.

3 3

Re: FW: /8s and filtering
by tim.thorne＠btinternet.com 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

David Schwartz <davids(a)webmaster.com> wrote: > Not only would this increase the size of the global routing table, but this >would actually decrease reliability for most basement multihomers. Basement >multihomers tend to flap their routes more often than their upstreams. By not >being inside a larger aggregate, these flaps are likely to result in more >significant pockets of unreachability than they would be otherwise. Have any of the major players ever tried cleaning up in the basement multihoming market? It seems to me that a pair of well positioned regional ISPs could easily share an aggregate, use it exclusively for multihomers thus alleviating the strain on the global routing table while giving their customers good visibility in the routing table. Tim

1 0

Cisco OSMs for 65XX
by Jeff Nelson 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

I'm looking into an edge 65XX solution for a new DC with multiple sonet connections to GigE and I was hoping for some real world feedback. Particularly, we're considering the OSM-4OC3-POS-SI+ and the OSM-2OC12-POS-SI+. While performance and redundancy may best be served by GSRs with engine3/4 linecards or the big J, I'm not convinced the expense is worth the additional costs. Any hands-on experiences or 3rd party performance statistics are most welcome. Thank you, jeff

3 2

Thank you everyone for all the help yesterday
by Harsha Narayan 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

1 0

Reuters: Europe's ISPs Overrun with Website Take-Down Orders.
by Ejay Hire 11 Dec '02

11 Dec '02

Yahoo news: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=582&e=3&cid=582&u=/nm/2 0021211/wr_nm/tech_isps_dc

1 0