March 2001 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Sprint and peering points
by Roy 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

Since I am located in what PacBell thinks is a rural area, I have to contend with using multiple T1s. This forces me to play with the AS paths in order to load balance between my upstreams (Sprint and others) I have found that Sprint is prepending their AS when sending routes to many of the public exchanges (example "1239 1239 20001") in order to "shift load" to private peer connections. The result is that now my other upstreams that send out the normal "701 20001" get the brunt of the traffic from the public exchange points. Needless to say I am a bit pissed at Sprint for doing this and not telling me. I had been a fan of Sprint until this happened. Anyone else out there seeing the same problems? Any ideas on how to cure it Roy Engehausen

5 7

RE: dsl providers that will route /24
by Jason Lixfeld 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

Are we talking business grade DSL or Resi grade DSL? > -----Original Message----- > From: Roeland Meyer [mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 3:04 PM > To: 'michael'; nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: RE: dsl providers that will route /24 > > > > If you find such, I want to know too. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: michael [mailto:michael@aplatform.com] > > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 8:08 AM > > To: nanog(a)merit.edu > > Subject: dsl providers that will route /24 > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Looking for contact information on dsl providers that route > > IP space not > > within their assigned block. I am also curious on high > speed wireless > > doing the same. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael... > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > This email server is running an evaluation copy of the > MailShield anti- > spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any > questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com .

19 70

RE: California PUC orders outage notification
by Roeland Meyer 01 Apr '01

01 Apr '01

> From: Bora Akyol [mailto:akyol@akyol.org] > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:07 PM > I don't understand why they don't go to planned blackouts instead of > unplanned blackouts. This may actually drive the demand down > and price > with it. Plus maybe the population would decline with people > migrating > to South Dakota and all (for those of you that are not living > in the SF > Bay Area, S.D. has been advertising extensively on the radio > as a good > place to do business with ample energy). The argument against such planned blackouts are, Crypts, Bloods, F-troop, et al. (gangs/looters, for those whom aren't familiar) IOW, physical security. Numerous blackouts have proven that social predators take advantage of situations where no one can see them, the power is out, and the police are otherwise occupied.

2 1

Microwave...
by Rodney Joffe 01 Apr '01

01 Apr '01

I' be interested in hearing about any operational experience the users on this list have had, such as issues and challenges with routing, reliability, etc., with the use of Microwave at DS3 or greater level.... -- Rodney Joffe CenterGate Research Group, LLC. http://www.centergate.com "Technology so advanced, even we don't understand it!"(R)

7 6

PPPoE server software?
by Matt Cramer 31 Mar '01

31 Mar '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- We are looking to test various DSL modems and routers in our lab, but can't get a DSL connection put in that building according to Verizon. I'd like to simulate one by running my own PPPoE server (my purpose is to test the various SOHO routers on the market, particularly the Linksys and the Cisco). If anyone has any information about doing this, such as pointers to PPPoE server software (I'd prefer to do it with linux or BSD), I would appreciate the info. Thanks, Matt - -- Matthew S. Cramer <mscramer(a)armstrong.com> Office: 717-396-5032 Lead Security Analyst Fax: 717-396-5590 Armstrong Information Technology Services Pager: 717-305-3915 Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Cell: 717-951-0141 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: ascii iQEVAwUBOr9k8QdAU78fakRxAQG6LAf7BWyQBomGC8wP/QJZfc/nOtscImITGF+2 hBXuRGdBoIjQVF84htsPEbz/n2YTch5FEdRmeKxRkD9ul9bPX4wgH7enJKurhM5n rYw4gHwtJNu8IInnarHuJfa4M518tALvLq/ea0tu0oMOj0Eu9f601D20qtDtoXh7 1KIVBZ8SpKFpXKoly0yHBfYZgo6pWZVkSiv4wtx5U+zlMzX2f7iNEPXSX0LH9BCl b3VA///LOQ7rVqVa1rNQpNycR6yPIHZrmauDEy4Qn+bG4WtwSd3xk7De02RnXjBm 2NlJ9+hNt4Mm8luYyX96x9NcwBUPYhkPZFqSSHa+Cqg4AQ0Kd60GfQ== =v2jZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

The Cidr Report
by Tony Bates 31 Mar '01

31 Mar '01

This is an auto-generated mail on Fri Mar 30 23:00:00 PST 2001 It is not checked before it leaves my workstation. However, hopefully you will find this report interesting and will take the time to look through this to see if you can improve the amount of aggregation you perform. The report is split into sections: 0) General Status List the route table history for the last week, list any possibly bogus routes seen and give some status on ASes. 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level This lists the "Top 30" players who if they decided to aggregate their announced classful prefixes at the origin AS level could make a significant difference in the reduction of the current size of the Internet routing table. This calculation does not take into account the inclusion of holes when forming an aggregate so it is possible even larger reduction should be possible. 2) Weekly Delta A summary of the last weeks changes in terms of withdrawn and added routes. Please note that this is only a snapshot but does give some indication of ASes participating in CIDR. Clearly, it is generally a good thing to see a large amont of withdrawls. 3) Interesting aggregates Interesting here means not an aggregate made as a set of classful routes. Thanks to xara.net for giving me access to their routing tables once a day. Please send any comments about this report directly to me. Check http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html for a daily update of this report. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CIDR REPORT for 30Mar01 0) General Status Table History ------------- Date Prefixes 230301 98100 240301 99246 250301 99357 260301 101036 270301 99534 280301 98459 290301 98695 300301 98619 Check http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr.plot.html for a plot of the table history. Possible Bogus Routes --------------------- *** Bogus 91.16.23.0/24 from AS11770 AS Summary ---------- Number of ASes in routing system: 10372 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix: 6079 (3458 cidr, 2621 classful) Largest number of cidr routes: 923 announced by AS701 Largest number of classful routes: 1608 announced by AS1221 1) Gains by aggregating at the origin AS level --- 30Mar01 --- ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS1221 1608 1207 401 24.9% Telstra Pty Ltd AS701 1451 1278 173 11.9% UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS9269 162 53 109 67.3% City Telecom (H.K.) Ltd. AS4151 260 157 103 39.6% USDA AS6595 163 62 101 62.0% DoD Education Activity Network As AS705 343 245 98 28.6% UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS4293 371 278 93 25.1% Cable & Wireless USA AS8013 327 242 85 26.0% PSINet Ltd. Canada AS7018 672 590 82 12.2% AT&T AS4755 207 131 76 36.7% Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Autonom AS13999 88 17 71 80.7% Mega Cable S.A. de C.V. AS577 240 171 69 28.7% Bell Advanced Communications Inc. AS5106 101 37 64 63.4% Ameritech Advanced Data Services, AS3464 153 91 62 40.5% Alabama SuperComputer Network AS3749 120 61 59 49.2% Tennessee Board of Regents AS9498 74 17 57 77.0% BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. AS16758 63 6 57 90.5% IKON Office Solutions AS6413 67 11 56 83.6% Southern Online Systems, Inc. AS376 134 78 56 41.8% Reseau Interordinateurs Scientiqu AS226 149 93 56 37.6% Los Nettos AS11170 60 4 56 93.3% Bewell Net AS7568 84 29 55 65.5% C.S. Communications Co., Ltd. AS724 194 139 55 28.4% DLA Systems Automation Center AS4323 233 178 55 23.6% Time Warner Communications, Inc. AS1 608 554 54 8.9% BBN Planet AS6471 98 45 53 54.1% ENTEL CHILE S.A. AS11252 89 36 53 59.6% ISU Computer Center Bldg. 5 AS7046 303 251 52 17.2% UUNET Technologies, Inc. AS174 445 393 52 11.7% PSINet Inc. AS1237 107 58 49 45.8% System Engineering Research Insti For the rest of the previous weeks gain information please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html 2) Weekly Delta Please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html for this part of the report 3) Interesting aggregates Please see http://www.employees.org:80/~tbates/cidr-report.html for this part of the report

1 0

Lame reverse delegation at Sprint
by John R Levine 31 Mar '01

31 Mar '01

I live on a tiny network at 208.31.42/24, which is SWIP'ed via my ISP to me from Sprint. I do my own reverse DNS. It looks like sometime in the last day or so, Sprint's DNS servers stopped serving 31.208.in-addr.arpa, which of course has broken my reverse DNS. Sprint won't talk to me since I'm not a direct customer, and my ISP has gone home for the weekend. Before I call them at home, if anyone from Sprint is listening, could you make NS[123]-AUTH.SPRINTLINK.NET serve that zone again? Regards, John Levine, johnl(a)iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Sewer Commissioner Finger for PGP key, f'print = 3A 5B D0 3F D9 A0 6A A4 2D AC 1E 9E A6 36 A3 47

1 0

California PUC orders outage notification
by Sean Donelan 31 Mar '01

31 Mar '01

The California Public Utilities Commission has ordered electric utility companies to provide advance notification of rolling blackouts. In the past some utilities have declined to provide advance notice before blackouts, citing security concerns such as the possibility of looting and rioting. The City of San Francisco complained the lack of notice hampered its ability mobolize police and medical workers. No mention how the utilities will actually accomplish this advance notification.

3 2

RE: California PUC blocks Northpoint shutdown
by Jade E. Deane 30 Mar '01

30 Mar '01

Try the PUC here in Nevada sometime. Thanks to a blunder on the part of Sprint and the PUC OC-3 MRC is in the range of 3-8k :) Jade Jade E. Deane Sr. Network Engineer helloNetwork Las Vegas, Nevada email: jade.deane(a)helloNetwork.com -----Original Message----- From: Majdi S. Abbas [mailto:msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 7:12 PM To: Mike Batchelor Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: California PUC blocks Northpoint shutdown On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:23:27PM -0800, Mike Batchelor wrote: > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010330/wr/northpoint_shutdown_dc_2.html We now return you to your regularly scheduled fits of laughter at the expense of the CPUC. Never before has such a small organization perpetually amused so many. I'd really like the CPUC to explain to both me and the bankruptcy court who's going to pay for that. Regardless, the company has ceased to exist, and the contracts are void. It's over, and some people need to accept it and get on with their lives. --msa

1 0

Re: InterNAP
by CARL.P.HIRSCH＠sargentlundy.com 30 Mar '01

30 Mar '01

I was going to say that much as I love InterNAP, you might want to steer clear of them as their stock is down in deathwatch territory. They've been down around $1.50 a share for a while now... but apparently as of today their stock is up 34%. Something I should know about InterNAP? I interviewed with InterNAP last year. My kung-fu wasn't strong enough (Not enough experience with OC-3s, multiplexing and the like). At least I got a free trip to Seattle! InterNAP has some very talented engineers working for them. I'm hoping they pull through. -carl hirsch network analyst sargent & lundy llc owner-nanog-outgoing @merit.edu AT nxmime To: CARL P HIRSCH/Sargentlundy, nanog(a)merit.edu AT nxmime@SNL-ccmail 03/30/01 04:33 PM cc: Subject: InterNAP Anyone have any comments (good/bad/indifferent) on InterNAP? Larry -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(a)lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

1 0